Home / Pennsylvania / Levittown
2629 Trenton Road, Levittown, PA 19056 · Bucks County · (215) 943-7777
101 certified beds, about 99 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1977
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395259 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
32.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure required posting for the Department of Health were displayed at the facility. Findings Include: Observation on September 2, 2025 at 10:05 a.m. revealed the main lobby, A wing, B wing, and C wing did not have any postings or signage for the Department of Health. This was confirmed by the front desk receptionist Employee E7 at 10:09 a.m. An interview was held with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1 at 10:10 a.m. The interview revealed that there was one spot outside of the lobby area where the name and phone number are posted and stated, it must have been taken down by one of the residents. Employee E1 confirmed that this is the only place where the Department of Health reporting phone number is posted in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and home-like environment for one of three nursing units observed. (C wing)Findings Include: On September 2, 2025, at 12:02 p.m., observation conducted on C wing of the bathroom of Resident R80's room, revealed that the covering of the heater/cooler- outlet- was not properly fixated to the heater/cooler- outlet and the rusted metal pieces were exposed around the base of the wall. The same observation was noted on September 3, 2025, at 10:01 a.m., on September 4, 2025, at 10:31 a.m., and on September 5, 2025, at 9:31 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received quality care related to incontinence care for and medication administration for three of twenty-one residents reviewed (R5, R57, R114)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately display facility daily nurse staff hours as required. Findings Include:On September 5, 2025 at 10:34 a.m. observations at the front lobby area revealed staffing was posted is a spot behind the front desk receptionist on the wall in a clear sleeve. Observation of the posting revealed the posting would be difficult to access for people with mobility issues due to the height of the posting and the position behind the receptionist desk. Employee E7 the front desk receptionist, was asked if this was the only placed that the staffing was posted and Employee E7 replied, I believe so. The form in the clear sleeve on the wall was from September 4, 2025 and the form was left blank without any of the staffing information filled in. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure a care plan was developed for one of twenty-two residents reviewed. (Resident R57)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Planning Policy with a revision date of March 20, 2025 states, Policy- An interdisciplinary plan of care will be established and updated as indicated for every resident in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements. Further review of the policy revealed, Procedure- the facility will develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable goals and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a rational was provided for the discontinuation of blood sugar monitoring for 6 of 6 residents reviewed who were insulin dependent (Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and family interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to participate in the development and implementation of a person-centered plan of care for 2 out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R61 and R71).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of care and services, reviews of clinical records and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care preferences and reasonable accommodations for the adaptive equipment used to enhance mobility and bathing for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident R10)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and the review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a person-center plan of care was developed for a resident with a history of deep vein thrombosis (blood clots) and anticoagulant medications for 1 out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R61).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R61).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician regarding a change in Resident R61's meal and fluid consumption for 1 out of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R61).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, observations, interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the availability of necessary emergency tool kit for one resident, out of the six residents receiving hemodialysis (R36).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly administer medications in accordance with physician orders, for one of seven residents' medication administration observed, resulting in a significant medication error (Resident R21).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers and discharges as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records, facility investigation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to treat residents with respect and dignity for three of 20 residents reviewed. (Resident R242, R37, R39) Findings Include: Review of facility investigation dated October 16, 2023, revealed that Resident R242 reported that his nurse aide said she wished the facility would stop taking heavy ass people to save her back while turning him for care on October 15, 2023. Review of statement from Employee E13, nurse aide, who provided care to Resident R242, confirmed that she stated to her co-worker that she wishes that the facility would stop taking heavy ass people to save her back while repositioning Resident R242 to provide care. Interview with the facility administrator and director of nursing on January 29, 2024, at approximately 2:00 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to answer call bells in a timely manner for four of 20 residents (Residents R34, R57, R82, R25), failed to accommodate the residents' needs related to having access wheelchair accessible bathroom including sink and toilet for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident R72) and the use of bed rails for 2 out of 20 residents observed.(Resident R25 and Resident R18)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to support and accommodate a resident's choices and preferences for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R72).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information and phone communication on two of six nursing units (A unit).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident remained free from abuse of 20 residents reviewed. (Resident R3)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected resident status related to discharge for one of four closed records reviewed (Resident R302).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act, facility policies, interviews and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments and medication were performed in accordance with professional practices for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 295).
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's orders was followed related a psychotropic medication one of four closed records reviewed. (Resident R302)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, observations, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to administer a resident's tube flushes per physician orders for one of one resident reviewed receiving enteral nutrition. (Resident R79).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide mental health services to a resident with a mental disorder for one of 20 residents reviewed (Resident R302). Review of the closed record revealed that Resident 302 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on December 20, 2023, with a bipolar disorder current episode manic severe with psychotic features (is a mental health condition characterized by episodes of mania (or hypomania) and depression. When someone experiences a manic episode with psychotic features, it means they are in a state of elevated mood, energy, and sometimes psychosis). Hospital record indicated Resident R302 had a prescription of Quetiapine 25 mg tablet commonly known as Seroquel take 1.5 tablets (37.5 mg total by nouth 3 times a day. Last time given December 18, 2023, to treat agitation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the the faciltiy failed to provide a diet in accordance with resident's preference for one of 20 residents reviewed. (Resident R43)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents and review of clinical record and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident and resident's representative had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement for 4 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents R72, R86, R29, R59).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review facility policy and review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain an effective infection prevention program related to hand hygiene during wound care observation and medication administration for five of eight residents observed. (Residents R295, R4, R84, R48, R65 and R8)
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility records, observations and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment on one three of three nursing units observed. (C unit) Finding Include: On January 29, 2024, at approximately 10:07 a.m. a significant urinal odor was detected on the C unit near room C43. On February 1, 2024, at 9:23 a.m. an observation was taken place with Housekeeping Director, Employee E15 who reported room B27 has a significant unsanitary odor. The root cause Employee E15 reported that Resident R39 and Resident R37 refuse care. Both residents agreed to take showers as it was their shower days and investigate where the significant odor was coming and prevent future reoccurrences. On February 1, 2024, at 10:03 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor meal and nutritional supplement consumption for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident CL1)
14 fire safety citations on file: 6 on November 12, 2024, 8 on February 2, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.49 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.97 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.59 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.38 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.49 | 0.52 | 3.59 | 3.25 | 1.4% | 0 of 90 | 99 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.45 | 0.56 | 3.57 | 3.14 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 97 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.58 | 0.69 | 3.74 | 3.16 | 1.6% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.38 | 0.60 | 3.57 | 2.90 | 1.9% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.4 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.8 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Statesman Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (58.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.
5.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 62 eligible stays.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STATESMAN HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shg Recs, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/02/2022 |
| Saber Pa Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Wwbv Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 09/30/2019 | |
| Bhatia, Sanjay | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 11/30/2010 | |
| Woodward, Cindy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Meenan, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.