Home / Virginia / Martinsville
1607 Spruce Street, Martinsville, VA 24112 · Martinsville City County · (276) 632-7146
140 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1984
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495143 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 19 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 70 health citations since October 2019, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.
CMS links it to Trio Healthcare, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 70 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist documented their findings in the clinical records after completing drug regimen reviews for (5) five of (5) five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #9, and Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, ombudsman interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the resident's needs and preferences to get out of bed for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #55.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to honor resident's choices for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to periodically review resident's advance directive information for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #50.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay for (1) one of (3) three sampled residents, Resident #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide required documentation to receiving entity at time of transfer/discharge for (3) three of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #80, and Resident #91.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set assessment for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #58.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, facility staff failed to complete (PASARR) for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #18.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for (3) three of (38) thirty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #64, and Resident #94.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered, comprehensive, activity care plan for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #80.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team, for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living care for (2) two of (28) twenty-eight dependent residents, Resident #10 and Resident #64.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered activity program to support resident choice, interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provided ordered treatment for pressure ulcers for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide food that is prepared to conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for (1) one of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident # 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow an established infection control program for (3) three of (28) twenty-eight sampled residents, Resident #4, Resident #32, and Resident #73.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for (1) one of (5) five sampled residents, Resident #14.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensue medications were available for administration for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 13 resident were free of significant medication errors, Resident #1 and Resident #1 and Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to notify physician and/or responsible party of a change in condition for 3 of 13 residents, Resident #4, Resident #7, and Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement facility policy and procedures regarding reporting and investigating a resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an incident of alleged resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate an incident of alleged resident-to-resident abuse for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the administration of medications for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow medical provider orders for 1 of 13 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less during medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022. During medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022, the surveyor observed 25 opportunities for error. The surveyor observed 3 medication errors affecting 2 residents. The calculated error rate was 12% (3/25=.12 X 100%= 12%). Error observation detail: 1- For Resident #47, the antidepressant medication Wellbutrin was unavailable and the ordered dose of Adderall was not available. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was stored under safe and sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 dry storage rooms and 2 of 3 nursing unit pantries, North Unit and South Unit. In the dry storage room, two (2) cans of tomato soup and three (3) cans of evaporated milk had exceed the best by dates. The [NAME] Unit pantry refrigerator contained an unlabeled container of cut watermelon, two (2) unlabeled fast food sub sandwiches, and an open, unlabeled package of precooked bacon. The South Unit pantry contained an open, unrefrigerated container of grated parmesan cheese.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete an admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 23 Residents, Resident #91. The facility staff failed to code the MDS to indicate Resident #91 was receiving dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for 1 of 3 closed resident record reviews, Resident #97. The facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary when Resident #97 was discharged home.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document reviews, facility staff failed to ensure ordered medications were administered for 2 of 23 sampled current residents (#47, #70). 1- For Resident #47, the antidepressant medication Wellbutrin was unavailable and the ordered dose of Adderall was not available. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sequelae of cerebral infarction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, dementia, major depressive disorder, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction on right dominant side, and iron deficiency anemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 2 of 26 sampled residents, Resident #96 and Resident 47. Resident #96's eye drops, Amiodarone, and Spironolactone were not available for administration. Resident #47's Wellbutrin was not available for administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider ordered laboratory test was completed for 1 of 23 sampled current residents, Resident #44. For Resident #44, the facility staff failed to obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) laboratory test. A potassium level is part of a BMP.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the completion and posting of the facility's daily 'nurse staffing information.'
Inspectors wroteBased on observation clinical record review, Resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 30 residents in the survey sample was free from neglect, Resident #63
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for 4 of 30 residents (Resident #40, #103, #47 and #316 and failed to assess and monitor for 2 of 25 residents (Resident #77 and #63) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prevent accident hazards for 6 of 30 residents and in (1) oxygen storage room in the nursing facility (Resident #9, #63, #68, #314, #13 and #97).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide a quality assurance program to meet the needs of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the receiving provider all of the required documentation including a comprehensive care plan when a resident was transferred to the hospital for 4 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68, #39, #96 and #63).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the resident or resident representative of the bed hold policy when 4 of 30 residents in the survey sample were discharged to the hospital (Resident #68, #39, #96 and #63).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 6 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #29, #39, #58, #78, #63 and #94).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide one of 30 Residents in the survey sample with reasonable accommodation of needs, Resident # 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, Resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, clinical record review, staff interview and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of changes for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident #63 and Resident # 110.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's property from loss or theft resulting in unavailability of pain medication and failing to maintain a clean air conditioning unit in the resident's room for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Residents #103 and #112). 1. For Resident #103, facility staff failed to secure from loss or theft Resident #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid tumor of the rectum, major depression, low back pain, diabetes mellitus type 2 with ophthalmic complications, chronic pain, difficulty in walking, traumatic amputation of right lower leg, hypertension, anxiety, nicotine dependence, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bipolar disorder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review, and during the course of a complaint investigation it was determined that the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 314 and Resident # 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to investigate abuse allegations for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 314.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman and/or resident upon discharge for 3 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68, #39, and #63).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, the facility staff failed to periodically conduct a standardized reproducible assessment by completing an annual assessment for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 8). Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy, contracture of left wrist and hand, anemia, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following infarct, acquired absence or leg, essential hypertension, atherosclerosis with ulceration of left heel, symbolic dysfunctions, paraplegia, and other sequelae of cerebrovascular disease. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date 6/10/19, the resident scored 10/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure that two of 30 residents in the survey sample received the necessary services as outline in the Level II PASARR, Resident #9 and Resident #74. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 9 had restorative nursing and outpatient psychiatric services as recommended in her Level II PASARR (preadmission screening and record review). Resident # 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a readmission date of 9/10/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The clinical record for Resident # 9 was reviewed on 10/10/19 at 11:10 am. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/17/19. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a baseline care plan for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68 and #39).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 of 30 Residents in the survey sample resulting in failure to provide specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the nursing facility would provide as a result of PASARR recommendations (Resident #74) and to attain highest practicable well-being related to hospice care (Resident #108)and behavioral health (Resident #73). 1. For Resident #74, facility staff failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into the resident's comprehensive care plan. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice for two of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47 and Resident # 96.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care of one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to pain management was provided to residents who require such services resulting in unavailability of the pain medication oxycodone for administration according to physician orders for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #103).
Inspectors wroteBased clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate and complete communication between the nursing facility and the dialysis facility for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #68).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to assure that nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety for two of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9 and Resident # 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure that three of 30 residents in the survey sample received behavioral health care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being, Resident # 9, Resident # 17, and Resident # 63.
Inspectors wrote2. The facility staff failed to ensure that the plan of care for Resident # 11 included resident centered dementia care to ensure the highest practicable well-being. Resident # 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 11/29/17. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, dementia, anxiety, psychosis, and delusional disorders. The clinical record for Resident # 11 was reviewed on 10/9/19 at 11:57 am. The most recent MDS assessment for Resident # 11 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD of 8/26/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 11 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 15 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 11 was cognitively intact. The most recent annual MDS assessment for Resident # 11 had an ARD of 3/20/19. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that medications were available for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that a pharmacy recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner for one of 30 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that psychotropic medications necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record followed physician orders in regards to administering antipsychotic and psychotropic medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #113) and failed to monitor side effects of medications for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #106 and #110).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to obtain labs as ordered for 2 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #23 and #77).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain dental services to meet resident needs for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 17.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services for one of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 63.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to have a written order of a physician to provide Physical Therapy services for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample (Resident #97). Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, contractures of hips and knees, repeated falls, attention and concentration deficits and spatial neglect following subarachnoid hemorrhage dysphagia, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, major depression, and psychosis. On the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date 8/21/19, the resident was assessed with short and long term memory deficits and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for two of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 63 and Resident # 77.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control guidelines on one of three facility units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a pest free environment in the dining room as evidenced by two surveyors walked into dining room and observed a roach crawling across the floor.
19 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 15, 2026, 12 on June 15, 2022, 6 on October 18, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.50 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.25 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.93 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.12 on weekdays and 3.50 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.83 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.76 | 4.12 | 3.50 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.90 | 0.78 | 4.05 | 3.51 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.05 | 0.64 | 4.20 | 3.66 | 1.9% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.83 | 0.50 | 3.99 | 3.44 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.6 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Martinsville Health and Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GL VIRGINIA MARTINSVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Trio Healthcare, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 1.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gl Virginia Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/16/2016 |
| Trio Health Care - East, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/24/2019 | |
| Trio Healthcare Investors LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/16/2016 | |
| Trio Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/10/2019 | |
| Gentry, Boyd | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/16/2016 | |
| Rubenstein, David | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/16/2016 | |
| Davis, Duane | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/29/2023 | |
| Gentry, Boyd | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/16/2016 | |
| Rubenstein, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/16/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.