336 Edgewood Drive, Pineville, LA 71360 · Rapides County · (318) 442-9552
130 certified beds, about 90 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195390 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 11, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since December 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,387 in the last three years; the largest was $15,387, and the latest is dated August 28, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
53.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Central Management Company, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition/weight loss. The facility failed to provide dietary interventions for a resident with significant weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 9 residents who received a puree diet. The facility failed to ensure staff were wearing a beard restraint during meal preparation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff by failing to provide an adequate number of clean washcloths and towels. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received mail on Saturdays. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with the resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #11) residents of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure the Physician and Registered Dietician was notified of significant weight loss for Resident #11, who was at high risk for malnutrition according to their plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain bed mobility. The facility failed to provide bed mobility/repositioning as ordered for 1 (Resident #5) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent incidents and accidents. The facility failed to ensure a resident received supervision while smoking for 1 (Resident #34) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents received a mechanically altered diet as ordered by the physician for 3 (#4, #49, #50) of 3 residents reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 9 residents receiving pureed diets.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The facility failed to ensure personnel stored and processed linens so as to prevent the spread of infection by not drying and storing laundered lift slings, privacy curtains, mattress protectors, and Geri-chair cushions in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 89 residents living in the facility. On 02/10/2026 at 3:45 p.m. and on 02/11/2026 at 7:45 a.m., an observation was conducted of an area outside the laundry room door which revealed lift slings and a privacy curtain draped on a metal rack. These items were piled on top of each other and open to outside air and elements. In an interview on 02/11/2026 at 7:45 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from neglect by failing to provide the necessary care and services to 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide care and services that met professional standards of quality for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents, by failing to ensure physician orders were followed timely for the management of pain, and timely hospital transfer after a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the nurse staffing pattern was posted daily. The facility census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide quarterly personal funds statements for 3 residents of 3 (Resident #44, Resident #67 and Resident #75) residents review for personal funds. The facility held personal funds for a total of 52 residents. Findings Review of the facility's policy from the admission Packet dated February 2023 and titled Resident Rights read in part . Resident Rights The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside of the facility. A facility must protect and promote the rights of each resident, including each of the following rights: (c) Protection of resident funds. (4) Accounting and Records (ii) The individual financial record must be available through quarterly statements and on request to the resident or his or her legal representative. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meeting was held at least quarterly and included the required staff members.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed and determined if a resident was clinically appropriate for self-administration of medication for 1 resident of 1 (Resident #75) residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Review of the facility's policy and procedure undated and titled Self-Administration of Medication read in part . Policy: It is the policy of this facility that each resident has the right to self-administer medications, but is the responsibility of the interdisciplinary team to determine that it is safe prior to the resident exercising that right. Procedure: 2. If the resident wishes to self-administer medications, the Interdisciplinary Team must assess the resident's overall ability to safely administer his/her own medications. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to ensure call light was accessible by a resident for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 Resident reviewed for Positioning. The total sample size was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations were reported to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 3 (#42, #93, and #96) of 6 (#42, #50, #65, #75, #93, and #96) residents reviewed for Accidents. The total Sample Size was 44. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure serious bodily injury of Resident #42 was reported within 2 hours in accordance with State law through established procedures. 2. Ensure serious bodily injury of Resident #93 was reported within 2 hours in accordance with State law through established procedures. 3. Ensure serious bodily injury of Resident #96 was reported within 2 hours in accordance with State law through established procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that required discharge documentation was completed for 1 (#99) out of 1 Residents reviewed for discharge. The total sample size was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident. The facility failed to implement a care plan intervention by failing to ensure a hand roll was used for contracture of hand for 1 (Resident #42) of 44 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered plan of care was reviewed and revised for 2 residents (Resident #31 and Resident #75) of 44 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure care plans were updated: 1. To include resident was educated to notify nursing staff of need to increase her oxygen if needed for Resident #31 who required oxygen therapy; and 2. To include physician ordered nasal spray in resident's room to be included with self-administered medications for Resident #75.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to document a Discharge Summary for 2 residents (Resident #98 and Resident #99) of 3 (Resident #98, Resident #99 and Resident #100) residents reviewed for closed records. The total Sample Size was 44.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review of every certified nurse aide (CNA) at least once every 12 months for 2 (S16 CNA, and S17 CNA) of 5 (S5 CNA, S7 CNA, S16 CNA, S17 CNA, and S18 CNA) CNA personnel records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 (#62) of 1 sampled residents for incidents and accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #62 received 2 person assist for lift transfers in accordance with the CPOC(Comprehensive Plan of Care).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services had been provided for 1 (#3) of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's vital signs were checked pre and post dialysis and failed to ensure communication including the resident's status with the dialysis facility prior to and post dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes enhancement of his or her own quality of life. The facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary catheter drainage bag was covered to ensure privacy for 1 (#33) of 1 resident reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure residents' assistive devices were maintained in clean and sanitized condition for 2 Residents (Resident #38, and Resident #74) of 30 sampled Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (#39) of 1 sampled Resident reviewed for catheters.
5 fire safety citations on file: 4 on February 11, 2026, 1 on December 21, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 28, 2025 | Fine | $15,387 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.93 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.72 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.6% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.02 on weekdays and 3.72 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.97 in April to June 2025 to 3.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.93 | 0.35 | 4.02 | 3.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 90 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.74 | 0.33 | 3.82 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.02 | 0.40 | 4.13 | 3.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.97 | 0.42 | 4.14 | 3.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.8 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.0 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (39.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
39.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
53.5% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
6.3% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.
5.5% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HILLTOP NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Central Management Company, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kisatchie Corporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 52% | 01/01/2006 |
| Prico, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 48% | 01/01/2006 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 6% | 03/31/2025 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12% | 03/31/2025 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2006 | |
| Price, Teddy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2006 | |
| Kisatchie Corporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2001 | |
| Prico, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2006 | |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2008 | |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2013 | |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Price, Teddy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Rogers, Dawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2006 | |
| Shelton, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2006 | |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/31/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.