Home / New York / Staten Island
135 Vanderbilt Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10304 · Richmond County · (718) 447-0701
320 certified beds, about 277 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1972
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335372 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2024, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 40 health citations since October 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, 1) dairy walk-in refrigerator contained undated, unlabeled food items. 2) dry storage room was not maintained at appropriate temperature condition and was observed with expired items, and 3) cold food items were not held at the proper temperatures during tray line service. This was observed during the Kitchen Observation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY00335874) from 7/9/24 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through the support of resident choice for 1 (Resident #143) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, and 2 (Resident #39 and #63) of 2 residents reviewed for Choices. Specifically, the preferred number of showers per week were not obtained and not provided in accordance with Resident #143, Resident #39's, and Resident #63's wishes.
Inspectors wroteDuring multiple observations from 7/9/24 to 7/16/24 the following were noted: 2) On Unit 6 a) Rooms 615/616/618-Name plaques were missing near bedroom doors leaving square area of mismatched, scuffed paint, b) Lock on 618A wooden closet was broken, c) a black-colored substance was noted along the floor/wall edge in shower room (lower side of unit), d) Resident #36's wheelchair armrests cracked and missing foam from right arm rest, e) Resident #102's left push handle grip missing and plastic part at end of left anti bar missing on wheelchair, f) Metal lockers and cabinet rusted and scratched (located in side hallway on unit), and g) Chipped paint, mismatched paint, scuff marks, and scratched furniture were observed throughout unit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00335874) and Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not assure that menus are developed/prepared/followed to meet resident choices including their nutritional, religious, cultural/ethnic needs. Specifically, 1) Resident #37 requested an ice cream during lunch service but was denied because of kosher dietary requirements, 2) Resident #143's alternative menu selection for lunch meal was not followed, and 3) Resident #58 stated the menus are developed with strict kosher dietary requirements and did not accommodating their cultural preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 7/09/2024 through 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program identified and prioritized problems and opportunities that reflect organizational process, functions, and services provided to residents. Specifically, there were 7 repeated deficiencies from the last survey conducted on 5/22/2023. (Refer to: F600, F609, F640, F655, F657, F758, and F880) for further information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1) Registered Nurse Supervisor #8 failed to practice hand hygiene and glove changes during wound care, 2), Licensed Practical Nurse #4 failed to practice appropriate infection control during wound care treatment, and 3). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity. This was evident for 1 (Resident #344) of 1 residents reviewed for Dignity out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not ensure privacy and dignity were provided when a licensed nurse performed blood glucose monitoring.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents are provided the option to formulate an advance directive and that advance directives are documented for each resident. This was evident for 2 (Resident #502 and Resident #233) of 6 residents reviewed for Advance Directives out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to discuss and provide information concerning the resident's right and option to formulate an advance directive for newly admitted residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 7/09/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not immediately inform the physician when a resident's blood sugar was below the parameter that needed to be reported. This was evident for 1 (Resident #344) of 1 resident reviewed for Dignity out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #344 had a physician's order to notify the physician when resident's finger stick blood sugar (method of drawing drops of blood from the finger for testing the blood glucose level) result was less than 70 milligrams per deciliter or more than 400 milligrams per deciliter. The licensed nurse failed to notify the physician when Resident #344's finger stick blood sugar was below 70 milligrams per deciliter on 07/09/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and survey from 7/09/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure services provided met professional standards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #193) of out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #5 was observed administering medications via gastrostomy tube by using the pistol syringe and forcing the medications through the gastrostomy tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00335874) and Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident was provided with appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to ambulate. This was evident for 1 (Resident #143) 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #143 was not provided with floor ambulation program as per physical therapy and in accordance with physician's order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification/ Complaint Survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident with indwelling catheter receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bowel function to the extent possible. This was evident for 2 (Residents #20 and #160) of 3 residents reviewed for Catheter care out of a sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the Foley urinary collection bag was improperly positioned compromising the devices' ability to maintain gravity drainage and prevent reflux of urine.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 7/09/24 to 7/16/24, the facility did not ensure that a drug regimen review performed by the Consultant Pharmacist was reviewed and acted upon by the attending physician or medical director in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #222) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications out of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, the attending physician did not address the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for Resident #222 as documented that they agreed and will do.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, during the recertification survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024 the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive and non-comprehensive assessments were submitted and transmitted into the Quality Improvement Evaluation System Assessment Submission and Processing system in a timely manner. Specifically, admission, annual, and quarterly assessments were not submitted and transmitted within 14 calendar days after the assessments were completed. This was evident for 53 of 53 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment facility task.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. Specifically, the garbage compactor door was observed ajar, and multiple flies were observed flying on top of garbage inside the compactor.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00344855) survey from 7/09/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident was free from physical abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 6/09/24 at 6:51 PM, the Dayroom Attendant sprayed Resident #36 with hand sanitizer when Resident #36 was trying to exit the dayroom.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00344855) survey from 7/09/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were immediately reported to the New York State Department of Health, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. This was evident for 2 (Resident #36 and #102) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #36 and #102 was not reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours of occurrence.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00344855) survey from 7/09/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #36) of 5 residents reviewed for Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the alleged staff-to-resident abuse involving the Dayroom Attendant and Resident #36 was not thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00335874) and Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. Specifically, the care plan related to Activities of Daily Living was not revised quarterly. This was evident for 1 (Resident #143) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of 38 total sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00344855) survey from 07/09/2024 to 07/16/2024, the facility did not ensure psychotropic drugs were not given to residents unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #102) of 5 residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medication out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #102 displayed worsening of behavioral symptoms and psychotropic medication was increased without Resident #102 being assessed for possible underlying medical cause.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Complaint (NY#00335874) and Recertification survey from 7/9/2024 to 7/16/2024, the facility did not ensure that medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for each resident. Specifically, Resident #143 was not provided with floor ambulation program, but documentation reflected that resident was provided with a floor ambulation program. This was evident for 1 (Resident #143) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living out of 39 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00321932), the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by nursing home staff. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, a review of the facility surveillance camera revealed that on 08/10/2023 at 12:16 AM, Resident #1 exhibited agitation and physical aggression. Resident #1 struggled with CNA #1 and stumbled on the floor. While Resident #1 was on the floor, CNA #1 held Resident #1's arms and their left knee rested on Resident #1's left hip preventing Resident #1 from getting up and as a means to control Resident #1's behavior. A review of the camera also showed at 12:22 AM that CNA #1 held Resident #1 against the wall when Resident #1 chased CNA #1 in the hallway. Cross reference: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00321932), the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical restraint. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, a review of the facility surveillance camera revealed that on 08/10/2023 at 12:16 AM, Resident #1 exhibited agitation and physical aggression. Resident #1 struggled with CNA #1 and stumbled on the floor. While Resident #1 was on the floor, CNA #1 held Resident #1's arm and their left knee rested on Resident #1's left hip preventing Resident #1 from getting up. A review of the camera also showed at 12:22 AM that CNA #1 held Resident #1 against the wall when Resident #1 chased CNA #1 in the hallway. Cross Reference:
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00321932), the facility failed to ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This was evident in 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #1). Specifically, Resident #1 exhibited several incidents of aggressive behavior towards staff and other residents. The facility did not evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions to address Resident #1's aggression.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure resident Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised upon each assessment. This was evident for 3 (Resident #60, #546, and #97) of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #60 did not have their CCP related to fluid restriction revised upon change in fluid restriction, 2) Resident #546 was not invited to their CCP meeting, and 3) Resident #97 did not have their CCP related to smoking revised upon noncompliance with facility smoking policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure a surety bond was purchased to secure all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility. This was evident for 160 residents with personal funds accounts (PFA) out of 249 residents. Specifically, the facility's PFA for 160 residents exceeded the facility's surety bond amount.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews conducted during the recertification and complaint survey (NY00309251) from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #143) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 01/24/23 Resident #143 was slapped on the buttocks by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 while being assisted with ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure each resident remained free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was evident for 1 (Resident #126) out of 1 resident reviewed for Physical Restraint out of a sample of 39 residents. Specifically, Resident #126, a resident with severely impaired cognition, was observed with bilateral full side rails in place, and there was no assessment, physician's order for the bilateral full side rails (SR), or medical justification. In addition, there was no assessment for the half-side rails that were ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during a recertification /complaint survey (NY 00309251) from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made. This was evident for 2 (Resident #143 and #18) of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #143 reported an allegation of abuse and the facility did not report the allegation to the NYSDOH timely, and 2) the facility did not report a resident-to-resident altercation that resulted in pain to NYSDOH involving Resident #18.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview conducted during a Recertification survey from 05/22/23 to 05/26/23 the facility did not ensure that each portion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. Specifically, The MDS assessments did not accurately document that four side rails were used with a resident. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Physical Restraints out of a of 39 sample residents. (Resident #126).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not develop and implement a Baseline Care Plan (BCP) within 48 hours of admission. This was evident for 1(Resident #546) out of 1 resident reviewed for Care Planning out of a sample of 35 residents. Specifically, Baseline Care Plan was initiated but not completed within 48 hours of admission, and residents and their representatives were not provided with a written summary of the baseline care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 05/22/23 to 05/26/23, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive care plans (CCP) were developed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #60 and #547) of 39 sampled residents. Specifically, a dialysis care plan was not developed for Resident #60, and an anticogulant care plan was not developed for Resident #547.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00308839), from 05/22/23-05/26/23, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. This was evident for 1 (Resident #35) of 1 resident reviewed for Infection Control, out of a sample of 38 residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a Pulmonary consult that was ordered for a resident (Resident #35), with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), was done.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and hazards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #107) of 5 residents reviewed for Accidents/Hazards out of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #107, a resident with a history of holding their own smoking materials against facility policy, did not receive adequate supervision to prevent the resident from smoking in their room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure a resident was provided pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was evident for 1 resident (Resident #18) reviewed for Pain Management out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #18 received opiod pain medications and treatment without ongoing monitoring of the efficacy of the pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that if bed rails are used, correct installation, use, and maintenance was maintained. This was evident for 1 (Resident #126) resident reviewed for Physical restraint out of a sample of 39 residents. Specifically, Resident #126 had full side rails in use without (1) An assessment for risk for entrapment from bed rails prior to installation; (2) review of the risks and benefits of bed rails with Resident #126's representative to obtain informed consent prior to installation, and (3) An evaluation to ensure the bed's dimensions are appropriate for Resident #126's size and weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure a resident was provided pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet their needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #446) of 39 total sampled residents. Specifically, a resident was prescribed Allopurinol once a day and nurses were administering twice a day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews during the Recertification and Complaint Survey (NY00308839), from 05/22/23-05/26/23, the facility failed to establish and maintain infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility did not follow their policy and procedures to maintain Contact precautions on a resident (Resident#35). with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Infection Control, out of a sample of 38 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure residents, staff, and the public were provided with a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This was evident for 2 (Elevator 1 and 3) of the 3 elevators. Specifically, Elevator 1 and Elevator 3 were observed with detached ceiling panels and dust buildup.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey conducted from 5/22/23 to 5/26/23, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) comprehensive and non-comprehensive assessments were submitted and transmitted into the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in timely. Specifically, Annual assessments were not transmitted within 14 days of the care plan completion date and Quarterly assessments were not submitted and transmitted within 14 calendar days from the MDS Completion Date. This is evident for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for the Resident Assessment facility task (Resident #s 68, 99 and 147).
21 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 16, 2024, 12 on May 26, 2023, 5 on October 20, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.68 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.40 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.1% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 41.9% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.83 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 36.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.67 in April to June 2025 to 3.68 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.43 | 3.83 | 3.33 | 36.7% | 0 of 90 | 277 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.83 | 0.49 | 3.96 | 3.49 | 36.6% | 0 of 92 | 261 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.71 | 0.45 | 3.84 | 3.38 | 32.5% | 0 of 92 | 260 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.67 | 0.43 | 3.80 | 3.33 | 27.3% | 0 of 91 | 269 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.1 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for New Vanderbilt Rehabilitation and Care Center, Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.5% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 187 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 238 eligible stays.
8.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.
51.3% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 117 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.
1.4% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 200 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NEW VANDERBILT REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schon, Anna | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 07/08/2020 |
| Schon, Baron | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 07/08/2020 |
| Schon, Henry | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 70% | 01/01/1989 |
| Schon, Henry | Corporate director | Individual | 03/22/2007 | |
| Schon, Anna | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2002 | |
| Schon, Baron | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2002 | |
| Schon, Henry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2002 | |
| Blush, Joel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Hersko, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/20/2023 | |
| Blush, Joel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Hersko, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/20/2023 | |
| Schon, Baron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/23/2013 | |
| Schon, Henry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/1976 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.