Home / Rhode Island / Providence
50 Maude Street, Providence, RI 02908 · Providence County · (401) 456-2600
206 certified beds, about 192 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 415084 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Rhode Island average is 9.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 47 health citations since September 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $153,202 in the last three years; the largest was $68,256, and the latest is dated April 7, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.71 across Rhode Island and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
42.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Rhode Island average 40.6%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to ensure an effective elopement prevention system for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident #1. The resident, who resides on a secured unit due to impaired safety awareness and a high risk for elopement, requires a wander guard device (a safety mechanism intended to monitor and prevent at-risk residents from exiting unsupervised). Despite this intervention, the facility failed to prevent unsafe exit-seeking behaviors. The resident was able to self-propel while in his/her wheelchair to a stairwell door, manipulate the handle until it released, and exited into the stairwell, resulting in him/her falling down approximately 10 stairs with the wheelchair positioned over him/her. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 3 residents reviewed related to medication administration, Resident ID #1. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure accurate, timely, and consistent documentation of the administration of Mounjaro, a medication prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews with the home care agency staff, the complainant, and facility staff, the facility failed to ensure that the appropriate resident information was communicated to the receiving health care providers at the time of discharge for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge, Resident ID #1. Specifically, the facility failed to communicate that the resident's primary care physician (PCP) was a new provider who would be unable to sign home health orders until the resident was established as a patient in that practice. Additionally, the facility failed to respond to requests of the home care agency to have the facility's Medical Director sign homecare orders to enable to resident to receive skilled nursing and therapy services as ordered, following his/her discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to the care of a central venous catheter (CVC, a long thin tube that is inserted through a vein and passed through to the larger veins into the heart), for 3 of 3 residents reviewed with a CVC, Resident ID #s 23, 161, and 206, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mouth care, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for not following physician's orders, Resident ID #s 2, 17 and 208.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 27 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task, there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 7.41%, involving Resident ID #s 56 and 161.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID# 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to implementing a surgical wound treatment order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 4 of 4 residents observed with their call lights out of reach who were requesting staff assistance, Resident ID #s 1, 105, 162, and 175.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, staff, and resident representative interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to incontinence care prior to a leave of absence (LOA), Resident ID #18.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a urology consult, Resident ID #1, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dietary restrictions, Resident ID #103.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for daily weights, Resident ID #192.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen is free from medication error rates of 5% or greater. Based on 28 opportunities for error observed during the medication administration task, there were 3 errors resulting in a 10.71% error rate involving Resident ID #s 24 and 135.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who left the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision to ensure the safety of 1 of 1 resident reviewed who left the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed who left the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident records are complete and accurately documented, relative to medication administration, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who left the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for use of a baclofen pump (a small device that is placed under the skin on one side of the abdomen near the hip bone. It is used to deliver baclofen, a medication prescribed to treat muscle spasms, directly into the spinal canal), Resident ID #35, and for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medications with parameters, Resident ID #s 71 and 137, and for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #76.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 4 of 5 residents reviewed relative to follow up appointments, Resident ID #s 71, 111, 117, and 19, and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds, Resident ID #135.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to complete resident assessments and entrapment assessments (an assessment which determines the risk of a resident being caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or around the bed/side rail) in their entirety for 3 of 3 floors affecting Resident ID #s 4, 20, 23, 25, 40, 43, 48, 50, 55, 57, 61, 65, 71, 73, 87, 93, 105, 109, 111, 114, 117, 120, 129, 137, 156, 157, 178, 333, and 387.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to contact precautions (utilized when a resident is known or suspected to be infected with a Multidrug Resistant Organism [MDRO] that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces in the resident's room, and for Respiratory Syncytial Virus [RSV; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to communication and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility to promote a dignified existence was promoted for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for reviewed for communication, Resident ID #333.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each baseline care plan included PASARR recommendations for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), Resident ID #333.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, Resident ID #43.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly), Resident ID #43. Record review revealed Resident ID #43 was readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease and the dependence on renal dialysis. Record review of a nursing progress note dated 1/9/2025 revealed, the resident returned from dialysis with a bottle of Velphoro 500 milligrams: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a scoop plate (a plate with raised, curved edges that helps guide food onto a utensil) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who requires adaptive eating equipment, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who have cancer diagnoses, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure that medication irregularities were identified by the pharmacist during the monthly drug regimen review for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID # 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with a focus related to medication administration. Additionally, the facility failed to provide evidence that new orders were audited per their QAPI plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident records are complete and accurately documented, relative to medication transcription errors, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID # 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed have sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety for 1 of 2 residents reviewed related to call light response, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is continent of bladder and bowel on admission receives services and assistance to maintain continence and prevent a urinary tract infection (UTI), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for continence, Resident ID #539. The facility further failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed with a suprapubic catheter (SP catheter - a device inserted through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine), Resident ID #s 10 and 68.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care, relative to intravenous (IV) administration of fluids, for 2 of 4 staff reviewed, Staff A and B.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for the Multidrug-resistant Organism (MDRO), Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Trauma-informed care, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who exhibited symptoms of an opioid overdose which required hospitalization in the critical care unit after being administered medication, methadone 60 mg, intended for another resident, Resident ID #1; and for 1 of 2 residents who missed a dose of medication and was not assessed for opiate withdrawal, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who exhibited symptoms of an opioid overdose, which required a hospitalization in the critical care unit after being administered medication, methadone [an opioid pain medication used to treat substance abuse] 60 mg [milligrams], intended for another resident, Resident ID #1, and for 1 of 1 resident who missed a dose of medication, causing the resident to experience symptoms of opiate withdrawal, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, served and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents' drug regimens were reviewed and acted upon when irregularities were identified during the monthly pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 62 and 105.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to staff wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) for 3 of 4 Covid-19 positive residents observed, Resident ID #s 22, 395, and 399.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to medications administered via a gastrostomy tube (a surgically placed device used to give direct access the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin or the underlying tissue due to pressure), Resident ID #135.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #23 and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for supervision with meals, Resident ID #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 2 of 4 medication storage rooms and 1 of 6 medication carts observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to the controlled substances record, Resident ID #247.
2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on February 6, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 7, 2026 | Fine | $27,378 |
| January 28, 2025 | Fine | $68,256 |
| January 28, 2025 | Payment Denial | 14 days from February 18, 2025 |
| August 28, 2024 | Fine | $33,579 |
| August 28, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from September 19, 2024 |
| November 14, 2023 | Fine | $23,989 |
| November 14, 2023 | Payment Denial | 7 days from December 1, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.59 | 3.71 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.28 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.86 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.8% | 40.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.87 in April to June 2025 to 3.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.44 | 3.75 | 3.20 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 192 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.70 | 0.42 | 3.84 | 3.35 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 181 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.82 | 0.46 | 4.00 | 3.35 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 176 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.87 | 0.53 | 4.04 | 3.46 | 0.6% | 0 of 91 | 181 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Rhode Island, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.69 | 3.82 | 3.30 | 5.4% | 1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.33 | $21.52 to $22.82 | 10,220 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.51 | $37.45 to $39.02 | 1,290 |
| Registered nurses | $48.39 | $39.35 to $51.49 | 10,090 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 19.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.8 | 16.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.1 | 22.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.6 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.4 | 14.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Rhode Island: 24 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 97 eligible stays.
9.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 156 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
65.2% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island59.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
6.3% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ELMHURST OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/14/2020 | |
| Bouchard, Lindsey | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/12/2024 | |
| Norton, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/16/2019 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Bouchard, Lindsey | Corporate director | Individual | 07/12/2024 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/21/2016 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/30/2025 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2017 | |
| Akhtar, Ali | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/21/2016 | |
| Bouchard, Lindsey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/12/2024 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/30/2025 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/17/2025 | |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/19/2025 | |
| Quinto Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/22/2016 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Sk 2013 Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Sora Kohn Fam Tr Uad 120120 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2025 | |
| Tryko Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/22/2016 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Ukr Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/22/2016 | |
| Valley Stream Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Yr 2013 Delta Tr Ua 03252013 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Akhtar, Ali | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/21/2016 | |
| Bouchard, Lindsey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/12/2024 | |
| Norton, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2019 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/21/2016 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Rhode Island. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.