6351 N Fort Apache Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89149 · Clark County · (702) 515-3000
120 certified beds, about 96 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 295089 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Nevada average is 9.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.70 hours per resident per day, against 4.34 across Nevada and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.14 of those hours.
29.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Nevada average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was clarified and the accurate amount of medication and water was documented per the physician's order for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 10). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident not receiving the maximum therapeutic effect of the medication and inaccurate documentation of the resident's fluid intake.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were provided per therapy recommendations for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 40). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's further decline in range of motion (extent of movement a joint could perform).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician's orders for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 31). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to O2 toxicity and exacerbation of the residents' underlying health conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the medication as ordered for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 243). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident having adverse events for not receiving physician prescribed medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to discard expired milk stored in a refrigerator located in the kitchen, an ice pack in the first floor nourishment room freezer, and employee food from the freezer located in second floor nourishment room. The deficient practice has the potential to lead to bacterial growth and foodborne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to update discharge instructions and failed to notify the physician of the changes in the discharge plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident not to receive the necessary provisions for continuation of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence wound care treatments were provided per the physician's order for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for delayed healing of a wound.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence a resident's midline (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a large vein of the upper arm used to administer medication into the bloodstream) was removed, and a site assessment was performed upon discharge for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for an increased risk of infection and to compromise the residents' health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for the use of bilateral mitten restraints for a resident was completed accurately and consent for the mitten restraints was obtained from the resident or the appropriate representative for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #44). The deficient practice had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two referral was completed for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #36). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of concern and other residents of necessary behavioral health services. Resident #36 (R36) R36 was re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pulmonary edema, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder. On 07/23/2024 in the afternoon, R36 was sitting on the bed. R36 stated had been at the facility for about 8 years and the care and services at the facility were good. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and document reviews, the facility failed to ensure documentation accurately reflected medications and treatment services were provided. Specifically, this pertained to 1) wound care treatment; 2) ACE wrap (elastic bandage); 3) Oxygen (O2) therapy; and 4) diuretic medication . This deficient practice could potentially have led to severe harm, including ineffective wound management, an increased risk of respiratory complications, inadequate compression therapy, and compromised medication management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) the wound care treatment was provided as ordered to treat impaired skin; 2) the ACE wrap (elastic bandage) was applied as ordered to treat edema; and 3) the Oxygen flow meter rate was administered as ordered to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 48). These deficient practices had the potential to cause delayed wound healing, increased risk of complications related to poor circulation and compromised respiratory function.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to implement floating heels to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 20 sample residents (Resident #11). The deficient practice had the potential to expose the resident to an avoidable skin injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to complete a post fall assessment and neurological checks after an unwitnessed fall for 1 of 20 residents (Resident 38). The failed practice could have contributed to increased pain and a delay of necessary medical interventions.
Inspectors wrote2) Resident 39 (R39) R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including infection of tracheostomy stoma, chronic pain, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, unspecified intestinal obstruction, acute embolism and thrombosis, and bed confinement. R39's Weight Summary report, documented a January weight of 218.7 pounds (lbs.) on 01/12/2024. No weights were tracked or monitored for April 2024. According to the weight task history, R39 was on monthly weights from 01/10/2024 until 05/15/2024 when the resident was switched to weekly weights due to weight loss. R39's Weight Report documented weights from January 2024 through July 2024 as follows: -07/22/2024: 198.4 lbs. -07/15/2024: 197.0 lbs. -07/08/2024: 196.8 lbs. -07/01/2024: 196.2 lbs. -06/17/2024: 198.4 lbs. -06/10/2024: 196.4 lbs. -06/03/2024: 196.0 lbs. -05/27/2024: 196.4 lbs. -05/13/2024: 195.8 lbs. -05/12/2024: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate tube feeding (TF) formula was provided as ordered to a resident who was TF-dependent or to notify the physician when it could not be carried out in a timely manner for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 188). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the resident's nutritional status and overall health, leading to malnutrition, dehydration, and an increased risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food products were labeled with the date when they were opened, and failed to dispose of fruits showing signs of spoilage. The deficient practice could have exposed the residents to potential health risk associated with contaminated food.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who required a one-person physical assist in toilet use and had history of falls was not left alone while using the toilet resulting in a fall for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for severe injury due to lack of assistance provided.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to account for narcotic medications signed out on the controlled drug record (narcotic log) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to delay a resident's pain management and increase risk for physical and psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure the resident right of dignity was honored for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 19). The deficient practice had the potential to cause a negative psychosocial outcome. Findings Include: Resident 19 (R19) R19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. A facility report indicated on 04/10/2023, R19 was placed near the nurse's station on a shower chair with bucket under the chair for the resident to defecate. On 07/25/2023 at 1:15 PM, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was familiar with incident and confirmed the incident did occur. The CNA explained while making rounds, the CNA noticed the resident close to the nurse's station and immediately advised nurse and CNA responsible for placing the resident at the nurse's station, so the resident could be returned to room. On 07/27/23 at 11: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a physician order for self-administration was obtained and an assessment was completed before allowing a resident to self-administer medications. The deficient practice had the potential to lead to medication errors impacting the well-being of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order for 2 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 144 and Resident 20). Specifically, 1) two intravenous (IV) antibiotic medications were not given as scheduled for a resident with pneumonia (Resident 144) and 2) a phosphate binder was not administered with meals for a resident with end stage renal disease (Resident 20). The deficient practice placed Resident 144 at risk for unresolved infection and potentially contributed to Resident 20's hyperphosphatemia (elevated Phosphorus in the blood).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to evaluate and provide appropriate interventions for hand contractures for 1 of 23 sampled residents (Resident 52). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to develop further decline or decrease in physical functioning.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review the facility failed to 1) ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing was changed per the physician's order or facility's policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 83) and 2) ensure a midline complication was reported to the charge nurse and physician for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 144). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to develop an infection and interrupted another resident's intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had documented evidence of competency skill sets for 1 of 6 sampled nursing staff members. The deficient practice had the potential to impact the safety of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure (1) food items in the refrigerator were labeled and dated, personal food items were not placed in resident only refrigerators in the nourishment room and family dining room, and (2) resident food was covered prior to transport to individual units, and meal trays were covered to prevent cross contamination. The deficient practices had to the potential to place all residents at risk for a food-borne illness. 1) On 07/25/2023 at 7:58 AM, the refrigerator in main kitchen contained three food items on shelf in clear plastic bags which were not labeled or dated. On 07/25/2023 at 8:03 AM the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (DNS) indicated all items outside of the manufacturer's box should be labeled and dated and indicated the three bags did not contain a label or date and should be discarded. [...]
37 fire safety citations on file: 9 on June 27, 2025, 12 on July 26, 2024, 16 on July 27, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Nevada | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.70 | 4.34 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.14 | 1.12 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.33 | 3.86 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.46 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.10 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.5% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.8% | 43.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.85 on weekdays and 4.33 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.80 in April to June 2025 to 4.70 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.70 | 1.14 | 4.85 | 4.33 | 2.1% | 0 of 90 | 96 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.67 | 1.19 | 4.84 | 4.24 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.80 | 1.25 | 4.93 | 4.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.80 | 1.12 | 4.93 | 4.47 | 1.8% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Nevada, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.85 | 4.05 | 3.46 | 2.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.87 | $18.80 to $23.07 | 8,100 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.62 | $31.70 to $38.26 | 3,350 |
| Registered nurses | $49.84 | $41.76 to $57.82 | 27,070 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Nevada | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 12.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.6 | 13.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.3 | 23.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marquis Care at Centennial Hills's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Nevada: 9 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 124 eligible stays.
14.2% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Nevada: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.
7.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Nevada: 1 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
85.2% this home
Median of homes: Nevada60.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Nevada0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.
5.1% this home
Median of homes: Nevada1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Nevada91.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/10/2010 |
| Fogg, Phillip | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Atwood, Jacob | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/06/2018 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Fogg, Steven | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Sprando, Erin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/10/2015 | |
| Tone, Staci | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | Corporate director | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 08/16/2010 | |
| Atwood, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/06/2018 | |
| Sprando, Erin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/10/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.