2629 Del Prado Blvd, Cape Coral, FL 33904 · Lee County · (239) 574-4434
118 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105342 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 27 health citations since July 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $32,188 in the last three years; the largest was $23,062, and the latest is dated February 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.79 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs by failure to ensure the call light was within reach to request assistance as needed for 9 (Residents #900, #1000, #1001, #20, #12, #89, #10, #1002, and #1004 ) of 18 sampled residents
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from neglect by failing to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #999, #89, and #27) of 5 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services as directed by the plan of care for 1(Resident #999) of 3 residents for rehabilitative services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment as evidenced by dry wall damage in resident's rooms. Failure to identify and complete needed repairs could cause safety and sanitary hazards to residents on Unit 1, which had damage in 8 of 31 rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of job description, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 5 (Resident #24, #69, #72, #83 and #271) of 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation nursing staff addressed a reported change of condition for 2 (Residents #46 and #66) of 3 residents reviewed for changes that may indicate a change in health status and need to revise the plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent. 29 opportunities, 5 residents and four different nurses were observed. Four medication errors were identified resulting in a medication error rate of 13.79%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to provide appropriate infection control practices during wound care for 2 (Residents #53 and #107) of 3 residents reviewed for Infection control/Enhanced Barrier Precautions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate smoking needs and preferences for 1 (Resident #470) of 2 reviewed for smoking, who required a specialized chair for transport to the smoking area, which was not available, that prevented the resident from smoking. This failure caused unnecessary anxiety to the resident, who was a long-term smoker, who required assistance from the facility staff and specialized equipment to get to the designated smoking area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan that described the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs and preferences and how the facility will assist in meeting these needs and preferences for 1 (Resident #83) of 28 care plans reviewed. The failure to complete an accurate and individualized care plan has the potential to impact the resident's quality of life and quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to identify and provide the appropriate services and interventions for the management of contractures and limitations in range of motion (ROM) for 1(resident #83) of 3 residents reviewed for limitations in ROM. The failure to provide the necessary services and interventions has the potential to cause pain and worsening of the contracture and loss of ROM.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infection for 1 (Resident #107) of 2 residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders for an abdominal binder over a feeding tube for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident reviewed, to prevent pulling and accidental removal of the tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure short peripheral catheter (a thin, flexible tube is inserted into a vein, usually in the back of the hand, the lower part of the arm) cover dressing was changed every 7 days to prevent local and systemic infection related to the intravenous (IV) catheter for 2 residents (271 and 23) of 3 reviewed for IV catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable and sanitary environment for residents and failed to make necessary repairs inside of the facility for 2 (North and South) of 2 units observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain hygiene for 3 (Resident #24, #750 and #999) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily care (ADLs).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and a sanitary environment free from pests for residents residing in the skilled nursing facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility records, review of facility policies and procedure and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure appropriate corrective action to resolve the expressed concerns with broken furniture and call light for 1(Resident #24) of 3 residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove outdated medications from the refrigerator and failed to ensure proper storage of medications to prevent unauthorized access for 1 (Unit 2) of 2 units observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a call light to accommodate the needs, of 1 (Resident #108) of 5 residents reviewed for call light needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed maintain an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) in a safe and sanitary manner for 1(Resident #69) of 1 resident sampled with an indwelling catheter. This had the potential to cause urinary tract infection and complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1(Resident #69) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents was assessed for alternative interventions prior to the use of bed rails. The facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation. In addition, the facility failed to have ongoing routine maintenance of the bed rails to ensure they remained safe for resident's use.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review report, and staff interview, the facility failed to have documentation of monthly medication review for 2 (Resident #93, and #27) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medication review.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the required current daily staffing data in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the facility's policies and procedures, staff, resident, and family member interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to have documentation of a discharge summary including recapitulation and post discharge plan of care to ensure a safe transition home for 3 (Resident #413, #164, and #165) of 3 sampled discharged residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a meaningful, resident centered activity program for 3 (Resident #88, #92 and #5) of 3 residents with cognitive impairment. The lack of individualized activity program has the potential to not maintain a physical and psychological quality of life.
14 fire safety citations on file: 7 on February 12, 2025, 7 on February 22, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 12, 2025 | Fine | $4,147 |
| February 12, 2025 | Fine | $4,979 |
| February 12, 2025 | Fine | $23,062 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.25 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.06 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.45 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 59.4% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.72 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.33 on weekdays and 3.06 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.25 | 0.79 | 3.33 | 3.06 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.23 | 0.88 | 3.32 | 2.99 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 107 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.29 | 0.90 | 3.36 | 3.11 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 97 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.86 | 3.41 | 3.08 | 0.4% | 0 of 91 | 107 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rehab & Healthcare Center of Cape Coral's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 260 eligible stays.
13.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 292 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 155 eligible stays.
61.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 105 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 170 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 170 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FI-CAPE CORAL, LLC. CMS links this home to Florida Institute for Long-Term Care, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/23/2002 |
| Jaffe, Howard | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2003 | |
| Katz-Hall, Kathy | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2003 | |
| Mullarkey, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2003 | |
| Richmond, Penny | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2003 | |
| Aegir Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2009 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/28/2011 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/13/2010 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/06/2012 | |
| Jones, Martina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/02/2021 | |
| Watson, Sasha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/22/2022 | |
| Aegir Health Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2003 | |
| Consulting Support Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/28/2011 | |
| Facility Support Company, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/13/2010 | |
| Florida Institute for Long Term Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2025 | |
| Kane Financial Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/06/2012 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2003 | |
| Select Rehabilitation, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/19/2016 | |
| Jones, Martina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/02/2012 | |
| Watson, Sasha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.