2222 Margaret Ave, Terre Haute, IN 47802 · Vigo County · (812) 232-2223
121 certified beds, about 102 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155484 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 27, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 48 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $40,790 in the last three years; the largest was $40,790, and the latest is dated September 4, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.09 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
57.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Communicare Health, an affiliated group of 110 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 48 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange transportation to an acute care hospital for a scheduled stay prior to a surgical procedure, causing cancellation of the surgical procedure, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care and administration/personnel (Resident B).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare a resident's food according to a physician's ordered modified diet for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for death (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected by 2/20/26 prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteA. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure paper towels at handwashing areas were maintained in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations and 1 of 1 dining observation. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was distributed in a safe and sanity manner and failed to ensure staff assisted residents with their meal in a safe and sanitary manner for 1 of 2 dining observations in the activity room (Residents 59, 1, 19, and 109).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure consent documents had been obtained for antipsychotics (medications used to manage symptoms of psychosis [a loss of contact with reality], such as delusions [a firmly held false belief that does not match reality], hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that are not there], insomnia [persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or waking up too early], and severe agitation) medications for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 11, 59, and 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within residents' reach for 3 of 32 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident 19, 55, and 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directives were ordered when the POST form was not the same as the physician order and care plan for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident 15).
Inspectors wroteBased record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (screening for serious mental illness and intellectual disability required before admission to a long term care facility) was updated when a psychiatric diagnosis was added to a resident's profile for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident 55).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and initiate a care plan to support the use of elopement risk preventive measures for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident 34).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided the necessary services to maintain grooming and daily care needs for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for daily care needs (Resident 12).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking protocols were followed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that nebulizer equipment was properly cleaned and stored after each use for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen and nebulizer use (Residents 12 and 63).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided routine dental services for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for dental services (Resident 9).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide family notification after a resident experienced a significant change in condition and subsequently received life-sustaining interventions to include a ventilator without notification to the emergency contact, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident B).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect, when the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided adequate monitoring and care during the night shift for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for neglect (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when staff failed to visualize a resident during the 8-hour night shift and the resident was found deceased on the floor between the bed and wheelchair the next morning at 7:15 a.m. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO), and a RDCO in training were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 4:52 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of isolated, no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to care for and supervise the residents that resided at the facility for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for sufficient staffing (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when the facility staff failed to provide care and supervision of residents residing at the facility during the eight hour night shift resulting in a resident not being checked on all night and was found deceased on [DATE] at 7:15 a.m. The Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO), and a RDCO in training were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 4:52 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of abuse allegations was conducted and a record of the investigation was maintained for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents H, G, and F).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to accurately document wound description upon admission to the facility for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds (Resident B), and failed to ensure medications were documented according to physician orders for administration of insulin for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered and documented according to physician orders for administration of insulin for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents, D, F, B, and E).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed during a dressing change for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident G).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nurse staffing for 5 of 6 units schedules reviewed (units 100, 200 A, 200 B, 400, and 500).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure inulin medications were administered as ordered for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for insulin medications (Residents F, K, and H).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing during 2 of 2 dining observations and 1 of 1 kitchen observations and the facility failed to ensure adequate dishwashing temperatures were maintained for 1 of 1 kitchen observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the code status (a medical term that indicates a patient's wishes regarding what life-saving measures should be taken if their heart stops beating or breathing stops) was documented and readily available to staff for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives ( a written document that tells the health care providers who should speak for a resident and what medical decisions they should make if the resident becomes unable to speak for themselves) (Resident 152).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure notification of a resident discharge had been reported to the Ombudsman (a person who investigates and resolves complaints and represents or protects the interests of another person or group) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments were completed timely for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for MDS records over 120 days old (Residents 42 and 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain and implement treatment orders upon admission for a stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed muscle and/or bone) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident K).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient weekend staffing for 1 of 4 fiscal year quarters reported for sufficient and competent nurse staffing (4/1/24-6/30/24).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff was competent in completing tasks accurately for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration (Residents 51 and M).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the correct supporting diagnosis was used to prescribe an antipsychotic for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 1), and failed to attempt a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) or provide evidence to support the denial of a GDR for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 48).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled properly for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Resident 51).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of the glucometer (small portable machine that's used to measure how much glucose [type of sugar] is in the blood) meter during medication administration pass for 1 of 4 residents reviewed during medication administration (Resident 51) and the facility failed to maintain a separation of clean and dirty mechanical lift pads and mop heads supplies in the laundry room for 1 of 1 laundry room observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to supervise, monitor, and initiate interventions for a dementia resident with a known history of intrusive wandering behaviors, Resident B, which resulted in her being hit by another resident, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents B and C).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for the reconciliation of narcotic medications resulting in two separate occasions of drug diversion for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication reconciliation (Resident C).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred to a doctor's appointment in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity concerns (Resident B).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents received care and services related to skin impairment (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement a system to monitor and reconcile narcotic medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medications, and failed to ensure medications were available and administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed medications (Resident D).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had safe smoking materials provided for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident 65), failed initiate fall follow-up protocols for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents (Resident 25), and failed to ensure safe medication storage for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Residents 39 and 254).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired insulin medications were disposed of properly for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 57 and 79) and the facility failed to ensure insulin medication was labeled properly for 1 of 3 medications carts reviewed for medication storage (Resident 97). The facility failed to ensure proper storage of insulin medication for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage (Residents 57 and 88).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cleanliness and sanitation of the kitchen and food preparation and storage areas for 2 of 2 kitchen observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided showers as preferred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 25).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of missing money was reported and handled as an allegation of misappropriation, and failed to report the allegation to the Indiana Department of Health completed for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for missing personal property (Resident 39).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, document, and conduct a thorough investigation after a resident alleged missing money for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for resident property (Resident 39).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans (Residents, 98 and 65). Findings Include: 1. On 10/03/23 at 10:51 a.m., while observing Resident 65, in the designated smoking area. The resident dropped ashes several times on her lap blanket. She indicated she had never had a smoking blanket or apron to wear when smoking and she was unable to feel sensation below her waist due to an auto accident resulting in injury to her spine. The Maintenance Technician provided one to one supervision for Resident 65 and indicated smoking blankets or aprons were not provided for the residents. Resident 154 indicated smoking blankets or apron were not available for her to use. Observation of the smoking area lacked evidence of a smoking apron or smoking blanket. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to a dependent resident for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident 13).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hand splint intervention was provided for a resident with a hand contracture (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin) and a compression sleeve intervention was provided for the resident with edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for limitation in range of motion (ROM) (Resident 13).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of respiratory equipment for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents 25 and 254). Findings Include: 1. On 10/3/23 at 9:04 a.m., Resident 25's unbagged nebulizer (turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) mouthpiece and tubing was observed hanging off the nebulizer machine. The resident was resting in bed. On 10/4/23 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 25 was asleep in bed and her unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing were observed hanging down the side of her bedside table almost touching the floor. On 10/5/23 at 10:03 a.m., Resident 25 was sitting up in her wheelchair and her unbagged nebulizer mouthpiece and tubing was observed sitting on top of her nebulizer machine. A clear substance was noted to be in the medication chamber of the mouthpiece. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of medication administration for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 33 and 60).
13 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 27, 2026, 4 on December 9, 2024, 2 on October 6, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 4, 2025 | Fine | $40,790 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.09 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.76 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.0% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.22 on weekdays and 2.76 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.96 in April to June 2025 to 3.09 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.09 | 0.31 | 3.22 | 2.76 | 1.2% | 0 of 90 | 102 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.04 | 0.34 | 3.16 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.08 | 0.31 | 3.20 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.96 | 0.32 | 3.10 | 2.59 | 1.2% | 0 of 91 | 94 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 38.5 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.6 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.3 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Southwood Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
14.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
9.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
51.6% this home
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Communicare Health, a group of 110 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hancock Regional Hospital | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2014 |
| Bond, Maria | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Clark, Timothy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Daugherty, Joshua | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Felker, Dean | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Joyner, Sara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Long, Steven | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/14/2018 | |
| Willard, Lacey | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilson, Roy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Bond, Maria | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Clark, Timothy | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Daugherty, Joshua | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Felker, Dean | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2014 | |
| Joyner, Sara | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Willard, Lacey | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilson, Roy | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Long, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2014 | |
| Margaret Mgt Co LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Abdayem, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Linder, Molly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/26/2024 | |
| Long, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/13/2022 | |
| Odenthal, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2017 | |
| Bond, Maria | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Clark, Timothy | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Daugherty, Joshua | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Felker, Dean | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Joyner, Sara | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Willard, Lacey | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Wilson, Roy | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Margaret Mgt Co LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Omega Healthcare Investors Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2017 | |
| Omg in Mstr Lsco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/06/2025 | |
| Abdayem, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/06/2025 | |
| Linder, Molly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/26/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.