Home / Pennsylvania / Philadelphia
1001 Wallace Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123 · Philadelphia County · (215) 235-1600
180 certified beds, about 169 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395461 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 3, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 47 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
55.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with residents and staff, a review clinical records, review of facility policy and documents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free from misappropriation of resident property related to medication given to another resident for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for five of nine residents reviewed (Residents R1, R5, R6, R9, R10, R12 and R13).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy and clinical record review, the facility failed to maintain and protect personal privacy and dignity while providing care to one of nine residents observed. (Resident R7)Findings Include:Review of facility policy titled Dignity dated April 1, 2022, revealed that all residents shall be cared for in a way that promotes quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Staff must treat residents respectfully, supporting personal choices in grooming, clothing, and activities, while always maintaining privacy and confidentiality. Personal spaces and belongings are protected, and bodily privacy is preserved during personal care and medical procedures. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for one of one activities personnel files reviewed (Employee E7).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide care according to professional standards of practice for one of 32 residents reviewed related to hypoglycemia management. (Resident R3)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation, interview with staff and review of clinical records it was determined that facility did not ensure to provide appropriate supervision during smoking break and during Hoyer lift transfer for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident R7, R111)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one resident reviewed for pain management. (Resident R8)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy/protocols, and interview with staff, it was determined that facility did not ensure to store drugs and biologicals according to professional standards of practice in two of two medication storage rooms observed (2nd floor and 3rd floor units)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable and served at palatable temperatures for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents R24, R79, R32, and R63).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that trash and recyclables were properly disposed of in the receiving and dumpster area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were knowledgeable of smoking policies during one of one smoke breaks observed (September 30, 2025, morning smoke break).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of resident clinical record, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the ordering physician of a critical laboratory results for one of eight resident records reviewed (Resident R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview with residents and staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that facility failed to ensrue that residents' clothing was properly identified for two of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1, and Resident R2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the consulting pest control reports, , and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the resident care areas for three of three nursing floors. (2nd floor, 3rd Floor and 4th floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan related to mobility, vision, and pressure ulcers for four of 35 residents reviewed (Residents R65, R1, and R102). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Baseline Care Plan, Comprehensive Care Plan and Ongoing Care Plan Updates dated April 1, 2022, revealed the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. The comprehensive care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of five residents reviewed (Residents R85, R89).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care for a dependent resident for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R65). Findings Include: Review of Resident R65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 21, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and had diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting the left side and muscle weakness. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident R65 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident R65's comprehensive care plan revised August 25, 2021, revealed the resident had an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to decreased mobility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement treatment and services for incontinence management for one of five residents reviewed with incontinence concerns (Resident R137).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to evaluate and address the nutrition needs of each resident in a timely manner for two of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R84 and R107). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention dated February 15, 2022, revealed the nursing staff and the Registered Dietitian will cooperate to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents. Further review of facility policy revealed if a weight loss is significant, the Registered Dietitian should discuss with the interdisciplinary team and make recommendations. Per the facility policy, significant weight change is defined as more or less than 5% within 30 days, and more or less than 10% within 6 months. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents consistent with standards of professional practice for one of one resident reviewed for pain (Resident R70). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Administering Pain Medication dated April 1, 2022, revealed the purpose of the policy was to provide guidelines for assessing the resident's level of pain prior to administering pain medications. Review of facility policy revealed staff should obtain the location and intensity of the pain. Staff should evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions and administer pain medications as ordered. Further review of facility policy revealed staff should document per facility protocol in the resident's electronic health record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify the resident's possible triggers that may cause re-traumatization related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of one resident sampled with a diagnosis of PTSD. (Resident R 81)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedure and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to hand hygiene during one of the six Medication Administration Reviews, and during peg tube dressing change for one of one resident review with a feeding tube
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident had reasonable access to their personal funds for one of one clinical record reviewed (Resident CL1).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy and procedure review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assure an ongoing collaboration with the dialysis facility for the provision medications as ordered by the physician before and after hemodialysis treatment for one of one residents on renal dialysis. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident care areas and personal belongings in a clean and homelike environment for three of three nursing units (2nd, 3rd, and 4th floor Nursing Units). Findings Include: Observations on January 26, 2024, at 11:50 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the floors were sticky to touch and there was a red juice stain next to the window bed. Further observations revealed Resident R115's wheelchair was dirty with significant build-up of food/debris along the frame of the chair. Observations on January 26, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed residents seated in the 3rd floor dining room and lunch was about to start. The floors were observed to be dirty from breakfast with breakfast food spillage and wrappers on the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse to the state agency as required for two of four abuse allegations reviewed (Resident R22 and R32). Findings Include: Review of undated facility policy Abuse revealed allegations of abuse are reported per Federal and State Law. Further review of facility policy revealed the facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency. If an allegation is considered reportable, the designee will make an initial (immediate or within 24 hours) report to the State Agency. A follow up investigation will be submitted to the State Agency within five working days. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and through investigation to rule about abuse and/or neglect for an injury of an unknown origin for 1 out of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R32).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understood after a selected resident was transferred to the hospital for two of 33 residents reviewed (Residents R22 and R471).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident had a physician order for a wander guard for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R62). Findings Include: Review of Resident R62's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated November 3, 2023, revealed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Further review of the MDS revealed Resident R62 had severe cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident R62's comprehensive nursing evaluation, Section 11. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, observations, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and were free from accidents and hazards related to smoking, mechanically altered diets, and resident safety (Resident R40, R105, and 162).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the proper care of indwelling urinary catheter and tubing for two of two residents observed with urinary catheters. (Residents R16 and Resident R59).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring to identify and apply relevant approaches to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of six residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident R78). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Weight Assessment and Intervention revised February 15, 2022, revealed the nursing staff and Dietitian will cooperate to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for the residents. Review of facility policy indicated the registered dietitian will review monthly weights by the 10th of the month to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be assessed and addressed by the registered dietitian whether or not the definition of significant weight change is met. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding practices related to labeling for one of three residents reviewed for tube feedings (Resident R74).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents for one nursing staff reviewed (Employee E8) Findings Include: Review of nurse aide, Employee E8's, personnel file revealed the nurse aide was hired by the facility on October 10, 2023. Further review of nurse aide, Employee E8's, personnel file revealed no competencies were available to ensure the nurse aide was competent in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents needs including activities of daily living such as personal hygiene, transfers, and mobility. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, and Regional Registered Nurse, Employee E4 on January 31, 2024, at 1:30 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medically related social services were provided to a resident who was cognitively impaired, and the recommendation of guardianship was made, to ensure treatment and care concerns were being made in the best interest of the resident, for 1 out of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R120).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician documented that the pharmacist's identified irregularities were reviewed and failed to document the action taken or not taken to address the irregularities for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R14). Findings Include: Surveyor requested the policy regarding monthly medication reviews on January 31, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. Subsequently the facility provided the policy Drug Regimen Free From Unnecessary Drugs, revised October 24, 2022. Review of facility policy Drug Regimen Free From Unnecessary Drugs revealed the policy did not address the time frames for steps in medication regimen review or steps the pharmacist must take when an irregularity requires urgent action. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident electronic signatures on admission documents were safeguarded to prevent unauthorized use of the signatures for one out of two residents reviewed (Resident R121).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment needed for resident care was in safe operating condition. Findings Include: A tour of the facility on October 26, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. it was revealed that there were serval pieces of broken equipment in the facility. Interview with Licensed nurse, Employee E6 on October 24, 2023, at 12:14 p.m. revealed we need new equipment. Employee E6 revealed the facility only has two or three working hoyer lifts for the entire facility and sometimes people have to wait to get care. Observation of the second floor shower room on October 24, 2023 at 11:15 a.m. revealed one sit to stand broken in the shower room area and one hoyer lift broken in the shower room area not being used. Observation on the third floor on October 24, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to complete weekly weights for a resident with a significant weight loss for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the food and nutrition services, review of facility policy, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food at safe and appetizing temperatures on one of three nursing floors (Third floor) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Food Temperatures dated January 17, 2019 states, 2. All cold food items must be maintained and served at a temperature of 41 degrees or below. Further review of the policy states 6. Food sent to the units for distribution (such as meals, snacks, nourishments, oral supplements) will be transported and delivered to maintain temperatures at or below 50 degrees for cold foods and at or above 125 degrees for hot foods. Point of service temperatures should be palatable to the taste. Observation of signage on the Third floor stated that lunch starts at 12: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility documentation, clinical records, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper documentation regarding treatment and services for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy dated January 3, 2022 Refusal of Care states, Residents have a right to refuse any portion of their plan of care. However, since the refusal may be harmful to the resident's health and well being the interdisciplinary team will make every effort to obtain complaint with the plan of care. Further review revealed, If the resident continues to refuse, the refusal is documented in the medical record. The refusal and reason are documented in the electronic medical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of housekeeping aide's job description, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, homelike environment in one of three nursing units. (4th Floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of pest control documentation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in one of three nursing units. (4th floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records and family and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an indwelling catheter received timely care for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional and sanitary environment on one of three nursing units (4th Floor)
24 fire safety citations on file: 12 on December 3, 2025, 7 on November 15, 2024, 5 on January 31, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.98 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.4% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 2.98 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 24.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.48 | 3.55 | 2.98 | 24.5% | 0 of 90 | 169 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.52 | 3.60 | 3.11 | 18.5% | 0 of 92 | 161 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.68 | 0.58 | 3.80 | 3.38 | 20.5% | 0 of 92 | 156 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.58 | 0.51 | 3.78 | 3.10 | 21.5% | 0 of 91 | 160 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.4 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.5 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.7 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tucker House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
40.9% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
7.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.