900 Elmhurst Blvd, Salina, KS 67401 · Saline County · (785) 825-5471
82 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175200 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 30, 2024, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since November 2021, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.22 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
45.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Recover-Care Healthcare, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 62 residents, The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and label medications in accordance with professional standards of practice. This placed the residents at risk of medication error.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ice was maintained in a sanitary manner and failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection control practice that uses personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) for Resident (R) 41 and R6 who had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). These deficient practices placed the residents at risk of contracting or spreading infectious processes.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 73 residents. The sample included five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent bathing and/or showers for five sampled residents, Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity, infection, and alteration in skin integrity.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 73 residents with three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from verbal abuse and/or mistreatment from staff. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for fear, intimidation and neglect.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 63 resident with three residents reviewed for quality care and treatment. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care and treatment for Resident (R) 1 when staff failed to apply ACE wraps to R1's bilateral legs daily for lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph). This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for edema (swelling), skin infections, and skin breakdown.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with four reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent ulcers for two sampled residents: Resident (R) 54, who obtained a facility acquired stage 3 (full thickness tissue loss) and R208, who obtained a facility acquired stage 2 (shallow with a reddish base) pressure ulcer. The facility further failed to ensure weekly monitoring of skin conditions to assess wound status including wound bed, healing, and effectiveness of treatments for R54 and R208. This deficient practice placed those residents at risk for delayed healing or worsened wounds.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to supervise cognitively impaired Resident, R 36, who exited the North Court Yard door, fell, and obtained a hematoma (collection of blood trapped in the tissues of the skin or in an organ, resulting from trauma) on her forehead. This deficient practice placed R36 at risk for further falls and avoidable injuries.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) for the 60 residents who resided at the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the resident at risk for receiving inadequate nutrition.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 60 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen, when facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas. The facility staff failed to change gloves after touching her glasses, other objects, then picked up bread with the same contaminated gloves. The facility kitchen staff failed to order enough food for the noon meal and the facility staff failed to complete refrigerator logs. This placed the 60 residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 70 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) program failed to provide good faith efforts to identify multiple issues of concerns for the 60 residents, who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide proper infection control when using the same glucometer without disinfecting it between residents, delivering linens throughout the facility in an uncovered cart, during urinary catheter care, while providing oxygen therapy, and filling resident's used water mugs with ice while holding the used mug inside the ice bin. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility at risk for infections.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure essential equipment in the kitchen was maintained in safe operating condition with two ovens and the plate warmer out of service.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to act promptly, investigate, and resolve grievances and recommendations of six resident council members (Resident (R)14, R13, R15, R29, R42 and R212). This placed the five resident council members at risk for depression from unsolved concerns.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to date one insulin pen when opened and monitor refrigerator temperatures for two of two medication rooms. This deficient practice placed Resident (R) 26 at risk to receive outdated insulin and residents to receive temperature compromised medications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance, when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing four residents' pureed diets. This deficient practice placed the four residents at risk for impaired nutrition.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure no more than a 14-hour lapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, when staff failed to provide the 60 residents who resided in the facility a nourishing snack at bedtime. This placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition.
Inspectors wrote- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R34 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), need for assistance with personal care, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, and other symptoms and signs involving appearance and behavior. R34's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R34 had severely impaired cognition, and required extensive assistance of two staff for personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, transfers, and bed mobility. The MDS further documented R34 required extensive assistance of one staff for eating. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents, with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicated Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide CMS Form 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which included the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for three resident:, Resident (R) 28, R47, and R56. This deficient practice placed all three residents at risk for unanticipated costs related to skilled services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for exploitation. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 35 was free from staff misappropriation of her money when an employee of the facility used R35's credit card for unauthorized purchases. This deficient practice placed R35 at risk of exploitation.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the state agency an unwitnessed fall with injury for Resident (R)36 who went outside without supervision, fell, and sustained a hematoma (a solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) on her forehead. This placed the resident at risk for further injury and unidentified abuse and mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two sampled residents, Resident (R) 12, who received a skin tear to his forearm, and R36, who had a fall with injury. This placed the residents at risk for further injury and unidentified abuse or mistreatment.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise care plans for five sampled residents, Resident (R)12's care plan for a skin tear, R36 who had 2 falls, R54 who had a facility acquired pressure ulcer, R9 who had venous ulcers (a shallow wound that develops on the lower leg when the leg veins fail to return blood back toward the heart normally) to her lower legs, and R25 for dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). This placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for transfer/discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to implement discharge planning when Resident (R) 45 requested to return to the community. This placed the resident at risk for impaired psychosocial wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents, the sample included 17 residents, with two reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based of observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate cares to include grooming for Resident (R) 34, observed wearing dirty clothes for two out of four days on survey, and failed to assist R34 during meal service as he ate his meal with a knife only. This placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene and injury while eating with the knife.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for positioning and two reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility staff failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to monitor and provide care for Resident (R)9's venous ulcers (a shallow wound that develops on the lower leg when the leg veins fail to return blood back toward the heart normally) and staff failed to complete weekly skin assessments, and failed to change her lower legs dressing, when the odiferous serosanguinous drainage seeped through her to her outer dressing. Staff further failed to provide instructions for staff on how to care for R12's skin tear and/or to monitor her skin tear. Staff failed to reposition R44 when she leaned over to the right without support. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for hearing loss. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 45 received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain his hearing ability when staff failed to follow up on R45's request to see an audiologist (physician who checks hearing loss). This placed the resident at risk for impaired communication.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for dialysis. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide physician ordered care and services related to dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). This deficient practice placed Resident (R) 25 at risk for complications related to dialysis.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD -psychiatric disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress, such as natural disaster, military combat, serious automobile accident, airplane crash or physical torture). Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide Resident (R)16 the appropriate treatment and services to attain her highest practicable mental and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors and individual thought and behavior) well-being, when staff failed to provide R16 with behavioral health services for PTSD. This placed the resident at risk for unmet mental health care needs.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one sampled resident, Resident (R) 43, who had behaviors. This placed the resident at risk for further decline of their emotional and mental well-being.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to place a stop date on Resident (R) 16's as needed (PRN) Ativan (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension). This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medications and related complications.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure the resident wore her leg immobilizer (a leg brace is a device used to immobilize a joint or body segment, restrict movement in a given direction, reduce weight bearing forces, or correct the shape of the body) during transfers as physician ordered for Resident (R) 33.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve foods in a sanitary manner for the 42 residents who received food from the facility kitchen and in the dining room.
Inspectors wrote- R46's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for dressing and limited assistance of one staff for toileting and personal hygiene. The ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/09/21, documented R46 was at risk for further decline in ADLs, falls, immobility, refused therapy and remained at a functional baseline. The ADL Care Plan, dated 08/13/21, directed staff to monitor, report a decline in abilities to assist with ADLs, and to provide assistance as needed. On 11/10/21 at 09:45 AM, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M assisted the resident to the bathroom, pulled the resident's pants down and dried feces (waste material from the bowel) was hanging from the resident's perineum (area between the genitals and the anus). [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for one sampled Resident (R) 40, regarding a wheelchair footrest needing repaired or replaced.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents with three sampled for Medicare Part A Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide one of three sampled residents (or their representative) the Advance Beneficiary Notices (ABN), forms 10055 and 10123 for discharge from skilled services, Resident (R) 37.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to prevent further falls for one sampled Resident (R) 36.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with seven reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 9, R46, and failed to provide bathing for R22.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R)36. This placed R36 at increased risk for falls and injuries related to falls.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 21, who had a history of weight loss, her breakfast meal and physician ordered supplement with meals on a consistent basis. This placed R21 at risk for further weight loss and complications related to decreased nutrition. The facility failed to provide the correct diet to R33, who received a regular diet and had a physician order pureed diet. This placed R33 at risk for choking and aspiration.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one reviewed for feeding tube (medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation) care and services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure competent nursing practice during the administration of medications via the feeding tube for sampled Resident (R) 34.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify and report to the Director of Nursing, facility medical director, and physician an inappropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 53.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify an inappropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 53.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 59 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff nursing schedule was posted for two of three days of the onsite survey.
49 fire safety citations on file: 15 on December 30, 2024, 14 on May 4, 2023, 20 on November 15, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.22 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.81 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.92 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.0% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 2.81 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.14 in April to June 2025 to 3.22 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.22 | 0.47 | 3.39 | 2.81 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.00 | 0.52 | 3.16 | 2.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 70 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.13 | 0.46 | 3.30 | 2.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.14 | 0.46 | 3.29 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 67 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.41 to $21.24 | 24,610 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.69 | $27.05 to $33.40 | 7,530 |
| Registered nurses | $38.14 | $35.24 to $45.53 | 33,800 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.9 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.6 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.2 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.4 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.9 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Kenwood View Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
50.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Kansas: 42 better, 17 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 77 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 107 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Kansas: 3 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.
44.2% this home
Median of homes: Kansas55.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 52 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Kansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 69 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Kansas2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 68 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Kansas99.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: KENWOOD VIEW HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Recover-Care Healthcare, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mrcmm II LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Halberstam, Miriam | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Halberstam, Moshe | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Mrc SNF Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2020 | |
| Hamilton, Amber | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Laswell, Kelley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2023 | |
| Schmidt, Alisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Kansas SNF Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Mrc SNF Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/18/2025 | |
| Natr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Rarmna Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Ratr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Rnr Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Wetr Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/28/2025 | |
| Laswell, Kelley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2025 | |
| Schmidt, Alisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.