Route 100, Somers, NY 10589 · Westchester County · (914) 232-5101
300 certified beds, about 280 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335261 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 7, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 44 health citations since February 2019, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $46,079 in the last three years; the largest was $46,079, and the latest is dated August 7, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
46.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Carerite Centers, an affiliated group of 34 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 44 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical abuse. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #1) of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 04/25/2026, between 8:24PM and 8:28PM (actual time) Certified Nurse Aide #1 is observed on facility video surveillance using an overbed table to restrict Resident #1 from getting out of their wheelchair to ambulate. Further review of the footage showed Certified Nurse Aide #1 hitting and pinching the resident on their left arm, then spitting at the resident as the resident attempted to move the table. This resulted in physical abuse to Resident #1 and Immediate Jeopardy to all 48 residents on the behavioral unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that two (2) of six (6) residents (Residents #7 and #1) received adequate supervision and interventions to prevent accidents. Specifically, 1) On 02/22/2026 Resident #7 had an unwitnessed fall sustaining a facial laceration requiring hospitalization and four staples to the resident's left temporal lobe and on 05/07/2026 had a fall and sustained bruising to the left side of their face and laceration to their left eye. Interventions to prevent falls were not developed and implemented following falls on 05/02/2026, 05/04/2026 and 05/05/2026. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure procedures were developed and maintained to include screening and abuse prevention training of prospective staff. This was evident for five of five facility/agency staff (Certified Nurse Aides #1, #2, and #5, Licensed Practical Nurses #1 and #2) employee files reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Certified Nurse Aides #1, #2, #5, and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and #2 were screened or received training to competently address residents with behaviors and to prevent abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility assessment failed to adequately identify and indicate resource necessary to care for its residents. This was evident for seven (7) of 7 units during review of Administration. Specifically, the facility assessment did not include the resident population's behavioral health needs, necessary staff competencies and skill sets needed, the facility's structural needs, the use of third-party staffing agency, staffing needs for each individual unit, did not reflect changes to the nursing home leadership staff and resident assessments did not accurately reflect behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure an effective training program was developed, implemented, and maintained for all new and existing staff consistent with their expected roles and based on a facility assessment. This was evident for five (5) (Certified Nurse Aide #1, #5, and #7, Licensed Practical Nurse #2, Registered Nurse #2) of five (5) staff sampled for education and training review. Specifically, 1) The Facility Assessment did not include a plan to ensure mandatory and ongoing in-service and competencies were provided to agency staff, including Certified Nurse Aides #1, #5, and #7, and 2) there was no documented evidence of effective training developed for facility staff Registered Nurse #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #2 to ensure competence in abuse prevention, behavior management, and dementia management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, including injuries of unknown origin, were reported immediately to the State Survey Agency and that reports submitted were accurate with all significant details. This was evident for four (4) Residents #3, # 4,#6, and #7) of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse reporting. Specifically, 1) the facility received an alleged incident of abuse that occurred on 04/10/2026 involving Resident #3, from a visitor. The facility submitted a report which documented a police report having been filed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were thoroughly investigated for three (3) (Residents #1, # 4, and #6) of seven (7) sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the facility's investigation into staff-to-resident abuse involving Resident #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #1 did not identify failures leading up to the abuse 2) Resident #4 sustained a left distal impact fracture on 02/2026. There was no documented evidence that the facility investigated Resident #4's fracture of unknown origin. 3) Resident #4 and Resident #6, both cognitively impaired and unable to consent, were found in bed together on 02/11/2026 and the facility did not conduct an investigation or report the incident to the New York State Department of Health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and maintain the well-being of each resident. This was evident for one (1) (Westminster Unit) of seven (7) units. Specifically, 1) the Facility Assessment did not adequately reflect characteristics of the Westminster Unit adequately to determine the level of staff needed to care for the acuity and needs of its residents 2) lack of competent and skilled nursing staff and 3) a pattern of falls for Resident #1 and Resident #7 resulting in harm. The unit was staffed with two (2) certified nurse aides to care for up to 50 residents on the night shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for four) (Resident's #1, #2, #4, and #6) of six residents reviewed for behavioral health. Specifically, 1) there was no documented evidence agency staff were oriented to behavior management or that a care plan was developed and implemented to address Resident #1's behaviors prior to an incident of agency staff to resident abuse on 04/25/2026; 2) Resident #2's care plan was not developed or individualized and agency staff were not trained to address the resident's agitation and verbal abuse; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility did not ensure the medical director was responsible for coordinating the medical care of one (1) (Westminster Unit) of seven (7) units. Specifically, the Medical Director was not involved in the facility assessment, quality assurance committee meetings, and did not oversee the development of facility policies and procedures to prevent abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience. This was evident for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, video surveillance dated 04/25/2026 showed Certified Nurse Aide #1 use an overbed table to prevent Resident #1 from getting up out of their wheelchair without documented evidence of restraint assessment or physician orders for such use.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure residents diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services for 1 (Residents #1) of 6 residents reviewed for dementia. Specifically, Resident #1's dementia care plan was not developed and implemented until 04/25/2026, after a staff-to-resident abuse involving Resident #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2619941), the facility did not ensure that the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 who had moderate cognitive impairment and a history of constipation was triggered on the facility bowel list report in June, July, and August 2025 for no bowel movement. The facility bowel protocol was not initiated for the resident. Prior to discharge on [DATE] the resident received a dose of Milk of Magnesia on 08/08/2025 with no documented evidence of the effectiveness of the Milk of Magnesia. Subsequently Resident # 1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] after discharge and was found to have large amounts of stool seen in the rectum with rectal mural thickening on Computed Tomography of the abdomen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2619941), the facility did not ensure a resident right to voice a grievance, and to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances. Specifically, Resident #1's representative informed the Patient Relations Concierge #1 that Resident #1 had several items that went missing from their room. Resident # 1's representative stated that they did not receive any follow-up from the facility regarding the missing items and no grievance was completed by the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2619941), the facility did not ensure all relevant resident information necessary to meet the resident's needs was conveyed to avoid risk of complications at time of discharge to the home for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge planning. Specifically, Resident #1 was scheduled to be discharged from the facility on 08/09/2025 with home care services. Resident #1's home care services were delayed due to the late submission of necessary information to the home care agency. Resident #1's home care services was not initiated until 08/14/2025.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2619941) the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for constipation. Specifically, Resident # 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of constipation with no care plan in place to address the constipation until 6/15/2025. On 8/9/2025, Resident # 1, was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis of severe sepsis. Review of the Facility Care Plan Policy last revised March 2022 documented that Resident Care Plans are developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by S483.21. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (2615374), the facility did not ensure that services being provided meet professional standards of quality in clinical practice for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for quality of care/treatment. Specifically, Resident #8 who had a history of stroke was noted to have a sudden onset of slurred speech by Licensed Practical Nurse #6 on 12/07/2024. Nurse Practitioner #3 was informed by Registered Nurse #1 of Resident #8's slurred speech and instructed the staff to place the resident back to bed for rest. Resident #8's slurred speech continued and was reported to Nurse Practitioner #3 and they ordered to treat the resident with intravenous fluids and obtain a speech evaluation done. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2619941), the facility did not ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including treatments at each visit for 2 out of 3 residents (Resident #1 and #10) reviewed for follow up consultation visits. Specifically, (1) Resident #1 who was admitted to the facility status post a right hip fracture had a follow up Orthopedic consultation visit on 06/12/2025. The consultation report documented Resident #1 was to be scheduled for a follow up visit in six weeks. Resident #1 was discharged home on [DATE] without getting the Orthopedic consultation. There was no documented evidence of a Physicians order for the six week follow up visit that needed to be scheduled by the facility for Resident #. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00372705/568716), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication errors for one (1) out of four (4) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, on 02/20/2025, Resident #4 was administered crushed extended-release Morphine by Licensed Practical Nurse #4 at 9:00 AM. At 10:15 AM, Resident #4 was found in their room in bed lethargic by Speech Language Pathologist #1. Resident #4 was assessed and noted to be lethargic with decreased respirations, wheezing, and pinpoint pupils. Resident #4 was administered Naloxone to reverse the effects of the crushed extended-release Morphine and returned to baseline shortly after. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #4 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00385588/568719, NY00373004/568714) the facility did not ensure that the comprehensive care plan was updated and revised for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #3)) reviewed for falls. Specifically, (1) Resident #1 had a fall from the Hoyer lift while being transferred by Certified Nurse Aide #1 and Certified Nurse Aide #2 on 07/02/2025. Review of Resident #1's fall risk care plan revealed it was not updated to reflect the actual fall. (2) On 03/10/2024, Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall in their room and sustained laceration to their left eyebrow. Review of Resident #3's care plans revealed their risk for fall care plan was not updated with the actual fall that occurred on 03/10/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00385588), the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for falls and supervision. Specifically, on 07/02/2025 Resident #1 who was dependent for transfers fell out of the mechanical lift while being transferred by Certified Nurse Aide #2. Resident #1 fell striking their head on the leg of the mechanical lift. Certified Nurse Aide #1 was in the room with their back turned getting the Resident #1's chair closer to the bed for transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00338981) from 10/31/24 to 11/07/24, the facility did not ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accidents hazards as possible for 2 (Residents #631 and #226) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, 1) Resident #631 had a physician order for a pureed diet with nectar thick liquids, and was able to consume thin liquids and a cookie while in a supervised area, and required oral suctioning to clear their throat. 2) Resident #226 had an electric air mattress overlay, on top of their mattress, that was not inspected by the maintenance department for safety until after the start of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/31/24 to 11/07/24, the facility did not ensure that they treated each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for one (Resident #66) of two residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, Resident #66's room was located on the first floor and looked out to the staff parking lot. The window had a broken screen and a broken window shade that was fully up and could not be pulled down to provide the resident with privacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/31/24 to 11/07/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene for one (Resident #226) of six residents reviewed for Activities of a Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #226 required total assistance with Activities of a Daily Living cares by facility staff, did not receive Activities of a Daily Living cares on multiple shifts, according to the October 2024 Certified Nurse Aide documentation. A private duty aide stated they provided all the cares for the resident 8 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00349833) surveys from 10/31/24 to 11/7/24, the facility did not ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means (delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #182) reviewed for tube feeding. Specifically, the facility did not have the physician prescribed gastrostomy tube size available.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00351352) from 10/31/24- 11/7/24, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently provided to meet the needs of residents on all shifts. Specifically, 1) Multiple residents reported during interviews and the Resident Council Group meeting that the facility was short staffed at times, 2) Several nursing staff members reported lack of sufficient staffing to provide care to the residents, and 3) a review of the actual staffing sheets from 10/1/24 to 10/31/24 showed that on multiple occasions the facility was below the minimum levels documented on the Facility Assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview conducted during a recertification survey from 10/31/24-11/7/21, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were maintained in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, labeling and the expiration date. Specifically, expired medications were found in the medication cart on one of five units (Westminister Unit) and unlabeled medication was found in the medication storage refrigerator on one of four units ([NAME] Unit) observed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 10/31/24 to 11/7/24, the facility did not ensure storage of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (the main kitchen) reviewed. Specifically, the kitchen walk-in freezer insulation door seals were not attaching properly causing formation of ice on the freezer's floor, the freezer's door, and plastic curtain inside the freezer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00346322), the facility did not ensure the right to receive services with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #212) reviewed for choices. Specifically, Resident #212 requested to use an electric wheelchair while at facility and was not assessed for ability to use an electric wheelchair.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the Recertification survey 10/31/24- 11/7/24 and abbreviated survey (NY00338981) the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of quality for 1 of 4 (Resident # 631) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, for Resident # 631 there was no documented evidence of a Registered Nurse assessment of breath sounds or pulse oximetry after a resident received a food not on their diet plan and began coughing requiring oral suctioning.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the abbreviated (NY00347929) survey, the facility did not ensure a resident was free from physical abuse by a staff member. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents sampled for abuse. Specifically, on 7/11/2024 between 1:48 AM to 1:49 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was seen on the facility surveillance video approaching Resident #1 from behind at the entrance of another resident's room. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was seen hitting Resident #1 on the upper part of their left shoulder, which startled Resident #1. Resident #1 was seen turning and trying to push Certified Nursing Assistant #1 away. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was seen shoving Resident #1 and they both start hitting each other. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during the abbreviated (NY00347929) survey from 7/23/2024 to 7/24/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option they prefer. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 total sampled residents. Specifically, a mood stabilizer medication, Depakote, was ordered and administered to Resident #1 without the resident's Designated Representative being informed in advance of the risks and benefits of the medication and alternative treatment options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the abbreviated (NY00347929) survey the facility did not ensure the resident right to a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 1 ([NAME] Unit) of 7 resident units. Specifically, a strong pervasive odor of urine was observed throughout the [NAME] Unit including in resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00347929), the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP) were reviewed and revised in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for behaviors. Specifically, Resident #2's At Risk for Fall Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was not updated after a fall incident on 04/02/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during the abbreviated (NY00347929) survey from 7/23/2024 to 7/24/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident who was diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for behaviors. Specifically, Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan related to dementia care was not reviewed and revised to address the resident's increasing dementia-related behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the abbreviated (NY00347929) survey from 7/23/2024 to 7/24/2024, the facility did not ensure a facility-wide assessment was conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently. This was evident for 1 ([NAME] Unit) of 7 resident units. Specifically, the Facility Assessment did not identify the [NAME] Unit as a specialized dementia unit and did not identify the staffing assignment necessary to care for residents during day-to-day operation.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00301968, NY00314825), the facility did not ensure that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months for seven (CNA's # 4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10) of nine CNA's reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and the spread of infection was followed during a lunch meal observation on 1 of 5 facility units ([NAME] Unit) for residents #140, #149, #257 and #260. Additionally, proper hand hygiene was not followed during a wound care treatment for 1 of 5 residents (#261) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that advance directives would be implemented according to residents' wishes. This was evident for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for advanced directives who had Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders (Residents #271, 183 and 224).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (a tool to assess a resident's care needs) was completed within the 14 day requirement. This was evident for a resident with two Stage 3 pressure ulcers (Resident #224).
Inspectors wrote3. Resident #141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Osteoarthritis and Major Depressive Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 12/20/18 indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 out of 15 which suggested severe cognitive impairment with daily decision making; required extensive assist of one person with transferring, walking in the room and corridor, and locomotion on and off the unit. The mobility device used was a wheelchair. The MDS also documented that the resident felt down, depressed or hopeless, had little interest or pleasure doing things and felt tired or having little energy for 2-6 days. The resident also had difficulty concentrating. There were no behavioral issues documented. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the necessary care was provided to prevent complications related to hemodialysis for one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident#128). Specifically, 1) daily assessment of the dialysis access for a bruit and a thrill to ensure adequate blood flow was not being done; and 2) the resident's care did not routinely include pre and post dialysis assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the pharmacy consultant's recommendation was implemented. Specifically the consultant pharmacist recommended that parameters be included for blood sugar levels that would indicate the need to call the physician. This was evident for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #12)
Inspectors wrote483.90(d)(2) Maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition. Based on observation, interview and documentation review, the facility did not ensure that all mechanical equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. Reference is made to diesel exhaust odors noted on the Berkshire unit (2nd floor, and Stairwell # 4) originating from one of two boilers (boiler no. 1) located in the basement of that building.
22 fire safety citations on file: 11 on November 7, 2024, 6 on August 23, 2022, 5 on February 13, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 7, 2024 | Fine | $46,079 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.76 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.53 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.60 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.61 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.6% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.5% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.86 on weekdays and 2.53 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.85 in April to June 2025 to 2.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.76 | 0.55 | 2.86 | 2.53 | 7.2% | 0 of 90 | 280 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.76 | 0.50 | 2.84 | 2.54 | 8.3% | 0 of 92 | 273 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.87 | 0.52 | 2.97 | 2.61 | 7.4% | 0 of 92 | 278 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.85 | 0.48 | 2.97 | 2.57 | 5.9% | 0 of 91 | 276 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.9 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.0 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.4 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Paramount at Somers Rehab and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (59.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
59.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 618 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 530 eligible stays.
5.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 388 eligible stays.
65.8% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 365 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 463 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 463 residents counted.
97.8% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 267 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SOMERS OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Carerite Centers, a group of 34 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Einhorn, Sharon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 43% | 01/10/2017 |
| Friedman, Devorah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 43% | 01/10/2017 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/10/2017 | |
| Friedman, Devorah | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/10/2017 | |
| Friedman, Devorah | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2017 | |
| Abolahrari, Saba | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Capowski, Kira | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/20/2016 | |
| Kiprovski, Igor | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/03/2025 | |
| Abolahrari, Saba | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Capowski, Kira | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/20/2016 | |
| Kiprovski, Igor | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/03/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.