1500 W Warm Springs Rd, Henderson, NV 89014 · Clark County · (702) 547-6700
255 certified beds, about 239 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 295071 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 28, 2025, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Nevada average is 9.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 66 health citations since November 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $20,719 in the last three years; the largest was $10,361, and the latest is dated March 28, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.34 across Nevada and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
38.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Nevada average 45.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 66 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to:1) Maintain sufficient and adequate linen supplies;2) Ensure a sanitary, clean and homelike environment of resident rooms;3) Maintain the cleanliness of shower rooms and resident care areas; and4) Ensure resident equipment, including a footboard, was maintained in good repair. This deficient practice had had the potential to encourage pathogen growth, spread infection, compromise resident comfort, dignity, and hygiene, and could interfere with the provision of timely and appropriate care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to implement its Drug Diversion Risk Tool for missing narcotics, for 1 of 64 sampled residents (Resident 272). The deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk of physical harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure skilled services were maintained for a resident with an approved appeal for 1 of 64 Residents (Resident 276). The deficient practice had the potential for a resident not to receive the necessary skilled services to attain maximum potential and prevention from hospital readmission.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide the documented evidence showers were provided to a resident for 1 of 64 sampled resident (Resident 228). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent resident from skin infections and exposing unhygienic conditions which can affect a resident's mental health, dignity, and overall immune response.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) enteral feeding bottle and hydration bag were labeled in accordance with facility policy for 1 of 64 sampled residents (Resident 245), and 2) a physician order was obtained for an enteral feeding tube de-clogging procedure for 1 of 64 sampled patients (Resident 5). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complications and for the resident's physician not to be aware of the enteral feeding tube clogging event and providing clinical oversight of the medical situation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not feel like their privacy rights were violated related to an unauthorized video recording and subsequent social media release by a resident's family member for 10 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 15, 18, 19, and 21). The deficient practice placed residents and/or representatives at risk for exploitation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a 1) fire incident and 2) an incident of unauthorized video recording and social media release of multiple residents by a resident's family member were reported timely to the state agency. The deficient practice placed residents at risk for delayed emergency response and potential violation of privacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review, the governing body of the facility failed to oversee services performed by a contracted vendor, including ensuring the accuracy of documentation of resident behaviors, for 2 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 4 and 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate tiering and state payments for residents in the Medicaid Behaviorally Complex Care Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure target behaviors and side effects were monitored with regards to use of an anti-psychotic medication for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and document review the facility failed to provide bathing as scheduled for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the resident's overall well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for monthly weights were followed for 1 of 6 sample residents (Resident 6). This deficient had the potential to impact monitoring of the resident's changes in weight (loss or gain), nutritional assessment, and delay dietary interventions. Findings Include: Resident 6 (R6) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, dementia, and major depressive disorder. A physician order summary dated 07/03/2025, documented monthly weight one time a day starting on the 1st and ending on the 7th every month for monitoring. A physician/nurse practitioner progress note dated 12/11/2025 documented R6 had an eight-pound weight loss from August of 2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review the facility failed to ensure an orthopedic consult was obtained as per physician order for 1of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to delay treatment and healing of a fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The plan of care was followed regarding transfers and the staff was provided with transfer training after a resident fall for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 25) and, 2. An Oxygen tank was secured for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 98). The deficient practice led to a resident's fall with injury and had the potential to cause a resident injury due to an unsecured Oxygen tank.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the outcomes of resident care and the quality of each resident's life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain documented evidence of maintaining a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee consisting at a minimum of: the Director of Nursing services; the Medical Director or his/her designee; at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, or board member; and the infection preventionist. The facility also failed to maintain documentation of evidence of the committee meeting at least quarterly. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the outcomes of resident care and the quality of each resident's life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained, an assessment was completed, and care plan was developed for the self-administration of medication for one unsampled resident (Resident 38). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's unsafe administration of medication or adverse reactions to medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility which are significant to the resident for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 102). The failure to accommodate the residents' preferences and choices had the potential risk to cause psychosocial distress to the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to document a written response including rationale to address complaints brought forth in the resident council. The deficient practice had the potential to cause resident concerns to remain unresolved.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was kept safe from physical abuse for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #43). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident to experience emotional and physical harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 168) remained free from restraints not needed to treat a medical symptom, identify the use of lower bed rails as a restraint, and follow policies and procedures in assessing the use of a physical restraint or alternatives considered prior to implementing a physical restraint. The deficient practice could have resulted in a decline in activities of daily living, loss of dignity, and physical and psychosocial harm to the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged incident of physical abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) within the required timeframes for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #43). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for incidents of physical abuse to not be adequately protected.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, record review, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered care plan was revised and physician order obtained for use of side rails for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 6). The deficient practice had the potential to put the resident at risk for harm due to lack of communication between staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 417) and 1 unsampled resident (Resident 468). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's skin integrity to be compromised.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in medication administration and orders clarified for medication for 1 of 3 closed record sampled residents (Resident 469), a medication was administered per the physician's order for one unsampled resident (Resident 219), and staff administered medication in a timely manner for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Residents 210 and 147) and 2 unsampled residents (Residents 27 and 137). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident not achieving the therapeutic effect (specific and desired effect) of the medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the removal or use of an intravenous (IV) access, including assessing and monitoring the site, for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 90). This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as infection, infiltration, phlebitis, or impaired venous access.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 168) was assessed and reviewed for risk and benefits, appropriate alternatives were attempted prior to installing the bed rail, and physician orders were obtained for bed rails. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of injury such as falls, entrapment, and broken bones.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-made foods were stored, labeled, dated, and used within seven days in the refrigerator. This deficient practice posed a potential risk to safety and health standards which could lead to food spoilage and place residents at risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 98) and 2 unsampled residents (Resident 467 and Resident 469). The deficient practice had the potential for residents not to receive timely interventions needed and for the facility missing the opportunity to identify care issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 25). The deficient practice had the potential to increase risk of cross-contamination, spread infectious diseases, and compromise health and safety for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1.) the Infection Preventionist had specialized training in infection control prior to appointment to the position; 2.) a COVID-19 outbreak was reported to the appropriate state agency; and 3.) N-95 respirator fit testing was completed, documented and staff training was provided per facility policy. The deficient practice had the potential for the facility's infection prevention program to be ineffective.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a grievance report was initiated and followed through for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 1). The deficient practice had the potential to result in a resident having an unresolved grievance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to vancomycin medication was initiated upon admission for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 20). The deficient practice had the potential prevent the continuation of a resident's medicine regimen for a serios infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence discharge planning was provided to 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 10). The deficient practice had a potential for inadequate post management and coordination of the continuation of care for a resident. Findings Include: Resident 10 (R10) was admitted on [DATE] for short term rehabilitation for open heart surgery. R10 was discharged on 03/01/2024. R10's medical record lacked documented evidence of a case manager's assessment for discharge needs during the resident's short-term stay. On 12/03/2024 at 1:19 PM, the Licensed Social Worker indicated case management oversaw discharge planning for short term skilled residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) was provided for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 3). The deficient practice had the potential for the resident's skin integrity to be compromised.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound evaluations were completed and weekly skin observations were documented accurately for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 1) and failed to implement a physician order for a psychiatric consultatin for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 32). The deficient practice had the potential to delay the assessment and treatment of residents' skin condition and management of a resident's mental health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure weekly wound evaluations were completed and weekly skin observations were documented accurately for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 2). The deficient practice had the potential to delay the assessment and treatment of residents' skin condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and documentation review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from accident hazards by ensuring the sharps containers were replaced after it reached the manufacture fill line, used razors and syringes were disposed in an appropriate sharps container in a common shower room (Hall 600), residents were assessed for smoking, and the designated smoking area was under supervision. The deficient practice had the potential for increased risk of needle stick and compromised the resident's overall safety and well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not use personal blood pressure monitors to take vital signs for residents in transmission-based precautions when disposable blood pressure cuffs were available. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure, 1) Oxygen tanks were stored appropriately, 2) medications were not left at bedside, 3) storage rooms were secured, 4) a respiratory cart and medication cart were secured, and 5) the facility's smoking policy was followed when residents were allowed to have possession of smoking supplies. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for harm or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unsecured in a medication cart at the 800-900-Hall nursing station, and medications were not left at bedside. The deficient practice posed a risk for resident's safety of obtaining medications not prescribed and not taking ordered medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) residents with suspected scabies were placed on contact precautions for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 112), 2) a staff member who was assigned to provide care to residents with unconfirmed rashes and who themself was undergoing treatment for scabies, was not assigned to another unit, 3) laundry items of residents with unconfirmed rashes were handled in accordance with the facility's policy, 4) the wound care team was notified of residents with unconfirmed rashes and 5) suspected resident and staff scabies cases were reported to the health department. The deficient practice placed other residents and staff at risk of contracting scabies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for a resident who was admitted with a surgical wound (Resident 635) and a resident with a contracture (Resident 108). The deficient practice had the potential the residents would not receive the wound care or contracture care the residents required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with bed rails (Resident 95). The deficient practice placed the resident at a risk for safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to administer medications timely in accordance with the facility's policy for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 42). The deficient practice had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings including: Resident 42 (R42) R42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, mononeuropathy, and anxiety disorder. On 02/07/24 at 7:52 AM, R42 indicated scheduled medication for pain and anxiety were frequently administered late. A review of the medical record documented: - A physician order for Lorazepam oral tablet 1 milligram (mg), give 1 mg by mouth three times a day for anxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a pressure redistributing mattress was implemented for a resident with a stage four coccyx pressure ulcer. The deficient practice potentially resulted in the worsening of the resident's coccyx pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services (RNA) was provided to residents in accordance with therapy recommendations for 3 of 35 sampled residents (Residents 34, 108 and 110). The failure to provide RNA services had the potential for the resident's further decline in mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure care orders were obtained and implemented for a resident who was admitted with an indwelling catheter for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 182). Specifically, a physician's order was not obtained when the resident's catheter had to be replaced and perineal (area between the anus and posterior part of external genitalia) wash was not performed routinely in accordance with the facility's policy. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for a recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessment for entrapment was completed, alternatives were attempted, and informed consent was obtained prior to installation of side rails for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 95). Resident 95 (R95) R95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including encephalopathy, unspecified, personal history of traumatic brain injury and seizure disorder. On 02/06/24 at 10:21 AM, R95 was in bed with the upper side rails in the up position on both sides of the bed. On 02/08/24 at 9:15 AM, R95 was in bed with the upper side rails in the up position on both sides of the bed. On 02/08/24 at 10:23 AM, a Certified Practical Nurse (CNA) confirmed R95 had upper side rails in the up position on both sides of the bed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) an admission and quarterly social services assessment was completed for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 182), 2) the Social Worker followed-up with the acute care hospital and the onsite dental services regarding the missing dentures for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 53), and 3) there were sufficient number of social services staff members in accordance with the facility assessment. The deficient practice had the potential for the facility not meeting the social services needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to 1) label and date food items, and 2) discard potentially hazardous foods. The deficient practice had the potential to expose resident to foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the hospice physician's order to place a resident on transmission-based precautions for possible scabies infection was followed for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 112). The deficient practice placed other residents and staff at risk for spreading scabies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure a dislodgement of a urinary indwelling catheter that resulted in urethral trauma and hematuria was promptly reported to the attending physician for 1 of the 33 sampled residents (Resident #1). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent the resident from receiving the treatments to prevent urinary complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for the care of surgical wounds for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #1). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident for receiving wound care services in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to manage the pain for a resident with communication problems related to ventilator-dependent respiratory failure for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #32). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident for receiving effective pain management and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and document review, the facility failure to perform the initial assessment for wound care, obtain physician orders for wound care, and provide treatment for surgical wounds in timely manner for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #1). The deficient practice placed residents at risk for unmet treatment care needs that could have resulted in surgical site complications such as infection, improper healing, and pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1) wound treatments were provided per physician's order and 2) wound assessments were conducted on a weekly basis in accordance with facility policy for a resident with an existing pressure ulcer for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 6). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for wound complications such as wound deterioration, infection, and pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure post fall protocol was implemented for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident 22). The deficient practice had the potential for inaccurate assessment and monitoring following an unwitnessed fall, impacting the quality of life of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately assess the pain for a resident with communication problems related to ventilator-dependent respiratory failure for 1 of 33 sampled residents (Resident #33). The deficient practice had the potential to deprive the resident of receiving effective pain management and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to account for narcotics signed out on the controlled drug record for 1 of 33 sampled residents (R29). The deficient practice had the potential to delay a resident's pain management and increase risk for physical and psychosocial harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for Oxygen therapy for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 14), and administration of a stool softener for one unsampled resident (Resident 271). The failure to follow physician orders had the potential for the resident's treatment plan to be ineffective.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to report signs of possible urinary tract infection (UTI) to the physician in a timely manner for 2 of 32 sampled residents (Residents 7 and 96) and ensure there was a medical justification for the continued use of a urinary catheter for 1 of 32 sample residents (Resident 134). The failure could potentially increase the risk of complications related to urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an attending physician personally visited a resident for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 4). The failure denied the resident the right to be seen by a physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure there was documented evidence a physician was notified of the laboratory results timely for 1 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 109). The failure could potentially delay treatments and interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food preferences were honored for one unsampled resident (Resident 31). The failure resulted in the resident being offered disliked foods.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure burned Brussels sprouts were not served to residents. The failure to provide a palatable meal had the potential to cause a decrease in the residents' appetite and, as a result, the alteration in nutritional parameters such as weight.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine was offered and re-offered to 1 of 32 sampled resident (Resident 134) and two unsampled residents (Residents 49 and 78). The failure prevented the residents/representatives to decline or avail the vaccine.
45 fire safety citations on file: 14 on March 28, 2025, 17 on February 9, 2024, 14 on November 18, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 28, 2025 | Fine | $10,358 |
| March 28, 2025 | Fine | $10,361 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Nevada | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.51 | 4.34 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 1.12 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.26 | 3.86 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.01 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.7% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 51.5% | 43.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.02 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.58 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.51 | 0.59 | 3.62 | 3.26 | 8.7% | 0 of 90 | 239 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.53 | 0.54 | 3.61 | 3.34 | 7.2% | 0 of 92 | 231 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.69 | 3.29 | 7.1% | 0 of 92 | 231 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.68 | 3.33 | 5.0% | 0 of 91 | 230 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Nevada, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.85 | 4.05 | 3.46 | 2.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.87 | $18.80 to $23.07 | 8,100 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.62 | $31.70 to $38.26 | 3,350 |
| Registered nurses | $49.84 | $41.76 to $57.82 | 27,070 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Nevada | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 12.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 13.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.5 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.1 | 23.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.7 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.2 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Tlc Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
42.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Nevada: 9 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Nevada: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Nevada: 1 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
37.9% this home
Median of homes: Nevada60.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Nevada0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
6.1% this home
Median of homes: Nevada1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 122 residents counted.
50.0% this home
Median of homes: Nevada91.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: TLC SNF OPERATIONS LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lion 26 Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 49% | 09/07/2023 |
| Sabrina 1818 Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 49% | 09/07/2023 |
| Hills, Daniel | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/07/2023 | |
| Sterling, Phillip | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/07/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.