Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Oklahoma City

Baptist Village of Oklahoma City

9700 Mashburn Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73162 · Oklahoma County · (405) 721-2466

120 certified beds, about 96 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375381 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on October 1, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 25 health citations since June 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $28,695 in the last three years; the largest was $18,337, and the latest is dated October 1, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.15 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.

54.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
1K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
11E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
October 1, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect 1 (#106) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #106 was physically abused by Certified Nurse Aide # 8 causing two red marks on their right leg that was tender to touch. This caused Resident #106 to be afraid of the CNA. The administrator identified 95 residents resided in the facility
  2. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide safe resident transfers for 1 (#65) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The administrator identified 95 resided in the facility.
October 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for two of two (#1 and #3) residents observed with indwelling devices. A Resident/Guest Suite List, dated 10/15/24, documented 96 residents were residing at the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a CNA from physically restraining one resident (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A Resident/Guest Suite List, dated 10/15/24, documented 96 residents were residing at the facility and 30 of the residents were in memory care.
July 19, 2024Standard inspection · 21 citations
  1. K
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteOn 07/15/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to ensure the shower room door on the memory care unit closed and locked behind them to ensure residents were not able to enter the room. On 7/15/24, during initial tour, the shower room floor was wet and slippery, there was a hair dryer placed in the grab bar area and it was plugged it to the electrical outlet. There were greater than 10 bottles of shampoos, conditioners, alcohol based surface cleaner, and shaving cream covering over half of the shower bench. The cabinet in the shower room was unlocked, razors within reach. Staff stated the shower room door was supposed to close behind them automatically. [...]
  2. G
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a decrease in range of motion for one (#40) of one sampled resident reviewed for limited range of motion. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  3. G
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to review medications for a gradual dose reduction for four (#14, 33, 40, and #41) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 14 residents were on psychotropics medications in the facility.
  4. F
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure breakfast menu was posted.
  5. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to notify residents they were allowed to have resident council without staff present. The facility's deficient practice interfered with the resident's right to hold group meetings privately. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  6. E
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    F574 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman's contact information was posted in view of residents. The facility's deficient practice interfered with the resident's rights to communicate and access the state's ombudsman office. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  7. E
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    F576 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility failed to provide mail delivery to residents on Saturdays. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  8. E
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure survey results were readily accessible/available to residents and visitors. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  9. E
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives were able to file a grievance form anonymously and post information regarding the name of the grievance official. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  10. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a timely manner to a resident with a fractured finger for one (#40) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  11. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed for the use of bed rails, an order and consent had been obtained prior to installation for two (#4 and #19) of two sampled residents reviewed for bed rails. The DON identified 13 residents who used bedrails in the facility.
  12. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. food items were labeled, dated and stored according to facility policy; b. proper food handling practices were followed to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness; c. that staff changed gloves between task and according to facility policy; d. proper sanitization pratices or safety of the residents according to facility policy; e. hot food temperatures were documented according to facility policy.
  13. E
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call devices were accessible to residents for two (#17 and #58) of 28 resident observed for call lights in the memory care unit. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  14. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote resident dignity by staff standing over a resident while assisting them to eat. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  15. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a physician order and an assessment to self-administer medications for one (#1) of one sampled resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  16. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a quarterly assessment for one (#45) of 21 sampled residents for accurate MDS assessments. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  17. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised to include the use of bed rails for two (#4 and #19) of two sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed for bed rail use. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  18. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and concentrator filters were changed per physician's order for one (#4) of one resident sampled for respiratory care. The DON identified 11 residents used supplemental oxygen in the facility.
  19. D
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information, which included the facility name, date, actual hours worked for RNs, LPNs, CMAs, and CNAs, and the resident census was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
  20. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control while handling wet linens. The DON identified 28 resident resided on the memory care unit.
  21. C
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility assessment was updated annually. The DON identified 101 residents resided in the facility.
June 15, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 19, 2024, 3 on June 15, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · July 19, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · July 19, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · July 19, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 15, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 15, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · June 15, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 1, 2025Fine $10,358
July 19, 2024Fine $18,337

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)6.153.793.86
Registered nurses0.430.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.293.443.42
Nurse aides4.21
Licensed practical nurses1.50
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)54.9%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover42.9%53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.49 on weekdays and 5.29 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.90 in April to June 2025 to 6.15 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20266.150.436.495.29 0.0%0 of 9096
Oct to Dec 20255.640.485.914.95 0.0%0 of 92101
Jul to Sep 20256.340.586.665.54 0.0%0 of 9292
Apr to Jun 20255.900.536.145.28 0.0%0 of 9198
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Baptist Village of Oklahoma City. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.413.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.62.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.64.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.413.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.54.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.617.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.527.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.816.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.23.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Baptist Village of Oklahoma City's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

62.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 578 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 607 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

9.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 388 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

68.2% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 248 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 316 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.4% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 316 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

97.5% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 81 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BAPTIST VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%09/26/1993
Bancfirst5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization07/08/2013
Abbott, PaulCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Barrett, JeanCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Bell, KevinCorporate directorIndividual11/17/2020
Briggs, ParnieceCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Burrows, DougCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Davis, FrankCorporate directorIndividual11/29/2022
Enlow, LindaCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
Fisher, ToddCorporate directorIndividual11/30/2021
Fuchs, KellyeCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
Gandy, MarkCorporate directorIndividual11/30/2021
Gibbs, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Gibbs, LindaCorporate directorIndividual11/30/2021
Goddard, CatherineCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Haynes, NanCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Johnson, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Johnson, WillCorporate directorIndividual11/17/2020
Koons, BrianCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Matlock, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2019
McFarland, RandallCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
McPherson, AndyCorporate directorIndividual11/18/2025
Miles, JudyCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
Miller, EddieCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Mink, JacquelineCorporate directorIndividual11/30/2021
Russell, KerryCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Scott, PaulCorporate directorIndividual11/29/2022
Smith, MargaretCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Staats, SamuelCorporate directorIndividual11/19/2024
Trentham, MatthewCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
Turner, JamesCorporate directorIndividual11/28/2023
Fluke, LauriCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2021
Gandy, MarkCorporate officerIndividual11/19/2024
McFarland, RandallCorporate officerIndividual11/19/2024
Pierce, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual08/01/1990
Rooker, SusanCorporate officerIndividual11/19/2019
Russell, MaryCorporate officerIndividual11/19/2019
Short, WendellCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2013
Stewart, FriedaCorporate officerIndividual08/20/2019
Thomas, StevenCorporate officerIndividual05/01/2012
Trentham, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual11/28/2023
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/26/1993
Hall, MartinOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2013
Pierce, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/1990
Rooker, SusanOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/19/2019
Short, WendellOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2013
Stewart, FriedaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/20/2019
Thomas, StevenOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/14/1984
Haynes, NanTrustee of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
BancfirstAdp of the SNFOrganization03/12/2025
Baptist Village Retirement Communities of Oklahoma, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization09/26/1993
Abbott, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Barrett, JeanAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Bell, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual11/17/2020
Briggs, ParnieceAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Burrows, DougAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Davis, FrankAdp of the SNFIndividual11/29/2022
Enlow, LindaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/28/2023
Fisher, ToddAdp of the SNFIndividual11/30/2021
Fluke, LauriAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2021
Fuchs, KellyeAdp of the SNFIndividual11/28/2023
Gandy, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual11/17/2021
Gibbs, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Gibbs, LindaAdp of the SNFIndividual11/30/2021
Goddard, CatherineAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Hall, MartinAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2013
Haynes, NanAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Johnson, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Johnson, WillAdp of the SNFIndividual11/17/2020
Koons, BrianAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Matlock, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2019
McFarland, RandallAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
McPherson, AndyAdp of the SNFIndividual11/18/2025
Miles, JudyAdp of the SNFIndividual11/28/2023
Miller, EddieAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Mink, JacquelineAdp of the SNFIndividual11/30/2021
Pierce, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/1990
Rooker, SusanAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2019
Russell, KerryAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Scott, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual11/29/2022
Short, WendellAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2013
Smith, MargaretAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Staats, SamuelAdp of the SNFIndividual11/19/2024
Stewart, FriedaAdp of the SNFIndividual08/20/2019
Thomas, StevenAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2003
Trentham, MatthewAdp of the SNFIndividual11/28/2023
Turner, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual11/28/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 19, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on October 1, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 1, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 16, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Baptist Village of Oklahoma City's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Baptist Village of Oklahoma City 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Baptist Village of Oklahoma City get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 1, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Baptist Village of Oklahoma City been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $28,695 in the last three years.
Does Baptist Village of Oklahoma City accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Baptist Village of Oklahoma City?
CMS lists 87 owners and managers. Legal business name: BAPTIST VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection