287 East South Boulevard, Petersburg, VA 23805 · Petersburg City County · (804) 733-1190
120 certified beds, about 107 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495144 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 13, 2026, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since November 2018, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $26,125 in the last three years; the largest was $26,125, and the latest is dated March 13, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
57.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for four residents in a survey sample of 53 residents (Resident #61- R61, Resident #74-R74, Resident #76-R76, and Resident #77-R77). This non-compliance resulted in R61 sustaining a fracture, R74 having a bloody nose, R76 having scratches, all which required medical interventions, which constituted harm for those three of the four residents. This noncompliance resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) and substandard quality of care which began on 10/29/24 and required immediate facility intervention to protect residents from abuse and neglect. The facility had self-identified the deficient practice and achieved past non-compliance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 resident (#29) in a survey sample of 53 residents. For resident #29 (R29) the facility staff failed to ensure adequate hygiene and grooming assistance for a resident who is dependent on staff for ADL careR29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis and that included but not limited to atrial fibrillation, alcohol, abuse, history of right hemispheric CVA with left upper extremity weakness, low back pain, and alcohol induced dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure the residents right to a dignified existance for 2 residents (resident #10 and resident #94) in a survey sample of 53 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 1 resident (Resident #113), and 1 employee (Employee #6) in a survey sample of 53 Residents, and the facility as a whole.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to report incidents of abuse in accordance with regulatory requirements for three residents (Resident #52, Resident #74 and Resident #76) in a survey sample of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have credible evidence of a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #77) in a survey sample of 53 residents.
Inspectors wrote3. For Resident #76 (R76), the facility staff failed to remove the one-on-one supervision on the care plan, when it was discontinued. On 3/10/26, R76 was observed in his room lying in bed with no one else present in the room. R76 did not respond when spoken to. On 3/11/26 at 10:48 AM, an interview was conducted with R76 using the facility's interpreter line via telephone, as R76's primary language was Spanish. R76 reported no concerns. On 3/11/26, during a clinical record review, it was noted that R76's care plan had an intervention dated 10/22/25 that read, 1:1 supervision related to resident to resident altercation. On 3/11/26 at 2:03 PM, an interview was conducted with registered nurse #2 (RN #2), who was the care plan coordinator. RN #2 explained that care plans are updated during daily clinical meetings, when there is a change in condition, or when they have order changes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical recrord review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure residentsrecei ve treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 Resident (#10) in survey sample of 53 Residents. For Resident #10 (R10) the facility staff failed to ensure the resident received her medication in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and history of falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure proper foot care was provided to one resident (Resident # 94) in a survey sample of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility failed to properly post nurse staffing information at 2 of 2 units with an up-to-date and current nursing sheet for resident, staff, and public view.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to respond to a pharmacy recommendation for one of fifty three residents in the survey sample. Resident # 54.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 Resident (# 10) in a survey sample of 53 residents. For Resident #10 (R10) the facility staff failed to administer Invega Sustena (a psychotropic medication) during the month of December 2025, gave the incorrect dosage in January of 2025 and did not give it in February of 2025. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and history of falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored correctly for one of two medication carts inspected.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two residents (Resident #117-R117 and Resident #64-R64), in a survey sample of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and medical record and facility policy reviews the facility failed to provide Resident (R51) with essential discharge planning. This failure impacted R51's psychosocial wellbeing, causing him anxiety at times and desperation to return to his community. This is harm. The facility failed to meet this requirement by failing to: 1. Ensure R51's discharge goals were clearly understood through the use of an interpreter. 2. Develop a discharge plan for R51 to return to his community. 3. Regularly evaluate R51 for his desire to return to his community and assist with resources to make his transition successful.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a water management plan for Legionella with regards to a risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other waterborne bacteria could grow, which has the ability to affect all Residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to promote dignity with dining by failing to provide residents with proper silverware by serving the residents in the facility with disposable, plastic spoons daily. Finding Included: 1. The facility failed to promote dignity with dining by failing to provide residents with proper silverware by serving the residents in the facility with disposable, plastic spoons daily During the initial pool portion of the survey process on the afternoon of 04/12/22 and through the morning of 04/13/22 several alert and oriented residents were interviewed/screened. Some of the residents were observed with their meal trays during the interviews and it was noted that they had regular forks and knives but could only get plastic spoons with their meals. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on dining observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the Food and Drug Administration's Food Code 2017, the facility failed to provide foods that were palatable and maintained at appetizing temperatures for 3 of 40 sampled residents (R44, R86 and R88).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to facilitate resident self-determination for one resident (Resident #93) in a survey sample size of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible representative of a change in condition for one Resident (Resident #103) in a sample size of 40 Residents. For Resident #103, the facility staff failed to: a) Notify the Physician and the Responsible Representative in a timely fashion for significant weight loss on 09/03/2020. b) Notify the Responsible Representative for Resident #103's right eye infection on 09/17/2020.
Inspectors wroteBased on family member interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide notice in writing, as soon as practicable, when a facility transfers or discharged a Resident to the hospital, to the Resident and Resident Representative (RR/RP) for 1 Residents (Resident #29) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on family member interview, staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide notice of bed hold policy to the Resident and Resident Representative (RR/RP) at the time of transfer, for 1 Residents (Resident #29) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, facility document reviews, and in the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident centered care plan for two Residents (Resident #11, and #93) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure timely ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for 2 Residents (#101, and #93) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing program to support a Resident's choice of activities based on the preference of the Resident for one Resident (Resident #65) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to prevent significant weight loss for Two Residents (Resident #11, and #103 ) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services for one Resident (Resident #7) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement their immunization policy and ensure each Resident is offered an influenza and pneumococcal immunization, unless medically contraindicated or they have already been immunized for 1 Residents (Resident #85), in a sample of 5 Residents reviewed for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to offer a COVID vaccine for a Resident who was not vaccinated against COVID-19, for 1 Residents (Resident #85), in a sample of 5 Residents reviewed for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have a 100% vaccination rate on 04/15/2022 due to one Employee (Employee L) in a sample size of 101 total staff members. Specifically, Employee L was only partially vaccinated while employed as kitchen staff and the facility staff failed to schedule for the second vaccination dose in the series.
Inspectors wrote3. For Resident #47, the facility staff failed to provide a clean mattress and clean linen. Resident #47 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47's diagnoses included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left side, Hyperlipidemia, and Major Depressive Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/11/18 was reviewed. It coded Resident #47 as having a Brief Assessment of Mental Status Score of 11, indicating mild cognitive impairment. On 11/27/18 at 11:26 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident #47. The Director of Nursing (DON Employee B) was present. Resident #47 stated that his mattress was damaged and that he wanted another one. In addition, another Resident who was identified and placed in the sample as Resident #158 was present. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure an air gap was in place in the main kitchen. The drainage pipe from the ice machine in the main kitchen was flush against the floor drain. There was no air gap in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that three residents (#30, #158, #98) in the survey sample of 36 residents were free of physical and verbal abuse. 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to ensure that she was free of physical and verbal abuse by CNA E. 2. For Resident #158, the facility staff failed to ensure that she was free of verbal abuse by CNA E. 3. For Resident #98, the facility staff failed to ensure that he was free of verbal abuse by CNA E.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement abuse policies for two residents (#30 and #98). 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to implement abuse policies. 2. For Resident #98, the facility staff failed to implement abuse policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that two residents' (#30 and #98) allegations of physical and verbal abuse by staff, in the survey sample of 36 residents were reported to the state agency. 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency. 2. For Resident #98, the facility staff failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate assessment for 1 of 36 residents sampled (Resident #3) by not including Vistaril (an antianxiety medication) in the resident's assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR prior to admission to the facility for two residents (Residents # 94 and # 49) in a survey sample of 36 residents. 1. For Resident # 94, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR screening prior to admission to the facility. 2. For Resident #49, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR prior to admission to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 residents (Resident #89 and #98) of 36 residents in the survey sample. 1. For Resident #89, the targeted behaviors supporting the use of Seroquel were not included on the comprehensive care plan. 2. For Resident # 98, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to include verbally abusive behaviors until 11/28/2018.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff to ensure the catheter bag was maintained in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 1 resident (Resident #92) of 36 residents in the survey sample. Resident #92's catheter bag was observed on the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 resident (Resident #92) of 36 residents in the survey sample. For Resident #92, Flagyl (antibiotic) was unavailable for administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #89) of 36 residents in the survey sample was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #89: 1) Did not have an appropriate diagnosis to support the use of Seroquel. 2) There were no documented target behaviors in the clinical record or in the comprehensive care plan that supported the use of Seroquel. 3) The facility had not attempted a Gradual Dose Reduction.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #92) of 36 residents in the survey sample was free from significant medication error. For Resident #92, Flagyl (antibiotic) was ordered on 10/4/18. The first does was not administered until 10/7/18.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that expired drugs were not in use.
15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on March 13, 2026, 9 on April 15, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 13, 2026 | Fine | $26,125 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.27 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.90 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.73 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.1% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.8% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 2.90 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.31 in April to June 2025 to 3.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.27 | 0.56 | 3.42 | 2.90 | 9.3% | 0 of 90 | 107 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.48 | 3.61 | 3.07 | 9.4% | 0 of 92 | 105 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.31 | 0.41 | 3.47 | 2.91 | 12.3% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.31 | 0.33 | 3.52 | 2.77 | 9.6% | 0 of 91 | 112 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Petersburg Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SOUTH LEASING VA CO LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Mstr Lsco, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2017 |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| South Leasing VA Co LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Campbell, Say'eh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Mohiuddin, Abdul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/10/2025 | |
| South Leasing VA Co LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/16/2025 | |
| Campbell, Say'eh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Groves, Donna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Mohiuddin, Abdul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.