Home / Rhode Island / Providence
99 Hillside Avenue, Providence, RI 02906 · Providence County · (401) 574-4800
165 certified beds, about 143 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 415129 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 2, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Rhode Island average is 9.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 56 health citations since December 2023, 11 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (8 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 8 fines totaling $347,385 in the last three years; the largest was $135,397, and the latest is dated March 26, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.71 across Rhode Island and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
33.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Rhode Island average 40.6%).
CMS links it to Adviniacare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 56 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from resident to resident abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID#s 1 and 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent an avoidable accident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents, Resident #77. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the resident's care-planned intervention requiring a two-person assist for bed mobility and turning/repositioning. As a result, a Nursing Assistant (NA) provided care to the resident without another staff member, resulting in the resident rolling from the bed onto the floor and sustaining an avoidable right tibia/fibula fracture that required emergency department evaluation, treatment, and pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, surveyor observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that bed side rails were safely installed, assessed, and managed in accordance with manufacturer recommendations, the CMS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and the facility's own policy. Specifically, the facility failed to: ensure bed side rails were compatible with the bed frame and installed according to manufacturer specifications for four of four units, affecting one of one resident reviewed for bed system compatibility, Resident ID #6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, surveyor observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the weekly menu relative to providing soup daily as stated on the menu for 4 of 4 units. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' meal tickets matched the meal served to each resident, affecting Resident ID #s 12, 20, 45, 56, 58, 76, 93, and 115.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated with dignity and in a manner that maintained his/her quality of life for 1 of 3 residents reviewed related to gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a medical device inserted directly through the abdomen into the stomach prescribed to provide nutrition), Resident ID #16.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff, resident and resident representative interviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for resident needs and preferences by not individualizing the physical environment. Specifically, affecting 1 of 1 resident who requested a bariatric bed Resident ID #45 and for 1 of 1 resident who required the correct placement of a Foot Buddy positioning device, Resident ID #101.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for wound care, Resident ID #111. Specifically, nursing staff improperly applied an Unna boot (a specialized compression dressing) to Resident ID #111's right lower extremity (RLE), omitting the foot and ankle.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification, including the reason for the room change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility is changed, for 6 of 6 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s, 45, 66, 93, 99, 101, and 147.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and failed to maintain an effective elopement prevention system for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement risk, Resident #1. The resident was assessed as a high elopement risk, had a documented history of exit-seeking behaviors, requiring a wander guard device (a safety mechanism intended to monitor and prevent at-risk residents from exiting unsupervised) and resides on a secured unit intended to prevent unauthorized egress. Despite the utilization of the wander guard device, the facility's failure allowed the resident to elope undetected from the secured unit and travel approximately two miles away from the facility, including navigating and crossing four lanes of a heavily trafficked roadway before being located. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents are provided or arranged services in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to 1 of 1 resident who was admitted from the hospital with a diagnosis of spinal stenosis (the narrowing of one or more spaces within the spinal canal that can put pressure on the spinal cord and nerves, which can cause pain), with a referral to see a neurosurgeon (a medical doctor who diagnoses and treats conditions that affect the nervous system, including your brain, spinal cord and nerves) for spinal injections, which was not arranged, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 3 and 4, as evidenced by not implementing effective, enhanced interventions despite documented intrusive wandering by Resident #3 on 12/26/2025, 12/27/2025, 1/10/2026, and 1/12/2026. This failure led to a resident to resident physical altercation on 1/13/2026, in which Resident #4 forcefully pushed Resident #3, resulting in a fall and a left femoral neck fracture that required surgical repair. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program, for existing staff, consistent with their expected roles, relative to education pertaining to emergency preparedness, as required per the facility assessment, for 4 of 5 staff reviewed, Staff H, I, J, and K. This failure has the potential to impact 163 of 163 residents and an indeterminable number of staff and visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an actual restraint, as the resident was observed in his/her wheelchair with a black Velcro strap across his/her right arm, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for skin tears and bruising, Resident ID #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan relative to 1 of 2 residents reviewed who require one to one staff assistance with meals and supplements, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 2 resident reviewed, who has an actual pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #'s 2 and 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every Nursing Assistant (NA), at least once every 12 months, for 4 of 4 NA personnel records reviewed, Staff H, I, J, and K.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise each resident's care plan, by the interdisciplinary team, for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed relative to gastrostomy tubes (g-tube-a tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach used to provide nutrition, hydration and medications for residents that are unable to take food or fluids by mouth), Resident ID #1, and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to falls, Resident IDs #1 and 2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents with gastrostomy tubes (G-tube-a tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach used to provide nutrition, hydration and medications for residents that are unable to take food or fluids by mouth), Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide a qualified dietitian for 4 of 4 residents reviewed who did not receive dietary consultations to evaluate individual nutritional needs, Resident ID #s 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and residents and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of residents' weights to accurately assess weight status and identify potential health concerns related to weight changes for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who experienced a significant weight gain, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to refuse medications and treatments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who refused medications, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections as the facility failed to implement a water management program (WPM) based upon industry standards and/or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and to perform and document specified testing for the prevention of Legionella disease (a very serious type of lung infection caused by the bacteria called Legionella which can be found in water) resulting in infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who tested positive for Legionella pneumonia, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an actual restraint, as the resident was observed in bed with a bed sheet tied across his/her abdomen, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, and resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe temperature range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in the facility as the 5th floor of the facility reached a temperature of 88 °F and the 3rd floor reached a temperature of 85 °F.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a person-centered comprehensive care plan was developed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition where significant weight loss had occurred, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who experienced actual weight loss, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication with the dialysis center, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who sustained a fall with injury from a shower chair that broke when staff attempted to pull the shower chair into the shower stall, resulting in fractured ribs and an admission to the Trauma Intensive Care Unit (TICU), Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and 3 of 3 kitchenettes observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for fluid management, Resident ID #s 42 and 51, and for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for communication with the dialysis center, for Resident ID #s 42 and 79.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (NA), at least once every 12 months, for 6 of 6 NA personnel records reviewed, Staff E, F, G, H, I and J.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and surveyor interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the QAPI/QAA (quality assurance performance improvement/quality assessment and assurance) committee includes the required committee members consisting at a minimum of, the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), the Medical Director, Infection Preventionist and at least three other members of the facility staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide residents with the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records relative to the posting of past survey results.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a continuous feeding via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #102.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant weight loss, Resident ID #28.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that medical records are accurately documented for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities), Resident ID #s 13 and 217.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities), for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with a history of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Resident ID #217.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Levothyroxine (a medication used to treat hypothyroidism, an underactive thyroid), Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents observed who receive insulin, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to document all required components of the facility-wide assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are complete in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for blood sugar parameters for insulin administration, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician's orders relative to using an insulin pen injector to administer insulin, Resident ID #6.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a cognitively impaired resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to wound care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for burns, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to serve and store food under sanitary conditions relative to food storage in 2 of 3 nursing unit refrigerators, the serving temperature of potentially hazardous cold food in 2 of 3 dining locations. The facility also failed to ensure staff were wearing hair restraints and beard covering in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a sanitary environment and to help prevent the development of infections for 3 of 4 residents reviewed relative to the use of positive airway pressure devices; Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP). These devices provide breathing support which is administered through a face mask or nasal mask, Resident ID #s 5, 21 and 38.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a valproic acid level (a laboratory test that is monitored when a patient is receiving Depakote) Resident ID #83.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to the need for a Glucagon injection (a medication used to treat low blood sugar) secondary to a critically low blood sugar level, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, who received insulin, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to reconcile all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications, for 1 of 3 discharged residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. The facility also failed to complete a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the residents status at discharge and a reconciliation of the residents medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined the facility failed to maintain all patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 wheelchairs reviewed, Resident ID #1.
10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 2, 2026, 3 on March 13, 2025, 3 on April 4, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2026 | Fine | $25,500 |
| December 12, 2025 | Fine | $94,049 |
| October 30, 2025 | Fine | $135,397 |
| June 30, 2025 | Payment Denial | 30 days from July 23, 2025 |
| May 14, 2025 | Fine | $12,726 |
| January 8, 2025 | Fine | $34,073 |
| January 8, 2025 | Payment Denial | 20 days from January 28, 2025 |
| September 24, 2024 | Fine | $12,038 |
| March 11, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| March 11, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| March 11, 2024 | Payment Denial | 11 days from April 19, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.71 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.14 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.38 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.57 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.6% | 40.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 17.6% | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.58 on weekdays and 3.14 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.77 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.50 | 3.58 | 3.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 143 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.40 | 0.59 | 3.51 | 3.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 136 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.49 | 0.57 | 3.65 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 128 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.77 | 0.71 | 3.96 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 114 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Rhode Island, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.69 | 3.82 | 3.30 | 5.4% | 1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.33 | $21.52 to $22.82 | 10,220 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.51 | $37.45 to $39.02 | 1,290 |
| Registered nurses | $48.39 | $39.35 to $51.49 | 10,090 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.0 | 19.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.8 | 16.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.6 | 22.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.8 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.2 | 14.6 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Adviniacare Summit Commons, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Rhode Island: 24 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
42.9% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island59.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
3.6% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ADVINIACARE SUMMIT COMMONS LLC. CMS links this home to Adviniacare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ri 5 Holdco Op, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/30/2026 |
| Benjamin Berkowitz Revocable Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Enykri, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Leah Braun Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Ri 5 Investor Group, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Braun, Shraga | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| 1219 Limted Partnership | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| 257 Limted Partnership | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| 42170 Limted Partnership | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Bider Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Bunneli, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Cba II, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| F Squared Investments, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Frederick S Frankel Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Joshua Hoffman Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Marlee Associates | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Msar Enterprises, LP | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Pearl Kahan 2023 Family Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Robin Miller Revocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| S&d Investments | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Silver Equities | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Wilhelm Legacy Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Ycd Group, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Bider, Tzvi | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Bloch, Samuel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Bram, Tova | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Frankel, Frederick | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Goldfarb, Brian | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Hamui, Moriel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Hoffman, Joshua | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Kahan, Jerome | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Katz, Shmuel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Kroll, Joette | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Kutoff, Eliyahu | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Lebowitz, Helen | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Leiner, Simcha | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Leiner, Yisroel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Mandelbaum, Avraham | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Meystel, Joel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Miller, Robin | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Rapoport, Yitzchok | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Rosenberg, Zev | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Russell, Aryeh | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Salamon, Israel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Salamon, Mark | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Salamon, Nathaniel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Sussman, Aaron | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Sussman, Barry | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Sussman, Joel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Tober, Yehuda | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Twerski, Bassheva | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Ulbert, Lisa | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Wilhelm, Yehoshua | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Yolinsky, Jack | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Braun, Shraga | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Adviniacare, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Adeoye, Morenike | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Braun, Shraga | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Decosta, Dejah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Idumwonyi, Eghosa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Talamona, Raymond | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Braun, Leah | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| 99 Hillside, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/04/2026 | |
| Advinia Properties, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Adviniacare, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/04/2026 | |
| Benjamin Berkowitz Revocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Curis Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| David a Berkowitz Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Enykri, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Jack Yolinsky Revocable Trust Agreement Dated 2/18/11 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Leah Braun Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Pointe Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Ri 5 Holdco Prop, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Ri 5 Investor Group, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Yosef Meystel Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/30/2026 | |
| Adeoye, Morenike | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Berkowitz, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Braun, Shraga | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Decosta, Dejah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Idumwonyi, Eghosa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Seitler, Dovid | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Spector, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Talamona, Raymond | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Turofsky, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 | |
| Wilhelm, Naftali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/30/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Rhode Island. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.