3400 Stocker Dr, Evansville, IN 47720 · Vanderburgh County · (812) 424-8100
113 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155621 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2026, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 56 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.67 of those hours.
61.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Adams County Memorial Hospital, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 56 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change of health condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. The physician was not notified of new skin impairment. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records; skin assessment forms were not documented weekly in the clinical record, did not include all of the current skin impairments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nursing services. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents who resided in the facility for 1 of 2 units observed. Baseboards, walls, door trim on resident rooms were marred or had chipped paint, floors had debris built up. ( 200 unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. ( Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly dated and labeled, failed to keep medications refrigerated until opening, and failed to destroy expired medications for 4 of 4 medication carts observed. (North Hall Medication Cart, South Hall Medication Cart, Stocker 1 Medication Cart, Insulin Administration Cart, Resident W, Resident 13, Resident M)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurate for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations, 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding, and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheter. (Resident D, Resident C, Resident Y, Resident M, and Resident R)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment during four random observations. Odors were present in the facility. (Main lobby, Stocker Unit 1, Stocker Unit 2, Conference Room)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed training related to dementia management for 4 of 5 staff, employed longer than one year, reviewed. (QMA 6, RN 14, CNA 15, and LPN 16)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care conferences were conducted every 3 months in 3 of 18 residents reviewed for care conferences. (Resident 26, Resident N, Resident 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who had medication at bedside had a physician order for the medication to be kept at bedside and self-administer, a completed assessment to self-administer, and a care plan based on 2 of 3 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. (Resident W and Resident 62)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 5 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Fall interventions were observed out of place and wound treatment was not completed according to physician orders. (Resident S and Resident N)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise residents' care plans to reflect changes in condition for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. An advanced directive care plan was not revised to reflect a full code status, and a fall intervention was not revised following a change of equipment. (Resident 18 and Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was an order and care plan for oxygen, tubing was properly dated, and there was an administration posted on door for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen administration.(Resident W)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide coordination between facility staff and hospice staff to meet residents' nursing needs for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for falls. Fall interventions were not installed on a resident's wheelchair which resulted in a fall with injury. (Resident S)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were performed on 2 of 2 random observations. Staff observed not utilizing the proper use of PPE of donning and doffing a gown when entering and exiting a room on Enhanced Barrier Protocol (EBP), did not utilize proper hand hygiene and changing gloves when performing tracheostomy suctioning, and locating a glucometer that was not cleaned after use. (Resident N, glucometer)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's emergency contact of an injury and subsequent x-ray order in 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls and weight loss. An x-ray of an emergent injury was delayed 24-hours and weekly weights were not completed as ordered. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure alternative supplements were provided to accommodate a resident's allergies. (Resident D)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notification of transfer and bed hold policy to residents or their representative in 4 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 7, Resident 51, Resident 53, Resident 57)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for 3 of 3 medication carts observed. Loose pills were observed in the medication cart drawers. (300 Hall, 400 Hall, 200 Hall)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures and taste for 1 of 1 tray tested for temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and dated properly in accordance with professional standards for food service and refrigerator temperature were recorded for 3 of 3 kitchen observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public for 9 random observations on 6 of 6 days. Urine smells in unit hallways and conference room, pests flying in resident room and nurses' station, and condition of resident air conditioners. (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 308, Conference Room, Hallway 400 Unit, 200 Unit Nurses Station)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure SNF-ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility-Advanced Beneficiary Notice) and NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) Forms were provided following the end of Medicare skilled services for 2 of 2 residents who discharged from Medicare services and remained in the facility. (Resident 9 and Resident 215)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide the proper work for a resident emergently transferred to the hospital in 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman office in 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development of a resident's comprehensive care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors, accidents, and nutrition. (Resident 39, Resident 15, Resident 58)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quarterly care plan conferences. (Resident 13 and Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide person centered engagement activities for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dementia care. (Resident 13)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received proper treatment to maintain vision abilities by assisting in arrangements for vision services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for vision impairment. (Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to appropriately care for and maintain a resident's suprapubic catheter leading to infection at the catheter insertion site and multiple urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary tract infections and urinary catheter. (Resident 47)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were available and dispensed according to physician's orders and stored in an organized manner for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medication storage. (Resident 15, Resident 47)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 50 and Resident 6) observed during medication pass. Two medication errors were observed during 25 opportunities for error in medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 8%.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure consistent documentation for wound care treatments on 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injury. (Resident 47)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to follow proper infection prevention and control practices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary tract infection and urinary catheter care, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure injury, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a urinary catheter. (Resident 47, Resident 8, and Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of pests based on 3 of 3 random observations of flies and gnats during the survey. (Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], Second Floor Nurses Station)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate safety measures were in place for safe transport for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in Resident B obtaining injuries that resulted in medical intervention and fractures. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of in a timely manner for discharged residents, medications that had been discontinued were disposed of, controlled medications were double locked, refrigerator temperature logs in place, ice removal in refrigerator freezer, a system was in place for documentation of medication disposition, for 2 of 2 medication rooms observed, and 5 of 5 residents reviewed for medications. ( Resident D, Resident E, Resident G, Resident H, Resident J, Stocker unit medication room, North/South unit medication room)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed and implemented for 1 of 1 resident with an enteral feeding tube. A plan of care was not created timely for an enteral feeding tube and physician orders for enteral tube feeding and treatments were not completed as ordered by the physician. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. A resident was inappropriately touched by another resident. ( Resident D, Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide effective interventions to prevent the development of a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the left great toe for 1 of 3 residents who met the criteria for review of wounds. Due to lack of assessments and not following the plan of care, the resident acquired a pressure ulcer. (Resident G)
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain 8 hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in a 24-hour period a total of 10 days from 1/1/23 to 3/31/23 for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed for sufficient staffing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication regimen recommendations were reviewed or addressed by a Physician for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 22, Resident 53, Resident 12, Resident 37, Resident 6, Resident 56) Findings Include: 1. On 9/6/23 at 2:02 P.M, Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed. The resident's profile included a diagnosis, but was not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A quarterly quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/12/23, indicated Resident 53's cognition level was unable to be assessed and received insulin injections for seven days during the seven day assessment. A Physician's order, dated 8/28/23, indicated Lantus (an insulin medication) 20 units two times a day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure GDRs (gradual dose reductions) were completed for psychotropic medications and PRN (as needed) antianxiety medications were evaluated every 14 days for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 12, Resident 37, Resident 25, Resident 22).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable, for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and observation, the facility failed to provide each resident with food and drink that was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Food that was supposed to be served hot was served at below the recommended temperature; food that was supposed to be cold was served above the recommended temperature for 1 of 1 trays reviewed for temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview. the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food services safety for 3 of 3 observations of the kitchen. Findings Include: During a tour of the kitchen beginning on 9/5/23 at 8:46 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated the kitchen had been very short staffed and they had recently hired new staff in the past 2 weeks but they needed to be trained. During an interview with the DM on 9/5/23 at 9:00 A.M., she indicated the dishwasher uses hot water to sanitize the dishes. On 9/5/23 at 9:35 A.M., the dishwasher was observed during the wash/rinse cycle. The wash was 150 degrees F(Fahrenheit), rinse was 165 degrees F. On 9/7/23 at 9:56 A.M., the dishwasher was observed during the wash/rinse cycle. The wash was 140 degrees F, the rinse was 175 degrees F. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly prevent and contain COVID-19 for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for infection control and providing safe and sanitary environment for 9 resident rooms and Stocker unit. (Resident 6, Resident 56, Resident 115)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public, for 3 of 3 observations of the second floor dining room and 1 of 1 observations of the first floor hallways.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of resident assessment on 1 of 2 closed records reviewed for comprehensive assessment. (Resident 9)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised after a change in status for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (Resident 36, Resident 37, Resident 23).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper tracheal suctioning and oxygen services were provided according to physician orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 56, Resident 115)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the complete and accurate staffing records were posted for 5 of 6 days of the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed of properly for 1 of 1 dumpsters observed on the east side of the building. The dumpster was left open and used gloves were observed around the dumpster.
45 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 30, 2026, 15 on November 14, 2024, 23 on September 11, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.31 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.57 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 61.3% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.2% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.64 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.39 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.67 | 3.64 | 3.32 | 5.3% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.44 | 0.69 | 3.55 | 3.17 | 10.2% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.61 | 0.67 | 3.70 | 3.37 | 7.5% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.39 | 0.71 | 3.54 | 3.00 | 6.4% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.1 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.9 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.3 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for River Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
43.5% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ADAMS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Adams County Memorial Hospital, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.a. | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Lehman, Scott | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Macklin, Larry | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| McIntire, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Adams County Memorial Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| River Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Borne-Bauman, Candice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Flueckiger, Russell | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Hutson, Jared | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Lehman, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Macklin, Larry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| McIntire, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Ross, Eric | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2024 | |
| Sprunger, Kyle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Wheeler, Dane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Greatorex, Tina | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2026 | |
| Schiowitz, Marc | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2026 | |
| Sebbag, Gabriel | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/26/2026 | |
| 3400 Stocker Drive Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Advanced Care Consultants LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Blue Management Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Clinical Consulting Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| First Bank of Berne | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Jsj Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/25/2026 | |
| Jsj Property LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Lme Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| River Bend Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Samara Family Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Summation Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2022 | |
| Hutson, Jared | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Ross, Eric | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.