900 North Taylor Street, Arlington, VA 22203 · Arlington County · (703) 516-9455
31 certified beds, about 25 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495269 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 12, 2026, inspectors cited 42 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 63 health citations since August 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $39,692 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated March 12, 2026.
68.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Sunrise Senior Living, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 63 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident from physical abuse while obtaining a urine sample that resulted in hospitalization, thus resulting in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42. After IJ was removed, the scope and severity was lowered to a level 3 (three), isolated, harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to keep the resident from being physically restrained while obtaining a urine sample that resulted in hospitalization, thus resulting in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42, (R42). After IJ was removed, the scope and severity was lowered to a level 3 (three), isolated, harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to prevent an allergic reaction to a documented food allergy which resulted in the resident requiring emergency medical treatment, thus resulting in a determination of Jeopardy (IJ) for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #43. After IJ was removed, the scope and severity was lowered to a level 3 (three), isolated, harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, the facility staff failed to uphold a resident's right to refuse care and treatment causing harm and resulting in a hospitalization for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain emergency medical equipment in a sanitary manner and ensure the supplies on the emergency medical cart were not expired, for one of one unit. Observation was made on [DATE] at 12:13 p.m. of the emergency medical cart (crash cart) on the health care unit. The following observations were made:Oxygen tank was 2% full, nearly empty. Top of the cart:Suction machine was not covered, only a mesh covering so air and dust can get through. There was no oxygen mask, no nasal cannula or normal saline, per their list of required items. The Ambu bag (used for resuscitation) was not in a bag to protect it. Lubricating jelly - two packages that were expired [DATE] and one package with an unreadable expiration date.[NAME] suctioning catheter package had a rip in it, making it not sterile any longer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate competencies for 15 of 15 nurses and for one of three CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of required CNA training for five of five CNA records reviewed: CNAs #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the document with administrative staff changes and address the emergency equipment to address the emergent medical needs of the residents. The facility assessment, reviewed on 2/3/2025, documented in part, 6. Medical and non-medical equipment required: Facility has Hoyer lifts sliding boards, reais to toilet devices, grab bars, wheelchair accessible vans and buses for transportation, feeding tube equipment and bolus services, wheelchairs, specialty wheelchair cushions, air mattresses, nebulizer and oxygen services. The facility does not have access to rental c-pap and bi-pap machines. All new admissions after January 1, 2024, must provide their own devices and supplies (excluding distilled water). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to have evidence of QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) from July 2023 through December 2023.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to evidence the attendance at the QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) meetings for 2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement their policy to prevent abuse for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42 and for four of five staff records reviewed, Licensed Practical Nurses #8, #9, #10 and #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop/implement the care plan for five of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #5, Resident #22, Resident #14, Resident #36 and Resident #24.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to follow the physician's order for three of 36 current residents in the survey sample, Residents #16, #24 and #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide parenteral catheter care for four of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #2, #6, #25, and #22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow state regulations at the time of hire for four of five staff records reviewed, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8, LPN #9, CNA (certified nursing assistant) #10, and CNA #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for five of ten staff records reviewed, CNA (certified nursing assistant) #5, RN (registered nurse) #1, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist, OSM #4, a dietary aide, and OSM #5, a housekeeper.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for five of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed, CNAs #5, #6, #7, #8, and #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff /resident interviews facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote dignity and respect for one of 36 residents, Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and/or the responsible party when medications are not available for administration for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #24.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate MDS (Minimum Data Set) record for 1 of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the baseline care plan for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #34.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote ADL (Activities of Daily Living) abilities for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident/staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for one of 36 residents, Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the assessment of a pressure injury for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #9.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff /resident interviews facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care services for one of 36 residents, Resident #22.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure required physician visits for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #7.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to verify licensure at the time of hire for two of three CNA (certified nursing assistant) records reviewed: CNAs #10 and #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one of 36 residents in the survey sample, Resident #24.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to prevent administration of unnecessary medications for three of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #34, #24, and #14.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to store medications in a safe manner for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, and #25.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory tests for two of 36 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6 and #24.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 11 residents in the survey sample, Resident #108.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for three of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3 (a speech and language pathologist), CNA (certified nursing assistant) #6, and LPN (licensed practical nurse) #6.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for one of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for one of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for one of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for one of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide required training for one of ten staff records reviewed, OSM (other staff member) #3, a speech and language pathologist.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or provide residents and/or their responsible party, with a summary of the baseline care plan for five of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #176, #18, #177, #174 and #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a complete pain management program including implementation of non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as-needed pain medications for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #177 and #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to prepare, store, and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchen, and in one of one activity room refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a written notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a hospital transfer for one of 17 residents in the survey sample; Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for one of six residents in the medication administration task; Resident #174.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide clinical services in a manner to promote a resident's highest level of well-being for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #23 and #7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow and clarify an order for oxygen for one of 17 residents in the survey sample, Resident #17.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete annual performance evaluations for two of five CNA (certified nursing assistant) employee records reviewed, CNAs #2 and #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a medication was available for one of six residents in the medication administration task; Resident #174.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to act upon pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for one of 17 residents in the survey sample; Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to comply with all the requirements of a binding arbitration agreement for two of 17 residents in the survey sample; Residents #1 and #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreements contained explicit language for the selection of an arbitrator and venue, for two of 17 residents in the survey sample; Residents #1 and #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement a complete immunization program for one of five residents immunization record reviews, Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to post the required nursing staffing information each shift for 30 of 30 days of records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence notification of facility COVID-19 activity to residents and/or responsible parties and families during active COVID-19 cases confirmed in the facility 12/8/2022-12/25/2022.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence COVID-19 testing of staff during an outbreak of active COVID-19 cases confirmed in the facility 12/8/2022-12/25/2022 for one of 3 staff sampled, RN (registered nurse) #3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to dispose of garbage in a sanitary manner. On 8/10/21, the facility staff failed to ensure trash in the garbage compactor was covered. Multiple flies were observed flying above the trash.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for five of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #20, #22, #74, #13 and #8. The facility staff failed to obtain informed consent prior to the use of bed rails for Residents #20, #22, #74, #13 and #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for six of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #18, #20, #22, #74, #13 and #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store medications according to professional standards for one of one medication room. Two expired vials of Aplisol PPD (purified protein derivative) solution (1) was stored in the medication room refrigerator available for resident use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to post current nurse staffing information. Nurse staffing information for 8/10/21 was not posted on 8/10/21. Instead, nurse staffing information for 8/8/21 was posted.
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 12, 2026, 2 on August 12, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 12, 2026 | Fine | $8,278 |
| March 12, 2026 | Fine | $14,069 |
| March 12, 2026 | Fine | $17,345 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.3% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.75 on weekdays and 5.49 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 19.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.99 in April to June 2025 to 6.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 6.39 | 1.19 | 6.75 | 5.49 | 19.3% | 0 of 90 | 25 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.46 | 1.14 | 5.90 | 4.34 | 14.3% | 2 of 92 | 25 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.01 | 1.57 | 5.32 | 4.21 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 25 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.99 | 1.47 | 5.26 | 4.32 | 6.0% | 0 of 91 | 26 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.7 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.3 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Jefferson's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (67.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
67.7% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 432 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 407 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 243 eligible stays.
67.9% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 137 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 214 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 214 residents counted.
98.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WELLTOWER OPCO GROUP LLC. CMS links this home to Sunrise Senior Living, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welltower Trs Holdco LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/27/2018 | |
| Welltower Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/27/2018 | |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/27/2018 | |
| Anbessie, Tedla | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Campbell, Kaleb | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Coelho, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Falco, Denise | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Frantz, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Kessler, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Marcinik, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Painter, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Royal, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Sekel, Wendy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Thompson, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Wells, Anja | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/20/2025 | |
| Welltower Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/27/2018 | |
| Welltower Trs Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/27/2018 | |
| Anbessie, Tedla | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Campbell, Kaleb | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Coelho, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Falco, Denise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Frantz, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Harris, Tony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Kessler, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Marcinik, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Painter, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Royal, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Sekel, Wendy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Thompson, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Wells, Anja | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.