127 West Diversey, Elmhurst, IL 60126 · Du Page County · (630) 530-5225
180 certified beds, about 135 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145339 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 23, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 50 health citations since March 2023, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $143,281 in the last three years; the largest was $82,250, and the latest is dated June 11, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.36 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
49.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Legacy Healthcare, an affiliated group of 95 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 50 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene, including oral care, nail care, and grooming. This applies to 5 of 9 residents (R42, R73, R89, R102, and R115) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and perform AHA (American Heart Association) CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/7/26 at 5:04 PM when the facility failed provide timely rescue breaths and placement of the available AED (Automatic External Defibrillator) on an unresponsive resident designated as full code. This applies to 82 of 83 residents (R1, R3-R83) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 83. V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing), and V36 (Corporate Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 6/9/26 at 5:50 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1:1 supervision at a meal to a resident who had physician orders for 1:1 feeding assistance. This failure resulted in R1 consuming food during a meal while unsupervised and becoming unresponsive for 13 minutes before being assisted. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for meal supervision in a sample of 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to respect residents' dignity by using cell phones during resident care. This applies to 3 of 3 resident (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change a resident's feeding tube dressing as ordered. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for nursing care in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI). This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for nursing care in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with urinary catheter care. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label residents' opened insulin pens and vials with the residents' name, opened-on, and expiration dates, and failed to remove expired medication. This applies to 7 of 8 residents (R30, R31, R48, R54, R64, R67, R189) reviewed for medications in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to residents who require assistance. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R81, and R86) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and obtain treatment orders for a resident with a laceration. This applies to 1 out of 1 resident (R340) reviewed for wound treatments in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow treatment orders as prescribed for residents with pressure wounds. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R128 and R8) reviewed for pressure injuries in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to residents with indwelling urinary catheters in a manner to prevent infection. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R441 and R58) reviewed for urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to process reccommendations for and then provide residents their dietary nutritional supplements. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R57, R4, and R8) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate transportation procedure/activities to avoid several missed appointments to residents. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R52, R91, R127) reviewed for outside appointments and transportation in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 25 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 12% error rate. This applies to 2 of 7 residents (R127, R190) observed during the medication pass.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to cohort and implement transmission-based precautions for a resident with an acute GI (gastrointestinal) infection. The facility also failed to follow Enhanced-Barrier Precautions (EBP). This applies to 3 out of 5 residents (R48, R74, R45) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement it's antibiotic stewardship program to monitor usage of prescribed antibiotics for residents. This applies to 2 out of 3 residents (R109 and R85) reviewed for antibiotic use in a sample of 33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and treat a wound when it was first identified. This applies to 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle soiled cleaning supplies and soiled bedding in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. This applies to 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This failure affected 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for physical abuse and resulted in R3 hitting R1 and R2 on the head.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by V3 (Agency CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant), when V3 punched R1 in the face and grabbed R1's lower arm. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for staff-to-resident abuse in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing bruising on her face and lower arm and R1expericing a psychosocial impact. R1 stated she can still see V3's fist coming towards her face when she closes her eyes. The Immediate Jeopardy began on April 27, 2024, at 8:00 PM when V3 (Agency CNA) punched R1 in the face and grabbed R1's lower arm. V26 (Assistant Administrator), V25 (Vice President of Operations), and V19 (Regional Nurse Consultant) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on May 7, 2024, at 1:41 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided hand splints to prevent a resident's further decrease in range of motion as recommended by the Therapy Department. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for physical therapy in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received scheduled pain medication as ordered. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for improper nursing care in the area of pain in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, report, assess, and obtain physician orders for new skin breakdown; failed to ensure treatment dressings were in place, soiled dressings were changed for residents with stage 3 and stage 4 pressure ulcers; and failed to implement pressure ulcer interventions. As a result of these failures, R41 had an unidentified right ischium wound with 25% necrotic tissue that was uncovered with no treatment; R24 had a right ischium wound with necrotic muscle tissue exposed with no treatment; and R18 had a right ischium wound with no treatment that increased in size from previous assessments. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R9, R18, R24, R41, and R66) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for resident medications to be at the bedside. The facility also failed to complete self-administration of medication assessments for residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R62, R109, R21, R88) reviewed for medications in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure intravenous medications were administered by qualified staff. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R24, R95, R476, R477, and R478) reviewed for intravenous therapy in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and respond to call lights in a timely manner. This applies to 8 of 8 residents (R11, R19, R40, R50, R56, R92, R99 and R105) reviewed for incontinence care in a sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wrote2. R99 currently residing on the memory care unit. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R99 has diagnoses that includes dementia, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease. R99's care plan dated 3/11/24 states he has extensive care needs and requires the support services of the long-term care setting. On 4/02/24 at 10:08 AM, during the room observation V32 (CNA--Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed providing incontinence care to R99. V32 threw the two-urine saturated disposable briefs on the floor. V32 with same soiled gloves went to the wardrobe and put one pair of clean briefs on R11's (R99's roommate) bed. V32 then picked the soiled briefs off the floor placed them in a plastic bag then threw the bag of soiled briefs on the floor. V32 then applied a clean brief to R99. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize a standardized tool to determine the necessity of antibiotics prescribed to residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R32, R41, R121, R176) reviewed for antibiotics in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within residents' reach. This applies to 3 out of 3 residents (R2, R33 and R66) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the required documentation in the medical record of residents who had pacemakers. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R86, R91) reviewed for pacemakers in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change a resident's midline catheter dressing, measure, and document the external length of the catheter and arm circumference per facility policy. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R476) reviewed for midline catheters in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately address a resident screaming in pain. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R75) in a sample of 30 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to dispose of controlled medications per facility policy. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R4, R58, and R108) reviewed for controlled medications in a sample of 30.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide toileting hygiene for residents who required assistance with incontinence care. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R1, R4, R5, R6) reviewed for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the family/emergency contact of resident's change in condition. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change of condition notification in a sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from mental abuse. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity during care. This applies to 4 of 27 residents (R54, R120, R100, R24) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the abuse policy for 1 of 27 residents (R28) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure abuse was reported to the administrator immediately for 1 of 27 residents (R28) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected following resident to resident abuse for 1 of 27 residents (R28) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide R18 with a communication board for one of twenty-seven residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of twenty-seven.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are totally dependent and residents who require extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received assistance with incontinence care and showers. This applies to 3 of 27 residents (R13, R24, R59) reviewed for ADLS in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a treatment dressing was in place for a resident with a skin alteration. This applies to 1 of 1 resident's (R4) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were completed and dressings were re- applied for 2 residents with pressure injuries (R13, R24) and failed to ensure a resident was turned and repositioned (R24). This applies to 2 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a splint was in place for a resident with impaired mobility. This applies to 1 of 7 (R13) residents reviewed for mobility in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided to a resident at risk for weight loss and failed to ensure a significant weight loss was reported. This applies to 2 of 12 (R70, R130) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 27.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a resident from receiving another resident's medication for 1 of 7 residents (R73) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 27. On 2/27/2023 at 10:28 AM, V24 R73's Mom was interviewed at R73's bedside. V24 stated R73 had been given an iron (ferrous sulfate) tablet that wasn't ordered in the last two weeks. V24 said R73 was given another resident's medication in error. On 3/1/2023 at 9:30AM, V1 Administrator said R73 did receive an iron (ferrous sulfate) tablet in error. V1 said R73 was given an iron tablet in error. V1 said the iron tab was R73's roommate who was hospitalized at the time. The facility's Medication Variance Report dated 2/16/23 shows R73 was given 325mg of ferrous sulfate on 2/16/23, which was not R73's medication, and R73 did not have an active order for any ferrous sulfate dose. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered through the prescribed route. There were twenty-nine opportunities with three errors resulting in a 10.34% error rate. This applies to one of six residents (R100) observed in the medication pass.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 11, 2026 | Fine | $82,250 |
| April 5, 2024 | Fine | $61,031 |
| April 5, 2024 | Payment Denial | 6 days from May 4, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.36 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.92 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 49.6% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 51.7% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.43 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 3% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 20.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.43 in April to June 2025 to 3.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.36 | 0.68 | 3.39 | 3.30 | 20.7% | 0 of 90 | 135 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.73 | 3.37 | 3.31 | 20.9% | 0 of 92 | 139 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.40 | 0.73 | 3.40 | 3.38 | 23.3% | 0 of 92 | 139 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.43 | 0.70 | 3.44 | 3.40 | 32.7% | 0 of 91 | 138 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.3 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.7 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Grove of Elmhurst, the's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (63.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
63.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
45.5% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
6.5% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ELMBROOK SKILLED NURSING FACILITY, LLC. CMS links this home to Legacy Healthcare, a group of 95 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doros Generation Trust U/a/D 1/3/12 | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 05/03/2017 |
| Gpn Family Trust U/a/D 4/28/08 | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 05/03/2017 |
| Elmbrook Hc Realty, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 11/06/2015 | |
| Forbright Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 07/31/2024 | |
| Shabat, Menachem | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/03/2017 | |
| Forbright Bank | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/31/2024 | |
| Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/06/2015 | |
| Liyanapatabendi, Chool | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/06/2015 | |
| Morris, Margaux | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/11/2024 | |
| Shabat, Menachem | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/03/2017 | |
| Doros Generation Trust U/a/D 1/3/12 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/06/2015 | |
| Elmbrook Hc Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/06/2015 | |
| Gpn Family Trust U/a/D 4/28/08 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/06/2015 | |
| Legacy Healthcare Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/14/2025 | |
| Miller Cooper & Co, Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Liyanapatabendi, Chool | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/06/2015 | |
| Morris, Margaux | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/11/2024 | |
| Shabat, Menachem | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/03/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.