Home / North Carolina / Greenville
2575 W 5th Street, Greenville, NC 27834 · Pitt County · (252) 830-9100
130 certified beds, about 90 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345377 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 25, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 44 health citations since November 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $62,160 in the last three years; the largest was $51,965, and the latest is dated September 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
76.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 44 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews with staff, residents, and a family member, the facility failed to ensure linens were available for 4 of 4 residents who were interviewed or their family member was interviewed regarding linens (Residents # 9, # 10, # 11, and # 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with staff, Responsible Party (RP), Physicians, and Wound Nurse Practitioner, the facility failed to obtain supplies and implement the Wound Nurse Practitioner's treatment plan for a resident with a pressure sore. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure sores (Resident # 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews with staff and Responsible Party, the facility failed to 1) identify in their accident investigation that an assigned staff member had not been on duty when Resident # 2 fell and thereby evaluate how this might have contributed to the accident occurring in order to take corrective action and 2) failed to toilet Resident # 2 at bedtime as directed by the resident's care plan in order to try and prevent future falls. This was for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls (Resident # 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with staff and Physician, the facility failed to have effective systems in place to ensure ordered medications were acquired from the pharmacy and available for administration and the backup supply of medications was utilized for medications that had not been received from the pharmacy for 1 of 1 resident whose medications were reviewed (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours for 2 of 142 days reviewed for staffing (12/28/25 and 1/24/26).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff, Medical Director, and Consultant Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments for potential adverse reactions to antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 62 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments (Resident #84).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and an interview with the Pharmacy Consultant, the Pharmacy Consultant failed to identify and report irregularities when conducting monthly drug regimen reviews for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff, Dialysis Dietician/Nurse Practitioner, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was functioning properly for 3 of 97 residents observed for resident call system (Resident #78, Resident #4, and Resident #94).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing sheets were complete and accurate for 36 of 53 days reviewed for 12/1/25 through 3/22/26 (12/12/25, 12/17/25, 2/2/26, 2/4/26, 2/5/26, 2/6/26, 2/9/26, 2/10/26, 2/11/26, 2/13/26, 2/15/26, 2/16/26, 2/17/26, 2/18/26, 2/19/26, 2/21/26, 2/24/26, 2/25/26, 2/26/26, 2/27/26, 2/28/26, 3/3/26, 3/4/26, 3/5/26, 3/7/26, 3/9/26, 3/10/26, 3/11/26, 3/12/26, 3/13/26, 3/14/26, 3/15/26, 3/17/26, 3/18/26, 3/21/26, 3/22/26).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews with resident, staff, and a representative from the company that manufactures the mechanical lifts used at the facility, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. A mechanical lift sling broke while Resident # 3 was being transferred resulting in Resident # 3 sustaining a fractured humerus (large bone of the upper arm). This was for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident # 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and Physicians the facility failed to notify the physician when residents developed pressure sores for 2 of 3 sampled residents with pressure sores (Residents # 1 and Resident #8).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews with staff and physicians the facility failed to 1) ensure Nurse Aides reported skin breakdown to a nurse prior to the wound bed being unstageable (Resident # 1); 2) ensure effective communication amongst nursing staff and the Wound Physician to ensure orders were obtained, initiated, and carried out for pressure sore treatments per the Wound Care Physician's plan of care (Resident # 1 and Resident #8); 3) ensure further diagnostic studies were completed per the Wound Care Physician's directions when a wound continued not to heal (Resident # 1), and 4) ensure the settings of a pressure relieving air mattress were set correctly for pressure relief (Resident # 8). This was for 2 of 3 of three sampled residents with pressure sores (Residents # 1 and # 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, Resident Representative (RR), and staff interviews, the facility failed to invite a resident to participate in the development of his plan of care for 1 of 3 residents were reviewed for care planning (Resident #271).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days following the Assessment Reference Date (ARD, last day of the assessment period) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for assessments (Resident #48).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for antipsychotic use, hospice status, and wound status for 3 of 18 resident assessments reviewed (Resident #50, Resident #58, and Resident #173).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident that exhibited aggressive verbal behaviors, a resident prescribed an antipsychotic medication, and a resident that had a surgical wound, for 3 of 18 residents reviewed for development and implementation of a comprehensive care plan (Resident #55, Resident #62 and Resident #58).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store the wet syringe separately from the barrel when Nurse #3 did not separate a bolus enteral feeding syringe (a large 2 part syringe used to administer oral medications or liquid feedings) used for medication administration through a gastrostomy tube (a hollow tube inserted directly through the skin of the abdomen into the stomach to deliver nutrition, hydration, and medication) for one of one resident (Resident #21). The deficient practice occurred for one of one staff member observed for medication administration via a gastrostomy tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when Nurse #3, the Wound Nurse, and the Wound Physician failed to apply a gown before entering residents' rooms to provide high contact care activities for two of two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #58). The deficient practice occurred for three of three caregivers observed for infection control practices. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedure to ensure facility staff received infection control training on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to know what required EBP and when to implement EBP for 1 of 1 staff reviewed for infection control training (Wound Care Nurse).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for physical environment (Resident #6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews with staff, Physician, Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, and the facility's Pharmacy Consultant the facility failed to 1) analyze Resident #2's falls to determine causative factors and implement interventions to reduce the risk for further falls and 2) ensure a paraplegic resident (Resident # 1) did not roll out of bed during care. Resident # 2 was identified to have an impacted arm fracture (a fracture that generally occurs following a fall). This was for two of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and an emergency room physician interview the facility failed to provide care to a feeding tube site for one (Resident #1) of three sampled residents reviewed for feeding tube care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, Medical Director/Physician interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to remove narcotic pain medications from the medication cart within the parameters set by the physician's orders for narcotic medication; failed to follow procedures for disposal of wasted narcotic medication; and failed obtain an order for narcotic pain medication prior to removing narcotic pain medication from the medication cart. Additionally, the facility failed to have effective safeguards and systems in place to control for, account for, and periodically reconcile controlled medications to protect the residents right to be free from potential drug diversion. This was for three residents, (Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services for narcotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to document the administration of narcotic medication in the medication administration record for 3 (Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of documentation of narcotic medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interviews, hospice staff interview, physician interview, pharmacy consultant interview, and psychiatric nurse practitioner interview the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification and complaint investigation of 4/13/2021, the recertification and complaint survey of 6/30/2022, the recertification and complaint investigation of 11/2/2023, and the complaint investigation of 2/27/2024. This was for 3 repeat deficiencies in the areas of supervision to prevent accidents, hospice services, and pharmacy services. The continued failure of the facility during four federal surveys showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assessment and Assurance Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, Medical Director interview, and Pharmacist interview the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from potential diversion of a total of seventeen narcotic tablets for two (Resident #7 and Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for diversion of narcotics.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, hospice staff interview, and physician interview the facility failed to communicate and coordinate with hospice to identify a resident had sustained a dislocated finger. This was for one (Resident # 3) of two sampled hospice residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, pharmacy consultant interview, and pharmacy operations manager interview the facility failed to provide pharmacy services within the time frame for a scheduled dose of a medication for one (Resident #6) of four residents observed during a medication pass observation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident, and staff interview the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 11/2/2023, the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 6/30/2022, and the recertification survey and complaint investigation completed on 4/13/2021. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and resident interview the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mistreatment when an employee (Housekeeper #2) hit Resident #5 with a cell phone charging cord causing pain. This was for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse by not obtaining a written statement from the perpetrator for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse investigations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to use the urinary tract prevention method of keeping the drainage bag and tubing off the floor for 1 of 3 (Resident #4) residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with staff and the consultant pharmacist and record reviews the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by 2 medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 8% for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #8) of 4 residents observed during the medication administration observation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for the cleaning and disinfecting of a glucometer during a medication pass observation for one (Nurse #1) of two nurses observed for infection control procedures during medication pass.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident (Resident # 47), who was assessed as a supervised smoker, while Resident #47 was smoking in the designated smoking area, secure Resident #47's smoking materials and complete quarterly smoking assessments for a resident (Resident #7 ), who was assessed as not requiring supervision when smoking, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess cognitive patterns, anticoagulant medication use, and mood for 3 of 20 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments reviewed (Resident #55, Resident #47, and Resident #62).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #51).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an individualized person-centered care plan was accurate for smoking for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan (Resident #47).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to attach an indwelling urinary catheter tubing to a secure device to prevent tension and possible injury, to position the urinary collection bag at a lower level than the urinary bladder to allow gravity drainage of urine into the collection bag, to ensure the urinary tubing was not touching the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheter (Resident #47).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer supplemental oxygen as prescribed by the physician and failed to place signage indicating the use of oxygen for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident #269).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and resident and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions that the committee had previously put in place following the recertification and complaint surveys of 6/30/22 and 4/13/21. This was for 5 recited deficiencies in the areas of Accuracy of Assessments (F641), Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (F644), Baseline Care Plans (F655), Care Plan Timing and Revision (F657), and Free of Accident Hazards/ Supervision/Devices (F689). The continued failure during 2 or more federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective Quality Assurance Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain bathroom and closet doors in good repair in 5 of 13 rooms (Rooms 302, 304, 306, 313 and 316) on the 300 hallway.
21 fire safety citations on file: 11 on March 25, 2026, 2 on December 19, 2024, 8 on November 2, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 11, 2025 | Fine | $10,195 |
| September 11, 2025 | Payment Denial | 7 days from October 3, 2025 |
| February 27, 2024 | Fine | $51,965 |
| February 27, 2024 | Payment Denial | 14 days from April 26, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.65 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.09 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 76.7% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 76.2% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.47 | 3.88 | 3.09 | 16.1% | 0 of 90 | 90 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.58 | 0.39 | 2.76 | 2.14 | 12.7% | 31 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.70 | 3.85 | 2.96 | 12.2% | 2 of 92 | 70 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.46 | 0.61 | 3.63 | 3.02 | 8.8% | 4 of 91 | 71 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.9 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.3 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for East Carolina Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
8.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
32.1% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EAST CAROLINA OPERATOR LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Carolina Operator Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2025 |
| Bridgewater Nc Holdings II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 31% | 11/01/2025 |
| Jbk Nc Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 31% | 11/01/2025 |
| Milano Nc Holdings II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 31% | 11/01/2025 |
| Baker, Juanita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Boyd, Sherri | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Cole, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Crickmore, Reid | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Grady, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Harris, Pamela | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Rajchenbach, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Rivers, Abbigail | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Ib Mimi 2022 Family Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Jk 2022 Family Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Ml Milano 2022 Family Trust | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| 2575 West 5th Street LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Isva Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Jkva Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Mlva Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Williamsport Property Holdings II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Cole, Scott | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2025 | |
| Harris, Pamela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.