Home / Pennsylvania / Somerset
495 West Patriot Street, Somerset, PA 15501 · Somerset County · (814) 445-4549
100 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395840 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $132,561 in the last three years; the largest was $132,561, and the latest is dated October 20, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.47 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
31.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Abraham Smilow, an affiliated group of 7 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Pennsylvania Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow physician's orders to hold blood thinner and anticoagulant medications prior to a scheduled surgical procedure resulting in delayed surgery for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 7).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure that physician's orders were followed for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 23).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a long-term intravenous catheter and a midline catheter (a type of peripheral catheter inserted into a large vein in the upper arm used to deliver fluids and/or medications) were flushed prior to and/or after medication administration for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure communication between a dialysis provider and the facility's nursing staff for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive significant change Minimum Data Set assessment was completed in the required time frame for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1), and failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessments for one of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 91).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for three of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 34, 86).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs of residents for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 40).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in residents' care needs for two of 36 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to respond to a pharmacy recommendation for one of 36 residents reviewed (Resident 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for five of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 46, 54, 65, 73, 77).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow physician's orders for three of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 27, 50, 77), and failed to ensure that bowel protocols were followed as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 69).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, and a meal test tray, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dignity for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident 34) who had an indwelling urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or resident representative had an opportunity to develop an advance directive (instructions regarding the provision of health care when the resident is incapacitated) or assist in formulating an advance directive for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 10, 46).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for three of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 69, 84).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and failed to ensure that a written notice was provided to the resident and the resident's responsible party regarding the reason for transfer to the hospital for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 73).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 61, 74).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were clarified when needed for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 73).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments and preventative measures for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for two of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 50).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that restorative nursing programs to maintain or improve physical abilities were provided as ordered and/or care planned for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for indwelling urinary catheters for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 34).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 50).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in one of three medication carts reviewed (First floor cart), failed to discard expired medical supplies, and failed to sign out routine narcotics on the appropriate narcotic medication card (Residents 37, 69).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment as ordered by the physician for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 69).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policy, and residents' clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines from the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 50).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 7).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer's instructions and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store unopened (unused) multi-dose containers of insulin according to manufacturer's instructions for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 22), and failed to ensure that controlled refrigerated medications were stored in a separately-locked, permanently-affixed container in one of two medication refrigerators reviewed (third-floor east medication room refrigerator).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to store food under sanitary conditions, failing to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings, and failing to ensure that a microwave was clean and free of deterioration, for one of three microwaves reviewed (first-floor pantry)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessments for two of 45 residents reviewed (Residents 30, 72).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that baseline care plans included the information and instructions needed to provide person-centered care for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 80).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents' care plans were reviewed and revised to reflect their current care needs for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 35, 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete treatments as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 78).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of anti-anxiety medications for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 53).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical records reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 42).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2), resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to the resident's physical/mental health and safety. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and investigation documents, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one of five nurse aides reviewed upon hire (Nurse Aide 2) and staff failed to report physical abuse of one resident (Resident 1) in a timely manner which allowed a second resident to be physically abused (Resident 2) putting all of the residents in danger of being abused, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy to their physical safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to honor a power of attorney's right to make informed choices and participate in treatment decisions for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that supervision and adequate interventions were in place to prevent a resident from receiving food items from other residents outside of their ordered diet restrictions for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 2), and failed to ensure that supervision and adequate interventions were in place to prevent a resident from giving other residents food items outside of their ordered diet restrictions for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 1). The facility's failure created a situation in which Resident 2 obtained a food item outside of his ordered diet restriction causing him to accidentally choke to death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included specific and individualized interventions for two of six residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of job descriptions and the deficiencies cited during the current survey, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to assume responsibility for effective management of the facility to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of accident hazards, and for ensuring that each resident receives and is provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
20 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 8, 2026, 5 on January 9, 2025, 11 on February 29, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 20, 2023 | Fine | $132,561 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.47 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.26 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.53 in April to June 2025 to 3.47 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.47 | 0.46 | 3.55 | 3.26 | 6.1% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.48 | 3.52 | 3.19 | 6.2% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.44 | 0.48 | 3.53 | 3.21 | 4.5% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.53 | 0.52 | 3.65 | 3.24 | 4.3% | 0 of 91 | 78 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.5 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.7 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.3 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Patriot Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 89 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
42.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 69 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 69 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PATRIOT OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Abraham Smilow, a group of 7 nursing homes averaging 1.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patriot Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Patriot Propco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Patriot Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Patriot Propco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| T3 Real Estate Initiatives LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Smilow, Abraham | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Fockler, Craig | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Hagerich, Bryan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Smilow, Abraham | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Fockler, Craig | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Hagerich, Bryan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Smilow, Abraham | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Hillel Tropper 2016 Irrevocable Trust | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Moshe Trooper 2016 Irrevocable Trust | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/01/2021 | |
| T3 Initiatives LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Hillel Tropper 2016 Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/18/2024 | |
| Lads Avenue Associates LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Moshe Trooper 2016 Irrevocable Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/05/2024 | |
| Patriot Consulting Company LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/05/2024 | |
| Patriot Opco Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Patriot Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| T3 Real Estate Initiatives LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Fockler, Craig | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/03/2025 | |
| Hagerich, Bryan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Smilow, Abraham | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Travitsky, Baruch | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.