905 West Cornerview Road, Gonzales, LA 70737 · Ascension County · (225) 644-5358
120 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195327 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 13, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $92,032 in the last three years; the largest was $84,014, and the latest is dated August 14, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.19 of those hours.
43.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Nexion Health, an affiliated group of 51 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of physical abuse for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #60) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an ordered nutritional supplement was provided for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for nutritional supplements.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to:1. Ensure a Personal Protective Equipment gown was used during intravenous central line (tube placed in a large vein for medication administration) medication administration (Resident #5); and,2. Ensure proper hand hygiene during nephrostomy tube (catheter inserted into the kidney to drain urine) site care (Resident #55). This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #55) of 29 sampled residents observed and/or investigated during the medication administration and/or the infection control tasks.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to: 1. ensure expired medications were not available for resident use on 2 (Medication Cart c, Medication Cart e) of 2 (Medication Cart c, Medication Cart e) medication carts observed; 2. ensure expired medications were not available for resident use in 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g) of 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g) medication rooms observed; and, 3. ensure food items were not stored in the medication room for 1 (Medication Room g) of 2 (Medication Room h, Medication Room g).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach for 2 (Resident #6, Resident #12) of 4 (Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #37, Resident #51) sampled residents investigated for accommodation of needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan intervention for a low air loss mattress to bed was in place for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 (Resident #6, Resident #30) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect when nursing staff failed to provide peri-care for 1(Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the facility's abuse policy by failing to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and/or neglect to the State Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence that ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after many allegations of abuse and neglect were identified in 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to keep a resident free from staff to resident verbal abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional for 1 (S4Former Activities Director) of 1 (S4Former Activities Director) staff personnel files reviewed for activities director qualifications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the investigation of an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey agency within the required time frame for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) sampled residents investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of neglect for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled resident investigated for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to provide sufficient evidence that ongoing monitoring and evaluations were implemented to ensure corrective actions were put in place after identification of residents not receiving incontinence care as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly secure residents in the facility's transportation vehicles for 2 (Resident #5 and Random Resident #6) of 2 (Resident #5 and Random Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/22/2024 at 11:47 a.m. for Resident #5 when S6Driver failed to properly secure the resident in a forward facing direction in the facility's transportation bus, Resident #5's wheelchair tipped over backwards during transport, and caused Resident #5 to strike the back of her head. Resident #5 was transported to the hospital where she was assessed as having an abrasion to the back of the head and had to receive pain medication. The IJ continued on 09/03/2024 at 12:30 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently by failing to have an adequate system in place to ensure residents were properly restrained in the facility's transportation vehicles, vehicle transportation logs were completed as required for the facility's transportation vehicles, and the facility's transportation drivers were competent on the use of the facility's van and bus restraint systems prior to transporting residents. This lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation on 08/22/2024 at 11:47 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to report the results of an investigation to the required state agency within 5 working days of a reportable incident for 1 (Resident #6) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of neglect was thoroughly investigated by the facility for 1 (Resident #4) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7) residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received timely incontinence care for 1 (Resident #5) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) sampled residents investigated for incontinence care .
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #239 for 1 (Resident #75) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, Resident #239, Resident #20, and Resident #23) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect; 2. Protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #43 and Resident #47 for 2 (Resident #43 and Resident #47) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, Resident #239, Resident #20, and Resident #23) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect; 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to administer a resident's tube feeding water flush as ordered for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 (Resident #50) sampled residents investigated for tube feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #43) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, and Resident #239) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for 1 (Resident #43) of 8 (Resident #11, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #47, Resident #75, and Resident #239) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not have an order for administration of a psychotropic medication (drugs that affect one's mental state) on an as needed basis (PRN) without a physician's documentation of the specified duration of the order for 1 (Resident #46) of 5 (Resident #16, Resident #46, Resident #47, Resident #64, and Resident #82) sampled resident investigated for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to administer a medication for hypertension as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #14) of 22 (Resident #11, Resident #14, Resident #16, Resident #21, Resident #37, Resident #43, Resident #46, Resident #47, Resident #48, Resident #50, Resident #52, Resident #54, Resident #57,Resident #62, Resident #64, Resident #69, Resident #75, Resident #82, Resident #87, Resident #88, Resident #239, and Resident #440) residents investigated in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to obtain a resident's most recent hospice Plan of Care, recertification of terminal illness, and documentation of hospice services provided for 1 (Resident #50) of 1 (Resident #50) sampled resident reviewed for hospice.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) completed hand hygiene during incontinence and catheter care for 1 (Resident #57) of 1 (Resident #57) residents reviewed for catheter care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect and psychosocial harm when nursing staff failed to provide care and services to a newly admitted resident for 1 (Resident #5) of 19 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) reviewed for neglect. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm on 02/08/2024 at 10:00 p.m. when S6Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and S7Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) both arrived to work at 10:00 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of neglect for 6 (Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, and Resident #17) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) residents investigated for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure staff answered call bells to assist residents timely with toileting and/or incontinence care for 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, and Resident #17) of 19 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, and #19) sampled for incontinence care and toileting
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an incontinent resident dependent on staff for incontinence care received timely incontinence care for 1 (Resident #14) of 19 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15, Resident #16, Resident #17, Resident #18, and Resident #19) sampled residents investigated for incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for a resident identified as being at high risk for falls for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) sampled residents in which the care plans were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a dependent and incontinent resident with a history of urinary tract infections was provided incontinence care per the facility's policy and procedures for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled. 2. Ensure a resident who completed self-catheterization was monitored for urine output and signs and/or symptoms of urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Protect residents (Resident #10 and Resident #12) from resident to resident physical abuse; and, 2. Ensure a resident (Resident #5) was free from neglect by failing to provide incontinence care timely. This deficient practice was identified for 3 (Resident #10, Resident #12, and Resident #5) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for abuse and neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property/financial abuse/Exploitation for 1 (Resident #3) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for misappropriation of resident property.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident neglect were reported to the state agency within 24 hours of the allegation for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #10) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following allegations of neglect for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #10) of 13 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #13) sampled residents investigated for neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1(Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #R5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 (Resident #4) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #R5) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to immediately notify a resident's physician of a change in a resident's ability to tolerate an enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube) for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for enteral feedings.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to enhance a resident's tolerance of enteral feedings (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube) for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) sampled residents investigated for enteral feedings.
4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 13, 2026, 1 on May 7, 2025, 1 on May 16, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 14, 2024 | Fine | $84,014 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.16 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.84 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.54 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.5% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.74 on weekdays and 3.16 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.71 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.19 | 3.74 | 3.16 | 2.6% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.61 | 0.20 | 3.77 | 3.19 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.60 | 0.24 | 3.84 | 3.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.71 | 0.29 | 3.99 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.1 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.1 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 43.0 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.3 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Gonzales Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
12.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
7.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
24.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NEXION HEALTH AT GONZALES, INC.. CMS links this home to Nexion Health, a group of 51 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexion Health of Ohi Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/31/2006 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Nexion Health, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Bolt, Bretton | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Kirley, Francis | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| January, Yiesha | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/04/2019 | |
| Oubre, Wendy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/02/2014 | |
| Herdrich, William | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Corporate director | Individual | 08/08/2001 | |
| Reid, John | Corporate director | Individual | 12/03/2018 | |
| Riner, Meera | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Lee, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Riner, Meera | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Nexion Health Leasing, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Nexion Health of Ohi Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/31/2006 | |
| Nexion Health, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Bolt, Bretton | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Herdrich, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| January, Yiesha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/04/2019 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Lee, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Riner, Meera | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.