909 East 6th Avenue, Oakdale, LA 71463 · Allen County · (318) 335-1469
91 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195584 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 17, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 36 health citations since December 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $133,224 in the last three years; the largest was $133,224, and the latest is dated August 19, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.73 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to designate an individual as Infection Preventionist who was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program who has completed specialized training in infection prevention and control.
Inspectors wroteBased interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of chemical restraints for 1 (Resident #8) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications by failing to ensure: 1. A new order was obtained for an as-needed (PRN) psychotropic drug after 14 days; and2. Indications of use were documented for the administration of a PRN psychotropic drug Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use revealed in part . Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia, but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional, psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosages for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. 14. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the nutritional needs of residents. This failure had the potential to affect every resident who received meals from the kitchen, 3 residents on puree diets, and Resident #36 of 27 sampled residents. The facility failed to: Ensure the appropriately sized scoops were used to serve meal trays; Ensure pureed menus were followed; and Follow menu preferences for Resident #36.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prevent the likelihood of foodborne illnesses and failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals prepared by the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure:Expired Food Items were not available for use; andFoods were not labeled and stored appropriately
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #59) of 2 sampled residents investigated for PASARR.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the Medical Director or his designee and Administrator in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee quarterly meeting, as required. The facility's total census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs for residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The facility failed to follow the menu for all residents receiving puree diet. 5 residents in the facility received a puree diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents who resided in the facility. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items in the refrigerators and freezers were labeled and dated; 2. Dry food items were labeled with an open date and stored in a sealed container; 3. Dishware was clean and stored under sanitary conditions; 4. Staff were wearing hair restraints, including beard restraints, to prevent hair from contacting food.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by failing to ensure the facility was free from flies. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 72 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her own quality of life by failing to apply a privacy cover to an indwelling catheter urinary drainage bag for 1 (#61) of 1 residents reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to have an assistive device accessible to 1 (Resident #45) of 26 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality by failing to ensure a resident received enteral feedings as ordered by the physician for 1 (#65) of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding. Total sample size 26.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for the provision of respiratory care in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 (#55) of 2 (#14 and #55) residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured accurate disposition and/or administration of medications to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper nursing procedures and documentation were completed at the time of wasting/destroying narcotics on 1 (Med Cart 1) of 2 (Med Cart 1 and Med Cart 2) medication carts for Resident #26. 2. Ensure proper nursing procedures for wasting of controlled substances were completed when Resident #60's controlled medication was not administered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with current accepted professional principles. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired medications were not available for administration to residents in 1 (Med Room B) of 2 (Med Room A and Med Room B) medication rooms. 2. Ensure controlled substances were properly stored in a permanently affixed compartment and had restricted access until destroyed appropriately.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection by: 1. Failing to store clean unused resident care items in a sanitary manner on Hall Z 2. Failing to ensure opened resident care items were not stored on the clean linen cart on Hall Z after use 3. Failing to practice Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident #63.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had a comprehensive person-centered care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her goals and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to meet professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents by providing Resident #2 with THC gummies without consulting the resident's physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with a mental disorder received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem and to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident who had a history of wandering, was adequately supervised and not allowed to exit the building without staff knowledge, for 1 Resident (#R7) of 12 sampled residents (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9). This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 06/25/2024 at 3:59 p.m., when Resident #R7, a severely cognitively impaired resident who had a history of wandering, followed visitors out of the building via the front entrance door, and walked into the parking lot unsupervised on 06/25/2024 and 08/03/2024. S1 ADM was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 08/16/2024 at 6:50 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 1 Resident (#R7), of 12 sampled residents (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9). The facility failed to: 1. Have an effective system in place to ensure Resident #R7 was adequately supervised to prevent her from exiting the building unsupervised on 06/25/2024 and 08/03/2024; 2. Complete an incident report and/or thoroughly investigate Resident #R7's elopements on 06/25/2024 and 08/03/2024; and 3. Update Resident #R7's care plan to include new interventions to prevent the resident from exiting the building unsupervised after two previous elopements. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 06/25/2024 at 3:59 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by staff for 1 (Resident #1) of 12 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9) sampled residents. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation for Resident #1 on 07/23/2024 on the 6:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shift when Resident #1, who was severely impaired cognitively, and had diagnoses of Dementia and Major Depressive Disorder, was verbally and mentally abused by S3 CNA. Review of Resident #1's video camera footage revealed on 07/23/2024 at 7:54 p.m., S3 CNA while in Resident #1's room stated to Resident #1 You old meanie. At 11:00 p.m., while S3 CNA and S4 CNA were providing ADL assistance to Resident #1, S3 CNA stated to Resident #1 Why you gotta be like that man? Resident #1 replied I love Jesus. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner which promotes enhancement of his or her own quality of life for 1 (Resident #1) of 12 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for 1 Resident (#R7), of 12 sampled residents (#1, #2, #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9). The facility failed to revise the comprehensive person centered care plan to include new interventions following two elopements.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 (Resident #1) of 12 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9) sampled residents. The facility failed to create and sustain an environment which humanized Resident #1's quality of life when: 1. Resident #1 was abruptly transferred to her geri-chair. 2. Resident #1 was pulled up in bed with S3 CNA standing on her bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and help to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 12 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, #R1, #R2, #R3, #R4, #R5, #R6, #R7, #R8, and #R9) sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure the following: 1. Staff provided proper perineal care for Resident #1. 2. Staff did not stand on Resident #1's mattresses to provide care. 3. Proper disposal of soiled linens and briefs in Resident #1's room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to: 1. Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents whom EBP are indicated. 2. Maintain a water management program, to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water system. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The total resident census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by failing to assess, obtain, and implement services for the behavioral health care needs for 1 of 1 (#21) residents reviewed for behavioral health services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding by failing to check placement and gastric residual volume (GRV) for 1 (#45) of 2 (#34, and #45) residents reviewed for Tube Feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly changed, labeled and stored.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (#57) of 1 sampled residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice as evidenced by failing to ensure there was ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines by failing to: 1) follow the approved menu in regard to meals served 2) record and archive deviations/substitutions of menu 3) post menus in at least 2 resident areas This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 68 Residents who receive meals prepared by the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food served to residents was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature for 3(#1, #2, #5) of 7(#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, and #R2) sampled resident's. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 68 residents who received meals served by the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy and procedure was followed. The facility failed to inform the resident/resident's RP (responsible party) of investigation findings and actions taken to correct the identified problems for 1 (#1) of 7(#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #R1, and #R2) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to properly log temperatures daily for 1(Refrigerator A) of 2 (Refrigerator A, Refrigerator B) Refrigeration units observed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 68 Residents that received meals prepared by the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged injury of unknown origin was reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 (#2) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect a total census of 70 residents.
10 fire safety citations on file: 9 on June 17, 2026, 1 on July 2, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 19, 2024 | Fine | $133,224 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.73 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.28 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.92 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.92 on weekdays and 3.28 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.73 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.73 | 0.31 | 3.92 | 3.28 | 4.4% | 1 of 90 | 76 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.39 | 0.32 | 4.58 | 3.92 | 4.3% | 1 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.7 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 34.6 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.4 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Allen Oaks Nursing and Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
11.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
51.9% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
2.4% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ALLEN HEALTH CARE PARTNERS LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acme Health Care LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 10/13/2011 |
| Camellia Grove Properties LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 19% | 05/20/2020 |
| Seagrove Health Care LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 29% | 05/20/2020 |
| Broussard, Kendall | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 10/13/2011 |
| Broussard, Reuben | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 10/13/2011 |
| Brunson, Karen | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 8% | 10/13/2011 |
| Ghanta, Prabhavathi | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 10/13/2011 |
| Hudgens, Patricia | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 10/13/2011 |
| Tolleson, Amy | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/04/2018 | |
| Butler, Brian | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 10/13/2011 |
| Butler, Kevin H | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 10/13/2011 |
| Butler, Renee | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 10/13/2011 |
| Butler, Stacy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 10/13/2011 |
| Depriest, Dorothy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 10/04/2018 |
| Tolleson, Amy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 10/04/2018 |
| Oaks Management Group | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/08/2021 | |
| Butler, Kevin H | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/13/2011 | |
| Tolleson, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/13/2011 | |
| Acme Health Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/08/2019 | |
| Camellia Grove Properties LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/08/2019 | |
| Oaks Management Group | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/30/2025 | |
| Seagrove Health Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/08/2019 | |
| Broussard, Kendall | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Broussard, Reuben | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Brunson, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Butler, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Butler, Kevin H | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Butler, Renee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Butler, Stacy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Depriest, Dorothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Ghanta, Prabhavathi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Hudgens, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2019 | |
| Tolleson, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/13/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.