Home / Massachusetts / Boston
1190 Vfw Parkway, Boston, MA 02132 · Suffolk County · (617) 325-1688
141 certified beds, about 126 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225497 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 54 health citations since November 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $29,489 in the last three years; the largest was $18,258, and the latest is dated February 13, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.14 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.
23.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 54 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable/homelike interior on three out of four units. Specifically, the facility's housekeeping and maintenance services failed to clean mice droppings, identify and repair peeled wallpaper, cracked floor tiles, stained and peeling ceilings and gouges in resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) were accurately documented for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to ensure that Advanced Directives indicated on the MOLST form (Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment form) were consistently documented in the medical record.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for two Residents (#81 and #10) out of a total of 32 sampled Residents. Specifically,1. For Resident #81, the facility failed to provide supervision during his/her breakfast meals.2. For Resident #10, the facility failed to remove unwanted facial hair.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for one Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, for Resident #78 the facility failed to elevate heels off of the mattress to prevent the development of pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) care plan and complete a trauma assessment for one Resident #14 out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify the residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the Resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for one Resident (#106) out of a total sample of 32 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from behavioral health services were relayed to the physician and implemented for Resident #106.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#6) out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure weekly labs were obtained according to the physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have an adequately equipped communication system for one Resident (#1) out of a sample of 32 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a functioning call light.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the Resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer/discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and failed to provide in writing the facility's bed hold policy, for one Resident (#128) out of one hospitalized resident sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified his/her physician of a change in condition related to the development a new pressure injury on his/her right heel.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing to have a new pressure injury to his/her right heel, the Facility failed to ensure he/she received treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice when physician orders for treatment of a new pressure injury were not obtained timely from the provider.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed, interviews and review of surveillance camera video footage, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and was cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a respectful and dignified manner which included being free from the use of restraints, when on 05/01/25, nursing staff used a bed sheet wrapped around the Resident #1's chest then tucked it under his/her arms and tied behind Resident #1's wheelchair, to keep him/her from getting up.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physician's orders included the administration of oral hypoglycemic agents for treatment and management of his/her diabetes, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when on 02/09/25 nursing did not properly identify Resident #1 prior to administering him/her Levemir insulin (a long-acting insulin) via subcutaneous injection. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for close monitoring of his/her blood sugars and treatment, as needed. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, undated, indicated the Following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a dignified manner during the dining experience. Specifically, 1. For Resident #56 who was dependent on staff for assistance with meals, the facility failed to provide assistance when his/her meal was delivered. 2. For Resident #66 who was dependent on staff for assistance with meals, the facility failed to provide assistance when his/her meal was delivered. 3. On the [NAME] 2 unit and the China Garden 1 unit, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience. 4. On the China Garden 2 unit, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience in the dining room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment during dining on three of four nursing units. Specifically, on the [NAME] 1, China Garden 1 and China Garden 2 units, residents were observed eating meals on meal trays in the dining rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide an activities program to: 1. the residents on the [NAME] 2 Unit, out of four units, and 2. four Residents (#3, #120, #32 and #52) out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, the facility failed to perform annual performance reviews for three of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) records.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed ensure medications were properly labeled and dated with an expiration, on 1 of 4 nursing units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#82) was seen by the dentist for routine cleaning and had his/her dentures replaced once missing, out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness and ensure food trays and dinnerware were in good condition. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to separate staff's personal food items from resident food items in the walk-in refrigerator and properly label and date food. 2 The facility failed to ensure resident's meal trays and food domes were in good condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program. Specifically, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the contracted pest control company to reduce the risk of pest infestations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#82 and #120) had their call lights within reach, out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives (written documents that instruct health care providers of the decisions for specific medical treatment if a person was unable to speak or lacked the capacity to make decisions for themselves) consent was valid in the medical record for one Resident (#66) out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one discharged Resident (#133), out of three applicable discharged resident records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed for one Resident (#11) to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I was requested from DMH/Designee after the Resident was screened to have a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and exceeded the discharge exception of 30 calendar days, out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement the physician orders for five Residents (#59, #11, #132, #131 and #133) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #59, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights as ordered. 2. For Resident #11, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a dressing to his/her left shin. 3. For Resident #132, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a Registered Nurse (RN) pronouncement of death. 4a. For Resident #131 and 4b. Resident #133, the facility failed to obtain an order to discharge from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for dependent residents for one Resident (#16) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide supervision with meals as per the plan of care for Resident #16.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide quality of care for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify a round dark red area on Resident #11's left shin and failed to identify areas on his/her right shin, consistent with being bruised.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide one Resident (#88) with hearing devices out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#20) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #20 was wearing prevalon boots to offload heels while in bed as ordered.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#80), out of a total sample of 27 residents received proper care and treatment to maintain good foot health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement the use of a hand carrot (orthotic) in accordance with the physician's order and the rehabilitation plan of care for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 27 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate falls for two Residents (#13 and #133) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #13, the facility failed to investigate his/her fall to the ground in the outdoor smoking area. 2. For Resident #133, the facility failed to ensure an incident report and investigation was completed after getting his/her hand caught in the elevator.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#30, #68 and #74) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #30's nebulizer equipment was bagged and dated. 2. Ensure that Resident #68's oxygen flow rate followed physician orders. 3. Ensure that Resident #74's oxygen flow rate followed physician's orders and ensure his/her a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPap) mask was kept clean and sanitary.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#85 and #16) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an individualized care plan for Resident #85, who has a secondary diagnosis of Substance Use Disorder (SUD), was developed. 2. Ensure recommendations from behavioral health services were relayed to the physician and implemented for Resident #16.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy identified irregularities for one Resident (#15) of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, an antidepressant was incorrectly prescribed for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for one Resident (#66) out of a total of 27 sampled residents. Specifically for Resident #66, the facility failed to ensure there was a re-assessment date for his/her as needed (PRN) Ativan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained an accurate medical record for two Residents (#88 and #16) out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, they failed to: 1. For Resident #88, the facility failed to accurately document if he/she was wearing his/her hearing aids. 2. For Resident #16, the facility documented that the Resident was wearing his/her left hand splint when he/she was not.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing information daily as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3), the Facility failed to ensure it maintained complete and accurate medical records, when Health Care Proxy activation forms were filled out and signed by the physician, however there were no Health Care Proxy forms and therefore no designated Health Care Agents, on file in the medical records.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu, or provide a substitution, for a breakfast meal.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to inform two Residents (#19 and #49), out of a total sample of 26 residents, of their right to be informed of the use of psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice for two Resident (#53 and #97), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #53 the facility failed to offload heels as ordered. 2. For Resident #97 the facility failed to ensure the Resident wore Prevalon boots while in bed as ordered. Findings Include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in August, 2021 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, muscle spasm and pressure induced deep tissue damage of left heel. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/28/24, indicated that Resident #53 had intact short term and long-term memory. The MDS further indicated the Resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an unhealed deep tissue pressure injury. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of meaningful and person-centered group activities designed to meet the interests of, and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for residents on two out of three resident care units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#3), who required dialysis, that they receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #3 the facility failed to ensure nursing maintained visible and accessible emergency equipment supplies at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. One out of two nurses observed made five errors in 28 opportunities on one of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 17.86%. These errors impacted two Residents (#99 and #8), out of 4 residents observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored according with manufacture's guidelines on one of three sampled medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow a therapeutic diet, as prescribed by the attending physician, for one Resident (#15) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #15 the facility failed to ensure the kitchen provided a fluid restriction as ordered by the physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented for two Residents (#40 and #97) out of a total of 26 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #40 the facility failed to ensure nursing documented wound treatments as complete. 2. For Resident #97 the facility failed to ensure nursing accurately documented when Prevalon boots were applied in the Treatment Administration Record.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a gap in the bed was filled to prevent possible entrapment for one Resident (#97) out of a total sample of 26 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who developed a new wound to his/her right foot and had physician orders to be seen by the podiatrist and the facility wound physician, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality of care that met professional standards of practice, when he/she was not seen by a podiatrist and there was a delay in being seen by the facility wound team for evaluation and treatment for his/her new pressure injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who had physician orders for wound dressing changes, the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate resident treatment records related to documentation of wounds and dressing changes.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviewed, interviews and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, wandered without purpose into other residents room, and therefore resided in a private room, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from involuntarily seclusion by being confined to his/her room by staff, when on 11/14/23 from approximately 12:00 A.M. to 1:45 A.M. a bed sheet was tied to the doorknob of Resident #1's room and then tied to the handrail in the hallway outside his/her room, by Certified Nurse Aide #1 who admitted to doing it in order to prevent him/her from exiting his/her room and wandering the unit. Review of Facility video surveillance camera footage showed that Resident #1 had made attempts to open the door during that time, but was unsuccessful.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a compete and accurate medical record, when although staff members said Resident #1 did not wear and had never required the use of a wanderguard bracelet (electronic monitoring device that triggers an alarm to sound when person wearing it enters into close proximity of alarm sensor), his/her Care Plan Interventions, however, identified that he/she required the use of a wanderguard bracelet daily and also indicated that nursing staff needed to check for the positioning and function of his/her wanderguard bracelet every shift.
31 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 27, 2026, 16 on February 13, 2025, 12 on March 28, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 13, 2025 | Fine | $11,231 |
| November 30, 2023 | Fine | $18,258 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.14 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.75 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.73 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 23.9% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.6% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.30 on weekdays and 2.75 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.04 in April to June 2025 to 3.14 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.14 | 0.53 | 3.30 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 126 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.98 | 0.56 | 3.11 | 2.64 | 0.0% | 3 of 92 | 129 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.09 | 0.65 | 3.22 | 2.74 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 129 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.04 | 0.68 | 3.20 | 2.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 129 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $21.32 to $23.94 | 38,130 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.57 | $34.91 to $40.66 | 13,210 |
| Registered nurses | $50.27 | $42.05 to $65.44 | 88,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.3 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.3 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.9 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Care Village at Parkway's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (32.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
32.8% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
11.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
3.3% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.