30 Montvue Drive, Luray, VA 22835 · Page County · (540) 743-4571
120 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495255 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 2, 2023, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since November 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.78 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
35.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Hill Valley Healthcare, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for eight of 34 residents in the survey sample; Residents #94, #11, #29, #97, #106, #23, #35, and #46.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide dialysis care and services for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #29.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to protect the dignity of 1 of 34 residents in the survey sample; Resident #65.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence periodic review of Advance Directives for three of 34 residents in the survey sample; Residents #78, #33 and #41.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a possible need to alter treatment for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed for one of 34 residents in the survey sample; Resident #24.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 34 residents in the survey sample; Resident #94.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement interventions for the prevention of a decrease in range of motion for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory services per the physician orders for two of 34 residents in the survey sample, Residents #46 and #97.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for one out of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 106.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide pharmacy services for one of 34 residents in the survey sample, Resident #35.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% for one of 34 residents in the survey sample; Resident #94. The facility had two medication errors out of 35 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.71%.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide complete and accurate documentation for two of 34 residents in the survey sample, Residents #11 and #106.
Inspectors wrote4. The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for bathing for Resident #52. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/30/2021, the resident scored an 8 of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, the resident was coded as not having had a shower or bath during the lookback period. The comprehensive care plan dated 11/29/2021 documented, in part, Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Dementia, Limited Mobility .BATHING/SHOWERING - Provide sponge bath when a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program by documenting the location of the resident's pain and implementing non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of prn (as needed) pain medications for two of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 25 and # 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during lunch service on 2/7/2022, with the potential to affect 53 of 54 residents on the North unit receiving a meal tray.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to act upon a reported grievance for missing personal items for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident #21. The facility staff failed to promptly respond to a known grievance for missing clothing items for Resident #21.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement facility initiated transfer requirements for 3 of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #96, #81 and #54. The facility staff failed to evidence a physician note regarding facility initiated hospital transfers for Residents #96 and #81 and failed to evidence required information provided to hospital staff for facility initiated transfers for Residents #81 and #54.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an accurate assessment for one of 51 residents, Resident #32. The facility staff failed to complete an accurate MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment, for Resident #32.
Inspectors wroteBased on family interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52. Resident #52, a dependent resident, was not provided baths.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the physician ordered interventions for the prevention of pressure injuries for one of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 11. The facility staff failed to place a donut pillow on the resident's left ankle.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent an accident for two of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 10 and #32.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory services as ordered, and in a sanitary manner, for three of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #74, #28, and #41.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to complete an assessment for the use of side rails and/or failed to have consent, after discussion of the risks and benefits for the use of the bed rails, for three of 51 residents in the survey sample, Residents #11, #40 and #28.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence documentation for one of four CNA (certified nursing assistant) employee records reviewed, CNA #3. For CNA #3, the facility staff failed to evidence documentation of an annual performance review.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 51 residents in the survey sample, Resident #83. The facility staff failed to ensure that the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) level 2 screening was available on the clinical record.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to administer the pneumococcal immunization for one of five resident immunization record reviews, Resident 91. Resident #91's RR (resident representative) provided consent for the pneumococcal immunization on 12/29/21. The facility staff failed to evidence the immunization was administered to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to track all employees' COVID-19 vaccination status, and failed to implement the facility policy for employee vaccination tracking for 6 of 100 employees sampled, OSM (other staff member) #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15. The facility staff failed to implement their policy for COVID-19 employee vaccination status tracking, and failed to track COVID-19 vaccination status for OSM #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, and #15, all employees of [name of Hospice Company].
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have an annual inspection of three resident beds of 52 beds in the survey sample, Resident #11, #40, and #28.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and employee record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of four CNA (certified nursing assistants) had required training, CNA #2. The facility failed to provide CNA #2 training in dementia care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to make available the results of the most recent survey. The facility staff failed to include the results of the abbreviated survey ending 12/29/2021 in the survey results notebook in the lobby.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to post the daily nursing staff posting on 2/6/2022.
Inspectors wrote4. Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: Alzheimer's (1), schizophrenia (2) and depressive disorder (3). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/23/19, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was coded as independent for bed mobility, transfer, walking in room and corridor, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. The annual MDS (minimum data set) assessment with ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/23/19 coded the resident's current tobacco use, as yes. The care plan dated 2/6/19, documented in part, Focus: Smoking: Non-compliant with smoking policy. The Goal: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure RN (Registered Nurse) coverage for at least 8 hours a day, every day. A review of the staffing schedules and postings revealed several dates where there was no RN on duty.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and employee record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to meet the training requirements for eight of 15 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) employee records reviewed, (CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #6, CNA #7, CNA #8, CNA #9, CNA #2 and CNA #100.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, facility staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assist residents to exercise their right to vote. The facility staff failed to offer residents who could vote the opportunity to do so for the November 2019 election.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and facility staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a comfortable home-like environment in two of two common areas on the north wing, and in the main dining room. On 11/13/19, observations revealed temperatures in the north wing common areas were 61 degrees, and the temperature in the main dining room was 64 degrees.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence documentation that the care plan goals were sent to the hospital upon transfer for 5 of 60 Residents in the survey sample, Residents #56, #19, #81, #82, and #105
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure professional standards of quality for as needed pain medications for two of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #81 and #87. The facility staff failed to clarify two PRN (as needed) pain medication orders for Resident #81 to determine when each medication should be administered based on pain level parameters. The facility staff failed to clarify two PRN (as needed) pain medication orders for Resident #87 to determine when to administer each medication based on pain level parameters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to assess a resident to administer their medications independently for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #87. Resident # 87 was observed administering her nebulizer treatments without supervision from a nurse on two occasions; review of the clinical record failed to evidence a self-administration of medication assessment for the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, facility staff failed to ensure two of 60 residents in the survey sample, Residents #72, and #82, were free from abuse. On 9/24/19, Resident #304 hit Resident #72 on the face with his open hand, causing a red area on Resident #72's face and pushed Resident #72, hitting his knee on the doorframe causing an abrasion. On 7/12/19, Resident #53 hit Resident #82 with her cane causing a bruises to her fifth digit of the right hand. The Findings Included: 1. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes, delusional disorders, and intellectual disability. Resident #72's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/15/2019. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital and evidence a notice was given to the resident and/or responsible party with the reason for the transfer for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment for smoking status for 2 of 60 residents in the survey sample; Residents #32 and #45. The facility staff coded the Resident #32 as not being a current tobacco user on the most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] and the resident was observed smoking. The facility staff coded the Resident #45 as not being a current tobacco user on the most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], when the resident stated during interview that (Resident #45) does go outside to smoke about twice a day with another resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one Resident, Resident #25, in a sample of 60 Residents. The facility staff failed to implement the interventions for Resident #25's urinary catheter care plan. The Findings Included: Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression, and urinary retention. Resident #25's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a Significant Change Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/2019. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored Resident #25 at a 15, indicating no impairment. Resident #25 was coded as requiring extensive assistance of two or more people for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and/or revise the comprehensive care plan to address a fall for one of 60 residents in the survey sample; Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practices for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 86. The facility staff failed to ensure a full E-cylinder of oxygen for Resident #60 was properly stored and secured.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record for one of 59 residents, Resident #48. The physician's progress notes failed to document discussion regarding alternative to smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a continuous, accurate posting of the facility staffing. Observation of the staff posting upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] 11:40 AM, revealed the staff posting for Friday, 11/8/19. There was no evidence of a current posting was observed.
21 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 2, 2023, 8 on February 8, 2022, 10 on November 18, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.78 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.42 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.43 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.6% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.92 on weekdays and 2.42 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 15.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.52 in April to June 2025 to 2.78 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.78 | 0.35 | 2.92 | 2.42 | 15.9% | 0 of 90 | 111 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.73 | 0.28 | 2.85 | 2.45 | 14.1% | 0 of 92 | 111 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.59 | 0.30 | 2.74 | 2.22 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.52 | 0.31 | 2.66 | 2.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 115 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.9 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.3 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.0 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Skyview Springs Rehab and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (39.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
39.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 101 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
33.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
3.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SKYVIEW SPRINGS SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Hill Valley Healthcare, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skyview Springs Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/31/2021 |
| Copper VA Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| Gold VA Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| Hvh Luray Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| Luray Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| Silver VA Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| VA Noble Parentco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/31/2021 | |
| Miller, Eva | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Idels, Shimon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.