Find a nursing home

Home / Arizona / Tucson

Haven of Saguaro Valley

6651 East Carondelet Drive, Tucson, AZ 85710 · Pima County · (520) 731-8500

112 certified beds, about 98 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035085 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 23, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since March 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.85 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.

38.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).

CMS links it to Haven Health, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
December 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that blood pressure medication was administered in accordance with physician ordered parameters for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident # 1). The deficient practice could result in uncontrolled blood pressure.
May 23, 2025Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure bowel and bladder care was provided for one resident (#3) out of 3 sampled. The deficient practice could result in skin breakdown and possible formation of pressure ulcers.
October 19, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from abuse. The deficient practice could result in further resident abuse.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions and proper hand hygiene was implemented during incontinence care. The sample size was one. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infections to residents.
April 13, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The census was 66 and the sample was 17. The deficient practice could result in resident not provided with advanced care activities to meet their needs.
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the responsible party was notified of a fall with injury for one resident (#186). The deficient practice could result in required decisions regarding treatment and care not made timely.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure intervention was implemented to prevent a fall for one resident (#29). The sample size was 19. The deficient practice may result in avoidable accidents.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#11) was free from unnecessary pain medications. The deficient practice could result in residents experiencing adverse side effects. Findings Include: Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pubic fracture, pulmonary embolism and hypertension. The care plan dated January 19, 2023 revealed the resident was on opiate medication related to pelvic fracture. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and to monitor for side effects. Review of the physician order revealed for oxycodone (opioid narcotic) 5 mg (milligram) 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain on a scale of 6-10. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that expired supplies and medications were not available for resident use. The census was 85. The deficient practice may result in ineffective treatments and/or in residents receiving the expired medications.
March 25, 2022Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one resident (#53) regarding providing an assistive device. The sample size was 23. The deficient practice could result in residents' needs not being met.
  2. E
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (#241) was provided pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, the person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. The deficient practice could result in residents' pain not being managed.
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, resident, family member and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a call light was within reach of 1 resident (#50). The sample size was 23. The deficient practice could result in residents not being assisted timely with care.
  4. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (#341) and the resident's representative was notified in writing of a transfer/discharge with the required information and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman. The deficient practice could result in residents and representatives not being informed of their discharge/transfer in writing and the Ombudsman not being providing a copy of the transfer/discharge notices.
  5. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wrote-Resident #63 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD) exacerbation, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, and metabolic encephalopathy. An admission assessment dated [DATE] at 5:41 PM revealed resident #63 had experienced shortness of breath or trouble breathing with exertion (e.g., walking, bathing, transferring). Additionally, the assessment stated that the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. However, the flow rate was not indicated. Review of the current care plan initiated on February 21, 2022 revealed the resident had altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing related to COPD. The goal was that the resident would have no complications related to shortness of breath. The interventions included providing oxygen as ordered. [...]
  6. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#9) drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. The sample size was 5. The deficient practice could result in the resident receiving medications that are not necessary.
  7. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident, family member and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (#395) medical record was accurately documented regarding advance directives. The sample size was 23. The deficient practice could result in residents having inaccurate records regarding advance directives.
  8. D
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    F943 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on personnel record reviews, staff interviews, the Facility Assessment, facility documents, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to provide evidence that 2 of 10 sampled staff (#24 and #15) were provided training on dementia management. The deficient practice could result in staff not being knowledgeable of how to care for and respond to residents with dementia.
  9. B
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all posted daily nurse staffing data was retained for a minimum of 18 months. The deficient practice could result in posted nurse staffing data not being available for public access and review.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 23, 2025, 2 on April 13, 2023, 3 on March 25, 2022.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 23, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · April 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 25, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · March 25, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · March 25, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.853.983.86
Registered nurses0.390.700.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.483.513.42
Nurse aides1.41
Licensed practical nurses1.05
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)38.8%45.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%43.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.82 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.00 on weekdays and 2.48 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.93 in April to June 2025 to 2.85 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.850.393.002.48 0.0%0 of 9098
Oct to Dec 20252.860.383.022.45 0.0%0 of 9297
Jul to Sep 20252.900.373.082.44 0.0%0 of 9294
Apr to Jun 20252.930.313.122.47 0.0%0 of 9190
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Arizona, Jan to Mar 20263.870.634.053.433.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Arizona

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Arizona, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.53$18.43 to $22.4220,320
LPNs and LVNs$37.05$32.10 to $39.366,530
Registered nurses$47.84$39.33 to $52.2073,150
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Haven of Saguaro Valley. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeArizonaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.510.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.12.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.712.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.04.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.710.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.623.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.510.412.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Haven of Saguaro Valley's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (70.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

70.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Arizona: 74 better, 1 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 196 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Arizona: 4 better, 1 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 208 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Arizona: 6 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

82.3% this home

Median of homes: Arizona69.9% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 79 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Arizona0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Arizona0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Arizona95.1% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HAVEN OF SAGUARO VALLEY LLC. CMS links this home to Haven Health, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Robertson, BrettIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, RobertIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, SpencerIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, StephenIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
Seastrand, JasonIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
West, ChristianIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2019
Haven Health Properties LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization07/01/2019
Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLC5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization07/01/2019
Health Group Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/21/2024
Espinosa, StephanieOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/14/2024
Evans, ColeOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/10/2025
Fragoso, LindsayOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/10/2021
Muir, MarkOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Robertson, BrettOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, RobertOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, SpencerOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, StephenOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Sanjeev, BijayOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2023
Seastrand, JasonOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
West, ChristianOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Zikhale, TshegofatsoOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2019
Haven Health Properties LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/26/2024
Haven Saguaro Valley Real Estate LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/21/2024
Espinosa, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual10/14/2024
Evans, ColeAdp of the SNFIndividual02/10/2025
Fragoso, LindsayAdp of the SNFIndividual05/10/2021
Muir, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Robertson, BrettAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, RobertAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, SpencerAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Samuelian, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Sanjeev, BijayAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2023
Seastrand, JasonAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
West, ChristianAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019
Zikhale, TshegofatsoAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 23, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  2. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 11, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 13, 2023: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 13, 2023: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.48 hours per resident per day, below the Arizona average of 3.51.

Other nursing homes nearby

Arizona contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Haven of Saguaro Valley's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Haven of Saguaro Valley 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Haven of Saguaro Valley get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 23, 2025. The Arizona average is 6.4.
Has Haven of Saguaro Valley been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Haven of Saguaro Valley accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Haven of Saguaro Valley?
CMS lists 36 owners and managers, and links the home to Haven Health. Legal business name: HAVEN OF SAGUARO VALLEY LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection