Home / Pennsylvania / Hanover
267 Frederick Street, Hanover, PA 17331 · York County · (717) 637-8937
151 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1968
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395016 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 14, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since September 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
56.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, hospital records, staff interviews, and review of the facility incident report, it was determined that the facility displayed past non-compliance in it's failure to ensure that care and services were provided timely and consistent with professional standards of practice following a fall with fracture which resulted in harm as evidenced by fracture-related pain and delayed corrective treatment for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Falls Management System, last reviewed July 25, 2025, stated the following: Any fall that involves an actual head injury and all un-witnessed falls will include follow-up neurological checks. Neurological checks will be documented. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's weight status in accordance with facility policy and clinical standards of practice for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 5, 8, and 85). And failed to consistently monitor a resident's weight status and implement timely interventions to maintain adequate weight resulting in actual harm as evidenced by continued weight loss for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed at least once every 12 months for three of five nurse aides reviewed (Employee 7, 8, and 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist, and failed to ensure any irregularities were responded to in a timely manner by the attending physician or prescriber for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 2, 11, and 56).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food/beverages in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the kitchen and in four of four nourishment pantries.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to formulate an advance directive for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 39). Findings Include: An Advance Directive is defined as a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. Review of the facility's policy, titled Advance Directives, revised September 2022, reads, in part, 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director or designee inquires of the resident, his/her family members, and/or his or her legal representative, about the existence of any written advance directives. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide side effect monitoring for one of five residents reviewed (Residents 56).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for two of 23 residents reviewed (Residents 39 and 75). Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physician, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one resident reviewed (Resident 94).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select Resident Council meeting minutes, resident and staff interviews, observations, and completion of one meal test tray, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that are palatable, attractive, and at appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to develop a timely hospice baseline care plan, document a hospice physician order, or have an authorized hospice agreement for one of three residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident 13).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift, including an accurate resident census, on January 11 and 12, 2026.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain adequate personal hygiene and grooming of residents who are dependent on staff for assistance with these activities of daily living for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 2 and 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a urinalysis and urine culture and sensitivity were completed timely for one of two resident records reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, clinical record review, facility document review, hospital record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility displayed past non-compliance by failing to ensure that residents were free from any significant medication errors, which resulted in actual harm, as evidenced by low blood pressure, low heart rate, sweating, lightheadedness, and hospital transfer, for one of two residents (Resident 1). Findings Include:Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, last revised April 2019, indicated medications are administered by licensed nurses or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state. The policy states:Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for each resident for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 63 and 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 15, 17, and 93). Findings Include: Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) refer to basic self-care tasks that people typically perform daily. A review of the facility's policy, titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), revised March 2018, read, in part, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene [bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services as ordered by the physician for two of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6 and 99). Findings Include: Review of the clinical record for Resident 6 revealed diagnoses that included lymphedema (swelling in the legs caused by lymphatic system blockage) and peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). During an interview with Resident 6 on February 24, 2024, at 11:14 AM, the Resident was asked about his lymphedema pumps (pumps that use compressed air to apply pressure to the affected limb to force excess fluid out of the limb) that were lying in his room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for two of two residents reviewed for dialysis (Residents 80 and 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 15 and 93). Review of the facility assessment and documentation determined that the facility failed to meet the staffing needs of their residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility's document, titled Facility Assessment, approved August 9, 2024, revealed its purpose is to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The document continued, This assessment addresses . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) credential review, it was determined that in addition to the role of the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON was also the ICP and worked on the unit caring for residents as the nursing supervisor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection control policies and practices to prevent the spread of infection by using PPE (personal protective equipment) for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 32, 63, 96, and 99). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Isolation- Multi Route Transmission-Based Precautions, last revised October 2018, revealed that staff and visitors will wear clean, disposable gloves and a disposable gown when entering the room of a resident on contact precautions. Review of Resident 96's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included clostridium difficile (bacterium that causes an infection of the colon) and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys stop filtering waste from the blood). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 28 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 41, and 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of the resident's admission for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a pressure ulcer received care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for one of three residents reviewed for mobility (Resident 63). Findings Include: Review of Resident 63's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included quadriplegia (partial or total loss of use of all four limbs) and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 63's physician orders revealed an order to cleanse both hands and check placement of cushion pad/brace that is worn at all times for contractures each shift, effective June 1, 2023. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assessment for two of three residents reviewed for use of enabler bars (Residents 3 and 39). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Use of Bed Rails, revised September 2022, read, in part, Facility staff, in conjunction with the Attending Physician, will assess and document the resident's risk for injury due to neurological disorders or other medical conditions. Also, The resident will be checked periodically for safety relative to bed rail use. According to the policy, examples of bed rails included, Grab bars and assist bars. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review observations, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services for one of 28 residents reviewed (Resident 90).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to act upon the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 8 and 41). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last reviewed July 2024, read, in part, Antipsychotic medication will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review .18. The physician shall respond appropriately by changing or stopping problematic doses or medications, or clearly documenting (based on assessing the situation) why the benefits of the medication outweigh the risks or suspected or confirmed adverse consequences. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy review, product packaging review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store medication in accordance with manufacture guidelines for one of three medication carts reviewed (D-2 medication cart). Findings Include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Medication Storage in the Facility, most recently reviewed July 2024, revealed, Medications requiring 'refrigeration' or 'temperatures between 2ºC (36ºF) and 8ºC (46ºF)' are kept in a refrigerator with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring. Medications requiring storage 'in a cool place' are refrigerated unless otherwise directed on the label. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on document review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provided nursing and related services to assure resident safety and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as determined by individual plans of care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans-Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised September 2022, read, in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy and document review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure that each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine, when available, and if the vaccination requires multiple doses, the resident and/or representative has the opportunity to accept or refuse the COVID-19 vaccine for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, titled Coronavirus (COVID-19) and COVID-19 Vaccine Policy, revised on February 18, 2022, read, in part, The vaccine will be offered and administered to residents per the most current Manufacturers', CDC [Centers for Disease Control], Federal, State, and/or local guidance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to get a resident out of bed when requested for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of staffing schedules, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of four residents reviewed (Residents 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 53, 107, and 358).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to attain or maintain the highest practicable level of physical and mental well-being for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 49).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received proper treatment to maintain vision for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 90).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the monthly pharmacy medication regimen review recommendations were acted upon in a timely manner for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 37 and 49).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were contained in a permanently affixed locked compartment for two of two medication rooms observed (A1/B1 hall and C2/D2 hall); failed to ensure adherence to medication expiration dates for one of two medication storage rooms observed (A1/B1 hall); and failed to ensure appropriate labeling of medication when opened for one of two medication storage rooms observed (A1/B1 hall).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of select facility documentation, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate portion sizes for residents prescribed double portions for three of five residents observed (Residents 5, 7, and 32); and failed to provide therapeutic diet restrictions (a meal plan that controls the intake of certain foods or nutrients) for five of five residents observed on the carbohydrate controlled diet restriction (Residents 28, 58, 70, 83, and 409) during one of one tray line meal service observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and four of four nourishment areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of nurse aide in-service records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all nurse aide staff received a minimum of 12 hours of in-service education training each year for five of five direct care staff members reviewed (Employees 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 49).
Inspectors wroteBased on completion of a test tray and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods that were at an appetizing temperature for one of one meals tested.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide education regarding the benefits and risks of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for three of five residents reviewed for vaccination status (Residents 61, 90, and 92).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that direct care nursing staff completed training/demonstrated competency upon hire and annually thereafter related to resident rights for two of five direct care staff members reviewed (Employees 8 and 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation as well as resident and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident the right to a clean and comfortable homelike environment for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 4). Findings Include: An observation of Resident 3, on March 4, 2024, at 10:15 AM revealed him to be sitting in his wheelchair resting. A closer observation of Resident 3's wheelchair revealed multiple areas of dried liquid on the seat, as well as debris resembling crumbs and other materials located on the seat, arm rests and back of the wheelchair. An immediate interview with Resident 3 revealed he did not know how the stains or debris were deposited on his wheelchair but assumed them to be remnants of his meals. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and complications related to the use of a catheter (thin tube that can be inserted through the urethra and into the bladder, allowing urine to drain) by catheterizing more times than required and improper placement of a foley catheter, for one of three residents reviewed for use of a catheter (Resident 1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Catheterization, Intermittent, Female Resident, revised October 2010, revealed, Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet resident needs on two of four nursing units (A1 and C2/D2).
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.9% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.83 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.26 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.73 | 3.52 | 3.05 | 10.6% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.60 | 3.46 | 3.09 | 9.9% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.30 | 0.50 | 3.44 | 2.96 | 8.3% | 0 of 92 | 116 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.26 | 0.50 | 3.38 | 2.97 | 11.3% | 0 of 91 | 114 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.3 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.6 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.2 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hanover Hall for Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (38.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 76 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 82 eligible stays.
53.7% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
95.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HANOVER OPCO LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spacebar Opco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2021 |
| Ai Elements LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 33% | 11/01/2021 |
| Strawberry Hill Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 33% | 02/25/2022 |
| Tilde Propco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 33% | 01/01/2023 |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Priority Care Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Hawkins, Stacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/16/2022 | |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| 267 Fredericks Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/05/2025 | |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/11/2025 | |
| Hawkins, Stacey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/20/2025 | |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/11/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.