Home / North Carolina / Greensboro
109 S Holden Road, Greensboro, NC 27407 · Guilford County · (336) 522-5600
126 certified beds, about 122 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345116 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since December 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 5 fines totaling $217,827 in the last three years; the largest was $96,786, and the latest is dated October 23, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.
47.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Alliance Health Group, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews of the staff, Family Member, Responsible Party, Paramedic, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Psychiatry NP, and Medical Director, the facility failed to identify the seriousness of new behaviors and increased confusion and complete and document thorough on-going assessments of a resident which delayed medical interventions and treatment. On 10/2/25 nursing staff were aware Resident #1 was undressing, which was a change for the resident and as the day progressed, he became more confused and agitated. A family member visited that evening and found the resident naked on the floor in his room. The family member reported to the nurse that the undressing was out of character for the resident, and he was agitated. The family member told the nurse she felt like something was wrong and asked the nurse to call 911. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, Responsible Party interview, On-Call Nurse Practitioner interview, Nurse Practitioner interview, and Medical Director interview, the facility failed to notify the physician immediately after Resident #5 exhibited a change in condition related to a fall. Resident #5 had a low pulse during vital sign checks after the fall and Resident #5's Responsible Party identified a hematoma on the resident's head later in the day and requested he be sent to the hospital. The deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5). The findings Included: Resident # 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy, abnormal findings on diagnostic imagining of skull and head, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff, Medical Director and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to ensure the necessary supervision was provided to a severely cognitively impaired resident to prevent an avoidable accident. Resident #1 was prescribed a puree diet and had a history of choking. On 3/19/25 Resident #1, who was known to have poor safety awareness, had a choking episode in the main lobby. Staff performed a back blow that produced a piece of bread from his mouth. He was assessed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and determined to return to his baseline. Following the 3/19/25 choking incident, all facility staff were educated on the importance of providing residents with diets per the physician order. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews with staff and the Medical Director, the facility failed to provide care in a safe manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #1). On [DATE] Resident #1 requested incontinence care and Nurse Aide (NA) #1 gathered supplies and raised the level of the bed to provide care. NA #1 asked Resident #1 to turn on her side away from NA #1. NA #1 stated she had her right-hand touching Resident #1 and while the resident was turning the brief fell on the floor. NA #1 took her hand off Resident #1 when she bent down to pick up the brief and Resident #1 rolled off the bed onto floor hitting her head. Nurse #1 was called to the room and assessed Resident #1 and noted she was incoherent and unable to answer questions. When Nurse #1 palpated Resident #1's head she yelled out in pain her head and neck hurt. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a newly admitted resident that required assistance with bed mobility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents. (Resident #1)
Inspectors wrote2. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included stage 4 kidney disease and diabetes. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact. While reviewing the section of the MDS titled functional abilities and goals, the section for self-care was observed not to be completed. Further reviews of subsequent quarterly MDS assessments were observed to have the self-care section filled out. During an interview with MDS Nurse #1 on 12/3/24 at 2:48pm, the MDS Nurse explained she had been hired as the MDS Nurse in September 2024 and prior to that the facility relied on an outside contract company to complete the residents' MDS assessments. She explained the contract company continues to assist with completing MDS assessments. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer a resident the opportunity to participate in his care plan meetings for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for care planning (Resident #32).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect when Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 and the dietary staff did not ensure Resident #12 received lunch. This occurred for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for food preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the areas of smoking (Resident #76) and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident #5) for 2 of 18 residents whose care plans were reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update a care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff, and Physician interview, the facility staff failed to confirm residents had taken their medication and left the medication on their meal tray. The medication was found by dietary staff. This occurred for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #58) reviewed for medication storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide foot care and arrange podiatry services for 1 of 10 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Resident #5 was discovered to have long and jagged toenails on both feet that extended ¼ to ½ beyond the tip of her toes (Resident #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview and physician interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for 2 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #40 and Resident #14).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with an alternate preference during the lunch meal for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for food preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain walls or baseboards in good condition for 6 of 13 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #213, #215, #217, #218 and #222). This occured for 1 of 2 halls (200 hall) reviewed for clean, comforatble, homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #109) reviewed for submission of MDS assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to verify competency for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers according to the manufacturer's instructions. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same shared glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. MA #1 was interviewed and reported she worked at the facility for approximately 2 years and her competencies for cleaning and disinfecting glucometers per the manufacturer's instructions had never been verified. She stated she never cleaned and disinfected the glucometer between residents. This was for 1 of 1 Medication Aide reviewed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility staff failed to disinfect a shared blood glucose meter (glucometer) between residents whose blood glucose levels required monitoring. Medication Aide (MA) #1 was observed to conduct a finger stick blood sugar (FSBS) check on Resident #1 and using the same glucometer proceeded to check blood sugar levels on Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4 without disinfecting the glucometer between any of the residents. This occurred while there were no residents with known bloodborne pathogens, such as Hepatitis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), in the facility. Failure to clean and disinfect the shared glucometer per manufacturer's instructions after use on each resident has the high likelihood of exposing residents to the spread of bloodborne pathogens. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and staff, Pharmacist and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to send expired or discontinued narcotic medications back to the pharmacy for 2 of 4 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a 24-hour and 5-day report to the State Agency when the facility became aware of an allegation of misappropriation of property by a staff member on 7/5/24 for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident interview, staff interviews, Nurse Practitioner (NP) interview and Medical Director interview, the facility staff failed to implement a pain management program that included pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches for Resident #518 who was admitted with chronic pain syndrome. Resident #518 was not thoroughly assessed for pain, a plan for pain management was not initiated, pain medication was not ordered, care continued to be delivered to Resident #518 in the presence of pain described at 9 out of 10. Pain interfered with sleep, mobility, and provision of activities of daily living. Resident #518 exhibited verbal and nonverbal cues of pain that included facial grimacing, groaning, and holding tightly onto the grab bars during incontinence care and bed mobility. A diagnostic x-ray was not implemented stat (rush) as ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's continence status for 1 of 2 residents who were continent to both bowel and bladder (Resident #518).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the sanitizing solution (chlorine) was maintained at the required concentration of 50 ppm (parts per million) during the final rinse cycle according to manufacturer's instructions in the low temperature dish machine. And failed to ensure the ceiling in the kitchen, meal delivery carts, and venting units were clean, free from debris, and/or in good working condition; and pots and pans stacked for use were clean and dry on the storage rack. The facility also failed to ensure the personal food items stored in the nourishment refrigerator/freezer in 1 of 2 residents' nourishment rooms (the first-floor nourishment room) were labeled and dated. These practices had the potential to affect food served to all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor intervention the committee put in place following a focus infection control survey conducted on 2/05/21. This was evident for seven deficiencies that were cited in the areas of Environment (homelike), Activities of daily living for dependent Resident, Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan (discharged planning process)Bowel/Bladder incontinence ,Resident Allergies, Preferences and Substitutes and Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve-Sanitary and on the current recertification and complaint survey conducted on 12/04/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure they had provided mandatory training that outlined and informed all their staff of the elements and goals of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor resident requests for two showers per week for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for self-determination (Resident #101)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to investigate and resolve grievances for Residents #12, #419, #267 and maintain evidence demonstrating the result of the grievances for Residents #80, #29, #68. This was for 6 of 17 residents reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #99, Resident #11, Resident 102, Resident #518, Resident #80 and Resident #51).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene to a resident (Resident #69) dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL). This occurred for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for ADL. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and a history of a cerebral infarction. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #69 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision and hearing, required extensive assistance of one staff member with personal hygiene, and did not refuse care. A review of the care plan dated 9/20/2023 included a focused area that Resident #69 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to a history of decreased mobility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 22 out of 120 days reviewed for staffing. The failure to have RN coverage for the facility had a high likelihood of impacting every resident in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, Consultant Pharmacist, and the Medical Director (MD), the Pharmacy Consultant failed to identify drug irregularities for the use of a psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This was for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #106).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure medicated treatment supplies left in an unattended treatment cart for 1 of 2 treatment carts (the upper-level treatment cart). In addition, the facility failed to secure resident medications left in an unattended medication cart for 1 of 2 medication carts (second floor- east side medication cart).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to follow a Dental provider's recommendations to assist a resident in obtaining dentures. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #46) reviewed for dental services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by not providing toileting assistance to a resident continent of bowel and bladder (Resident #518). Resident was instructed to use the bathroom in an incontinent brief and she indicated this did not feel-good wearing briefs and did not like it because she was able to tell when she needed to be toileted . This occurred for 1 of 13 residents reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure advanced directive information was correct throughout the medical record for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #71) reviewed for advanced directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and the Medical Director interview, the facility staff failed to notify medical provider of resident's complaint of right shoulder pain, and genitalia area for 1 of 1 resident reviewed. (Resident #518).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to issue a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), CMS-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) at least two days before the end of Medicare part A services to two of three residents (Residents #48 and 105) reviewed for SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews with resident and staff, the facility failed to maintain a dresser drawer in good repair for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for a safe comfortable, homelike environment (Resident #98).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property when an unknown person used a resident's bank card information and made an unauthorized purchase. This occurred for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #267) reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for immediately notifying the Administrator of allegations when they 1) failed to notify the Administrator of an allegation of abuse (Resident #116) and 2) failed to notify the Administrator of misappropriation of resident property (Resident #267). This deficient practice occurred for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to certify the accuracy of pain interview responses relative to the resident's condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident #518)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to develop a resident specific care plan for 1) discharge planning and this occurred for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 568) reviewed for discharge planning and 2) urinary catheter status and this occurred for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for urinary catheter care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Responsible Party, and staff interviews the facility failed to have a discharge planning process in place for a resident with a discharge goal of transferring to an alternate facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident for discharge planning (Resident #98). Findings Included: Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included altered mental status. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 was cognitively impaired. A telephone interview was conducted with the Responsible Party on 11/28/23 at 10:03 PM. She indicated that she made a request on 11/1/23 for assistance with transferring the resident to another skilled nursing facility and still had not received a response. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and the Medical Director interview, the facility failed to provide a diagnosis for the use of risperidone (a psychotropic medication which is any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This was for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to honor food preferences for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for preferences (Resident #71).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical record included pneumococcal immunization status to include to inform, offer, and provide education on the pneumococcal immunization. This occurred for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #54, #71, and #80) reviewed for pneumococcal immunization status.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain for 1 of 1 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for privacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the mandatory twelve hours of annual in-servicing for 1 of 4 nursing assistants (NA) #1 reviewed for competent nursing staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to post the required posting of a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, or a statement the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to display accurate Posted Nurse Staffing Information as compared to the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets for 30 out of 31 days reviewed for staffing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete 3 admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of admission and failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), [which was the last day of the assessment period] for 8 out of 9 sampled residents. (Resident #99, Resident #20, Resident #79, Resident #105, Resident #102, Resident #38, Resident #68, and Resident #106)
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within 14 days of the Assessment Reference Date (ARD), [which was the last day of the assessment period] for 8 out of 9 sampled residents. (Resident #21, Resident #89, Resident #37, Resident #25, Resident #86, Resident #55, Resident #54, and Resident #28)
40 fire safety citations on file: 12 on February 27, 2026, 10 on December 5, 2024, 18 on December 4, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 23, 2025 | Fine | $50,505 |
| June 11, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
| December 5, 2024 | Fine | $18,086 |
| July 17, 2024 | Fine | $35,105 |
| December 4, 2023 | Fine | $96,786 |
| December 4, 2023 | Payment Denial | 2 days from January 2, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.24 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.65 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.3% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 71.4% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.31 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.24 | 0.25 | 3.31 | 3.05 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 122 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.04 | 0.16 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 123 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.25 | 0.28 | 3.36 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 0.24 | 3.45 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 118 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.1 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 36.5 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 38.4 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Piedmont Hills Center for Nursing and Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
45.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
4.1% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 34 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HOLDEN ROAD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC. CMS links this home to Alliance Health Group, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emanuel, Yosef | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Alliance Health Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/16/2025 | |
| Reagan, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Alliance Health Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/11/2024 | |
| Coalition Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Reagan, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Tejan-Sie, Sheikh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.