Home / Rhode Island / Woonsocket
4 St. Joseph Street, Woonsocket, RI 02895 · Providence County · (401) 765-5844
185 certified beds, about 166 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 415079 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 16, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Rhode Island average is 9.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since October 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 6 fines totaling $83,899 in the last three years; the largest was $25,373, and the latest is dated March 3, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.82 hours per resident per day, against 3.71 across Rhode Island and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
36.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Rhode Island average 40.6%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 3 of 4 units observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality relative to not following physician orders, for 3 of 3 residents. This included failing to change a wound dressing daily, as ordered, for Resident #10, failing to implement interventions related to weight loss, for Resident #11, and failing to provide seizure pads while in bed, as ordered, for Resident #157.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed who complained of chest pain and requested a hospital transfer, Resident ID #104.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care to maintain good foot health for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who complained of foot pain who is a type II diabetic and has a history of diabetic foot ulcers, Resident ID #40.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly smoking assessments for 2 of 5 residents reviewed who smoke, Resident ID #s 79 and 116.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a history of trauma, Resident ID #13.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that bed rails were used only when assessed, clinically indicated, and implemented in accordance with the resident's needs for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with bed rails, Resident ID #s 124 and 158.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 27 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task, 2 errors occurred, resulting in an error rate of 7.41% affecting Resident ID #s 128 and 133.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to accurately maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices relative to 1 of 1 closed record missing a discharge summary, Resident ID #171.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP; refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO] that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities), for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with wounds, Resident ID #s 63 and 93, and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a long, flexible, thin tube inserted through a vein in the upper arm and advanced into a large vein near the heart) Resident ID # 66.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to the pneumonia vaccine policy's failure to align with current guidelines, as recommended, by the Advisory Council on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from neglect relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was left unattended outside of the facility for approximately 3 hours and 20 minutes during a heat advisory resulting in cardiac arrest, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving amoxicillin-clavalanate (an antibiotic) and divalproex (a medication used to treat mood disorders) and 1 of 2 residents reviewed requiring insulin, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained relative to unsafe water temperatures, for 4 of 4 floors observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed ensure the director of food and nutrition services met the minimum qualifications of a Certified Food Safety Manager.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Director of Food and Nutrition Services met the minimum qualifications of a Certified Food Safety Manager for 1 of 1 Food Service Director (FSD) reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 4 of 4 kitchenettes.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis (a type of treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to.), Resident ID #s 35 and 137, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #161, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wounds infected with a Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO), Resident ID #83 and 1 of 2 closed records reviewed, Resident ID #169.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident's care plan by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments relative to 29 of 29 long term care residents reviewed, Resident ID #s, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 15, 21, 22, 23, 25, 29, 35, 38, 44, 67, 70, 75, 78, 83, 88, 95, 123, 129, 137, 139, 140, 142, 161, and 520.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to Narcan administration, Resident ID #25, 2 of 6 residents reviewed for following physician orders relative to unnecessary medication, Resident ID #s 44 and 123, 1 of 1 resident seen by the podiatrist, Resident ID #78, 1 of 2 residents observed with a non-pressure wound, Resident ID #83 and 1 of 3 residents receiving a medication that requires blood levels to be monitored, Resident ID #95.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for suctioning, Resident ID #96.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 of 8 medication carts observed on 3 of 4 units and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide food that is palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, relative to contact precautions (utilized when a resident is known or suspected to be infected with a Multidrug Resistant Organism [MDRO] that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces in the resident's room), for 3 of 3 residents reviewed on contact precautions, Resident ID #s 25, 38, and 83; for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP- refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) Resident ID #s 3, 123 and 161; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for all newly hired employees, consistent with their expected roles, relative to orientation education, as outlined in the facility assessment, for 4 of 5 newly hired employees, Staff J, X, Y, and the Food Service Director (FSD).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that they not employ or otherwise engage individuals who have been found guilty of abuse or mistreatment by a court of law, for 1 of 1 personnel record reviewed for disqualifying information, Maintenance Assistant, Staff A.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan relative to 1 of 3 wounds observed, Resident ID #137.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident observed with a pressure ulcer, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a nephrostomy tube (PCN, a catheter that is inserted through your skin and into your kidney), Resident ID #64.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for warfarin (Coumadin, a medication prescribed to prevent blood clots), Resident ID #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 2 reviewed for warfarin (Coumadin, a medication prescribed to prevent blood clots), Resident ID #23 and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with an elevated white blood count (WBC), Resident ID #420.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment on 4 of 4 nursing units observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was assessed to be a moderate risk for wandering, previously displayed exit seeing behavior and was able to successfully elope from the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, relative to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- which is inserted into a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near your heart), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Record review of a community reported complaint received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 6/19/2024 alleges that Resident ID #1 has not received his/her methadone (a medication used to treat opioid use disorder) and other medications for two days. The complaint further indicates that the resident tried to speak with the facility staff about this and was told they were checking with the pharmacy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 wound treatments observed, Resident ID #129.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range for 2 of 11 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident ID #s 98 and 129.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 wound treatments observed, Resident ID #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 2 of 2 ice machines.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living relative to incontinence care for 1 out of 1 incidence of incontinence care observed, Resident ID #129 and relative to the weekly scheduled showers for 9 out of 32 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 1, 11, 38, 41, 46, 63, 82, 112, and 118.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors for 6 of 32 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 7, 42, 48, 70, 112 and 123.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to 2 of 3 residents observed for a wound dressing change, Resident ID #s 87 and 105. Additionally, the facility staff failed to conduct appropriate infection control practices relative to hand hygiene for 4 of 4 residents observed during the medication administration task, Resident ID #s 7, 33, 86, and 443.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to other officials (Department of Health), in accordance with State law, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, Resident ID #129.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to following a physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for carbon dioxide retention, Resident ID #3, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for off-loading heel booties, Resident ID #66, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for knee splints, Resident ID #75, and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for edema (swelling), Resident ID #105.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 5 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag), Resident ID #s 79 and 129.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 25 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 8%, involving Resident ID #s 7 and 86.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for heel boots, Resident ID #66 and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for off-loading wounds and elevating legs, Residents ID #105.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly provide notice to residents and/or representatives informing when changes in coverage are made to items and services covered by Medicare and/or the state medical plan related to the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) of Non-coverage Form for 2 of 4 residents discharged from Medicare Part A Services that remained in the facility, Resident ID #s 111 and 143.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, sanitary, homelike environment relative to mouse droppings in resident rooms for 2 of 4 units reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident hazard for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for elopement, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for weight loss, Resident ID #s 2 and 3.
10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 16, 2026, 2 on March 3, 2025, 6 on March 15, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 3, 2025 | Fine | $20,257 |
| March 3, 2025 | Payment Denial | 5 days from March 28, 2025 |
| November 20, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
| March 15, 2024 | Fine | $16,559 |
| December 26, 2023 | Fine | $25,373 |
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $1,764 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $3,145 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.82 | 3.71 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.33 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.4% | 40.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.06 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.02 on weekdays and 2.33 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 2.82 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.82 | 0.45 | 3.02 | 2.33 | 2.3% | 0 of 90 | 166 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.97 | 0.43 | 3.17 | 2.49 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 158 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.04 | 0.47 | 3.26 | 2.51 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 154 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.49 | 0.53 | 3.63 | 3.15 | 0.9% | 0 of 91 | 157 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Rhode Island, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.69 | 3.82 | 3.30 | 5.4% | 1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.33 | $21.52 to $22.82 | 10,220 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.51 | $37.45 to $39.02 | 1,290 |
| Registered nurses | $48.39 | $39.35 to $51.49 | 10,090 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 19.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 16.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.0 | 22.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.2 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.7 | 14.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedar Haven Operations Holding LLC Valley View Hea's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Rhode Island: 24 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
63.0% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island59.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
7.6% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ASLC OPCO RI I, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Senior Living Communities Ri I LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/19/2014 | |
| Aslc Opco Ri I, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2011 | |
| Barnhill, Jeffery | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/19/2014 | |
| Flanagan, James | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/19/2014 | |
| Joseph, Rudy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Barnhill, Jeffery | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2011 | |
| Flanagan, James | Corporate director | Individual | 05/19/2014 | |
| Barnhill, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/19/2014 | |
| Flanagan, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/19/2014 | |
| Jbf Healthcare Management Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/19/2014 | |
| Wheeler-Omiunu, Linda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Rhode Island. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.