Home / Oklahoma / Oklahoma City
5600 South Walker, Oklahoma City, OK 73109 · Oklahoma County · (405) 632-7771
112 certified beds, about 67 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375135 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 13, 2024, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 45 health citations since December 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated April 9, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.
65.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to Emerald Healthcare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 45 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The admissions coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include fall interventions for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for fall interventions. The admissions coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a Nursing admission Data Collection (an assessment used for elopement risk timely for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for elopement. The administrator identified 71 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis order was completed and an antibiotic was transcribed as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for: a. a PICC line for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control; and b. the administration of IV fluids for 1 (#12) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medications as ordered. The DON identified six residents with IV lines resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for one of one meal service observed. The DON identified 63 residents who received their meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained during the provision of incontinent care and PICC line dressing change for 2 (#1 and #9) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's: a. emergency contact and physician were notified of a resident's refusal of urine specimen collection for urinalysis for 1 (#5); and b. physician was notified of a resident's low blood sugar as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis order was completed in a timely manner for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care and treatment. The administrator identified 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed include and update a careplan for one (#27) of eight sampled residents whose careplans were reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a smoking assessment was completed for one (#27) of 19 residents sampled for smoking assessments. The DON identified 64 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the correct inhaler medication was provided to a resident for one (#21) of one sampeld resident reviewed for medication administration; b. medications were administered according to physicians orders for two (#37 and #116); and c. a resident's chart was updated with a new antibiotic order to be continued after an ER visit for one (#116) of two sampled residents reviewed for UTI's.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was securely locked and attended to according to facility policy and procedure. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. hair nets were worn appropriately; b. the kitchen was kept clean and maintained in good repair; c. food items were labeled, dated, and stored according to facility policy; and d. hand washing and glove usage were appropriate. The DON identified 60 residents ate from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the antibiotic stewardship policy by ensuring a standardized tool for initiation of antibiotics was completed for the treatment of UTI's for one (#37) of three sampled residents reviewed for UTI's. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation pneumococcal vaccines were offered and/or administered for two (#37 and #216) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#2) of two sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for one (#10) of three sampled residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ulcer care as ordered by the physician for two (#1 and #3) of three residents sampled for ulcer care. LPN #1 identified 61 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure ADL assistance was provided in a timely manner for one (#7) of four resident call lights observed for staff assistance in a timely manner. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer pain and nausea medication as ordered in a timely manner for one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Administrator identified 65 residents resided in the facility. A Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. A physician's order dated 05/13/24, documented Norco 10-325 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain. A physician's order dated 05/13/24, documented Ondansetron 4 mg every 6 hours as needed for n/v. Review of Resident #6 MAR did not document the administration of prn pain nor nausea medications. Resident #5 had diagnosis which included senile degeneration of the brain and dysphagia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as ordered for three (#3, 5, and #8) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented two residents had pressure ulcers in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for two (#5 and #8) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at a resident's bedside for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility. The Administrator identified no residents in the facility with orders for bedside medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician ordered urinalysis for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for a change in condition. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented 73 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate portion sizes were offered to residents for one of one meal service observed. The DON identified 69 residents received services from the kitchen in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatment was accurately documented for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Matrix, dated 02/01/24, documented two residents with pressure ulcers resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician when: a. a resident's FSBS was out of range and when they administered glucagon for one (#44); b. a resident refused insulin administration for one (#44); c. a resident's routine insulin was held for one (#44); and d. a resident experienced a fall for one (#29) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for physician notification. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The facility Resident Matrix, dated 08/14/23, documented 23 residents who received insulin resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. intervene per physician's order when a resident's FSBS was out of range; and b. monitor blood pressure for a resident who received two medications to treat blood pressure and who received renal dialysis for one (#44) of eight sampled residents reviewed for medications administered as ordered. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The facility Resident Matrix, dated 08/14/23, documented 23 residents who received insulin resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as ordered for one (#7) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident report, dated 08/14/23, documented three residents with pressure ulcers, excluding stage one, resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a tube feeding bag administering nutrition and hydration contained the date, time, and name of the staff who hung the feeding for administration for one (#29); b. a resident was provided tube feedings as ordered by the physician for one (#44); c. staff documented by mouth intake for a resident who had tube feeding orders for by mouth intake of less than 50 percent for one (#44); and d. tube feeding water flush order was implemented for one (#53) of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented five residents who received tube feedings resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for two (#29 and #44) of eight sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for two of two meals observed. The DON identified 56 residents who received their meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. record food temperatures; b. ensure staff wore beard restraint during meal preparation; and c. ensure ice was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility. The DON reported six residents were NPO.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. the cap to prevent cross contamination was present on a tube feeding port for one (#29) of four sampled resident's reviewed for nutrition; b. linens contaminated with bodily fluids were removed from a resident's bed for one (#41) of 28 sampled residents observed for clean environment; and c. incontinent care was provided in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (#1) of three sampled residents observed for incontinent care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for one (#29) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for call lights. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary, homelike environment for one (#29) of 28 sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS Resident Assessments were accurate for one (#48) of 21 sampled residents reviewed for MDS resident assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. physician ordered weekly weights were obtained for one (#170) of three sampled residents reviewed for weight loss, and b. physician ordered supplement of high protein high calorie was provided for one (#170) of four sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/14/23, documented 62 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks for one snack service observed. The DON identified 56 residents who received their meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for four (#26, 46, 47, and #51) of four sampled residents reviewed for following physician's orders. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report documented 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to a. identify significant weight loss and intervene for one (#47), and b. identify a therapeutic diet preference and intervene for one (#51) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report documented 65 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to a. provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for storage of controlled drugs; b. monitor the medication room temperature daily in one of one medication storage room observed for medication storage; c. store drugs in a containers labeled with a resident's name and identification of the drug; and d. discard medications from the medication cart for destruction after a resident was discharged from the facility and discard expired medications for three of four medication carts observed for medication storage. The Census and Conditions of Residents Report identified 65 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to a. remove expired food from the refrigerator, and b. store and label food in a safe manner for two of two refrigerators observed for food storage and labeling. The Director of Nursing reported 65 residents received meals from the kitchen.
8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on December 13, 2024, 4 on August 18, 2023, 2 on December 21, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 9, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
| April 9, 2025 | Payment Denial | 3 days from May 2, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.33 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.00 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.18 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.8% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.33 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.47 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 67 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.31 | 3.43 | 3.19 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.27 | 0.41 | 3.36 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.34 | 0.46 | 3.47 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.8 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Emerald Care Center Southwest LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
11.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
8.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 60 eligible stays.
40.3% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
92.3% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GARDEN MANOR REHAB AND NURSING OF SOUTHWEST LLC. CMS links this home to Emerald Healthcare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Admn Group | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| David M Fistel Ok LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Jw Oklahoma Holdings, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Lme Family Holdings LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Moussaieff Family Holdings LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Mrw Partners LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Njny17 LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Okl Holdings LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Sandr | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Ycok Holdings LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Bankers Trust Company | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Awopeju, Olukayode | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/15/2020 | |
| Fleischmann, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/17/2022 | |
| Gopin, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/15/2019 | |
| Lee, Rebekah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/28/2021 | |
| Admn Group | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| David M Fistel Ok LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Emerald Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Evolve Therapy Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/21/2021 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Jw Oklahoma Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Limestone Fiscal Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/27/2024 | |
| Lme Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Merch Pay Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Moussaieff Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Mrw Partners LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Njny17 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Okl Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Sandr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Saul N Friedman & Company | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Wellsky Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Ycok Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/17/2017 | |
| Awopeju, Olukayode | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/19/2025 | |
| Fleischmann, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/17/2022 | |
| Gopin, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2019 | |
| John, Teney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2025 | |
| Lee, Rebekah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/28/2021 | |
| Miner, Laqueta | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/19/2022 | |
| Smith, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2017 | |
| Vanbrunt, Amy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.