Home / Pennsylvania / King of Prussia
600 West Valley Forge Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406 · Montgomery County · (610) 337-1775
170 certified beds, about 141 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395834 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 18, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 68 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $3,145 in the last three years; the largest was $3,145, and the latest is dated October 30, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.52 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
67.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 68 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility's policy, facility documentation, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow wound physician's treatment orders/recommendations and provide consistent and appropriate treatment for an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer on the right heel (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss), resulting in wound deterioration and actual harm for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, resulting in actual harm when Resident R1 required transfer to the hospital with the need for intubation and admission to the Intensive Care Unit, this was found to be a past noncompliance incident for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to properly store medications for one resident reviewed. (Resident R6)
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, policy reviews, and clinical closed record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure ombudsman notification procedures were followed for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident 6), and to document return of personal items upon discharge or death for two of three residents reviewed (Resident 139 and 140). Findings Include: Review of Resident 6’s clinical record revealed diagnoses including pulmonary embolism. (A pulmonary embolism (PE) is a blood clot in one of the blood vessels in your lung.) Interview with Director of Nursing on [DATE] at 10:02 AM confirmed no notification was sent to ombudsman Review of facility policy titled Personal Property: Patient's revealed, personnel will identify and record the resident's belongings upon admission to the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly follow physician orders for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 6 and 29).
Inspectors wroteBased upon review of facility policy and procedure and review of clinical records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure weight loss and weight gain was adequately monitored for two of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 8, Resident 60).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and policy and procedures review, it was determined the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen therapy for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document medication disposition for one of three discharged residents. (Resident 139).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment (dishwasher and sink faucet) in safe, operating condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report one resident's hospital transfer due to consumption of a liquid soap product. (Resident 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility documentation, facility personnel records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for new hires and existing staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, Employee E6,).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of new hire personnel records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, Employee E6, Employee E7).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and a review of facility training and orientation records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the facility's abuse prohibition policy and facility specific procedures for one out of five new hires (Employee E6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for four out of five new hires (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, and Employee E6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel file for nursing assistants employed by the facility, it was determined the facility failed to ensure consistent in-service training and competencies were completed as required for one of five personnel files reviewed. (Employee E13)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents, employee education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, and Employee E6)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for one of the 29 residents reviewed (Resident 54).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for four of eight residents reviewed (Residents 17, 96, 332, and 333).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for one of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 25).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for a resident, for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 333).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it as determined the facility failed to administer medications as ordered to one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order for Midodrine (increases blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg) three times a day (TID) for hypotension (low blood pressure) hold for systolic blood pressure greater than 140. Review of Resident 20's Medications Administration Record (MAR) from August 1-13 2024 revealed the resident received the midodrine four times when the systolic blood pressure was above 140. Review of Resident 20's MAR for the entire month of July 2024 revealed the resident received the midodrine 13 times when the systolic blood pressure was above 140. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 15, 2024 at 11:30 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for two of the 29 residents reviewed (Resident 54 and 127).
Inspectors wroteBased on Facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a potential elopement for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident 101) Findings Include: Review of Facility policy and procedure titled Wandering, last revised May 1, 2022, revealed wandering behavior symptoms will be documented on the Behavior Monitoring and Intervention Flow Record or Behavior Tracking Form. Forms will be reviewed to determine triggers associated with the behavior and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions. Behavior symptoms will be addressed in the care/service plan. Review of Resident 101's progress notes revealed a social service entry dated July 26, 2024 at 2:17 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review, observations, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services for foley catheters for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Catheter: Urinary-Justification for Use, last revised August 7, 2023, revealed Patients who have urinary catheters upon admission or subsequently receive one will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the patients clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary. If the patients condition meets any of the indwelling catheter criteria, obtain a physician order, include in care plan. Observation of Resident 20 on August 12, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. revealed the resdient had a Foley Catheter (tube placed into the bladder to drain urine). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to appropriately monitor, provide appropriate interventions, and timely notify the physician of a significant weight change for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 85 and 127).
Inspectors wroteBased on Clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (feeding delivered through a feeding tube) as ordered by the physician for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident 332)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for two of six residents reviewed. (Residents 65 and 101) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Behaviors: Management of Symptoms last reviewed July 1, 2024 revealed, when medication sis ordered for behavior symptoms completed the Psychotropic/Therapeutic Medication use evaluation when a patient is newly prescribed psychotherapeutic medication and then quarterly. Complete the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) per nursing schedule for patient receiving antipsychotic medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to date and label insulin pens on two medications carts and reconcile medications on discharge for one of three residents. (Resident: 131) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure Insulin Pens, last reviewed July 1, 2024, revealed Insulin Pens will be clearly labeled with the patient name, physician name, date used; a new pen must be ordered from the pharmacy. Observations of the medication cart 1 on the skilled nursing unit on August 15, 2024 at 9:15 a.m. revealed four insulin pens that were opened and being used but had no date of when they were opened or when they were to be discarded. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order dated August 1, 2024 for a CBC (comprehensive blood count- count of all the cells in the blood) and a CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel- a routine blood test that measures 14 different substances in a sample of your blood). Review of resident 20's Results for laboratory studies revealed these lab studies were not completed as ordered. Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order dated July 5, 2024 for a CBC and a CMP and a tacrolimus level (measures the amount of drug in the blood to determine whether concentrations have reached therapeutic levels). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility performed laboratory studies without a physician order for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 24) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's laboratory results revealed the results for a Magnesium level (blood test to determine the amount of magnesium in the blood), BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel- a test that measures eight different substances in your blood) and a CBC (comprehensive blood count- count of all the cells in the blood) completed on August 12, 2024. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed there was no order for these laboratory studies. Review of Resident 20's laboratory results revealed the results for a CBC completed on June 24, 2024. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed there was no order for this laboratory study. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed ensure infection control management was implemented during a tracheostomy care and failed to follow policy related transmissions-based precautions and use of personal protective equipment for two of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 4 and Resident 85).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment with dignity and respect for one of five residents observed (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide hot water for all residents residing in the facility for two of two days observed, April 16, 2024, and April 17, 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ensure three medication carts were locked and secured out of six medication carts observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's physician orders revealed an order dated January 20, 2024 for Oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 10mg, give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for severe pain. Review of Resident R1's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed Resident R1 received a dose on January 27, 2024 at 4:29 p.m. and the next dose administered was on January 28, 2024 at 8:30 p.m. Review of Resident R1's Progress Notes revealed a nursing entry on January 29, 2024 at 9:26 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on one of four nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for 13 of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 24, 27, 32, 33, 54, 64, 71, 84, 95, 101, 103, 112).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for four of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 29, 88, 96).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was timely physician notification and intervention for a significant weight loss for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 27).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were receiving tube feedings received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 79).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided as ordered for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 101).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety by failing to properly label and date stored foods and maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 64).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and staff training records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for two of five employees (Licensed Practical Nurse 15, Registered Nurse 16).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and employee files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its written abuse prevention policies, by failing to ensure that reference checks were obtained prior to hire for one of five employee files reviewed (Nurse Aide 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for nine of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 49, 50, 51).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 106).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 95).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 84).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 81).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 41).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician performed the initial comprehensive visit with the resident and was seen by the physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 102).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 84).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary drugs that were used for a longer duration than what was ordered by the physician for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 81).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 88).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment was completed, and reviewed and revised, as needed, at least annually.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for three of 56 residents reviewed who were receiving hospice services (Residents 40, 84, 95).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee met quarterly for two of three quarters reviewed (first and second quarter 2023).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the water management policy was implemented for the detection and/or prevention of Legionella within the facility's water systems.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined that based on nurse aides' hire dates, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed at least 12 hours of inservice education annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage, or failed to provide 48-hour advanced notice, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 122).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed insulin timely for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1).
45 fire safety citations on file: 7 on July 18, 2025, 20 on August 15, 2024, 18 on September 29, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $3,145 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.52 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.99 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.4% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.64 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.62 in April to June 2025 to 3.52 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.52 | 0.59 | 3.64 | 3.23 | 10.7% | 0 of 90 | 141 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.57 | 0.52 | 3.72 | 3.19 | 14.1% | 0 of 92 | 138 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.50 | 3.59 | 3.02 | 12.1% | 0 of 92 | 136 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.62 | 0.51 | 3.80 | 3.18 | 39.2% | 0 of 91 | 135 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.5 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.9 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.0 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for King of Prussia Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 212 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 201 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 138 eligible stays.
53.7% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
93.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 600 W. VALLEY FORGE ROAD OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis Pm Pa Operations LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/15/2022 |
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Ghc Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Sun Healthcare Group Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Whitman, Arnold | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Berg, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/15/2022 | |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Mendelson, Avi | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Bamba, Miata | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/11/2015 | |
| Morris, Diane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Yarmark, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/21/2025 | |
| Bamba, Miata | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/21/2025 | |
| Yarmark, Scott | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/21/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.