Home / Rhode Island / North Providence
610 Smithfield Road, North Providence, RI 02904 · Providence County · (401) 353-6300
200 certified beds, about 178 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 415035 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 19, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Rhode Island average is 9.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since October 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 6 fines totaling $70,731 in the last three years; the largest was $12,425, and the latest is dated April 21, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.71 across Rhode Island and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Rhode Island average 40.6%).
CMS links it to Marquis Health Services, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Morphine Sulfate solution (a medication prescribed to treat pain), Resident ID #1 and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for insulin use, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property relative to a narcotic medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an opened medication bottle of Morphine Sulfate solution that had been found to be missing 1 milliliter (mL) of medication, but had not been administered to the prescribed resident, Resident ID #6.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident, and staff interview, the facility failed to administer physician-ordered bolus tube feedings as prescribed to maintain an acceptable nutritional status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who required enteral nutrition via feeding tube, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a history of trauma, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical care of each resident was supervised by a physician when the ordering provider failed to communicate the discontinuation of a Morphine Sulfate (a narcotic; a controlled medication classified as an opioid, prescribed to treat severe pain) order and the initiation of a new more concentrated Morphine Sulfate order, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who was administered 10 times the prescribed dose of Morphine Sulfate and required transfer to the hospital for an evaluation, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed through a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a gastrojejunostomy tube (G-J tube, a specialized medical device that allows healthcare providers to access both stomach and small intestine through a single physical opening on the outside of the body, by having 2 separate access ports, a G-port to the stomach and a J-port to the small intestine), Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation involving an accident resulting in serious injury, which occurred prior to a resident's death, was reported to the appropriate authorities, including the State Survey Agency, as required by State law. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that positive airway pressure therapy (a mechanical device used to support breathing and maintain airway patency) was provided to a resident in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient food and nutrition service support personnel possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets to safely carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the cooks who were in charge during meal preparation and service obtained the required Food Manager's Certification, as required, to ensure safe food handling practices and resident safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the hallway handrails in a safe operating condition for 3 of 4 units observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, in relation to a dressing change, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and underlying tissues caused by constant pressure on an area over a long period of time) receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 17 and 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents reviewed related to a BiPAP machine (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure - a noninvasive ventilator machine prescribed to assist breathing by delivering pressurized air through a mask), Resident ID #s 161 and 204.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to transmission based precautions for 2 of 2 residents reviewed who have a central venous catheter (CVC - a thin, flexible tube that is placed into the large vein above the heart) used for dialysis (a medical treatment that filters waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are failing), Resident ID #s 1 and 2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the residents with an environment that remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 newly admitted resident who started a fire with a lighter, Resident ID # 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who received Dilantin (a medication prescribed to treat seizures) in error on 18 occasions without a diagnosis of a seizure disorder, instead of receiving the intended medication, Diltiazem (a medication prescribed to treat high blood pressure) which was not transcribed. Additionally, the resident was transferred to the hospital where s/he received emergent hemodialysis (a medical treatment to remove waste and excess fluids that the kidneys are unable to perform this function adequately) for the Dilantin use, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's physician completed a medication reconciliation upon admission, failing to identify a medication transcription error, resulting in the resident receiving Dilantin (a medication prescribed to treat seizures) in error on 18 occasions without a diagnosis of a seizure disorder, instead of receiving the intended medication, Diltiazem (a medication prescribed to treat high blood pressure) which was not transcribed. Additionally, the resident was transferred to the hospital where s/he received emergent hemodialysis (a medical treatment to remove waste and excess fluids that the kidneys are unable to perform this function adequately) for the Dilantin use, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents recently admitted to the facility, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste and fluids from the blood when the kidneys do not function properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to following the physician's orders for a fluid restriction and medication administration for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who sustained a fall from an improperly secured mechanical lift (hoyer lift) which resulted in broken bones, hospitalization, and surgical intervention, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 out of 5 residents reviewed for droplet precautions, Resident ID #s 5, 29, 106, and 107 and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins in the heart), Resident ID #416.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 15, 32, and 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to care of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line, a long thin tube that is inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins in the heart) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a PICC line, Resident ID #416.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a skin tear, Resident ID #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers receive the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was admitted with a pressure ulcer, Resident ID #415.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for significant weight loss, Resident ID #30.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are fed by a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who require continuous feeding via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding, hydration or medicine), Resident ID #144.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a skin tear, Resident ID #79.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to reconcile all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge medications, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed who were discharged from the facility, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains free of accident hazards relative to falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a suprapubic catheter (a medical device that helps drain urine from your bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't urinate on your own), Resident ID #3 and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with an indwelling foley catheter (a device that drains urine from your urinary bladder into a collection bag outside of your body when you can't urinate on your own), Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative relative to the decision to transfer a resident to an acute care hospital for one of one resident reviewed, Resident ID #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents are free from significant medication errors relative to the administration of medications to the incorrect resident, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed-hold policy to the resident or resident representative, prior to the transfer of the resident to the hospital, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician orders for obtaining appointments with specialists for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate administration of all drugs, relative to chemotherapy medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that all residents are free from significant medication errors relative to administering the correct dosage and medication in the correct form for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for chemotherapy medication, Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to protect and keep residents free from physical abuse relative to an incident that occurred between Resident ID #1 and Resident ID #2, resulting in significant injury of Resident ID #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored, served and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and the South 2 Nursing Unit kitchenette.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observations and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly relative to 1 of 1 dumpster and the surrounding area.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to the assessment of the resident before dialysis treatments and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for 3 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 75, 157, and 381.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 resident's reviewed for Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDRO), Resident ID #s 6 and 170.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #236.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with foley catheters relative to a urinary tract infection (UTI), Resident ID #170.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for as needed (PRN) medication for blood pressure, Resident ID #157; and for 1 of 2 residents with foley catheters reviewed for antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infections (UTI), Resident ID #170.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents are free from significant medication errors for 4 of 6 resident's reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #s 4, 2, 1, and 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive routine dental services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment relative to cold water temperatures in shower rooms and resident room sinks for 2 of 2 floors observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 1 resident who has an actual pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence), Resident ID #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide fluids and medications prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs of the resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who was ordered pudding thick consistency liquids, Resident ID #1.
3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 16, 2025, 1 on February 2, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 21, 2025 | Fine | $12,425 |
| November 25, 2024 | Fine | $12,038 |
| October 17, 2024 | Fine | $12,035 |
| August 15, 2024 | Fine | $12,035 |
| June 27, 2024 | Fine | $12,035 |
| December 15, 2023 | Fine | $10,163 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.71 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.01 | 3.34 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.66 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.1% | 40.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.0% | 37.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.54 on weekdays and 3.01 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.41 | 3.54 | 3.01 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 178 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.52 | 0.40 | 3.67 | 3.13 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 174 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.47 | 0.37 | 3.62 | 3.09 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 174 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.55 | 0.37 | 3.71 | 3.16 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 169 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Rhode Island, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.67 | 0.69 | 3.82 | 3.30 | 5.4% | 1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.33 | $21.52 to $22.82 | 10,220 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.51 | $37.45 to $39.02 | 1,290 |
| Registered nurses | $48.39 | $39.35 to $51.49 | 10,090 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Rhode Island | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 19.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 16.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.3 | 22.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.8 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.2 | 14.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Rhode Island: 24 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 196 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 203 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Rhode Island: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
60.9% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island59.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 156 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Rhode Island2.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 156 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Rhode Island100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LINCOLNWOOD OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Marquis Health Services, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skilled Venture LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Israel Discount Bank of New York - Idb Bank of York | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Arnett, Bena | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Harman, Dina | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Stevens, Joel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/26/2024 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Arnett, Bena | Corporate director | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/12/2024 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Arnett, Bena | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Dasari, Naresh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Lincolnwood Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/08/2021 | |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/21/2025 | |
| Nfr 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Nutraco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/24/2025 | |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/24/2025 | |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Sk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2021 | |
| Arnett, Bena | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Dasari, Naresh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Harman, Dina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Posen, Mindee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/08/2021 | |
| Stevens, Joel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/26/2024 | |
| Viroja, Yogesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/08/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Rhode Island. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.