111 East Washington, Bensenville, IL 60106 · Du Page County · (630) 766-5800
226 certified beds, about 156 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145420 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 60 health citations since January 2024, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $40,798 in the last three years; the largest was $24,448, and the latest is dated April 25, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.87 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
38.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Atied Associates, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 60 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's monthly atypical antipsychotic injection and oral antibiotics were administered as ordered. This failure resulted in a resident experiencing unstable behaviors with a subsequent involuntary psychiatric admission. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for significant medication errors. On 07/21/2026 at 10:05 AM, V18 (R4's family member) stated that R4 receives Invega (atypical antipsychotic medication) injections on the 5th of each month, and in July she did not receive it. V18 said on 07/12/2026, R4 also received an order for an oral antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection, but R4 did not receive her antibiotic either. V18 said R4's psychiatric symptoms worsened and the facility petitioned and transferred R4 to the hospital on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of resident during care. This failure resulted in R1 falling from her bed during peri care, sustaining a scalp laceration, and needing transferred to a local hospital for sutures. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of three. This past non-compliance occurred from 3/29/26 to 3/30/26.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to have orders in place to manage a resident's PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) Line. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for intravenous lines in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to administer antibiotics as ordered by the physician and notify the physician when those antibiotics were not administered. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility policy for filing grievances or complaints, failed to ensure residents know how to file a grievance and failed to make the grievance forms readily available for residents to complete. This applies to 8 of 8 residents (R8, R15, R26, R61, R78, R120, R121, R175) who attended the resident meeting in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with nail care and personal hygiene. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R27, R49, R63, R92 and R133) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe medication storage and labelling practices for residents receiving prescription and narcotic medications. This applies to one nursing unit and 7 of 7 residents (R3, R33, R88, R91, R106, R107, and R141) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility prevented a resident from utilizing their motorized wheelchair and failed to obtain the resident's consent before modifying a resident'smotorized wheelchair. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R175) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the referral process to obtain a motorized wheelchair per a resident's request in order for the resident to gain more independence with mobility. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R8) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing monitoring and reassessment of a physical restraint, implement restraint-reduction interventions, and ensure that a physical restraint was used only when medically necessary. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R147) reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the designated abuse coordinator and state agency. This failure applies to one of two residents (R175) reviewed for abuse in a total sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess a resident for discharge planning in accordance with their policy. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R61) reviewed for discharge planning in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the use of a restraint and oxygen therapy. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R9 and R147) reviewed for accuracy of assessments in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to off-load the heels of a resident, who has facility-acquired pressure ulcers. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R176) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to failed to provide adequate care and services to maintain adequate nutritional status by failing to monitor food intake and offer offering meal alternatives similar nutritive value, encourage resident intake of meals, and ordering and providing nutritional supplements as recommended by the dietitian for residents with low body weights and poor oral intake. This failure applies to three of six residents (R18, R49, and R105) reviewed for nutrition in a total sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received oxygen as prescribed. This applies to 3 of 4 resident (R7, R9, and R81) reviewed for oxygen administration in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with complaint of pain was reassessed and provided interventions to relieve pain in accordance with facility policy. This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R8) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices including hand hygiene during dining and the use of personal protective equipment for residents on isolation and enhanced barrier precautions. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R74, R92) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for environment in a sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased in interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy to notify resident representative of a change in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for notification of change in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and perform an assessment on a resident who exhibited a change in condition. This applies to 1of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for assessment in the sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and implement care plan interventions to prevent a fall that resulted in injury. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R12) reviewed for falls in the sample of 14. This failure resulted in R12, experienced a fall that resulted in a right hip fracture and required hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care timely incontinence care. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (R9) reviewed for activities of daily living in a sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in working condition and the resident receives services within a reasonable timeframe. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R9) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recipes as instructed for palatability. This applies to all residents that receive regular diets, regular or pureed texture, prepared in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/seal/store items, wear hair restraints, and maintain safe food storage temperature of walk-in cooler in kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen walk-in cooler in safe operating condition. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident and/or their family/POA (POA/Power of Attorney) in writing for the reason of transfer to the hospital. The facility also failed to notify the ombudsman of the transfer. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R9, R25 R58, R63, and R84) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide in writing to the residents and/or their POA (POA/Power of Attorney) information regarding bed hold and return at the time of discharge to the hospital. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R9, R25 R58, R63, and R84) reviewed for discharge in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for 5 residents (R34, R5, R151, R139, & R38) who are dependent on care for activities of daily living in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wrote6. On 12/10/24 at 11:01 AM, R109 was in her room and there were 10 Pills in a medication cup on her bedside table. R109 said that the nurse gave the medicine to her and then the nurse walked away. R109 said that she was not going to take her medications until her stomach felt better. R109 said that she had been throwing up since early morning and every time she drinks water she throws up. On 12/12/24 at 12:45 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) said that all residents need an assessment to self-medicate, and they also need an order from the physician. V2 then looks at R109 EHR (Electronic Health Record) and said that R109 did not have an order to self-medicate or an assessment. V2 said that the medications should not have been left there because the resident could throw away the medications and there is no guarantee the resident is taking the medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain temperature logs, properly store and label food items, and discard potentially spoiled food items. This applies to 5 residents (R153, R5, R16, R8, and R109) reviewed for personal food storage in a sample of 32 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices. This applies to all 159 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide care with dignity to 1 resident (R139) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have call lights accessible to dependent residents. This applies to 1of 1 residents (R63) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite a resident to the care plan meetings. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R146) reviewed for care plan meetings in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain residents' blood glucose levels appropriately and failed to follow physician order for administering insulin. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R100 and R121) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring and insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a physician's order. This applies to 1 resident (R77) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services to a resident as recommended per ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Restorative Assessment. This applies to 1 resident (R128) reviewed for restorative services in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly position resident's indwelling catheter bag/drainage bag during wound care dressing change and incontinent care. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R5, R84 and R155) reviewed for indwelling catheters and incontinent care in a sample of 32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the current daily staffing. This effects all 159 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a change in a resident condition, failed to provide frequent monitoring, failed to provide accurate information to the physician, and failed to transfer R2 to the hospital in a timely manner. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing a slow deterioration from the morning of [DATE], until she was transferred to the hospital at 12:30 PM on [DATE], in critical condition. R2 died at the hospital on [DATE] from septic shock. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 11. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 1:18 AM when V28 (LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse) failed to identify R2's change in condition, complete an assessment, obtain vital signs, and notify R2's physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance committee met quarterly with the required members. This failure has effects all the residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident hallway was safe, sanitary and comfortable for 7 residents (R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18) reviewed for safe, sanitary, comfortable environment in the sample of 18.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have fall prevention interventions in place for a resident at risk for falls. This failure resulted in R1 falling out of bed and sustaining a subdural hematoma. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident dependent on staff for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for ADLs.
Inspectors wrote3. R11 is 80 years-old with multiple medical diagnoses which include dementia, needs assistance with personal care, generalized muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows that R1 is total dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene. On January 22, 2024, at 11:47 AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was providing care to R11. There was a pervasive urine odor in the bedroom. R11's linen sheet was heavily saturated with urine, there were layers of brown ring stain in the linen which showed the different drying stages of the urine in the linen. R1's wound dressing to his sacral area was wet with urine. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide peri-care in a manner that would prevent urinary tract infection. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter bag is not touching the floor. This applies to 5 of the 7 residents (R14, R38, R114, R160, R163) reviewed for peri-care and indwelling urinary care in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. There were 31 medication opportunities with 4 errors, resulting in an 12.9% medication error rate. This applies to 4 of 6 residents (R8, R13, R36, R39) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications after opening to determine expiration dates. In addition, facility also failed to refrigerate an insulin that is unopened. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R14, R15, R22, R31, R47, R151) reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide fortified foods as ordered by the physician. This applies to 5 of 5 (R27, R33, R137, R146, R152) residents reviewed for dining in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control processes in regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of peri-care and medication administration. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that items were not stored under the medication room sink. This applies to 4 of the 34 residents (R13, R14, R38, R160) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to place residents' indwelling catheter urinary drainage bags into a privacy bag. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R51, R114) reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to include a plan of care for pain management in the Comprehensive Care Plan for residents experiencing pain. This applies to 2 residents (R102 and R132) reviewed for care planning in the sample of 34. 1. R132's face sheet showed R132 has resided in the facility since January 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson disease, and myasthenia gravis. R132's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and there was no plan identified or interventions for pain management found in R132's comprehensive care plan. On January 22, 2024, at 10:02, R132 stated she has pain in both knees that makes it very difficult for her to stand. R132 stated there is a prescription for lidocaine pain patches to be placed on each knee daily. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain prescriber's orders for holding a dose of insulin and for a formulary exchange of insulin; and failed to assess for medication self -administration and provide a secure bedside storage for self administered medications. This applies to 3 of 3 (R8, R22, R83) residents reviewed for medication administration and medication storage in a sample of 34. 1. R8's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, unspecified diastolic congestive heart failure, and cerebral infarction unspecified. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care as ordered by physician and failed to ensure that a resident with a sacral pressure injury was kept clean and dry to promote wound healing per plan of care. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R11) reviewed for pressure ulcer in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and provide interventions for R150's left hand contracture. This applies to 1 of 5 (R150) residents reviewed for range of motion and positioning in a sample of 34. R150's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spastic hemiplegia affecting left non dominant side, weakness, spinal stenosis lumber region, chronic viral hepatitis, vascular dementia, osteoarthritis of left, and contracture of muscle left forearm. R150's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated October 17, 2023, showed R150 with moderate cognitive impairment and impairment of upper extremity range of motion on one side, and substantial assistance from staff for bathing, dressing, bed mobility, dependent on staff for transfer and assistance with eating. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure effective treatment and interventions for a resident's pain. The facility also failed to provide pain relief patches for one resident per physician orders. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R102 and R132) reviewed for pain in the sample of 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the required IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Complaint Hotline information posted in the facility for residents and/or residents' representatives' information. This affects all 168 residents residing in the facility.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 25, 2026 | Fine | $16,350 |
| July 1, 2024 | Fine | $24,448 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.87 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.55 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.68 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.1% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.00 on weekdays and 2.55 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.96 in April to June 2025 to 2.87 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.87 | 0.50 | 3.00 | 2.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 156 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.82 | 0.54 | 2.94 | 2.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 161 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.00 | 0.56 | 3.15 | 2.64 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 153 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.96 | 0.56 | 3.09 | 2.63 | 1.2% | 0 of 91 | 161 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.2 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.7 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bridgeway Senior Living's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 99 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 140 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 91 eligible stays.
32.7% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 55 residents counted.
2.7% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 75 residents counted.
96.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BRIDGEWAY SENIOR LIVING LLC. CMS links this home to Atied Associates, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 1.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bensenville CCRC Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 28% | 01/01/2015 |
| Miriam Langsner Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 06/25/2021 |
| Nachum Langsner Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 14% | 06/25/2021 |
| Langsner, Shlomo | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Salazar Dujua, Anna Sarah | Corporate director | Individual | 04/04/2020 | |
| Truhlar, Susan | Corporate director | Individual | 06/25/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.