Home / Virginia / Harrisonburg
1225 Reservoir Street, Harrisonburg, VA 22801 · Harrisonburg City County · (540) 433-2623
180 certified beds, about 174 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495093 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 13, 2026, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 80 health citations since April 2021, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $192,533 in the last three years; the largest was $119,223, and the latest is dated February 13, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
60.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 80 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteAn unannounced Medicare/Medicaid third revisit to the 2/13/2026 standard certification survey was conducted on 7/2/26. The first revisit survey was conducted 4/13/26 through 4/15/26. The second revisit was conducted 6/8/2026 through 6/10/2026. Corrections are required for compliance with the following 42 CFR Part 483 Federal Long Term Care requirements. Two complaints were investigated during the survey (3076062 -Compliant; 3072965 - Non-Compliant with deficiency). Corrected deficiencies are identified on the CMS-2567B. The census in this 180 certified bed facility was 141 at the time of the survey. The survey sample consisted eight current resident reviews and one closed record review. On 7/15/26 at 8:55 a.m., an observation of the facility was conducted. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for three of 37 residents, Residents #227, #228 and #237; in one of six shower rooms; and in four of 89 resident rooms, room [ROOM NUMBER], #42, #45, and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 3 of 3 nursing units, public congregate spaces, and the building as a whole.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment for two of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #108 and Resident #142). One oxygen cylinder was observed free-standing, unsecured constituting the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) at Level Four, Isolated scope and severity resulting in substandard quality of care. Upon verification of the removal of the IJ, the scope and severity were lowered to Level Two, Isolated. The facility also failed to ensure an electric space heater was not used as a primary source of heat for one of forty-three residents (Resident #80).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure proper fitting of a mattress and bed frame for one of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #130) and failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses and bed rails for identification of possible entrapment risks as part of the facility's maintenance program.
Inspectors wroteBased on information obtained during the Resident Group interview, observations, staff interviews, and Resident Group meeting minutes, the facility staff failed to demonstrate their response, action and/or rationale regarding Resident Group concerns and requests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide detailed and accurate notification regarding the ending of Medicare covered services for 3 out of 3 residents (Residents 93,155 and 200) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, homelike room environment for two of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #130 and #165), failed to provide protections to prevent loss/theft of personal property for two of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #6 and #69) and failed to process laundry timely for multiple residents on three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for two of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #6 and #69) and make information of how to file a grievance available to seven out of seven residents in the resident council group meeting.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure dialysis communication logs were completed for one of 43 residents in a survey sample. The Findings Include: Resident #198 (R198) did not have dialysis communication logs completed over a ten-week period. R198 diagnoses include osteomyelitis, renal dialysis related to end stage renal failure, polyneuropathy, and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a discharge date d 11/17/25 and indicated R198 was cognitively intact. Review of R198's clinical record indicated dialysis was being provided three times a week (Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday). Review of R198's dialysis communication logs indicated the log was last completed on 11/25/25 consecutively. After 11/25/25 there were two other communication entries dated 12/1/25/and 12/27/25. On 2/12/2026 at 840 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include prescription labels and used within expiration dates for 2 of 3 medication storage rooms (West and South Units) and 4 of 9 medication carts (West, East and South Units).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the main kitchen and one of the three unit pantries (West Unit) in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a performance improvement program that corrected previously identified concern regarding a clean, comfortable, homelike environment and ensure the availability of linen sufficient to provide daily care of residents. The facility's quality assurance and performance improvement program failed to ensure thd implementation of actions to improve and sustain regulatory compliance, which affected residents on three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a heater was functioning for one of forty-three residents and failed to maintain essential equipment for one of four washers and one of four dryers in the laundry area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment for nine of 89 resident rooms (rooms #86, #26, #19, #12, #6, #5, #3, #41, and #34), six of 89 resident room bathrooms (resident room bathrooms #84, #27, #8, #5, and #35, and #34), and two of three units (the South unit and East unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess one of forty-three residents for safe self-administration of medication (Resident #44).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for one of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Resident #44).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident/staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #233.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff to develop a comprehensive care plan for two of forty-three residents in the survey sample (Residents #44 and #198).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #215.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet professional standards for two of 37, Resident #205 and Resident #216.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure enteral nutritional feeding was administered according to physician's order for one of forty-three residents in survey sample (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to dispose of refuse properly. The facility staff failed to maintain a clean dumpster area during the facility task- kitchen observation on 2/10/26 at 11:40AM.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, the facility staff failed to provide required training in communication for one of ten employee records reviewed, RN (Registered nurse) #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, the facility staff failed to provide required training in quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) for one of ten employee records reviewed, RN (Registered nurse) #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, the facility staff failed to provide required training in ethics and corporate compliance for one of ten employee records reviewed, RN (Registered nurse) #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for two of eleven residents in the survey sample (Residents #1 and #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for one of eleven residents in a survey sample. Resident #4 (R4) did not have a care plan for bowel incontinence.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide timely incontinence care for two of eleven residents in the survey sample (Residents #2 and #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to serve a palatable meal to two residents, Resident #7 (R7) and Resident #10 (R10) out of a survey sample of eleven residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide the residents preference with the meals for three residents, Resident #9 (R9), Resident #10 (R10), and Resident #11 (R11) out of a survey sample of eleven residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have medications available for administration for one resident (resident #102-R102) in a survey sample of twenty-three residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for one resident (Resident #123- R123), in a survey sample of twenty-three residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision and an environment free of accident hazards to prevent injury to residents, that resulted in two instances of injury/harm to Resident #12 (R12) and one occurrence of harm for Resident #18 (R18). Having the potential to affect multiple residents residing on three of three nursing units, the noncompliance resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for three residents (Resident #17-R17, Resident #23-R23, and Resident #10- R10) in a survey sample of 26 residents, which resulted in harm for two residents (Resident #10- R10 and Resident #23-R23) and the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and substandard Quality of Care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, facility documentation, clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide timely incontinence care to three residents (Resident #17, Resident #23 and Resident #10) out of a survey sample of 26 residents, resulting in harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one resident (Resident #5) in a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and facility documents, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program that affected three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a comfortable environment with internal temperatures affecting two of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration in accordance with physician orders for one resident (Resident #8-R8) in a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to follow infection control standards on three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary environment for rooms on three of three units.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, staff record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide behavioral health training to five of eight employees.
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility documentation and staff interview the facility staff failed to implement abuse policy regarding reporting to the Department of Health Professionals (DHP) for two residents (Resident #17 and Resident #23) out of a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse and neglect timely for two residents (Resident #17 and Resident #23) out of a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documents and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation regarding abuse and neglect for two residents (Resident #17, R17 and Resident #12, R12) out of a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise care plan with fall interventions for one resident (Resident #11, R11) out of a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical reviews and facility documents, the facility staff failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) care for one resident (Resident #17, R17) out of a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #8-R8) in a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate clinical record for two residents Resident #17 (R17) and Resident #12 (R12) in a survey sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure staff had abuse training for two certified nursing assistants, CNA#11 (CNA11) and CNA#12 (CNA12) out of eight employee records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide infection control training for two certified nursing assistants, CNA#11 (CNA11) and CNA#12 (CNA12) out of eight employee records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure a sanitary, clean, and comfortable environment for 3 of 3 nursing units in the facility and in the dining room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide appetizing food with palatable temperatures and appearance to residents on one of three units (West unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of two residents. Resident #1 (R1) had an admitting diagnoses of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and a care plan was not developed. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included: PTSD, anxiety, and depression. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/9/23, which assessed R1 with a cognitive score of 15 out of 15, indicating cognitively intact. R1 was admitted to the facility from a hospital to receive post surgical care and therapy. R1's hospital record documented R1 had a diagnoses of PTSD and did not include any other information regarding PTSD. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed initiate trauma informed care for one of two residents. Resident #1 (R1) had an admitting diagnoses of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and the facility did not identify past history of trauma, and /or triggers which may cause re-traumatization. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for R1 included: PTSD, anxiety, and depression. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/9/23. R1 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. A review of the Trauma Informed Screen assessment dated [DATE] revealed abuse to drugs and/or alcohol and did not reveal any other information related to PTSD. No other social service assessments or notes revealed information related to PTSD. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on group interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents had unlimited access to petty cash funds during the week and on weekends for four of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 107, # 71, #17, and # 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to incorporate and follow Level II PASARR recommendations for one of 38 residents, Resident #38.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for four of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident #158, #166, #322, and #110. Resident #158 did not have medications administered as ordered. Resident #166 did not have a physician ordered dressing applied. Resident #322 did not have insulin administered and fluid intake monitored as ordered. Resident #110 did not have ace wraps applied as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure behavioral health services were provided to maintain his highest practicable level of well being for one of 38 residents, Resident #38.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for three of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident #158, #121, and #30. Resident #158 had multiple medications for treatment of nausea, heart failure, pain, vitamin/electrolyte supplement, muscle spasms and constipation not available for administration. Resident #121 did not have the medication pravastatin available for administration. Resident #30 did not have prescribed nasal spray available for administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 38 residents in the survey sample was free from a significant medication error, Resident # 322. Resident # 322 did not receive her thyroid medication for eleven days.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and group interview, the facility staff failed to provide condiments, menu items, and honor dietary preferences for two of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 322 and # 158; and also in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 Resident #52's treatment administration record had incomplete documentation regarding gastrostomy care orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 38 residents had privacy while in his room, Resident #38. Resident #38 who resided in a private room on the east wing did not have a door separating his room from the hallway.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate assessment for two of 38 residents, Resident #90 and #53. Resident #90's current MDS section O was not triggered for dialysis; and Resident #53's current MDS sections C and D were not accurately completed for cognition and mood. The Findings Include: 1. Diagnosis for Resident #90 included: Parkinson's disease, End stage renal disease on dialysis, bipolar disease, and diabetes. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/13/22. Resident #90's cognitive score was 15 indicating cognitively intact. On 5/24/22 review of Resident #90's current MDS dated [DATE] section O did not trigger for dialysis. Review of Resident #90's physician orders included an order for dialysis weekly on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 38 residents were free from accidents, Resident #3. Resident #3 eloped through one of the facility's fire doors and fell.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for one of 38 residents in the survey sample, Resident #158. A provider failed to respond to two pharmacy recommendations for Resident #158 regarding risks with continued use of an antimicrobial agent and an anticholinergic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on medication pass and pour observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent. There were three errors out of 34 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 8.82 percent. The Findings Include: 1. On 05/25/22 at 7:44 AM, a medication pass and pour observation was conducted. Resident #121's Pravastatin Sodium 10 milligrams was ordered to be given at 8:00 AM. License practical nurse (LPN #4) could not find Resident #121's Pravastatin in the medication cart. LPN #4 then went to the medication storage room and did not find any Pravastatin. LPN #4 then called pharmacy and asked for the medication to be sent. LPN #4 stated that pharmacy was going to send the medication later in the day. On 5/25/22 at 9:00 AM, LPN #4 was asked about reordering medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure expired medication was not available for administration on the east wing. Two opened vials of Aspart insulin dated [DATE] were available for administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on group interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure resident mail was delivered on weekends. This facility census was 159 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, resident council interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to respond to call bells in a timely manner on one of three units. Residents on the East unit reported frequent call bell wait times from 30 minutes to one hour.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 36 residents, Resident #400, was free from physical abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one of 36 residents, Resident #400.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of 36 residents in the survey sample. Resident #147's baseline care plan failed to include problems, goals and/or interventions for anticoagulant medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan for 3 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #132, Resident #74, and Resident #400. Resident #132's care plan was not revised for the discontinuation of psychotropic medications. Resident #74's care plan was not revised regarding a meatus/urethral tear from a chronic indwelling foley catheter. Resident #400's care plan was not revised to include behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #46 and #84. License practical nurse (LPN #1) did not follow physician's orders when giving Ferocon (a hematopoietic agent given for anemia) to Resident #46. Facility staff failed to assess and monitor Resident #84 for correct inhalation technique and nebulizer operation to ensure proper dose administration of prescribed respiratory medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #143. Resident #143's clinical record did not document weights per physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure thermometers used for checking facility water temperatures were calibrated and accurate on two or three units.
9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on February 13, 2026, 3 on April 22, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 13, 2026 | Fine | $73,310 |
| February 13, 2026 | Payment Denial | 55 days from May 23, 2026 |
| April 11, 2025 | Fine | $119,223 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.17 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.73 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.0% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 56.3% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 2.73 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 43.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.10 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.17 | 0.28 | 3.35 | 2.73 | 43.8% | 0 of 90 | 174 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.11 | 0.30 | 3.28 | 2.66 | 50.1% | 0 of 92 | 169 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.31 | 0.29 | 3.54 | 2.71 | 51.2% | 0 of 92 | 157 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.10 | 0.27 | 3.36 | 2.46 | 46.5% | 0 of 91 | 156 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab Cntr's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 272 eligible stays.
13.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 247 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 174 eligible stays.
53.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 107 residents counted.
5.9% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 107 residents counted.
92.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HARRISONBURG OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harrisonburg Holdings I LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| America West LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Charles 1994 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Kss 2000 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ml 2000 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mrv West LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Redrock West LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Brooks, Matthew | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/11/2023 | |
| Rczbm West Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.