716 Village Road, Kenner, LA 70065 · Jefferson County · (504) 464-0604
215 certified beds, about 175 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195184 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 29, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 50 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $159,972 in the last three years; the largest was $93,873, and the latest is dated January 6, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.11 of those hours.
47.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Plantation Management Company, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 50 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve residents with proper utensils and dishware during meal service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure opened food, available for resident consumption, was dated and labeled; and 2. Ensure food, available for resident consumption, was maintained in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect a resident's nutritional status for 1 (Resident #4) of 1 sampled residents investigated for tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff performed proper hand hygiene technique for 1(S5Dietary Aide) of 3 dietary staff observed for hand hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to clarify the orthopedic physician's recommendation, obtain the necessary physician order, and implement the use of a right arm sling for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than 5% for 2 (Resident #R5 and Resident #R6) of 4 residents observed during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy was maintained during perineal care for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 sampled residents observed for privacy/dignity rights during perineal care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was not available for administration for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident equipment and rooms were maintained in a sanitary manner for 2 (Resident #57, Resident #148) of 2 (Resident #57, Resident #148) sampled residents investigated for tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident to resident physical abuse was reported to the state agency for 1 (Resident #110) of 1 (Resident #110) sampled residents identified to have physically abused residents during a mood and behavior investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident to resident physical abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #110) of 1 (Resident #110) sampled residents identified to have physically abused residents during a mood and behavior investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to:1. Ensure staff used soap and water to perform hand hygiene for a resident on physician ordered contact precautions for Clostridium Difficile (a highly contagious encapsulated bacteria that causes severe abdominal pain and diarrhea and is resistant to alcohol based hand sanitizer [ABHS])(C. Difficile) (Resident #75);2. Ensure staff wore proper personnel protective equipment (PPE) while caring for a resident on C. Difficile contact isolation precautions (Resident #75); and,3. Ensure housekeeping used the proper cleaning agent to clean and disinfect a room on contact isolation precautions for C. Difficile (Resident #75). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 (Resident #75) sampled residents investigated for infection control surveillance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control management program for 7 (Resident #16, Resident #24, Resident #67, Resident #72, Resident #95, Resident #139, Resident #148) of 7 (Resident #16, Resident #24, Resident #67, Resident #72, Resident #95, Resident #139, Resident #148) sampled resident rooms observed for pests, 1 (Hall C ) of 3 (Hall C, Hall D, Hall E) sampled halls reviewed for environment, and for 2 (Dining Room A, Dining Room B) of 2 (Dining Room A, Dining Room B) sampled dining rooms observed during dining observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 (Resident #110) of 1 (Resident #110) sampled residents identified to have physically abused residents during a mood and behavior investigation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure:1. The skilled nurse documented adequate indication for use of an anti-psychotic (medication used to treat psychosis) medication used on an as needed (PRN) basis (Resident #3); and,2. The physician re-evaluated the use of an anti-psychotic used on a PRN basis and documented the rational and duration for an as needed (PRN) anti-psychotic drug (Resident #3). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 (Resident #3, Resident #16, Resident #98, Resident #110 Resident #119) sampled residents investigated for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fingernails were maintained for 1 (Resident #174) of 2 (Resident #119, Resident #174) sampled residents investigated for activities of daily living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure chemicals in the beauty shop room were secured and not accessible to wandering residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have evidence a resident's oxygen tubing was changed weekly for 1 (Resident #74) of 2 (Resident #74, Resident #187) residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information at the beginning of each shift daily for 3 (07/21/2025, 07/22/2025, 07/23/2025) of 3 (07/21/2025, 07/22/2025, 07/23/2025) days observed for nurse staffing information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a privacy cover for a urinary catheter drainage bag for 1 (Resident #R9) of 1 (Resident #R9) residents reviewed for catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not available for resident use for 2 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b) of 2 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b) medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at a resident's bedside for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #12) sampled residents investigated for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve residents' food at an acceptable temperature as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a functional call bell was available for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #R6) of 15 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #R5, Resident #R6, Resident #R7, Resident #R8, Resident #R9, Resident #R10, Resident #R11, Resident #12, Resident #R13, Resident #R14, Resident #R15) residents investigated for functional call bells.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1. facility's halls were free of strong unpleasant odors for Hall A and Hall B; and, 2. debris and trash were removed from Resident #1's floor; and 3. a damaged wedge pillow used to reposition Resident #1 was replaced. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) notified the nurse that wound dressings were removed from Resident #1's sacral wound; right gluteal wound; and right ischium ; and, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) ensured Resident #1's heel protector was applied to her left heel. The deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1, Resident #3) residents observed for wound care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease had an appointment for toenail trimming for 1 (Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) demonstrated competencies for hand hygiene; use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions; proper showering; and and, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) demonstrated competency applying a heel protector when providing care to residents. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #1, Resident#2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide good personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained free of accident/hazards, identify and eliminate the risk of accident hazards to keep a resident free from elopement for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) residents investigated for accidents/hazards. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 12/23/2024 at 8:50 a.m., when Resident #1 who was ordered a WanderGuard transmitter (a personal safety device that will alert facility staff when the resident approaches an exit and/or has left the building) exited the facility through Exit b. On 12/23/2024 at 9:25 a.m., Resident #1 was found 0.4 miles away from the facility with a skin tear to the back of his head. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was competent in the facility's procedure for elopement risk residents for 1 (S7CNA) of 21 (S3CNA, S6CNA, S7CNA, S11Ward Clerk, S12CNA, S13Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN], S14CNA, S15LPN, S16Restorative Aide, S17CNA, S18CNA, S19LPN, S20LPN, S21LPN, S22CNA, S23LPN, S24CNA, S25CNA, S26CNA, S27LPN, and S28CNA facility employees interviewed for competency as it related to residents at risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided privacy during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the skin into the stomach to provide liquid nourishment) feeding care for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper protective equipment for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the skin into the stomach to provide liquid nourishment) feeding care for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 (Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for PEG tube feeding care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, he facility failed to ensure water from the shower room did not leak into the hallway for 1 (Shower Room A) of 4 (Shower Room A, Shower Room B, Shower Room C, and Shower Room D) shower rooms observed for physical environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to accurately revise a plan of care that addressed a resident's skin condition for 1 (Resident #62) of 2 (Resident #62 and Resident #29) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the facility's policy was followed by failing to complete a Braden skin risk assessment upon re-admission as required for 1 (Resident #62) of 2 (Resident #62 and Resident #29) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcer; 2. Ensure a resident's pressure ulcer status was accurately documented for 1 (Resident #62) of 2 (Resident #62 and Resident #29) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers, and; 3. Ensure Resident #29's pressure ulcer prevention/treatment interventions were implemented for 1 (Rsident #29) of 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #62) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 2 of 53 sampled observed for self-administration of medications (Resident #122 and Resident #189).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was in good repair and maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 resident (Resident #77) of 3 Residents (Resident #4, Resident #77, and Resident #168) sampled residents reviewed for environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurately completed to reflect a resident's diagnosis of mental illness for 1 (Resident #121) of 1 (Resident #121) sampled residents reviewed for PASARR.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure site care was provided to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) as per professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #596) of 2 (Resident #177 and Resident #596) sampled residents investigated for PICC site care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to maintain food on the steam table to at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to transmit the resident assessment within 14 days of completion for 1 (Resident #105) of 2 (Resident #105 and Resident #87) investigated for resident assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment reflected the resident's accurate skin condition for 1 (Resident #62) of 2 (Resident #62 and Resident #29) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a change in condition. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #268) of 5 (Resident #23, Resident #30, Resident #43, Resident #84, and Resident #268) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a newly developed stage 2 pressure ulcer was assessed in a timely manner by a registered nurse for 1 (Resident #23) of the 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #23, and Resident #30) review for skin conditions/pressure ulcer care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food was not stored on the freezer floor; 2. Ensure expired beverages were not available for resident consumption; 3. Ensure kitchen appliances were free of a buildup of a yellow and brown substance; and, 4. Ensure the flooring of the kitchen was free of a buildup of brown substance under appliances and along the kitchen's baseboards.
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 24, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 6, 2025 | Fine | $93,873 |
| September 21, 2023 | Fine | $66,099 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.04 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.63 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.5% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.07 in April to June 2025 to 3.04 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.04 | 0.11 | 3.19 | 2.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 175 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.04 | 0.10 | 3.18 | 2.68 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 179 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.07 | 0.10 | 3.22 | 2.70 | 2.1% | 0 of 92 | 182 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.07 | 0.10 | 3.25 | 2.64 | 1.5% | 1 of 91 | 185 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.6 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.1 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chateau Living Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 115 eligible stays.
13.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 112 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
29.7% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
7.7% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHATEAU LIVING CENTER OF KENNER, LLC. CMS links this home to Plantation Management Company, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highpoint Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 07/09/2008 |
| D'arensbourg, Jordan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| David, Lora | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2002 | |
| Delatte, Kimberly | Corporate director | Individual | 07/09/2008 | |
| Quirk, Gene | Corporate director | Individual | 07/09/2008 | |
| Quirk, Scott | Corporate director | Individual | 07/09/2008 | |
| Highpoint Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/09/2008 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.