Home / Virginia / Chesterfield
6800 Lucy Corr Blvd, Chesterfield, VA 23832 · Chesterfield County · (804) 748-1511
216 certified beds, about 198 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495079 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 7, 2023, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
None of its 48 health citations since March 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.08 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
58.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 48 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interviews, facility staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to permit the Resident Council to meet without a staff member being present which had the potential to affect Residents who attend resident council.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 Residents (#222, and #375) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)141 out of one reviewed for advanced directives was provided written information of the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure written acknowledgement of the Notice of Medicare Non Coverage for two Residents (Resident # 81 and # 123) in a survey sample of 3 Residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notices.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ensure that the appropriate information regarding a transfer was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider for one Resident (Resident # 8) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide Notice to the Ombudsman of discharge for one Resident (Resident # 8) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the bed hold policy to the resident and resident representative for one Resident (Resident # 8) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure care plan measures were developed and implemented to prevent skin injury during care for one Resident (Resident #222) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a discharge summary was written for one Residents (# 171) in a survey sample of 73 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to prevent, and treat timely, a stage 2 pressure ulcer prior to development for one Resident (Resident #222) in a survey sample of 73 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were offered to one of one Resident (R)26 reviewed for dental services.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure Committee Members were present for QAPI meetings for 4 of 4 QAPI meetings.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interviews, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have posted the list of names, addresses and telephone number of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups affecting Residents on all 5 nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience in 1 of 6 dining rooms (involving multiple residents) and for two Residents (Resident #29, Resident #82) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. The facility staff failed to serve meals to all residents at the same table, at the same time, in 1 of 6 dining rooms. 2. For Resident #29, the facility staff stood over resident while feeding and after feeding the resident three bites, left to go assist a different resident . 3. For Resident #82, the facility staff failed to serve meals at the same time as her table mates.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive, resident-centered care plans for 6 residents (Resident #146, Resident #14, #105, #180, #49, and #192) in a sample of 60 residents. 1. For Resident #146, the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for bathing & foley catheter care. 2. For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for contracture care. 3. For Resident #105, the facility staff identified the resident was at high risk for falls on 2/15/19 and failed to develop a comprehensive careplan to include interventions to prevent falls until 3/21/19. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate ADL (activities of daily living) care for four residents (Resident #146, #14, #86, and Resident #51) in the survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. For Resident #146, the facility staff failed to provide adequate fingernail and incontinence care. 2. For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to provide adequate nail care, and skin care. 3. For Resident #86, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with eating. 4. For Resident #51, the facility staff failed to provide timely assistance with ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) and in accordance with plan of care.
Inspectors wrote3. For Resident #251, the facility failed to ensure that she was free of a malfunctioning wheelchair - related accident hazard. Resident #251 was an [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #251's diagnoses included Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Osteoarthritis, Gout, Heart Failure, and Age-related Nuclear Cataract - Bilateral. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/1/19 was reviewed. Resident #251 was coded as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #251 was also coded as having impaired vision. In addition, she was coded as being independent in locomotion with a wheelchair. On 4/28/19 at approximately 4:00 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident #251 at the nurse's station. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure four Resident's (Resident #84, Resident #28, Resident #452, and Resident #113) received oxygen as ordered, in a survey sample of 60 Residents 1. For Resident #84, the facility staff failed to ensure that physician ordered continuous oxygen was administered in accordance with the plan of care. 2. For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to provide continuous oxygen treatment as ordered by the physician. 3. For Resident #452, the facility staff failed to ensure she received continuous oxygen therapy. 4. For Resident #113, the facility staff failed to ensure that physician ordered continuous oxygen was administered in accordance with the plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient staff for adequate care. 1. The facility staff failed to provide sufficient staff to answer calls bells in a timely manner. 2. The facility staff failed to provide sufficient staff to feed Residents in timely manner. 3. For Resident #146, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to maintain bathing and hygiene cleanliness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to properly store medication and the facility staff failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled drugs in three of five medication rooms. 1. Fluticasone for Resident #81 and Humalog for Resident #170 were sitting out on top of Medication Cart #1 on the Midlothian unit unsupervised. 2. In three of five medication rooms the facility staff failed to provide a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for storage of refrigerated controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to assign staff with appropriate skill set to effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. The facility staff assigned a dietary aide to the 3-compartment sink before he received the training and competencies to do so.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to follow proper sanitation practices facility-wide and failed to serve food with proper sanitation practices and at proper holding temperature in one of six dining rooms. 1. A facility staff member held a pen and the thermometer in her gloved hand simultaneously while temping the pureed eggs, the pureed sausage, and the sausage gravy. The pen hovered over the food and touched the edges of the food container at times during the temping process. 2. According to the facility's sanitizer solution log, the three compartment sink was not tested for three days in April to ensure the pots were effectively sanitized and chemical contamination was avoided. 3. The facility staff failed to perform proper hand washing prior to meal service. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain accurate and readily accessible medical records for four residents (Resident #198, Resident #179, Resident #452, Resident #105) in a sample size of 60 residents. 1. For Resident #198, the social worker did not document social services notes in the clinical record but kept notes in a soft file in her office. 2. For Resident #179, the social worker did not document social services notes in the clinical record but kept notes in a soft file in her office. There are inconsistencies in the bowel and bladder status documentation and the bowel and bladder elimination record is incomplete. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess if a resident was safe to self administer medications for one Resident (Resident #149), in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #149, the facility staff failed to assess if the resident was safe to self administer prescription medications kept at the bedside.
Inspectors wrote2. For Resident #251, the facility staff failed to accommodate her need for an appropriate wheelchair. Resident #251 was an [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #251's diagnoses included Anxiety Disorder, Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Osteoarthritis, Gout, Heart Failure, and Age-related Nuclear Cataract - Bilateral. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/1/19 was reviewed. Resident #251 was coded as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #251 was also coded as having impaired vision. In addition, she was coded as being independent in locomotion with a wheelchair. On 4/28/19 at approximately 4:00 P.M., an interview was conducted with Resident #251 at the nurse's station. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents' right to privacy during a Resident Group Interview. The facility Social Worker (Employee K) interrupted a private meeting and violated the residents right to privacy by walking into and throughout the meeting room uninvited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and responsible party that medications were available for administration for one Resident (Resident # 128) in a survey sample of 60 residents. For Resident #128, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and responsible party of several medications that were unavailable for administration including, but not limited to: the breathing treatment medication Acetylcysteine Solution 20%, the thyroid medication- Levothyroxine 50 micrograms and the mood disorder medication, Depakote 250 milligrams.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a clean comfortable homelike environment for Residents in the Memory Care Unit, and Resident's # 146, and #14 in a survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. For the memory care Unit the facility staff was checking blood pressures and administering medications during breakfast meal. 2. Resident #146's room smelled strongly of urine and the floors were coated with a sticky dirty film. 3. Resident #14's room smelled strongly of urine and the floors were coated with a sticky dirty film
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Representative interview, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that appropriate information was communicated to the hospital for one Resident (Resident #105) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #105, the facility staff failed to provide the receiving facility with a list of the resident's current medications at the time of transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the bed hold policy to the resident and resident representative for one Resident (Resident #105) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #105, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and resident representative with the bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure Residents had (Pre admission Screening and Resident Review) PASARR Level II screening prior for 1 Resident (#97) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. For Resident #97 the facility staff failed to obtain the required Level II screening done based on results of Level I. The Findings Include: Resident #97 a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Parkinson's disease, Type II Diabetes, Major Depressive Disorder, Restless Leg Syndrome, Sleep Apnea, and Reflux, Osteoarthritis. According to the admission Record the Resident was diagnosed with Dementia on 12/16/18 and Psychosis on 1/9/18 (a year after admission). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure Residents had (Pre admission Screening and Resident Review) PASARR for 1 Resident (#169) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #169 the facility staff failed to ensure a PASARR was obtained prior to admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for two residents (Resident #113 and Resident #179) of 60 sampled residents to meet professional standards of quality. 1. For Resident #113, the facility staff failed to administer the correct physician ordered dose of oxygen. 2. For Resident #179, the facility staff failed to identify, assess, or treat a potential bowel elimination problem according to professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide quality of care to 3 Residents (Resident #94, Resident #113, and Resident #179) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to apply adaptive devices as ordered by the physician. 2. For Resident #113, the facility staff failed to ensure that physician ordered continuous oxygen was available prior to transport from her room to the dining room. 3. For Resident #179, the facility staff failed to identify, assess, or treat a potential bowel elimination problem.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide services to prevent a decline in ROM (range of motion), and to increase range or motion, or prevent further decrease in ROM for one resident (Resident #14) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #14, who was not admitted with contractures, the facility staff failed to provide ongoing assessment, services, equipment, and assistance, to maintain Range of Motion, or to prevent a further decline in ROM.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent a Significant Weight Loss for 2 (Resident #192 and #65) of 60 residents and maintain fluids for 1 (Resident #11) of 60 residents. 1. The facility staff failed to prevent a Significant Weight Loss of 10.59% within 34 days. In addition, the facility staff failed to recognize, evaluate and address Resident #192's nutritional needs in a timely manner. 2. For Resident # 65 the facility failed to prevent wt. loss of 10.5% in two months. 3. For Resident #11 the facility staff failed to provide fluids in the amounts ordered by physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, Resident interview and clinical record and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Resident are provided adequate behavioral health services for 1 Residents (#180) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident # 180 the facility failed to provide adequate behavioral health services to prevent or manage behaviors exhibited by Resident #180.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed address psychosocial concerns for 1 Resident (#194) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. For Resident #194 the facility staff failed to provide adequate behavioral health services after a traumatic experience, leaving Resident #194 feeling unsafe at night.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one Resident (Resident # 128) in a survey sample of 60 residents. For Resident #128, several medications were unavailable for administration including, but not limited to: the breathing treatment medication Acetylcysteine Solution 20%, the thyroid medication- Levothyroxine 50 micrograms and the mood disorder medication, Depakote 250 milligrams.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide a nourishing, well-balanced diet for three Residents (Resident #108, Resident #140, Resident #105) in a survey sample of 60 Residents. 1. For Resident #108, the facility staff ran out of food and failed to provide a well-balanced meal. 2. For Resident #140, the facility staff ran out of food and failed to provide a well-balanced meal. 3. For Resident #105, the facility staff ran out of food and failed to provide a well-balanced meal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide food that accommodated resident needs for one resident (Resident #451) in a sample size of 60 residents. The facility staff served eggs to Resident #451 and she had an egg allergy.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record, the facility staff failed to ensure 5 residents (Residents # 106, 115, 175, 30, and 95) were assessed (Level I) (1) or referred for Level II (2) PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) after development of mental disorders. 1. For Resident # 106, the facility staff failed to ensure that a PASARR II was obtained after the development of mental disorders. 2. Resident #115's PASARR was not dated. 3. Resident #175 did not receive a PASARR (preadmission screening and resident review) on admission. 4. Resident #30 did not have a Level I PASARR on admission. 5. For Resident #95, the facility staff failed to ensure that a PASARR II was obtained after the development of mental disorders.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 8 residents (Resident #176, #55, #149, #193, #115, #8, #175, #93) of the survey sample of 37 to ensure a PASARR screening was conducted prior to admission to the nursing facility. 1. For Resident #176, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was not completed prior to admission to the facility. 2. For Resident #55, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was not completed prior to admission to the facility. 3. For Resident #149, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was not completed prior to admission to the facility. 4. For Resident #193, the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was not completed prior to admission to the facility. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for 2 residents (#151, #95) in the sample size of 37 residents to provide facility sponsored individualized activities. 1. For Resident #151, the facility staff failed to provide individual activities. 2. For Resident #95, the facility staff failed to provide individual activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #189) of 37 residents in the survey sample to ensure appropriate services were provided to prevent urinary tract infections. 1. Resident #189's catheter drainage bag and tubing were observed on the floor while resident was sleeping in bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to to administer oxygen in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for one Resident (Resident # 15). For Resident # 15, on 03/13/18 the oxygen tubing was not dated as to when it had been changed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #103 ) of 37 residents in the survey sample to ensure medications were available for administration. For Resident #103, the breathing treatment medication Acetylcysteine Solution 20% was unavailable for administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident # 151) in the survey sample of 37 residents, to review and renew a PRN (as needed) order for psychotropic medication every 14 days. The facility staff failed to review and renew a PRN order for Ativan for approximately 7 months. During that time, the order was never limited to 14 days duration.
24 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 7, 2023, 7 on April 30, 2019, 16 on March 16, 2018.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.08 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.67 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.51 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.3% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.69 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.24 on weekdays and 3.67 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.89 in April to June 2025 to 4.08 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.08 | 0.62 | 4.24 | 3.67 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 198 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.96 | 0.54 | 4.12 | 3.56 | 2.6% | 0 of 92 | 202 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.76 | 0.45 | 3.89 | 3.43 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 199 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.89 | 0.41 | 4.04 | 3.52 | 0.6% | 0 of 91 | 200 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.9 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.8 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.4 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Health Care Center Lucy Corr's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 398 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 357 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 289 eligible stays.
65.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 254 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 369 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 368 residents counted.
89.7% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHESTERFIELD COUNTY HEALTH CENTER COMMISSION.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chesterfield County Health Center Commission | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/1993 |
| Chesterfield County Health Center Commission | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 07/01/1993 | |
| Chesterfield County Health Center Commission | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/1993 | |
| Briggs, Jenae | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/15/2026 | |
| Cunningham, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Siddiqui, Mohammad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/08/2025 | |
| Chesterfield County Health Center Commission | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/1993 | |
| Parkway Financial and Accounting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/10/2024 | |
| Briggs, Jenae | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/15/2026 | |
| Cunningham, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2024 | |
| Siddiqui, Mohammad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/08/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.