250 Flank Road, Petersburg, VA 23805 · Petersburg City County · (804) 861-2223
119 certified beds, about 105 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495252 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 19, 2024, inspectors cited 20 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 72 health citations since September 2019, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
50.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 72 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on visitor interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to report an allegation of neglect for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on visitor interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to complete a thorough investigation of allegation of neglect for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan that addressed the preference for a plant-based diet for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one of four residents (Resident #3) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to make reasonable efforts to honor and meet the meal choices and preferences of one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to ensure that the written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered for one of four residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure a Resident's right to a dignified existence for 4 Residents (# 5, # 33, # 58 and #114) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to arrange regular unit council meetings for residents and/or family representatives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents were aware of their right to contact the Ombudsman to advocate for them and of their right to file a complaint with the state certification agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents packages were received unopened.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, comfortable homelike environment for the Residents on the 100's hall and any Residents that receive food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 3 Residents(Residents #92, #104, & #84) in a sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care and services to manage indwelling catheters for 2 of 42 residents (Resident #67 and 81), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to coordinate mental health services for a resident with a diagnosis of depression, who was voicing feelings of increased depression for 1 of 42 residents (Resident #81), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to remove expired Covid 19 tests, an expired medication, and expired wound dressings stored in 2 of 2 medication storage rooms; failed to provide the date medications were opened and stored in 1 of 4 medication administration carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to offer and provide snacks at bedtime.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff Interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the resident record, staff interviews and a review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a hospital discharges for 1 of 42 residents (Resident #67), in the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident (#84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for three Residents (#'s 5, 38 and 60) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents receive appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility, for 1 Resident (#84) in a survey sample to 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents who are fed by enteral feeding received appropriate treatment and services and to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 2 Residents (#'s 12 & 84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that a Resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 Resident (#40) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from unnecessary medications to include duplicate drug therapy for 1 Resident (#5) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 Resident (# 84) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to dispose of garbage properly in one of three trash receptacles (dumpster near the small employee parking lot) outside the facility. On 8/16/2021 at 8:30 AM, the large garbage dumpster near the smaller staff parking lot on the right side of the facility was observed with several white trash bags and cardboard boxes visible at least twelve inches above the level of the top of the dumpster. There was no cover over the top of the dumpster. There was debris on the ground around the dumpster. The debris consisted of several pieces of paper, and gloves. On 8/16/2021 at 10:57 AM, further inspection of the dumpster revealed several rusted holes in the front and sides and several flies were seen on top of the bags of trash visible above the top of the dumpster. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy regarding the screening of employees for 15 employees (Employee B, Employee D, Employee E, Employee F, Employee G, Employee H, RN A, RN B, LPN A, LPN B, LPN C, CNA A, CNA B, CNA C, and CNA E) in a sample of 25 employee records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code an MDS (minimum data set) assessment for four Residents (Residents #11 ,# 54, #11, #84, #33 ) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for one resident (Resident #51 in the sample of 40 residents) to continue skilled care services following the issuance of a SNF ABN (skilled nursing facility advance beneficiary notice). Resident #51 did not choose to discontinue services. This failure prevented the Resident from excercising her right to continue to receive skilled care services, and have Medicare make the coverage determination or the Resident pay privately for the services.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR (pre-admission screening) for 2 Residents (Resident #22 and Resident #207) in a sample of 40 Residents. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively impact both Residents, by failing to have a level I PASARR, the facility staff were not aware if the 2 Residents required a level II screening to determine if specialized services for the treatment of/for mental disorders and/or intellectual disabilities was warranted. 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR, level I screening prior to admission. 2. For Resident #207 the facility staff failed to ensure a PASARR was completed prior to entry to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for 1 (Resident # 92) in a survey sample of 40 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide services to prevent pressure ulcers, for 1 Resident (#36) in a survey sample of 40 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 Resident #207 to provide medially-related social services to attain or maintain highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to post in a readily accessible place, reports and any plan of corrections in effect with respect to any surveys conducted during the past 3 years for all 109 Residents residing in the facility. The facility's non-compliance has the potential to impact all Residents and their family's ability to make informed decisions with regard to knowledge of the facilities regulatory compliance history.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to post the daily nursing staffing on 1 of the 3 days survey was conducted. This non-compliance has the potential to affect all 109 Residents residing in the facility by not allowing them and/or their representatives to have knowledge of the facility's nurse staffing levels.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 3 residents were free from abuse and/or neglect (Residents #37 and 93, who was abused by Resident #43) in a survey sample of 42 residents. This resulted in harm for Resident #37.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure sores for one Resident (Residents #37) in a survey sample of 42 Residents, resulting in harm for Resident #37.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from accidents and hazards, for 2 residents (Residents #38, and #31) of 42 residents in the survey sample, resulting in harm for Resident #38. In addition, the facility staff failed to maintain water temperatures in a range to prevent burns, scalding and other injuries on 2 of 2 nursing units.
Inspectors wrote2. For Resident #28, the facility failed to ensure that he was offered adequate hydration. Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/19 was reviewed. Resident #28 was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. He was also coded as requiring set up assistance with meals, and being able to ambulate independently with his wheelchair. On 9/16/19 a review was conducted of Resident #28's clinical record, revealing the following diet order: 4/22/19. Renal diet. Regular texture, Large Portions, Sandwich 3 times a day at meals. On 9/15/19 at 1:40 P.M. an interview was conducted with Resident #28 in his room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 1 resident (Resident #38) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to provide annual nursing staff training based on their annual reviews for 5 out of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to label and store medications and medical supplies within accepted professional principles in one of two medications rooms and on one of four medications carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to effectively wear a hair restraint during meal preparation, and failed to ensure that an unidentified green vegetable was labeled and dated in the refrigerator in one of one kitchens.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to obtain verification of licensure for 6 of 6 Registered Dieticians.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility record review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to handle linen and facility equipment in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for 2 Residents (Resident #104, Resident #31) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed, for 1 resident (Resident #28), in the survey sample of 42 residents, to provide access to a dining room for his meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity for 3 residents (Resident #31, Resident #87, Resident #70) in a sample size of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to assess, to determine if a Resident was safe to self administer medications, for one Resident (Resident #104) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, Resident interview, the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 Resident (#30) in survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed for one Resident (Resident #28) in a survey sample of 42 residents, to facilitate a preference to interact with community members who live in the facility by sharing a community dining experience due to the dining room was closed for breakfast, lunch and dinner on the weekends
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure correct completion of the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (resident #67) of 42 resident and for 2 of 61 resident rooms to provide a clean, comfortable, home-like environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse, and neglect, to the state agency timely for one resident (Residents #38) of 42 residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS (minimum data set) assessment (SCSA) within 14 days of a significant change for one Resident (Resident #37) in a survey sample of the 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately code an MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two Residents (Resident #109, Resident #30) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one resident (Resident #78) in a sample size of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards for one Resident (Resident #122 ) in a survey of 22 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a discharge summary was written after discharge on [DATE] for one resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility record review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received assistive devices for vision for one Resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to administer physician ordered enteral feeding and water flushes for one resident (#101) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed to administer respiratory treatments as ordered by a physician for one Resident (Resident #13) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure received behavioral health services for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure Residents are free from unnecessary medications for 1 Resident (#71) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident's are free from significant medication error for 3 Residents (Resident #83, #109, and #72) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure meals were tailored to the preferences of 2 residents, (Residents #37, and #54) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #28) in the survey sample of 42 residents, to provide meals at scheduled mealtimes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide special eating utensils for one Resident (Resident #104) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for one Resident (Resident #108) in a survey sample of 42 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a functioning call bell system for 2 Resident's (Resident #30 and Resident #87) in a survey sample of 42 Residents.
13 fire safety citations on file: 5 on September 19, 2024, 1 on August 17, 2021, 7 on September 17, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.25 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.85 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.79 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.9% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 85.7% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 2.85 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.15 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.25 | 0.50 | 3.41 | 2.85 | 7.5% | 0 of 90 | 105 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.49 | 3.47 | 3.06 | 13.0% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.28 | 0.49 | 3.47 | 2.80 | 13.1% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.15 | 0.43 | 3.32 | 2.71 | 18.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.4 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.9 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.5 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Battlefield Park Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
12.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 17 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FLANK LEASING CO LLC. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC Mstr Lsco, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2017 |
| C.r. Stoltz Family Investment Company Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| C.r. Stoltz Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| I. Rosedale Family Investment Company Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| I. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| R.s. Wilheim Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Ronald S Wilheim 2012 Spousal Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Rosedale Family Investment Company, Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Rrw, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| S.l. Rosedale Irrevocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Skilled Hc Holdings, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Wilheim Family Investment Company, Inc. | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Groves, Donna | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Wilheim, Ronald | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Flank Mgt. Co., LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2017 | |
| Groves, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2023 | |
| Mohiuddin, Abdul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Morrison, Candy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/07/2024 | |
| Romeo, Dominic | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 06/06/2025 | |
| Flank Mgt. Co., LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/06/2025 | |
| Mohiuddin, Abdul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Morrison, Candy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/07/2024 | |
| Stoltz, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.