Home / Louisiana / New Orleans
4021 Roneagle Way, New Orleans, LA 70122 · Orleans County · (504) 246-7900
127 certified beds, about 124 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195356 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 46 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.11 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.15 of those hours.
58.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Volare Health, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 46 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' meals were served according to their nutritional needs, special dietary needs, and preferences for 4 (Resident #R4, Resident #R5, Resident #R6, Resident #R7) of 6 residents investigated for dietary services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve the dietician approved pureed menu for 1 of 2 meals observed for staff following the correct menu. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #R4, Resident #R8) of the 5 residents who had orders for a pureed diet.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a residents responsible party was immediately notified of a fall for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan to prevent falls included an individualized resident-centered intervention for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to document a resident's newly identified wound in the resident's clinical record for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from financial misappropriation for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that funds were available for resident use for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 (Resident #23) sampled residents reviewed for personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff donned personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to providing wound care services to residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #31); 2. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene before and after administering medications (Resident #89, Resident #91, Resident #97); and, 3. Ensure staff performed hand hygiene before and after feeding residents (S6Activity Director). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 2 (Resident #40, Resident #108) of 29 (Resident #8, Resident #16, Resident #20, Resident #23, Resident #24, Resident #26, Resident #31, Resident #38, Resident #39, Resident #40, Resident #48, Resident #53, Resident #57, Resident #60, Resident #65, Resident #73, Resident #79, Resident #83, Resident #84, Resident #94, Resident #100, Resident #103, Resident #108, Resident #110, Resident #111, Resident #112, Resident #113, Resident #164, Resident #215) sampled residents observed for medications available at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathrooms were clean and sanitary for 2 (Room C, Room D) of 2 (Room C, Room D) bathrooms observed for environment requirements.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to accurately update a resident's care plan for 2 (Resident #8, Resident #57) of 2 (Resident #8, Resident #57) sampled residents reviewed for accuracy of care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were available for resident use for 2 (Resident #20, Resident #53) of 2 (Resident #20, Resident #53) sampled residents investigated for call bell availability.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a functional environment by failing to ensure a water facet was functional in1 (Room B) of 1 (Room B) rooms observed for a functional environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A resident's indwelling catheter tubing and bag were changed monthly as ordered (Resident #3); and, 2. Indwelling urinary catheter tubing and collection bags were not on the floor (Resident #3, Resident #R4). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (Resident #3, Resident #R4) of 2 (Resident #3, Resident #R4) sampled residents investigated for urinary catheter care and Urinary Tract Infections (UTI).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled drugs were accurately reconciled for 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) of 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) medication carts reviewed for the reconciliation documentation of controlled substances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure eight opened insulin (a medication that lowers blood glucose) multi-dose vials were dated when opened and/or discarded as required for 3 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c) of 4 (Medication Cart a, Medication Cart b, Medication Cart c, Medication Cart d) medication carts observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. ensure a resident's water, used for jejunostomy tube (J-tube is a soft, plastic tube placed through the skin of the abdomen into the midsection of the small intestine. The tube delivers food and medicine) flushes, was labeled properly; and, 2. ensure a resident's feeding syringe was labeled, dated and clean. This deficient practice was identified for 1 (Resident #72) of 3 (Resident #57, Resident #64, and Resident 72) sampled residents investigated for enteral feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received specialized psychological service recommendations for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 (Resident #65) sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen equipment was dated and stored in a sanitary manner when not in use for 1 (Resident #92) of 1 (Resident #92) sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified of a pharmacist recommendation for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #94) of 5 (Resident #8, Resident #19, Resident #74, Resident #89, and Resident #94) sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have accurate documentation for the route of medication administration for 2 (Resident #64 and Resident #72) of 3 (Resident #57, Resident #64, and Resident 72) sampled residents investigated for enteral feeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a functional call bell was available for 1 (Resident #77) of the 4 (Resident #23, Resident #47, Resident #72, and Resident #77) investigated for environmental issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident that required two plus person assistance with transfers was transferred with at least two persons and the facility failed to prevent a resident fall for 1(Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for accidents hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate an allegation of physical abuse to the State agency for 1 (Resident #3) of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) sampled residents investigated for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented their Policy & Procedure for abuse for 1(Resident #3) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the incident was discovered to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 ) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with privacy during care for 3 (Resident #30, Resident #43 and Resident #313) of 22 (Resident #10, Resident #29, Resident #53, Resident #45, Resident #97, Resident #48, Resident #42, Resident #264, Resident #43, Resident #24, Resident #313, Resident #106, Resident #1, Resident #101, Resident #89, Resident #17, Resident #91, Resident #74, Resident #30, Resident #18, Resident #73, and Resident #49) sampled residents observed for privacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure dining room tables were in good repair for 7 of 27 tables present in the dining room; 2. Ensure the residents' bathrooms had soap present in the soap dispensers for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #18, Resident #30, and Resident #101) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #17, Resident #18, Resident #24, Resident #30, Resident #101, and Resident #313) sampled resident rooms observed for environmental concerns; 3. Ensure the residents' bathrooms had paper towels in the dispensers for 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #30) of 7 (Resident #1, Resident #17, Resident #18, Resident #24, Resident #30, Resident #101, and Resident #313) sampled resident rooms observed for environmental concerns; 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of physical abuse were reported within 2 hours of the allegation being made for 3 (Resident # 45, Resident #49, and Resident #263) of 5 (Resident #10, Resident # 45, Resident #49, Resident #101 and Resident #263) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to: 1. Thoroughly investigate a resident's allegations of abuse and/or neglect for 3 (Resident # 45, Resident #49, and Resident #263) of 5 (Resident #10, Resident # 45, Resident #49, Resident #101 and Resident #263) sampled residents reviewed for abuse; and, 2. Protect residents from the potential of further abuse during the investigation process for 2 (Resident # 45 and Resident #49) of 5 (Resident #10, Resident # 45, Resident #49, Resident #101 and Resident #263) sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the residents' care plan after completion of quarterly review assessment for 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #91) of 24 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and document the presence of pain for 2 (Resident #17 and Resident #101) of 2 (Resident #17 and Resident #101) residents reviewed for pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure communication with a resident's dialysis facility for 1 (Resident #48) of 1 (Resident #48) sampled residents reviewed for dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) had completed annual competencies as required for 5 (S4CNA, S31CNA, S33CNA, S37CNA, and S38CNA)of 6 (S4CNA, S13CNA, S31CNA, S33CNA, S37CNA, and S38CNA) CNAs reviewed for annual competencies. Review of S4CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, the last annual competency documented was 07/28/2022. Review of S31CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, the last annual competency documented was 07/26/2022. Review of S33CNA Supervisor's personnel file revealed, in part, the last annual competency documented was 07/28/2022. Review of S37CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, the last annual competency documented was 07/28/2022. Review of S38CNA's personnel file revealed, in part, the last annual competency documented was 07/28/2022. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for certified nursing assistants (CNA) for 6 (S4CNA, S13CNA, S31CNA, S33CNA, S37CNA, and S38CNA) of 6 (S4CNA, S13CNA, S31CNA, S33CNA, S37CNA, and S38CNA) CNA personnel files reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information on a daily basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy for the prevention of Legionella Disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures to prevent resident abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of property by failing to ensure unlicensed staff who worked in the facility had a completed criminal background on file prior to providing care to residents for 2 (S6Agency Certified Nursing Assistant and S7Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) of 2 unlicensed contract staff personnel files reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a new interventions were implemented following a resident's fall to prevent future falls for 1 (Resident #42) of 4 (Resident #42, Resident #106, Resident #264, and Resident #313) sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter was secured for 1 (Resident #313) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter or urinary tract infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer intravenous (medication administered directly into the vein) medications per professional standards and physician's orders for 1 (Resident #264) of 1 (Resident #264) sampled residents investigated for intravenous medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were locked and not available for use at a resident's bedside for 1 (Resident #264) of 22 (Resident #10, Resident #29, Resident #53, Resident #45, Resident #97, Resident #48, Resident #42, Resident #264, Resident #43, Resident #24, Resident #313, Resident #106, Resident #1, Resident #101, Resident #89, Resident #17, Resident #91, Resident #74, Resident #30, Resident #18, Resident #73, and Resident #49) sampled residents observed for medications left at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to: 1. Failed to discard expired milk in 1 of 1 nourishment refrigerators. 2. Failed to ensure Orange and cranberry juice were stored at a proper temperature to prevent food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings were held quarterly.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of the completion date for 6 (Resident #19, Resident #56, Resident #58, Resident #73, Resident #85, and Resident #96) of 6 (Resident #19, Resident #56, Resident #58, Resident #73, Resident #85, and Resident #96) residents reviewed for Resident Assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required.
8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 10, 2025, 4 on June 5, 2024, 3 on August 14, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.11 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.53 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.8% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 2.53 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.11 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.11 | 0.15 | 3.35 | 2.53 | 0.3% | 0 of 90 | 124 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.48 | 0.20 | 3.71 | 2.90 | 5.0% | 0 of 92 | 118 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.23 | 3.69 | 2.75 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.25 | 3.63 | 2.68 | 3.7% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.9 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 37.3 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for St. Bernard Nursing & Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
6.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
65.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 40 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
1.3% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ST BERNARD NURSING & REHAB LLC. CMS links this home to Volare Health, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 1.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La 10 Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/26/2022 |
| La 10 Pinnacle Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/26/2022 | |
| La10 Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/25/2023 | |
| St. Bernard Nursing & Rehab Propco LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 07/26/2022 | |
| Knox, Donald | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/24/2023 | |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/22/2023 | |
| Volare Health LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| McLendon, Ronald | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/26/2022 | |
| Russell, Kim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/29/2024 | |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/26/2022 | |
| La 10 Pinnacle Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/26/2022 | |
| La10 Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/26/2022 | |
| St. Bernard Nursing & Rehab Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/26/2022 | |
| Volare Health LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/26/2025 | |
| Hagar, Chaim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/26/2022 | |
| Knox, Donald | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/24/2023 | |
| McLendon, Ronald | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/26/2022 | |
| Russell, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/29/2024 | |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/26/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.