2 Blackberry Lane, Bennington, VT 05201 · Bennington County · (802) 442-8525
91 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 475027 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 10, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Vermont average is 7.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 46 health citations since November 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $242,044 in the last three years; the largest was $91,143, and the latest is dated December 10, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.10 hours per resident per day, against 4.22 across Vermont and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
63.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Vermont average 55.4%).
CMS links it to Icare Health Network, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 46 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to maintain safety and prevent elopement for 1 or 1 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings Include:A progress note dated 4/30/26 stated that Resident #1 left the faciity on an unauthorized leave of absence. A document completed by the facility titled: Elopement Drill Documentation form stated Resident #1 was identified missing at 9:42 PM. Resident #1 was located by [NAME] Police Department at their partners apartment and returned to facility at 10:12PM.Per record review, Resident #1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. (BIMS is a standardized cognitive screening tool used primarily in long-term care and skilled nursing facilities to assess a resident's memory, thinking, and orientation skills. A score of 14 indicates intact cognitive function). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely acquisition and availability of ordered medications to meet resident needs, resulting in omission or delay of physician ordered drugs for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) and, per facility audit, for 35 of 81 residents facility wide. As a result, Resident #1 did not receive venlafaxine XR for 4 days and pregabalin for 8 days and suffered an unwitnessed fall, headache, elevated blood pressure, and seizure like activity that required them to be evaluated and treated at the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors caused by frequent omissions of medications related to availability and/or transcription practices for 3 of 5 residents in the sample (Residents #1. #2. and #3). Due to this deficient practice Resident #1 experienced an unwitnessed fall, headache, elevated blood pressure, and seizure like activity that required them to be evaluated and treated at the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's representative was informed of benefits, risks, and alternatives prior to initiating an anti-anxiety medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 7/16/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of one residents (Resident #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services when ordered by a physician; and/or notify the physician when ordered labs were not completed for one resident [Resident #6] of 29 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the contracting food service department employed sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficiency has the potential to impact all residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 5 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #1) who was moved from one room to another room within the facility was provided a safe homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality for one of 3 sampled residents [Resident #1]. Resident #1 was receiving the medication Lithium Carbonate and physician orders for blood work were not completed as ordered and the physician was not notified of this or changes in the resident's condition. Additionally, the facility failed to act upon signs and symptoms of lithium toxicity while continuing to administer the medication, which eventually ended in the resident's death, and altered the resident's record to reflect compliance and notifications after they had been transferred out to the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to carry out critical medication level monitoring that was ordered and failed to consider whether the onset or worsening of symptoms, or a change of condition, may be related to the medication and failed to respond to the presence of adverse consequences related to the use of a high-risk medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents [Resident #1], which resulted in Resident #1's death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director assisted the facility with the development and implementation of resident care policies, specifically related to laboratory services. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies necessary to care for Residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and the plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess Residents for urinary and bowel incontinence on admission to ensure that a resident who is incontinent receives appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible for 3 of 4 Residents in the sample (Resident #31, #48, and #105).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a Resident Representative of a change in condition related to a worsening wound, abnormal laboratory results, and transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor weights and verify potential significant weight loss and gains as needed for 5 of 6 residents sampled (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan was followed for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1) as evidenced by a lack of documentation for monitoring of the presence of pain and evaluating the effectiveness of regularly scheduled pain medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff was provided the necessary training and possessed the necessary competencies to care for residents with diagnoses of OUD (opioid use disorder), SUD (substance abuse disorder), and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect was maintained for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1) received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent infection and a new wound from developing. As a result, Resident #1 developed a toe wound and osteomyelitis (infection of bone) which led to a partial amputation of the toe.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 29 residents in the sample were free from significant medication errors related to the administration of a medication prescribed for seizure management (Resident #1), and an antithrombotic (treatment and prevention of blood clots) medication (Resident #9). 1. Per observation of the lunch meal on 10/30/2023 at 11:45 AM Resident #1 was sitting in a specialized wheelchair eating her/his meal. S/he was observed with her/his arms raised above her/his head with a scared facial expression and drool coming from her/his mouth. This surveyor asked her/him if they were alright, and s/he stated in a barely audible voice can you help me? The nurse who was assisting another resident with their meal was alerted, and after speaking to Resident #1 they took her/him to their room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy that ensures written grievance decisions meet documentation requirements of issuing a written decision that includes the date the decision was issued to all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are a sufficient number of skilled licensed nurses, nurse aides, and other nursing personnel to provide care and respond to each resident's basic needs and individual needs as required by the resident's diagnoses, medical condition, or plan of care impacting all residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide required notice of the bed-hold policy before transferring a resident to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #56 and #309).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility after a hospitalization resulting in a facility-initiated discharge for 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents #56 and #309).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident for 3 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #210, #212, and #33).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident's care plans after each assessment and with the required team for 9 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #37, #42, #16, #31, #10, #14, #45, #9, and #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide services meeting professional standards regarding the use and monitoring of an IV (intravenous line) (Resident #210), and medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a tube that is inserted into the stomach to provide nutritional support in patients with impaired swallowing secondary to various disorders) (Resident #53) for 2 of 29 residents in the sample.
Inspectors wrotePer observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as needed for 2 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #210 and #212) and failed to provide transfer assistance within a reasonable amount of time for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #212).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for residents on the second-floor unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that required physician visits occurred every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least 60 days thereafter for 10 of 29 sampled residents (Residents #9, #31, #16, #37, #46, #1, #10, #14, #45, and #42).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure standard precautions were followed to prevent the spread of infection related to hand hygiene and equipment cleaning. On 10/31/2023 at approximately 8:55 AM on the third floor, the Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) was observed administering medications. She/he administered a nebulizer treatment to Resident #1, assisting the resident to put on an Oxygen mask, then was observed returning to the medication cart, preparing medications for the next resident without performing hand hygiene. She/he was observed donning gloves to administer an Insulin pen, removing the gloves, and returning to the medication cart to continue setting up medications without performing hand hygiene on two occasions during the medication pass. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to determine whether it is clinically appropriate for residents to self-administer medications for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #20).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to treat 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident # 53) with respect and dignity and recognize the resident's individuality.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records for 2 residents [Res.#259 and #53] of 29 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility without ensuring documentation in the resident's medical record of the danger that failure to transfer or discharge would pose. Additionally, the facility failed to document in the resident's medical record communication with and the provision of required information to the receiving provider by the resident's physician for 1of 2 residents sampled (Resident's # 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days of admission for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #210).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #46). This failure had the potential for Resident #46 to not receive specialized services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan including the participation of professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident's needs for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #8).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were monitored for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to recognize when a resident experienced pain and ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services for 1 of 29 sampled residents (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan that addresses the assessed emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident and failed to provide services that address the assessed needs of the resident for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #210).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and record review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services as ordered for 1 of 29 residents sampled (Resident #8).
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on December 10, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 10, 2025 | Fine | $74,620 |
| March 25, 2025 | Fine | $76,281 |
| November 1, 2023 | Fine | $91,143 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Vermont | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.10 | 4.22 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.80 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.71 | 3.66 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.60 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.8% | 55.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 44.4% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.25 on weekdays and 3.71 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 33.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 4.10 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.10 | 0.56 | 4.25 | 3.71 | 33.8% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.27 | 0.67 | 4.48 | 3.74 | 33.8% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.01 | 0.60 | 4.24 | 3.40 | 39.3% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.74 | 0.44 | 3.89 | 3.35 | 34.8% | 0 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Vermont, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.25 | 0.79 | 4.47 | 3.71 | 23.2% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.66 | $19.64 to $23.53 | 3,030 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.62 | $29.56 to $37.61 | 1,130 |
| Registered nurses | $46.86 | $39.53 to $50.58 | 7,410 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Vermont | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 19.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.5 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.4 | 22.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.7 | 17.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bennington Health & Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Vermont: 8 better, 3 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
12.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Vermont: 1 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Vermont: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
54.5% this home
Median of homes: Vermont57.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Vermont0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
3.2% this home
Median of homes: Vermont2.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Vermont97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BENNINGTON CARE CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Icare Health Network, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennington Care Center, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/12/2024 |
| Active Investments LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Lifecare Advisors LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plaza Investment Trust | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Procare Advisors LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Vantage Capital Investors LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plaza Investment Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 43% | 09/12/2024 |
| Noble Investment Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Krausz, Eliezer | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plausse, Michael | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Sebbag, Samuel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Wright, Christopher | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Wright, Christopher | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Bennington Care Center, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Bennington Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Icare Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Breault, Allison | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Brickley, Jesper | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Davis-Barron, Tabitha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Dix, Cindy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Faucher, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plausse, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Wright, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Active Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Apex Advisors | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/04/2025 | |
| Bennington Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Bennington Realty Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Executive Advisors, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/04/2025 | |
| Icare Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Lifecare Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/25/2025 | |
| Noble Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Orchard Capital Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plaza Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Sterling Capital Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Vantage Capital Investors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Breault, Allison | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Brickley, Jesper | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Davis-Barron, Tabitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/04/2025 | |
| Faucher, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Plausse, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Sebbag, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 | |
| Wright, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/12/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Vermont. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.