506 West 5th Street, Laplace, LA 70068 · St. John Baptist County · (985) 652-9538
148 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195303 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 13, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 40 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
45.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Inspired Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source with serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency within two (2) hours for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled for quality of care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was maintained free of odors, soiled linens, a spill, and debris for 1 (Resident #56) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #12, Resident #45, Resident #49, Resident #56, Resident #83, Resident #89) sampled residents investigated for environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory nebulizer tubing was changed and dated 1 (Resident #22) of 8(Resident #1, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #22, Resident #49, Resident #56 and Resident #89) sampled residents investigated for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to ensure menu substitutions were approved by the facility's dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to:1. Ensure food items stored in the facility's three door refrigerator and the facility's freezer were dated once opened; 2. Ensure food items stored in the facility's three door refrigerator were covered; 3. Ensure food items from an outside source which were stored in the facility's freezer were labeled; and, 4. Ensure the sanitization test strips used to test the amount of sanitization in the dishwasher were not expired.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. Staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while moving a mattress in the room of a resident on contact isolation precautions (an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms) (Resident #90); and,2. Staff wore the appropriate PPE while providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control strategy that uses gloves and gowns during high-contact resident care to reduce the spread of infection) (Resident #4). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #4, Resident #90) of 5 (Resident #4, Resident #62, Resident #76, Resident #82, Resident #90) sampled residents observed for infection control practices during direct resident care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to notify the State's Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharges in writing for 2 (Resident #3, Resident R1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident R1) sampled residents reviewed for discharge requirements.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure its facility-wide assessment addressed the behavioral health needs of its resident population as required . This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of 2 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident physical abuse for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview record and reviews, the facility failed to report an incident of resident to resident abuse to the statewide incident management system (SIMS) as required for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #4) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mood disorder that can cause intense mood swings) was referred to the appropriate state agency for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 2 (Resident #28 and Resident #40) of 6 (Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #40, Resident #47, Resident #61, and Resident #78) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADLs).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 resident (Resident #3) receiving respiratory care by nasal cannula.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff signed a verification of an accurate medication count at the beginning and end of each shift for 2 [Medication Cart (a) and Medication Cart (b)] of 2 [Medication Cart (a) and Medication Cart (b)] Medication Carts (Med Cart) observed and reviewed for accurate dispensation of controlled medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect client confidentiality for 1 resident (Resident #8) of 32 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #8, Resident #11, Resident #15, Resident #25, Resident #21, Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #29, Resident #40, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #53, Resident #54, Resident #56, Resident #57, Resident #60, Resident #6, Resident #67, Resident #68, Resident #70, Resident #73, Resident #78, Resident #80, Resident #88, Resident #86, Resident #87, Resident #89, Resident #340, Resident #34, and Resident #342).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed correctly for 1 (Resident #56) of 1 (Resident #56) residents reviewed for PASARR.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred for dental services for 1 (Resident #25) of 3 (Resident #25, Resident #68, and Resident #21) sampled residents reviewed for dental services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. Ensure clean items in the facility's laundry room were not kept in the contaminated laundry area, and 2. Ensure staff wore proper protective equipment and performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for 1 (Resident #24) of 6 (Resident #24, Resident #28, Resident #40, Resident #47, Resident #61, and Resident #78) residents investigated for activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal and physical abuse was reported to the required state survey agency for 1 (Resident #1) of the 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of physical abuse for 1(Resident #1) of the 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a training program for 1 (S1Administrator) of 6 (S1Administrator, S6Sunshine Aide, S7Social Services, S8Cerified Nursing Assistant [CNA], S9CNA, and S10CNA) sampled personnel files reviewed for training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by other residents. This deficient practice was identified for 6 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) of 10 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was: 1. Reported to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #10) of 10 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) sampled residents reviewed for abuse; and, 2. Reported timely to the State Survey Agency for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #9) of 9 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, and Resident #9) sampled residents reviewed for timeliness of reporting of abuse allegations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of verbal abuse between 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #10) of 10 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #10) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a significant change of condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications per a physician's order for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) resident's records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have accurate orders and nursing notes for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) resident's records reviewed for accuracy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to allow residents access to their personal funds for 1 (Resident #29) of 4 (Resident #4, Resident #29, Resident #44, and Resident #69) sampled residents investigated for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status matched and was maintained throughout the clinical record for 1 (Resident #44) of 16 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #13, Resident #18, Resident #19, Resident #25, Resident #29, Resident #38, Resident #44, Resident #53, Resident #57, Resident #58, Resident #59, Resident #69, and Resident #81) residents reviewed for code status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan and administer a resident's insulin per physician's order for 1 (Resident #11) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #13, Resident #53, Resident #57, and Resident #58) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident with a history of falls received increased supervision to prevent further falls for 1 (Resident #59) of 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #59) sampled residents reviewed for falls; and 2. Ensure a resident with a known history of unsafe smoking in his room did not have smoking materials in his possession for 1 (Resident #25) of 6 (Resident #6 and Resident #25) sampled residents reviewed for safe smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident's physician's order for dialysis was accurate for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for dialysis services; and, 2. Maintain ongoing communication regarding a resident's condition with the dialysis facility for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side effect monitoring for the use of anticoagulant medication was completed for 1 (Resident #53) of 5 (Resident #11, Resident #13, Resident #53, Resident #57, and Resident #58) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the nurse performed hand hygiene during insulin (a medication used to lower blood sugar) administration for 3 (Resident #9, Resident #53, and Resident #286) of 3 (Resident #9, Resident #53, and Resident #286) residents observed for glucose monitoring and insulin administration; and 2. Ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performed hand hygiene while passing ice to 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, Resident #26, Resident #50, Resident #66, Resident #67, and Resident #286) of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #8, Resident #26, Resident #50, Resident #66, Resident #67, and Resident #286) observed for hand hygiene while passing ice.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had access to the air conditioner thermostat controls in order to set the temperature in her room per her preference for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 (Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed ensure necessary supervision was provided to ensure a resident did not verbally and physically abuse another resident for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse and verbal abuse was reported to the state survey agency within 2 hours of the allegation for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, failed to ensure an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 (Resident #19) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure only licensed personnel administered medications for 1 (Resident #43) of 1 (Resident #43) sampled residents observed for medicated cream administration in a total sample of 18.
11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 13, 2025, 6 on August 7, 2024, 2 on November 2, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.23 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.82 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.59 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.27 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.3% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.85 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 2.82 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.23 | 0.36 | 3.39 | 2.82 | 4.2% | 0 of 90 | 81 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.31 | 3.50 | 3.01 | 4.5% | 0 of 92 | 77 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.37 | 0.35 | 3.49 | 3.06 | 6.5% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.62 | 0.40 | 3.78 | 3.24 | 15.9% | 0 of 91 | 77 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.9 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.9 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.5 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.2 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Twin Oaks Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
7.3% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TWIN OAKS NURSING HOME INC. CMS links this home to Inspired Healthcare Management, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Oaks Nursing Home Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/13/1973 |
| Burch, Felix | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Burch, Guy S. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Burch, Jeffery | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Burch, Paula | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Burch, Renee | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Kerl, Elise | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 06/22/2020 |
| Burch, Guy S. | Corporate director | Individual | 01/21/2021 | |
| Goux, Jeremy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/21/2021 | |
| Goux, Timothy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Burch, Guy S. | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/21/2021 | |
| Goux, Jeremy | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/21/2021 | |
| Inspired Healthcare Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2017 | |
| Bailey, Colin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/1983 | |
| Connor, Karen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/22/2015 | |
| Leach, Mary Lynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/08/2020 | |
| Inspired Healthcare Management, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/06/2025 | |
| Twin Oaks Nursing Home Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/13/1973 | |
| Bailey, Colin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/1983 | |
| Burch, Felix | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 | |
| Burch, Guy S. | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 | |
| Burch, Jeffery | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 | |
| Burch, Paula | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 | |
| Burch, Renee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 | |
| Connor, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/22/2015 | |
| Goux, Jeremy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/29/2020 | |
| Goux, Timothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/29/2020 | |
| Kerl, Elise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.