600 Bayard Street, New Iberia, LA 70560 · Iberia County · (337) 365-3441
100 certified beds, about 82 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195326 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 23, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 45 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,169 in the last three years; the largest was $8,169, and the latest is dated February 8, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.12 of those hours.
44.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).
CMS links it to Nexion Health, an affiliated group of 51 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 45 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to document behaviors of a resident diagnosed with mental disorders, to ensure the resident attained the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) out of 8 (#1- #8) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided services reflecting accepted standards of quality care as evidenced by medications being left at the bedside for 3 residents (#17, #84 and #90) out of a finalized sample of 36 residents. Resident #17:Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to history of falling and allergic rhinitis. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident's cognitive function was intact. Review of physician's orders revealed an order written on 07/14/2025 for Zyrtec allergy oral tablet 10 mg (Cetirizine HCL [hydrochloride]) give 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth one time a day for allergic rhinitis. On 07/21/2025 at 10:38 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free of accident hazards, by failing to lower and lock beds for 2 (#17 and #84) of 3 (#10, #17, and #84) residents investigated for accidents. On 07/23/2025, a review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program with a last review date of 06/18/2025, read in part. All residents will be assessed for the risk for falls at the time of admission, on a quarterly basis. Based on the results of this assessment, interventions will be implemented to minimize falls, avoid repeat falls and minimize falls resulting in significant injury. 3. The following is a list of commonly used interventions that may be considered to minimize falls and injury.c. Bed maintained in low position. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, by failing to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services for 1 (#37) of 1 (#37) resident investigated for dialysis. On 07/23/2025, a review of the facility's dialysis protocols with a reviewed date of 07/11/2025 read in part.2. Implement dialysis communication regarding plan of care. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served to residents that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 3 (#4, #7, #37) out 3 (#4, #7, #37) residents investigated for food out of a total sample of 36 residents1. Resident #4. On 07/21/2025 at 11:43 a.m., the resident stated that he did not like the way the food was prepared. On 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m. during the resident council meeting, the resident stated the food was served cold and the portion sizes were too small. 2. Resident #7. On 07/21/2025 at 12:47 p.m., the resident stated the food was not good, not seasoned, the meat was tough, and the portion sizes were for a child. On 07/22/2025 at 8:55 a.m., S14CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed picking up the resident's breakfast tray out of his room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service, and ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen as evidenced by: opened food items in the walk in cooler not labeled with the date and time; thick layer of debris and food residue on the deep fryer cooking oil collection area; andexposed facial hairThe facility had a census of 84 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the grievances the resident group voiced in regards to the food that was being served were acted upon and resolved. Review of the monthly resident council meeting minutes dated from 01/13/2025 to 07/03/2025 revealed there were complaints that the food was cold, improperly cooked, and portion sizes were small. On 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m. during the resident council meeting, the residents in attendance stated the food issues were not addressed and was worse. The residents complained the food was served uncooked, cold, and the meat was tough. The residents in attendance were Resident #4, #11, #16, #39, #50, #66, #69, #85, #87, and #90. During the resident council meeting on 07/22/2025 at 10:10 a.m., S15AD (Activity Director) was present during the meeting per the residents' request. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that Resident #7's grievance was reported and investigated for 1 (#7) out of 36 sampled residents. Resident #7. On 07/21/2025 at 12:41 p.m., the resident stated that about 6 months ago when he was admitted to the facility his wallet was stolen. The resident stated that his wallet contained 350 dollars, driver's license and social security card. The resident stated he reported it to the administrative staff. The resident stated that no one has followed up with him concerning his stolen wallet. The resident stated that he does not know if there was an investigation. Review of the resident's general nurses notes dated 10/27/2024 at 11:30 a.m. revealed, Resident reported theft of a wallet (containing: bank card, social security card, driver's license, insurance card and $350.00 cash) and a pair of sunglasses. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement physician's orders by failing to change the dressing on a peripherally inserted central catheter site for 1(#56) of 5 (#9, #11, #43, #56, and #58) residents investigated for infections. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection, extended beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, and enterococcus as the cause of diseases. Review of physician's orders revealed an order written on 07/11/2025 to change midline dressing following technique and apply BIO (round antimicrobial dressing used to prevent infections at catheter insertion sites) patch every day shift every Fri (Friday). On 07/21/2025 at 10:54 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #56. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents received all care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to inform the resident's physician/nurse practitioner that resident (#4), who has a diagnosis of Heart Failure, was having difficulty breathing and had a low O2 sat (oxygen saturation- the amount of oxygen circulating in blood) reading of 88% for 1 (#4) out of 4 (#4, #7, #13, #92) residents investigated for hospitalizations out of a total sample of 36 residents. Resident #4. Review of the resident's electronic clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Heart Disease, Heart Failure, Hepatitis C, and Diabetes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 (#9) out of 36 sampled residents. Resident #9. On 07/21/2025 at 10:23 a.m., the resident was observed siting up in bed in his room. During this observation, a suction canister was observed on the resident's dresser. There was drainage noted in the canister. The resident stated that the suction canister had been on the dresser for days. On 07/21/2025 at 10:24 am, S17LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) entered the room and observed the canister on the dresser. S17LPN stated she did not know how long the canister had been on the dresser and that it should have been discarded. On 07/23/2025 at 10:33 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON (Director of Nursing). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, for 1 (#2) of three (#1, #2, and #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by Resident #2's use of a wheelchair seat belt the resident was unable to remove.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term care Ombudsman of a facility-initiated transfer for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an assessment and ongoing communication with the dialysis facility by using dialysis communication forms for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2, and #3) residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a yearly performance review was completed on every Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) for 1 (S8CNA) of 4 (S8CNA - S11CNA) CNAs personnel records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents complaining of pain for 1 (Resident #3) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was available for 1 (Resident #3) out of 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive plan of care was implemented for 2 (#1, #3) residents out of 6 (#1-#6) sampled residents. The facility failed to: 1. Monitor a hematoma and perform wound care for a laceration as ordered for Resident #1; and 2. Perform wound care as ordered for Resident #3's surgical incisions.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent and treat pressure ulcers for 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) residents of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) sampled residents investigated for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide wound care as ordered by the physician for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and Resident #5; and monitor proper functioning of a low air loss mattress for Resident #1 per the resident's plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily nursing staffing that included the facility name, date, census, and the total number and actual hours worked by staff responsible for resident care in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed for residents. This had the potential to affect a census of 80 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Clean the kitchen fryer, fryer baskets, floor beside fryer and oven; 2. Label refrigerated foods and discard expired foods in the refrigerator; 3. Monitor refrigerator and freezer temperatures; 4. Monitor dishwasher temperature and chemicals; and 5. Ensure staff wore hair restraints in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results of the facility were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents. The facility's census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered plan of care for each resident as evidenced by: 1. failing to follow the plan of care to address Resident #33's elevated blood sugar; and 2. failing to ensure Resident #1 had enabler bars attached to the bed as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that recipes were followed for 4 of 4 (#11, #34, #45, and #55) residents who received pureed diets, by failing to follow a recipe for mashed potatoes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and records reviewed the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control and prevention program and implement accepted infection control practices to help prevent and control the spread of an infectious communicable disease, COVID-19, as evidenced by staff: 1. Failing to remove Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to exiting a positive COVID-19 room and perform hand hygiene upon removing PPE; and 2. Failing to ensure housekeeping staff used gloves and performed hand hygiene while handling a dirty mop.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity by failing to provide a covering for a urinary catheter bag for 1 resident (#428) out of 35 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure clean bed linen was provided to 1 (#23) out of 2 (#23 and #33) residents investigated for a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The final sample size was 35 residents.
Inspectors wroteResident #1 Review of Resident #1's EMR revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with Schizophrenia on 01/22/2018. Further review of Resident #1's EMR (electronic medical record) revealed a Level 1 PASARR screening dated 05/07/2018 that was completed at another facility. Section 3 titled Mental Illness, was checked yes, and only Major Depression Disorder was checked. On 07/22/2024 at 1:13p.m., an interview was conducted with S6Corp. She stated Resident #1 was diagnosed with Schizophrenia on 01/22/2018. S6Corp confirmed the Level 1 PASARR screening was not answered correctly because Schizophrenia was not checked. She confirmed no other PASARRs were found and was unable to confirm a corrected submission was sent. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff demonstrated specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide care to meet the residents' needs safely to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 1 (#428) of 35 sampled residents. This was evidenced by S18LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) leaving Resident #428's medication at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that were in order and accounted for the drug record reconciliation of all controlled drugs during shift changes for 1(Medicine Cart 1) MC1 of 3 Medicine carts reviewed during their annual survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents residing in the facility. On 07/23/2024, a review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substances, with a review date of July 8, 2024, revealed in part .4. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. On 07/22/2024 at 09:09 a.m., an interview and review of the July 2024 Controlled Drugs-Count Record for MC1 was conducted with S19LPN (Licensed Practice Nurse) and S20ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store drugs as evidenced by 1. Loose pills found in the bottom drawers of 1(MC2 (Medicine Cart 2) out of 3 medication carts reviewed. 2. Failure to label a multi-use vial found in 1(MS1) out of 2 medicine storage rooms reviewed This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 80 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident was adequately supervised and monitored while exiting off the transportation van's wheelchair ramp resulting in the residents sustaining injuries for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents sampled for accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 resident (#1) out of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the Physician and Responsible Party, immediately after an accident involving the resident for 1(#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any of the 82 residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a person centered care plan for 2(#1, #2) of 3(#1, #2, #3) sampled residents, by failing to ensure the residents received nutritional supplement as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 27 residents who were ordered nutritional supplements.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to provide accurate documentation that the resident's nutritional supplement was offered for 1 (#3) out of 3 (#1, #2 and #3) sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the 82 residents that resided in the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from other residents for 1 (#1) out of 4 (#1, #2, #3, and #4) sampled residents. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from being bit by Resident #4. This deficient practice resulted in actual physical harm for Resident #1 on 12/23/2023 at 1:00 p.m. when S4CNA and S3LPN failed to protect Resident #1 from Resident #4 who was known to be verbally and physically aggressive. Both S4CNA and S3LPN observed Resident #4 in an agitated state when she kept repeating that Resident #1 had her baby. S4CNA and S3LPN allowed Resident #4 propel her wheelchair down the hallway towards Resident #1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service and failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Remove expired food item from the refrigerator; 2. Label food items with the date and time they were opened; 3. Label cooked items with the date they were cooked; 4. Appropriately label food items taken out of original containers; 5. Remove dust buildup from the kitchen ceiling; 6. Remove dust from the refrigerator blower; and 7. Maintain kitchen equipment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 83 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 89.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure hand hygiene was performed between distributing each resident's meal tray for 3 (#197, #198, #199) residents out of a final sample of 55 residents and ; 2. Failing to provide a lidded container to dispose used PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) used for a resident on Contact Precautions out of a final sample of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the easy touch call light device was within reach for 1 (#71) investigated for accommodation of needs in a final sample of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment by failing to clean the wall which had a dried brown and red splattered substance in Room A.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change in Condition MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed for 2 residents (#82, #83) out of a total sample of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's dialysis status for 1 (#83) out of 55 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 resident (#82) out of 1 resident investigated for hospice services. This deficient practice occurred when the facility failed to collaborate with the hospice provider to obtain discharge orders at the time the resident was discharged from hospice care.
5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 23, 2024, 2 on August 30, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 8, 2024 | Fine | $8,169 |
| February 8, 2024 | Payment Denial | 5 days from March 6, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.12 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.39 | 3.21 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.09 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.50 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.4% | 47.6% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 41.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.85 on weekdays and 3.39 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.71 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.12 | 3.85 | 3.39 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 82 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.81 | 0.19 | 3.97 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 82 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.89 | 0.24 | 4.09 | 3.37 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.71 | 0.17 | 3.89 | 3.27 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Louisiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.26 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 3.6% | 0.9% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $14.67 | $13.97 to $16.87 | 20,690 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.63 | $23.87 to $29.43 | 17,600 |
| Registered nurses | $38.57 | $33.19 to $45.00 | 48,970 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Louisiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 17.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 45.4 | 17.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 39.0 | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.1 | 28.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.1 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for New Iberia Manor South's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (67.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
67.6% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 102 eligible stays.
12.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 70 eligible stays.
44.8% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
2.2% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
5.1% this home
Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NEXION HEALTH AT NEW IBERIA SOUTH, INC.. CMS links this home to Nexion Health, a group of 51 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexion Health of Ohi Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/31/2006 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Nexion Health, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2002 | |
| Bolt, Bretton | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Kirley, Francis | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Doerr, Kevin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/01/2018 | |
| Herdrich, William | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Corporate director | Individual | 07/28/2004 | |
| Reid, John | Corporate director | Individual | 12/03/2018 | |
| Riner, Meera | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Lee, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Riner, Meera | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Nexion Health Leasing, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/15/2002 | |
| Nexion Health of Ohi Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/31/2006 | |
| Nexion Health, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2002 | |
| Bolt, Bretton | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Doerr, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2018 | |
| Herdrich, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Kirley, Francis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Lee, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/15/2002 | |
| Riner, Meera | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.