Home / New Jersey / Red Bank
100 Chapin Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701 · Monmouth County · (732) 741-8811
180 certified beds, about 166 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315286 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 31 health citations since October 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.02 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
44.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Infinite Care, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #2588341Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident's environment and living areas in a safe, sanitary, and homelike manner by ensuring that worn hallway carpeting and damaged shower flooring and equipment were identified and repaired in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 nursing units (2nd floor and 4th floor units) and was evidenced by the following:On 7/14/2026 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor toured the second-floor nursing unit A-wing shower room and observed the following:1. A wet shower chair had a large tear on the blue mesh backing where the back of the occupant would lean back while being showered. The tear in the mesh backing was more than three quarters of the length.2. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #2649970Based on observation, interview, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation if was determined that the facility failed to a.) follow surgical consultation post-appointment recommendations to assure the continuity of care, and b.) follow wound care consultant recommendations for 2 of 33 residents reviewed (Resident #7 and Resident#174). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) A review of the admission Record (AR) indicated that Resident #174 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to removal of an external fixation device and acute embolism and thrombosis of deep vein of the right lower extremity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided according to assessments and care plans for five of six residents (Resident (R) 5, R87, R92, R112, and R121) reviewed for activities out of the 32 sample residents This failure had the potential to affect the residents social and mental status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and washed hands after touching face and contaminated items while touching food and plates with the same contaminated gloves in one of one kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infection and food borne illness for 132 of 141 residents consuming food in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed for two of four residents (Resident (R) 92 and R107) reviewed for EBP and failed to ensure medications were handled properly for one of four residents (R101) reviewed for medication administration of 32 sample residents. In addition, isolation supplies were not readily available on one out of four floors of the facility. These failures put all residents at risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 107, R129, and R92) out of 32 sampled residents had an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. This had the potential to cause the residents to have unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a new level one Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when a psychiatric diagnosis was identified for one of three residents (Resident (R) 20) and failed to ensure level II was conducted for one of three residents (R101) reviewed for PASARR out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential for a failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the residents needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for three of 32 sample residents (Resident (R) 13, R56, and R121) reviewed for care plans specific to vision, oxygen use, and boots for skin protection. The failures had the potential to affect resident care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper incontinence care assistance to avoid double briefing for one of two residents (Resident (R) 92) reviewed for incontinence care of 32 sample residents. This failure put R92 at risk of pressure sore formation and skin breakdown.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for two of 32 sample residents (Resident (R) 121 and R89) reviewed for orders regarding boots to prevent skin breakdown for R121 and dressing change for R89. This failure put residents at risk for skin breakdown, infection, and worsening contractures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed dose for one of six residents (Residents (R) 56) reviewed for respiratory care out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential to cause residents' respiratory distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a meal or snack was provided and that there was ongoing pre- and post-dialysis communication for a resident receiving dialysis three times a week for one of one resident (Resident (R) 13) reviewed for dialysis out of 32 sample residents. This had the potential to affect the nutritional status and health of residents receiving dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropics were not prescribed beyond 14 days without documented rational, for one of five residents (Resident (R) 101) reviewed for unnecessary medications of 32 sample residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to excessive medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was less than 5% error rate which included gabapentin, scheduled for every eight hours was administered one hour and 39 minutes after the scheduled time; calcium acetate, which had been discontinued, was administered; and one tablet of estradiol was administered instead of two for one of four residents (Resident (R) 101) observed during medication administration of 32 sample residents. Medication errors have the potential to result in adverse health outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that three of six medication carts, located on all three floors of the facility, were secure when staff were not present. This had the potential to affect the health of all residents with medications on those carts and the safety of any resident who might open the cart and remove medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure complete records for two of four residents (Resident (R) 127 and R129) related to the death in facility for R127 and related to being discharged to the community for R129; reviewed for medical records of 32 sample residents. Failure to completely document the circumstances around resident discharge had the potential to result in staff not knowing why the resident was no longer in the facility; not knowing if the physician and family were notified; and potential legal ramifications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and submit discharge Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS), an assessment tool, as required for 17 of 17 residents (Resident #9, #17, #35, #47, #57, #82, #85, #93, #94, #96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #101, #102, and #110) system selected for MDS over 120 days and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 10:32 AM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator who stated she had been working alone on MDS for about five months, and the facility had been looking for additional help without success. At this time, the surveyor provided the MDS Coordinator with a list of thirty-seven system selected residents identified as having an MDS record that was over 120 days overdue. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct yearly performance reviews of Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) in order to provide specific education based on the outcomes of the reviews. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 4 CNAs whose personnel records were reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #1 was hired on 9/11/08. Review of CNA #1's personnel file reflected there was no current performance evaluations completed for CNA #1. 2. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #2 was hired on 11/5/14. Review of CNA #2's personnel file reflected there was no current performance evaluations completed for CNA #2. 3. According to the data provided by the facility, CNA #3 was hired on 11/8/93. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to employee staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service in the role of the Food Service Director (FSD) in the absence of a full-time Registered Dietitian. This deficient practice would affect all residents and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor entered the kitchen and asked to tour with the FSD. The Dietary Aide (DA) stated he was temporarily filling in for the FSD who has been out on leave since May. The DA stated he had no certifications in dietary management, food service management and safety or have a degree in food service management. The DA stated he was employed at the facility for many years and was just helping while the FSD was out. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure the dish machine in use maintained the appropriate temperature according to the manufacturer's specifications; b.) maintain multiuse food-contact surface cutting board in a manner to prevent microbial growth; c.) store, label, and date potentially hazardous foods to prevent food-borne illness; d.) discard potentially hazardous foods past their date of expiration; and e.) maintain storage areas in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor entered the kitchen and asked to tour with the Food Service Director (FSD). The Dietary Aide (DA) stated he was temporarily filling in for the FSD who has been out on leave since May. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the systemic implementation of their antibiotic stewardship program. This deficient practice was identified while reviewing Resident #29 for use of antibiotics for a urinary tract infection and has the potential to affect all residents. The evidence was as follows: On 1/3/23 at 12:02 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #29 lying in bed. The resident had a urinary catheter in a privacy bag that was positioned below the bladder. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #29. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by ensuring all new employees were screened for potential abuse by conducting reference checks from previous and current employers. This deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 staff (Staff #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for newly hired employees and was evidenced by the following: On 1/9/23 at 2:50 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) to provide the survey team with the personnel and health files for five selected newly hired employees (Staff #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) in the past four months. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for newly admitted residents with significant weight loss. This deficient practiced was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #19 and #59) reviewed for unplanned weight loss and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 lying in bed asleep with an enteral formula (formula administered via tube feeding (a tube inserted into the stomach wall to provide nutrition)) hanging on a tube feeding pole not being administered. The resident appeared to be very thin. On 1/3/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN) who stated the Second-Floor nursing unit did not have a weight book for the residents' weights; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined the facility failed to a.) ensure an accurate ordering and receiving of narcotic medications on the required Federal narcotic acquisition forms (DEA 222 forms) were completed with sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation for 1 of 1 forms provided; b.) ensure the DEA 222 forms were dated and signed as of the day it was submitted for filling for 4 of 7 forms provided; and c.) to accurately document the administration of controlled medication for 2 sampled residents (Resident #52 and Resident #61) identified upon inspection of 1 of 3 medication carts. The evidence was as follows: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose and maintain waste in garbage dumpster areas. This deficient practice was identified for 5 of 6 garbage dumpsters in 1 of 2 garbage disposal areas and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 8:15 AM, the surveyor observed the garbage dumpster area which contained five garbage dumpsters. Out of the five garbage dumpsters, one of the garbage dumpster's lids was opened exposing its contents. The surveyor observed high levels of debris surrounding all five garbage dumpsters on all four sides. The debris included but was not limited to disposable gloves, boxes, paper, bottles, and other debris. On 1/5/23 at 8:11 AM, the surveyor observed the garbage dumpster area which contained five garbage dumpsters. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least every thirty days. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for physician visits and evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 10:57 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #19 lying in bed asleep. The resident appeared to be thin. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #19. A review of the Resident Face Sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2016 with diagnoses which included iron deficiency anemia, type II diabetes mellitus, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar II disorder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order for no cheese by ensuring a resident did not receive cheese tortellini which was listed on their meal ticket preference as no cheese. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for food choices, and was evidenced by the following: On 1/3/23 at 11:22 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #23 awake lying in bed. The resident informed the surveyor he/she was unhappy with the kitchen because they sent inappropriate foods to them. The resident continued they had a recent diagnosis of lactose intolerance and was supposed to receive lactaid milk and no cheese. The resident stated the facility sent them dishes with cheese last week which included chicken cordon blue and pizza. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain infection control standards of practice and procedures to prevent the risk of infection and promote healing. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #33) observed during wound treatments and was evidenced by the following: On 1/4/23 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #33 in bed with his/her eyes open. The resident did not respond to the surveyor. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #33. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and medical record review, and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) transcribe orders to the electronic physician's orders and medication administration record (eMAR), for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for tube feeding, (Resident #32) and b.) obtain a physician's order to apply, monitor and care for a resident wearing a multipodus boot (a device worn to protect and correct from contractures), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning (Resident #124). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician face to face visits were conducted and progress notes were documented at least every 60 days. This deficient practice was identified for Resident # 90, 1 of 26 residents reviewed for the timeliness of physician progress notes and was evidenced by the following: On 10/22/20 at 10:40 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #90 lying in bed awake with a urinary catheter bag that was enclosed within a privacy bag on the floor to the right of the resident's bed. The surveyor reviewed the Resident Face Sheet contained within the medical record of Resident #90, which revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in 2016 with diagnoses that included: Retention of urine, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and cerebral infarction (stroke). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was identified that the facility failed to: a.) appropriately dispose of sharps equipment in accordance with infection control guidelines b.) sanitize a multi-use equipment blood pressure cuff between resident's during the medication pass observation in accordance with infection control guidelines, and c.) properly clean and replace a soiled privacy curtain for a resident. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units, (Second Floor which included six out of thirty rooms), for 1 of 1 unsampled resident during the medication pass observation, and in 1 of 26 resident's rooms, (Resident # 24). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. [...]
12 fire safety citations on file: 6 on February 27, 2025, 4 on January 11, 2023, 2 on October 28, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.02 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.78 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.3% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.8% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.10 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.11 on weekdays and 2.78 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.38 in April to June 2025 to 3.02 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.02 | 0.33 | 3.11 | 2.78 | 11.1% | 0 of 90 | 166 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.25 | 0.40 | 3.36 | 2.98 | 14.2% | 0 of 92 | 158 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.38 | 0.49 | 3.50 | 3.05 | 29.8% | 0 of 92 | 143 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.38 | 0.51 | 3.51 | 3.05 | 36.2% | 0 of 91 | 141 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.7 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.5 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
65.3% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: RB SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Infinite Care, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rb SNF Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/17/2023 |
| Ch Rb Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 23% | 07/17/2023 |
| Cw Rb Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 23% | 07/17/2023 |
| Seam Ny 2020 Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 48% | 07/17/2023 |
| Czh Investments LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Koi Equities LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Sk Rb Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Herzka, Chaim | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Capital Finance LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 10/01/2024 | |
| Berkowitz, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Herzka, Chaim | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/10/2016 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/26/2022 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Wolofsky, Chava | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/16/2022 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Infinite Care Consulting Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| National Datacare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Opco Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Ahmad, Nasir | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Jariwala, Punit | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Muilligan, Lori | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/17/2024 | |
| Nussbaum, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Pick, Shlomo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Wahl, Ezriel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Berkowitz, Michael | General partnership interest | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Klein, Solomon | General partnership interest | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Nussbaum, Moshe | General partnership interest | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Ch Rb Holdings LLC | Limited partnership interest | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Rb SNF Consulting Holdings LLC | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Realty Holdings LLC | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 08/12/2022 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| American Plan Administrators LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Infinite Care Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Martin Friedman Cpa PC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Myitcrew Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| National Datacare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Consulting Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/22/2025 | |
| Rb SNF Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Opco Manager LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Rb SNF Realty Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/12/2022 | |
| Rb SNF Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/12/2022 | |
| Rytes Company LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Streamline Verify LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Zunta LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/17/2023 | |
| Ahmad, Nasir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2022 | |
| Jariwala, Punit | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Klein, Solomon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Muilligan, Lori | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/17/2024 | |
| Nussbaum, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Pick, Shlomo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Wahl, Ezriel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/17/2023 | |
| Wolofsky, Chava | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.