2230 Executive Drive Revised, Hampton, VA 23666 · Hampton City County · (757) 224-2230
86 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495287 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2024, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 48 health citations since March 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.
54.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 48 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that residents and/or resident representatives had the opportunity to develop an Advanced Directive for 12 of 22 residents, Residents #3, 5, 29, 47, 4, 16, 62, 2, 38, 42, 50, and 75 and failed to honor an Advance Directive for 1 of 22 Residents, Resident #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that written transfer notices were provided for 4 of 31 Residents, Residents #26, #129, #71, and #72.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of medications and biologicals for 2 of 4 medication carts (Unit 1/Cart 1 and Unit 2/Cart 1) and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Unit 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor the residents preference of eating meals in the dining room for 1 of 22 current residents, Resident #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the provider of a critical lab result for 1 of 9 closed records, Resident #129.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage at least two days prior to the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay when benefit days were not exhausted for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #45.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate information is documented and/or communicated to the receiving healthcare institution for 1 of 31 sampled residents Resident #26.
Inspectors wroteBased on Staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of a bed hold being provided to 2 of 31 residents, Residents #26 and #71.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 9 closed record reviews, Resident #76 and Resident #25.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow provider orders for 2 of 9 closed record reviews, Residents #229 and #379.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 9 closed record reviews. (Resident #279).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain a provider ordered laboratory test for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and/or accurate clinical record for 3 of 31 sampled residents, Resident #379, Resident #9, and Resident #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for 1 of 2 nursing units, Unit #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #42, #49, and #72).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer an updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #49), failed to provide evidence of education regarding the risks, benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine prior to the administration for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #42), and failed to provide evidence of consent prior to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #42).
Inspectors wroteBased on a complaint investigation, observations, staff and resident interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to prevent pressure ulcers prior to identification at an advanced stage for 2 of 36 residents (R#13 and #408) in the survey sample which constituted harm for both residents. Resident #13's sacral pressure ulcer was first identified on 3/18/21 by senior nursing management as unstageable, as well as Resident #408's sacral pressure ulcer first identified on 3/7/20 at a Stage III.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 3 residents (#409, #50, and #35). The facility staff failed to protect Resident #409 from body exposure to public view and provide his personal clothing. Resident #50 and #35 were not provided dignity covers for bedside drainage bags.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of missed medication for one of 15 sampled residents, Resident #212.
Inspectors wroteBased on representative interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were procured for two of 15 residents in the survey sample; Resident #212 and #211.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interviews the facility's staff failed to afford the opportunity to get out of bed daily as desired for 1 of 36 residents (Resident #50), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on a medical record review, facility document review and staff interviews the facility The facility staff failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was given timely prior to the last covered skilled day of 12/17/20 for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews the facility's staff failed to maintain 1 of 36 residents (Resident #50), wheel chair in a clean and sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide evidence that care plan goals were sent with one of 36 residents (Resident #15) upon transfer to the hospital on 1/7/21.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to notify the Long Term Care Ombudsman of two residents (Resident #258 and #15) of transferring to the hospital in the survey sample of 36 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide two residents (Resident #258 and #15) with bed hold policy notice upon transfer to the hospital in the survey sample of 36 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement interventions, heel boots, in the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 36 Resident's in the survey sample, (Resident #6).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to failed to revise the care plan with a change in code status for one of 36 residents; (Resident #14) AND failed to ensure that the intervention, compression glove, was included in the comprehensive care plan for one of 36 residents, (Resident #27).
Inspectors wroteBased on representative interview, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice by signing off medications were administered to two of 15 residents; Residents #212 and #211 that were not available.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to accurately obtain, assess and monitor weights per physician's order and plan of care for one resident, Resident #40 AND failed to ensure that 2 of 36 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #6, and #27) treatments were implemented.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure pain relief measures were provided to one of 15 residents in the survey sample, Resident #212 who requested pain medication on 7/13/21 and 7/14/21.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 36 residents (Resident #10) in the survey sample had an order for Dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to acquire medications upon admissions for one resident (Resident #258) in the survey sample of 36 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observation of 2 medication carts, 1 treatment cart and 1 medication room; the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications and surgical supplies for two units. The facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications on Unit 1 and failed to discard two expired suture trays on unit 2.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #27.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to have the required minimal committee members attend QAA meetings and failed to meet on a quarterly basis.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to comply with regulations requiring the participation of the medical director at quarterly QAA meetings.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 21 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45). Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus, cardiopulmonary disease with oxygen dependence, hypertension, enteritis as a result of clostridium difficile infection, and chronic pain. On the admission minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 2/23/19, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessments for 2 of 24 Residents, Resident #22 and #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement the CCP (comprehensive care plan) for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #53.
Inspectors wroteThe facility staff failed to provide adequate ADL (activities of daily living) services to 1 of 18 residents at the facility (Resident #113).
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the highest practicable well-being for 3 of 24 Residents, Resident #6, #23, and #64.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, family interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure an accident free environment for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #53.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 24 Residents, Residents #8 and #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 24 Residents were free of unnecessary medications, Resident #22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed secure the narcotic box on unit 2 and on the back hall nursing cart on unit 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 24 Residents, Resident #23.
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 28, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.51 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.99 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.97 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.93 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.7% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.2% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.72 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.51 | 0.61 | 3.72 | 2.99 | 4.3% | 0 of 90 | 81 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.70 | 3.60 | 2.99 | 3.5% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.54 | 0.71 | 3.70 | 3.11 | 4.3% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.58 | 0.61 | 3.79 | 3.05 | 3.7% | 0 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.8 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.5 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hampton Health & Rehab Center, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.9% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 230 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 214 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
54.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 101 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 134 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 134 residents counted.
95.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 91 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HAMPTON HEALTH & REHAB CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wwbv Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2020 |
| Acorn, Christopher | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/23/2022 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Saber Governance LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2020 | |
| Jackson, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/28/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.