Home / Massachusetts / Agawam
61 Cooper Street, Agawam, MA 01001 · Hampden County · (413) 294-6800
164 certified beds, about 122 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225253 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 15, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since April 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
31.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Stern Consultants, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed, interviews, and observations for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was dependent on staff members for bathing, dressing, incontinence care, bed mobility, and positioning, the Facility failed to ensure his/her safety was maintained during care, when during the provision of care, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 positioned Resident #1 on his/her side in bed then turned away from him/her to obtain a wet cloth, and Resident #1 rolled off the bed and onto the floor. Resident #1 sustained a laceration to the back of his/her head, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation, where he/she required staples to close the wound and was diagnosed with an epidural hematoma (a collection of blood between the skull and outermost protective membrane of the brain).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that garbage was disposed of properly. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the area on the ground around three trash dumpsters outside of the facility building was kept free of various debris, garbage and waste.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety to prevent the potential of foodborne illness to residents at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to utilize pasteurized eggs in the preparation of over easy (eggs fried on both sides with a runny yolk) eggs to safely accommodate residents' choice during the breakfast meals and ensure that the unpasteurized eggs being used were cooked until all parts of the egg were completely firm to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to resolve a grievance timely for one Resident (#7) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #7, the facility failed to ensure that a reported grievance of missing hearing aids was resolved in a reasonable time period.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident #3), the facility failed to ensure they obtained written informed consent for his/her psychotropic medication prior to administering the medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident #7), who had an above the knee amputation, and whose Physician Orders and Plan of Care indicated that he/she required the use of bedrails for transfers, turning and positioning, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she had the necessary assistive equipment to maintain his/her safety when the left bedrail had fallen off the bed but was not repaired or replaced timely and on 04/02/25, Resident #7 sat up on the side of his/her bed reached for the bedrail, and when it wasn't there, lost his/her balance and fell.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed, observations and interviews for one of eight sampled residents (Resident #7) who was alert, oriented and made his/her own medical decisions, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was assessed for the use of bedrails and that alternatives were trialed, prior to installing bilateral bedrails.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, for one of eight sampled residents (Resident #3), whose physician's orders included the administration of a medication to manage his/her bipolar disorder, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from significant medication errors, when upon admission, the medication was inaccurately reconciled from his/her Hospital Discharge Summary by nursing and he/she was administered incorrect dosages of the medication for multiple days.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for two of eight sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3), who were dependent on assistance from staff for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical records.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical record when, 1) nursing documentation in Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was incomplete, with spaces for medication administration left blank, and 2) required information in the Controlled Substance Register (record/log book used by the facility for maintaining accurate records of all narcotics and other controlled medications ordered and administered to each resident) related to resident specific medications and physician's orders, was inaccurate and incomplete.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you are unable to communicate your own wishes) were accurate for three Residents (#3, #62 and #39) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident's #3 and #62, ensure that the MOLST (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form was valid and reflected the signature of the Resident's invoked (made active by a Physician) Health Care Proxy (HCP- a legal document that allows you to appoint someone you trust to make medical decisions on your behalf if you are unable to do so). 2. For Resident #39, offer the opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive for the Resident after his/her HCP had been deactivated by the Physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Non-Physician Practitioner (NPP/ Nurse Practitioner [NP]) of a significant change in condition for two Residents (#62 and #86) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Physician/NPP: 1. For Resident #62, when the blood sugar reading was greater than 400 mg/dL. 2. For Resident #86, when the Resident experienced an unplanned, significant weight loss of -10.73% in one month.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the timely completion and transmission of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments as required for four Residents (#65, #33, #92, #72) out of five applicable residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that the components of the MDS Assessments were completed and transmitted within the required timeframes when: 1. For Resident #65, the Assessment was transmitted 28 days after the MDS completion date. 2. For Resident #33, the MDS Assessment was completed 17 days after the ARD (Assessment Reference Date). 3. For Resident #92, A Quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 5/28/24, completed 6/11/24, was not yet transmitted as required. 4. For Resident #72, the MDS Assessment was completed 22 days after the ARD, and was not yet transmitted as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to notify the State Mental Health Authority for a resident review after a significant change in mental condition occurred for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Level II screen (PASRR- an evaluation done to determine if a resident has an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness[SMI] and if a Resident is in need of additional specialized support services at the facility) after Resident #2 received emergency mental health interventions and experienced limitations in major life activities due to mental illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to address a hearing problem for one Resident (#57), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide care and services that would maintain or improve Resident #57's hearing and communication when there was a decline in hearing ability, and the Resident/ Resident Representative had consented to be seen for audiology (the science of hearing, balance and related disorders) services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the administration of enteral (also referred to as tube feeding) nutrition was consistent with and followed the Physician's orders for one Resident (#76) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to administer the Physician ordered volume (quantity) of tube feeding for Resident #76, whose sole source of nutrition are enteral feeds thus placing the Resident at risk for altered nutritional status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain an oxygen concentrator (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) filter for Resident #15 in a clean, safe and functional manner in accordance with Physician orders, placing Resident #15 at risk for impaired oxygen delivery and equipment malfunction.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental care and services as required for one Resident (#39) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to refer Resident #39 for dental services, when the Resident had consents for dental care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain safe and sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety on three unit kitchenettes (F Wing, C Wing, and A Wing) out of four applicable unit kitchenettes, to prevent contamination and food borne infections. Specifically, 1) The facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions for the unit kitchenette refrigerators on the F Wing, C Wing and A Wing unit. 2) The facility failed to maintain clean and sanitary conditions for a unit microwave on the F Wing unit. 3) The facility failed to store food safely in the refrigerator in the kitchenette on the A Wing unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records, including provision of support services for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document social service supportive visits for Resident #2 after the Resident required multiple hospital evaluations for suicidal ideation (verbal expressions of thoughts of harming oneself that may or may not lack specific intent).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control measures to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident (#266), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to implement the use of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as indicated for Resident #266 when the Resident had been identified as having a COVID-19 infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff appropriately and safely stored medications, for three Residents (#79, #55 and #62), out of a total sample of 24 residents, on three out of four units. Specifically, facility staff failed to secure self-administration medications for Residents #79, #55 and #62, leaving them unsecured and available at the resident's bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff educated and offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine to four Residents (#5, #22, #32 and #66) out of five Residents sampled for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff assessed one Resident (#55) for self-administration of medications, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, Resident #55 was not assessed for the safety of self-administration of medications and was observed to have numerous medications accessible at his/her beside.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for two Residents (#59 and #98) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #59, ensuring the wheelchair was free from built up debris and cleaned, and repairs to the bedroom walls were done as required. 2. For Resident #98, providing repairs to the walls in the resident's bedroom as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure its staff completed a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment that accurately reflected the resident's status for two Residents (#51 and #22), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #51, to accurately assess the cognitive and mood status, and 2. For Resident #22, accurately reflect the resident was receiving Hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement the plan of care relative to the Physician's orders for three Residents (#16, #64 and #87), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure: 1) treatment was administered as ordered by the Physician for Resident #16, and 2) the Physician's orders were implemented relative to wound observations and required documentation with scheduled treatments for Resident's #64 and #87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to customize activities to meet the needs of one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that the activities, needs, and preferences of Resident #87 were met and that one to one (1:1) visits were implemented as careplanned.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure recommended behavioral health services was obtained for one Resident (#30), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to obtain psychotherapy services as recommended by Behavioral Health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to communicate MMR recommendations timely for one Resident (#62) out of five applicable residents reviewed, out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to ensure the attending Physician reviewed and acted upon documented recommendations for unnecessary medications made by the Pharmacist regarding Resident #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor the use and appropriateness of Psychotrophic medications for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to limit the timeframe for a PRN (as needed) Antipsychotic medication (medication used to treat certain types of mental health conditions) to 14 days.
8 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 15, 2025, 3 on July 16, 2024, 2 on April 26, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.59 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.6% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 35.3% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.48 | 3.81 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 122 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.71 | 0.52 | 3.94 | 3.13 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.57 | 3.91 | 3.13 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.83 | 3.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 115 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.8 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.7 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Agawam West Rehab and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 70 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 106 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
26.1% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 62 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: AGAWAM WEST REHAB AND NURSING LLC. CMS links this home to Stern Consultants, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman, Shana | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 12% | 10/16/2023 |
| Beatty, Brittany | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Com Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 10/16/2023 |
| Millman, Chaim | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Newhouse, Eric | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Ashkar, Rami | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Erblich, Avraham | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Millman, Chaim | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Newhouse, Eric | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Sheps, Boruch | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Millman, Chaim | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Etn Family Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Stern Therapy Consultants LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Tlco Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Ashkar, Rami | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Beatty, Brittany | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Erblich, Avraham | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Ianacone, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Millman, Chaim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Newhouse, Eric | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Plew, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Sheps, Boruch | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Millman, Chaim | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Newhouse, Eric | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Agawam West Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Com Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| E Newhouse Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Etn Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Stern Therapy Consultants LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/30/2025 | |
| T Newhouse Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Tlco Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Tlm Family Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2023 | |
| Ashkar, Rami | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Beatty, Brittany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Erblich, Avraham | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Ianacone, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Millman, Chaim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Newhouse, Eric | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Plew, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Sheps, Boruch | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 | |
| Stern, Bezalel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/16/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.