500 South Broad Street, Middletown, DE 19709 · New Castle County · (302) 449-3400
120 certified beds, about 112 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2005
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 085050 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2026, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Delaware average is 10.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 41 health citations since January 2024, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $216,429 in the last three years; the largest was $137,303, and the latest is dated May 29, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.88 hours per resident per day, against 4.35 across Delaware and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
44.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Delaware average 41.3%).
CMS links it to Cadia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 41 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, clinical record review, and review of other pertinent records, it was determined that for one (R1) out of four residents reviewed for dysphagia, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to R1 when the facility failed to identify R1 as high risk for choking and aspiration. On 5/15/26, R1 was served breakfast in bed and left unsupervised. Approximately 20 minutes later, staff found R1 unresponsive. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) documents revealed severe airway obstruction with large quantities of food (ham and eggs) removed from the airway and difficulty ventilating/intubating due to obstruction. The death certificate listed the immediate cause of death as airway obstruction by food bolus while consuming food. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R5) out of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse and injury of unknown origin, the facility failed to recognize and consequently report an injury of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of four residents reviewed for dysphagia, the failed to develop a person - centered care plan to address R1's identified eating behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R5) out of six residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality by having Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) complete admission assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment included an accurate and comprehensive review of the facility's resident population, including an identified population of residents receiving Comfort Care. The failure to update the Facility Assessment to accurately reflect resident needs for this specific resident population receiving care and services meant the facility assessment plan had potentially missed critical care needs specific and unique to this population. This failure had the potential to affect the care provided to the facility population and the training required for both direct and indirect care staff. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of psychotropic medication side effects and the associated risks versus benefits for two out of five residents (Resident (R) 58 and R5) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 31 sample residents. This failure had the potential for residents to be uninformed of potential outcomes related to psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the correct emergency contact of a change in condition for one of one resident (Resident (R) 122) reviewed for change in condition out of a total of 31 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to delay timely notification of R122's representative regarding the resident's condition change.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R) 28) was free from physical restraints when staff failed to identify a seatbelt worn on a motorized wheelchair as a physical restraint, restricting the resident's freedom of movement and access to their body. This failure created the potential for facility residents to receive inappropriate care and services, or a lack of, due to unidentified care needs and interventions from an unassessed lower extremity restraint.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for one resident (Resident (R) 21) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin out of 31 sampled residents. The facility's failure to promptly report injuries of unknown origin limited regulatory oversight and had the potential to delay protective interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (Resident (R) 21) out of a total sample of 31 residents. The facility's failure to promptly investigate injuries of unknown origin had the potential to delay protective interventions for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R) 28) care plans were reviewed and revised to identify the regular use of a wheelchair seatbelt. This failure created the potential for facility residents to receive inappropriate care and services, or a lack of, due to unidentified care needs and interventions. Cross-reference to F604, Physical Restraints.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services for one resident (Resident (R) 73) out of a total sample of 31 residents. R73 reported that she has not received help with oral care, and she was observed to have a buildup of debris on her teeth and gums. This failure had the potential to affect nutritional status, cause dental cavities, and gum diseaseFindings include:Review of R73's admission Record, located under the admission tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder, and osteoarthritis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assess and monitor comfort care (end of life) for one of three residents (Resident (R)122) reviewed for comfort care out of 31 total sampled residents and failed to follow physician orders for an ordered medication (Hyoscyamine Sulfate) for one of 31 residents. These failures had the potential for R122 not to receive the comfort care measures that she deserved at the end of life and not to receive physician ordered medication to control increased secretions which would cause R122 to have difficulty breathing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with physician orders for one of one resident (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total of 31 residents sampled. This failure had the potential to cause R4 to retain carbon dioxide and increased the risk of oxygen toxicity. Findings Include:Review of R4's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/01/26 indicated R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated R4 was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for one resident (Resident (R) 48) out of 31 total sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure current Physician Orders reflected an active order for R48's Comfort Care Program. This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, document review, and review of McGeer's criteria, the facility failed to have an Antibiotic Stewardship Program consistent with current standards of practice for the prescribing of an antibiotic for one of five residents (Resident (R) 71) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure had the potential to result in the unnecessary use of antibiotics, increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance and adverse medication-related side effects for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents sampled for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R1received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. R1, a completely dependent resident, fell on her face from the bed to the floor while receiving care from a staff member and sustained multiple rib fractures, clavicle fracture and splenic laceration. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision caused harm to R1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition, the facility failed to initiate CPR for R1, who was choking and became hypoxic and unresponsive. The RN supervisor did not assess R1's airway or respiratory status after choking and only delegated applying a non-rebreather mask and preparing for transfer without initiating CPR or further emergency intervention. The facility's failure resulted in R1 death. Due to this failure an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 1:58 PM on 7/3/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff had the skill set to recognize an emergent situation. R1 had a choking episode that progressed to respiratory distress which compromised R1's breathing. Nursing staff failed to provide competent nursing care for R1 that included assessments and interventions for a resident that had a change in respiratory status. Additionally, R1 was a full code and staff failed to initiate CPR on R1's behalf. The facility's failure resulted in R1's in death. Due to this failure an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called at 2:20 PM on 7/3/25.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for Neglect, the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of neglect when on [DATE], R1 had a choking episode and the present staff failed to provide essential services (airway clearance, assess lung air movement and initiate CPR) required to intervene on behalf of R1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out three residents reviewed for emergency care, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's assessment included nursing staff competencies, and the skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care that are needed for the resident population.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R97 and R114) out of two residents reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to offer R97 sufficient fluid intake in an accessible manner for her to maintain proper hydration. For R114, the facility failed to ensure that R114 received sufficient fluids to maintain proper hydration or provide additional interventions when R114's oral intake significantly dropped. This failure resulted in harm with R114 being transferred to the hospital on 2/28/24 with a BUN of 100.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined that that for one (R1) out of four residents reviewed for ______,the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and review of other facility documents, it was determined that for one (R66) out of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that that R66 was free from resident to resident physical abuse by R78.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R69 and R98) out of 27 sampled residents reviewed for assessments, the facility failed to accurately reflect each residents' status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R39, R62) out of two residents reviewed for PASARR, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state-designated authority when the resident's new diagnosis of mental disorder was identified. For R62, the facility failed to request a new PASARR after R62 was diagnosed with visual hallucinations. Additionally, for R39, the facility failed to notify the state-designated authority of a new order for an antipsychotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R28, R97 and R165) out of twenty seven residents reviewed for care plans, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person centered care plans. For R97, the facility failed to implement R97's need for an adaptive cup during non-meal times. For R28 and R165 the facility failed to ensure care plans included non pharmacological interventions prior to the use of PRN antianxiety medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R78) out of twenty seven sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that R78's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised based on preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R113) out of one resident reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to have a discharge summary that included a reconciliation of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R31) out of three residents reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to treat a urinary tract infection for twenty hours, after receiving a positive result of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R101) out of three sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that care was provided to support R101's hearing loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R73 and R66) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to provide appropriate treament and services to achieve or maintain as much nomal bladder function as possible. For R73, the facility failed to ensure that R73's urinary catheter care was monitored in a manner to prevent infection. For R66, the facility failed to maintain or restore continence.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R91) out of twenty-seven residents reviewed for physician services, the facility failed to ensure that R91's required visits were coordinated and alternated between the physician and the NP.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R78 and R90) out of five residents reviewed for medication review, the facility failed to ensure the provider documented that irregularities were reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Drug Regimen Review policy included all of the time frame requirements.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R28) out of five residents sampled for unneccary medication review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the targeted behaviors were documented and non- pharmacological interventions were implemented prior to the use administration of PRN antianxiety medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R90) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that laboratory services were obtained only when ordered by a provider.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R97) out of four residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living), the facility failed to supply R97's bedside water in a [NAME] adaptive cup.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R109) out of twenty seven residents reviewed, the facility failed to ensure that the electronic health record was complete and readily accessible.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R3 and R31) out of five residents reviewed for arbitration agreements, the facility failed to ensure that R3 and R31 were capable of understanding the arbitration agreement prior to signing it.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R98) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the staff wore appropriate PPE while administering R98's medications via her PEG tube.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on January 30, 2026.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2026 | Fine | $137,303 |
| July 7, 2025 | Fine | $17,610 |
| January 22, 2025 | Fine | $61,516 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Delaware | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.88 | 4.35 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.59 | 3.89 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.18 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.9% | 41.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 39.1% | 41.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.00 on weekdays and 3.59 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.88 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.71 | 4.00 | 3.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 112 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.77 | 0.81 | 3.89 | 3.45 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.72 | 0.79 | 3.84 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.80 | 0.84 | 3.92 | 3.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Delaware, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.79 | 4.21 | 3.67 | 5.7% | 0% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.21 | $18.51 to $21.74 | 5,530 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.03 | $30.97 to $36.07 | 2,240 |
| Registered nurses | $47.85 | $41.30 to $53.71 | 14,290 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Delaware | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.1 | 12.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 13.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 10.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.4 | 23.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cadia Rehabilitation Broadmeadow's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (67.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
67.4% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Delaware: 17 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 390 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Delaware: 1 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 383 eligible stays.
7.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Delaware: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 266 eligible stays.
63.7% this home
Median of homes: Delaware59.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 146 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Delaware0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 236 residents counted.
4.6% this home
Median of homes: Delaware2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 236 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Delaware98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BROADMEADOW INVESTMENT LLC. CMS links this home to Cadia Healthcare, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schafer Family LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 12/31/2010 |
| Silver Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 12/31/2010 |
| Ronald E Schafer Irrev Tr Fbo Eric Robert Schafer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Ronald E Schafer Irrev Trfbo Lauren Elizabeth Marie Schafer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Stephen Silver Irrevocable Trust Fbo Casey Silver | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Stephen Silver Irrevocable Trust Fbo Jonathan Silver | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Schafer, Eric | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Schafer, Lauren | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Silver, Jonathan | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 12/31/2010 |
| Hylton, Alfred | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 10/23/2023 | |
| Litwa, Karen | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Schafer, Ron | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Silver, Stephen | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Litwa, Karen | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2005 | |
| Long Term Care Corp | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2005 | |
| Dittmar, Laura | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Hylton, Alfred | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Price, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Schafer, Ron | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Silver, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Long Term Care Corp | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/24/2025 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/24/2025 | |
| Dittmar, Laura | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Hylton, Alfred | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Litwa, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Price, Elizabeth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 | |
| Schafer, Ron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/24/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Delaware. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.