3710 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22207 · Arlington County · (703) 243-7640
210 certified beds, about 196 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495121 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2025, inspectors cited 25 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 77 health citations since January 2020, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $18,066 in the last three years; the largest was $18,066, and the latest is dated April 24, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
63.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 77 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infections on two of four nursing units, fourth and fifth floors.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one resident (Resident #4- R4), in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for one staff member, which affected one resident (Resident #4-R4) in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to take measures to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was conducted for two residents (Resident #4- R4 and Resident #2-R2), in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for three residents (Resident #1- R1, Resident #5-R5, and Resident #6-R6), in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication errors affecting one resident (Resident #1- R1) in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for three residents (Resident #5- R5, Resident #6-R6, and Resident #8-R8) in a survey sample of eight residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve meals in accordance with the menu, affecting residents on four of four units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food at an appetizing/palatable temperature on one of four units.
Inspectors wrote3. Resident #103's lunch was supposed to be grilled chicken salad and milk for his beverage and was not served according to his preferences on his meal ticket. On 6/24/25 at 12:45 p.m., an observation was conducted with residents' meal trays in the resident's room. Resident #103 was being served lunch in his room and had requested a grilled chicken salad for lunch. His meal ticket had grilled chicken salad, crackers, apple crisp, tea and milk, and there was no apple crisp, grilled chicken or milk on his lunch tray. On 6/24/25 at 1:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #103. He stated that it was many times that he did not receive what was on his meal tickets. Resident #103 said, When I request the salads most of the time the meat that is supposed to be on the salad isn't there, sometimes they bring it and sometimes not. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to provide beverages to include, but not limited to milk, in accordance with meal tickets to maintain resident hydration for multiple residents on two units out of four units (Unit 4 and Unit 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and distribute food in a sanitary manner in accordance with food service safety standards in the main kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure staff followed proper infection control practices to include hand hygiene and handling of table linens to prevent contamination during meal service on two of four units ( Unit 4 and Unit 5) and failed to wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program affecting four of four resident units.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's legal representative of a medication change for one of twenty residents (Resident #112- R112).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a resident with written notice and reason for a room change for one of twenty residents (Resident #112- R112).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #102) out of a survey sample of 20 residents, was treated with respect and dignity by performing personal grooming without the resident's consent.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to administer medications to one of twenty residents (Resident #111- R111).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration to one of twenty residents (Resident #111- R111).
Inspectors wrote4. For Resident #56, staff failed to follow infection control practices for proper positioning of a urinary catheter bag. R56's clinical record documented that Resident #56 (R56) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction with hemiplegia, diabetes, hypertension, anemia, obstructive uropathy, and cognitive communication deficit. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R56 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. The record also included a physician's order dated 9/17/24 for a Foley urinary catheter for management of urinary retention due to obstructive uropathy. On 4/21/25 at 2:53 p.m., R56 was observed in bed. The urine collection bag for R56's catheter was positioned with the bottom part of the bag resting on the floor. The bag was strapped to the bed frame but was not positioned or strapped to ensure the bag was off the floor. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional either full-time, part-time, or on a consultant basis. A qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional with appropriate competencies and skills ensures palatable, therapeutic meals are provided to meet the residents' needs and preferences and carries out the functions of the food and nutrition service for all residents at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date, label, and/or store food products safely to decrease the risk of food borne illness, potentially affecting 185 of 189 residents who consume food prepared from the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's rights (R90) were honored during dining and that staff provided a homelike dining experience during meals affecting many residents on 1 of 4 units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve meals in accordance with the menu, affecting residents on four of four units.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at proper and appetizing temperatures for seven (Resident (R) 32, R35, R49, R66, R86, R89 and R154) out of 46 sampled residents, increasing the risk for altered nutritional status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to provide drinks at meals that were consistent with the residents' preferences and meal slips for 12 of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the required documentation and/or refusals related to administration of vaccinations for influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 for four of five Residents (R)(13, 57, 56, 157) which increased the risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing complications of respiratory infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program affecting four of four resident units.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was afforded the right to participate in the treatment plan for one of 46 residents. Resident #27 was not afforded the opportunity to participate in care planning and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's legal representative of a medication change for one of twenty residents (Resident #112- R112).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to honor a preference for twice weekly showers for one of thirty-nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #187).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a resident with written notice and reason for a room change for one of twenty residents (Resident #112- R112).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain food preferences upon admission for one of one residents (R175) in the sample of 46 residents, causing R175 not to have his preferences provided and honored. Failure to provide resident's food preference has the potential to result in weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable care for the protection of personal property for one of forty-six residents, Resident #137 (R137). R137 did not have a personal property invoice completed upon admission. The Findings Include: Clinical record review revealed that diagnoses for R137 included acute respiratory failure, diabetes, urine retention, chronic pain, and obstructive uropathy. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/2/2025, which assessed R137 with a cognitive score of 12 out of 15, indicating cognitively intact. On 4/21/25 at 4:39 PM, an interview with R137 was conducted. R137 verbalized that he had been missing a pair of ear pods and felt that they had been taken by staff about 6 months prior. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, document review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy in notifying the Department of Health Professions (DHP) after receiving an allegation of sexual abuse against Registered Nurse (RN) 2, involving one resident (Resident (R)50) reviewed for abuse, out of a sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence that actual and potential allegations of abuse/neglect were thoroughly investigated for two residents (Resident 50, Resident 128), of 46 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive MDS assessment was completed accurately for one resident (R41) in the sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed after admission for one (Resident (R)40) out of 46 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for two of two residents (Resident (R) 128 and R175), in the sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to completely fill out a Durable Do Not Resuscitate form for one of one resident (R)185) in the sample of 46 residents which could cause the R185 to receive unnecessary treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for one of thirty-nine residents in the survey sample (Resident #103).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, record review, and facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards, failed to implement fall intervention as care planned, and failed to conduct thorough investigation to identify post-fall causal factors for one resident (Resident 128 -R128) in the sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration to one of twenty residents (Resident #111- R111).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain safe and functioning equipment. Resident #80's (R80) hand assist bar in the bathroom was not securely anchored to the wall.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain food preferences upon admission for one of one residents (R175) in the sample of 46 residents, increasing the risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and dehydration.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and implement interventions for care/treatment of pressure ulcers for two of six residents in the survey sample (Residents #1 and #5).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in condition requiring treatment for one of six residents in the survey sample (Resident #5)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of seven residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain and/or follow physician orders for five of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample. 1. Resident #78 was not administered the medication epoetin alfa-epbx (Epogen) as ordered by the physician for treatment of anemia. After missing eight consecutive doses of the medication over a period of eight weeks, Resident #78 experienced critically low hemoglobin levels of 6.8 g/dL (grams per deciliter) and 6.7 g/dL and required treatment with a blood transfusion. 2. Resident #46 did not have a dressing applied to a forehead lesion as prescribed by the physician. 3. The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the care and treatment of a midline (intravenous) catheter for Resident #136. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of unavailable medications for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample. Resident #78's physician was not notified that the resident missed multiple doses of the medication epoetin alfa-epbx (Epogen) for treatment of anemia. After missing eight consecutive doses of the medication over a period of eight weeks, Resident #78 experienced critically low hemoglobin levels of 6.8 and 6.7 g/dL (grams per deciliter) requiring treatment with a blood transfusion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and in the coarse of a complaint investigation the facility failed to develop a care plan for three of 37 resident's, and failed to meet with the resident and family regarding care plan goals for one of 37 resident's. A care plan was not developed for the care and monitoring of a Midline (A Intravenous line inserted into the upper arm, usually used for the treatment of antibiotics) for Resident #20. Resident #93 did not have a care plan for dialysis or shunt for dialysis. Resident #46 did not have a care plan for the care and monitoring of a forehead lesion/growth. Care plan goals were not discussed with Resident #166 or the family. This was a complaint deficiency. The Findings Include: 1. Diagnoses for Resident #20 included: Sepsis, stenosis of left carotid artery, depression, and urinary tract infection. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 3 of 37 residents in the survey sample, Resident #135, Resident #42, and Resident #95. Resident #135's CCP was not reviewed and revised for the discontinuation and care of a PICC/Midline and for the change in discharge plans. Resident #42's CCP was not reviewed and revised for the discontinuation of anti-coagulant medication. Resident #95's CCP was not reviewed and revised for the discontinuation of tube-feeding and care of a gastrostomy tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, facility document review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to respond to call bells in a timely manner. Facility staff failed to answer call bells in a timely manner as evidenced by resident interviews and as documented in the resident council meeting minutes.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample. Resident #78 missed twelve doses of the medication epoetin alfa-epbx (Epogen) for treatment of anemia. Following the eight consecutive weeks of the unavailable medication, the resident experienced critically low hemoglobin levels that required treatment with a blood transfusion.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 37 residents (Resident #316) was free of unnecessary medications. Resident #316 had a physician's order to stop Lovenox injections when the resident's INR (international normalization rate) (measures the time for the blood to clot) reached above 2.0, the medication was not stopped at that time.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a gradual dose reduction for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample. Resident #159 continued to receive a 75 mg (milligram) dose of the antipsychotic medication Seroquel for 15 weeks after the physician ordered for a dose reduction to 50 mg per day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, group interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was served at safe temperatures and meals were palatable and appetizing on one of four units. Fourth floor residents were served food items below safe holding temperatures from the steam table. Residents stated food was not hot or appetizing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. Dietary staff entered the kitchen without washing hands. Refrigerated foods were stored beyond use by dates and/or without labels indicating dates opened. Food temperatures were not checked on the steam tables prior to plating food. Hot foods were stored and served from the unit steam tables below the safe/recommended holding temperature of 135 degrees (F).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure two of 37 residents were assessed for self administration of medications (Resident #99 and Resident #127). 1. Resident # 99 was not assessed to self administer eye drops. A bottle of eye drops were observed at the resident's bedside. 2. Resident #127 was not assessed to self administer eye drops (a bottle of betadine eye drops and a bottle of artificial tears were found at the resident's bedside).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to allow two of 37 residents to have private time together. Resident #103 and Resident #105, both cognitively intact, and consenting, were not allowed by the facility staff to spend time together alone.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of employee files, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to fully implement their policy for the screening of new employees. The facility filed to conduct a Criminal Background check for one of 24 employee files reviewed, and failed to ensure the Sworn Statement form was completed for two of 24 employee files reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two of 37 resident's in the survey sample. Resident #167's discharge MDS assessment was coded as being discharged to the hospital instead of home. Resident #136 was not properly coded for infection in the foot. The Findings Include: 1. Diagnoses for Resident #167 included: Right femur fracture, right hip replacement, and anxiety. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 5 day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/25/22. Resident #167's cognitive score was a 15 indicating cognitively intact. During a closed record review, Resident #167 was added to the sample as a hospital discharge review. On 8/17/22 Resident #167's clinical record was reviewed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to develop and provide a summary of a baseline care plan to one of 37 residents, Resident #166.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed recognize and report irregularities in the medication regimen review for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample. Two monthly pharmacist reviews failed to recognize and report that Resident #78 was not administered weekly injections of epoetin alfa-epbx (Epogen) as ordered by the physician for treatment of anemia.
Inspectors wroteBased on medication pass and pour observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent. There were two errors out of 27 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41 percent. Resident #101's Olanzapine 10 milligrams (mg) ordered for Schizophrenia and Folic Acid 1 mg ordered for anemia was unavailable for administration. The Findings Include: On 09/27/22 at 9:00 am a medication pass and pour observation was conducted. Resident #101's Olanzapine 10 mg and Folic Acid 1 mg was ordered to be given at 9:00 AM. License practical nurse (LPN #1) could not find either of the medications in the medication cart. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure proper functioning of the dishwasher and a functioning paper towel dispenser in the kitchen. The dishwasher was operated with water leaking from under the center stainless steel panel into the floor. A paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink near the kitchen entrance was not functional.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a safe transfer for one of 36 residents in the survey sample. Resident #90 was transferred to bed with the assistance of one person when her plan of care required two-person assistance for safe transfers, resulting in a fracture of the left femur.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 36 residents, Resident #49, was free from unnecessary medications. Resident #49 was prescribed Depakote without adequate monitoring. The resident had not had a Depakote level drawn in over 14 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored in a safe manner. The facility failed to ensure narcotics were stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment on 2 of 2 floors (3rd and 4th floors) and failed to ensure one of five medication carts had an insulin pen properly labeled (medication cart 'U' side on 4th floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure proper holding temperatures on the steam table for one of 4 floors. The 4th floor steam table had foods at holding temperatures below 135 degrees. The findings Include: On 01/28/20 at 12:20 PM, the food serving line was observed on 4th floor. Dietary aide (other staff, OS #5) was serving from the steam table and was asked to obtain food temperatures from the steam table. The following temperatures were observed: eggplant parmesan 120 degrees, chicken cordon bleu 118 degrees, and broccoli 120 degrees. When asked what food holding temperatures should be, OS #5 stated 135, 145, 150 degrees. On 01/29/20 at 5:19 PM, the above information was presented to the director of nursing and administrator during a staff meeting. A policy concerning holding food temperatures was requested. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure prevlon boots were maintained in sanitary condition and in good repair for one of 36 residents, Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility staff failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for two of 26 residents. Resident #118's care plan was not revised to include hospice services, and Resident #49's care plan was not revised to include wheelchair positioning.
Inspectors wroteBased on medication pass and pour observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to administer Janumet (a diabetic medication) within the specified timeframe for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #117.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide glasses for one of 36 Residents, Resident #122. The findings Include: Resident #122 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #122 included; Osteoarthritis, bipolar disorder, chronic respiratory failure, and joint pain. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/7/20. Resident #122 was assessed with a cognitive score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. On 01/28/20 at 10:29 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #122. During the interview Resident #122 stated that that it was hard to see to read and that an optometrist had came to the facility and did an examination and prescribed glasses but had never received the glasses. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide proper care and treatment for pressure ulcers for two of 36 in the survey sample, Resident #80 and Resident #355. Staff failed perform hand hygiene after glove changes during a pressure ulcer dressing change for Resident #80, and failed to follow physician orders for a dressing change for Resident #335.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility and positioning for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #49. Resident #49's wheelchair was not equipped with bilateral leg rests, and the resident's legs did not touch the floor, and were hanging approximately one foot off the ground.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to attempt alternatives, identify risks/benefits and obtain informed consent prior to the use of bed rails for one of 36 residents in the survey sample (Resident #90).
12 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 24, 2025, 4 on August 18, 2022, 4 on January 30, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 24, 2025 | Fine | $18,066 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.59 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.09 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.09 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 69.7% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.59 | 0.59 | 3.80 | 3.09 | 1.1% | 0 of 90 | 196 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.52 | 0.49 | 3.70 | 3.06 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 197 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.38 | 0.47 | 3.57 | 2.90 | 17.3% | 0 of 92 | 197 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.50 | 3.49 | 2.87 | 26.6% | 0 of 91 | 199 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.8 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.9 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.1 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.2 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 490 eligible stays.
14.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 480 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 280 eligible stays.
79.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 195 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 276 residents counted.
4.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 275 residents counted.
95.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MEDICAL FACILITIES OF AMERICA XI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cherrydale Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Medical Facilities of America XI Limited Partnership | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/05/1980 | |
| Chesapeake East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ek 2005 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ll 2013 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mms 2008 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mzr East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Silverstone East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Goddard, Trimane | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/11/2023 | |
| Rylbss East Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.