Home / Virginia / Newport News
4 Ridgewood Parkway, Newport News, VA 23602 · Newport News City County · (757) 886-6500
115 certified beds, about 104 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495204 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 20, 2026, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 62 health citations since March 2019, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $368,040 in the last three years; the largest was $368,040, and the latest is dated February 20, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.
66.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Eastern Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 62 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to conduct and document a thorough assessment for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #125) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for two of nine residents reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 2 and R122) out of 41 sampled residents. R2 experienced repeat sexual victimization when she was sexually abused by her Power of Attorney (POA2) in the facility, R121, and R100. Additionally, R122 was sexually abused by R99. Even though the facility was aware of R121's, R100's, and R99's incidents of sexual abuse and sexual behavior, the facility failed to put measures in place to protect R2, R122, and other vulnerable residents from sexual abuse, which constituted immediate jeopardy (IJ).
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for one of three residents (Resident (R) 120) reviewed for misappropriation out of 41 sampled residents. The Business Office Manager (BOM) used the resident's credit card for personal use, totaling over $10,000. This failure resulted in more than minimum consequence harming Resident #120 by deliberately misusing and exploiting significant amounts of money without consent which constituted Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an assessment of the building to determine where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens can grow and spread. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) for one of 41 sampled residents (Resident (R) 51). These failures had the potential for some of the areas at risk for Legionella growth not to be monitored in the building and placed residents at risk for the spread of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report alleged abuse violations timely for five of five Residents (Resident (R) 2, R99, R100, R121 and R122) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 41 residents. This had the potential for continued abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided with written notices of transfer and bed hold notices for four of five residents (Residents (R) 5, R8, R51, and R99) reviewed for hospitalizations out of a total sample of 41. This failure had the potential for residents and/or resident representatives (RP) not to have the necessary information to make informed decisions regarding bed holds and to not be informed of the reasons for transfers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for two Residents (Resident (R)8 and R30) of two observed during dining. R30 was left waiting for her meal set up after being delivered his tray. This failed practice had the potential to affect and resident who ate their meals in the dining room.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of resident-to-resident abuse involving one resident (Resident (R)7) out of nine residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 41 residents. This had the potential for unrevealed concerns and the potential for continued abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level one screen was completed accurately prior to admission for two residents (Resident (R) 8 and R105) of four residents reviewed for PASARR out of 41 sampled residents. This created a potential failure to identify what specialized or rehabilitative services the residents needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate prior to admission.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to conduct and document a thorough assessment for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #125) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with foot care for one of one resident (Resident (R) 77) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) out of 41 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident care including personal hygiene in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident for safety during a physician's appointment for one of five residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 41 sampled residents (Resident (R) 119). This failure had the potential to result in the resident experiencing an accident without an escort to the appointment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure alternative measures were attempted prior to the use of side rails, educated on the risks and benefits of side rail use, and failed to obtain a consent for the side rails for one of one Resident (Resident (R)63) out of 41 sampled residents. These failures placed the resident at risk of accidents and hazards related to side rail use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent. During medication administration three medication errors for three residents (Resident (R) 5, R10, and R62) were made of 27 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 11.11 percent. These failures had the potential to increase or decrease the effectiveness of these medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (Resident (R)23) of one observed out of a total of 41 sampled residents received the meal that was posted on the menu. The facility further failed to ensure the meal that was served to R23 was pureed. This had the potential for the resident not to have nutritional needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of the test tray, the facility failed to ensure foods were served at palatable food temperatures for three of 96 residents (Resident (R) 8, R51, and R77) who received meals from the facility's kitchen. This had potential to dissatisfaction with meals and potential weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe comfortable and homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents, staff interview and the facility's policy; the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy regarding the screening of employees for 25 of 25 employee records reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to have ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration with the dialysis center regarding acute changes in the resident's status for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #64), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview the facility, the failed to ensure 3 of 35 residents, Residents (#30, #55 and #6) in the survey sample was seen by the pharmacist for Medication Regimen Review (MRR) on a monthly basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the recommendation for do a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) made on 01/20/22 by the facility's Nurses Practitioner (NP) for 1 of 35 resident (Resident #30) in the survey sample. Resident #30 received 41 extra doses of the unnecessary psychotropic medication Zyprexa 5 mg.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to have laboratory reports filed in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #64), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to store utensils in a clean and sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, and it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, facility document and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the facility's COVID-19 staff testing for an unvaccinated employee based on the level of community transmission according for the recommended frequency of twice a week.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure 1 resident was treated with dignity and respect while receiving wound care. For 1 of 35 Residents (Resident #22), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interview and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility's staff failed to ensure privacy while providing wound care for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #31) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on a resident personal funds review, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 resident out of 35 residents, (Resident #14) in the survey sample was afforded the right to manage their personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on a resident personal funds review, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 resident out of 35 residents (Resident #14) in the survey sample was afforded the right to manage their personal funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record reviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 35 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #55 and #3) were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review; the facility staff failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were informed the medication (Zyprexa) was not decreased from 5 mg to 2.5 mg as ordered for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #30), and the facility staff failed to notify the resident representative and physician of a change in condition in a timely manner for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #316), in the survey sample. The Findings Included: 1. The facility staff failed to notify the physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Resident Representative (RR) that Resident #30's psychotropic medication (Zyprexa 5 mg) was not decreased to 2.5 mg as recommended by the (NP) on 01/20/22. Resident #30 received 41 extra doses of the psychotropic medication Zyprexa. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure Comprehensive Care Plan Goals were sent upon transfer to the hospital for 1 out of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan Goals were sent upon transfer to the hospital on [DATE].
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure a Bedhold notice was sent upon transfer to the hospital for 1 out of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #3's Bedhold notice was sent upon transfer to the hospital on [DATE].
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure that a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was conducted prior to admission or within 30 days of admission to the nursing facility for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was conducted prior to admission or within 30 days of Resident #3's admission to the facility on 7/23/19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to include anticoagulation in the comprehensive care plan, for 1 of 35 resident (Resident #55), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan after the resident's dentures were broken for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #65) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for 2 of 35 residents (Resident #31 and #14), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, family interviews, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion of the left arm received application of the left arm splint as ordered to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 35 residents, (Resident #13), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff and resident interviews and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 residents (Resident #316), in the survey sample was free of accident hazards. Activities of daily Living (ADL) assistance was not provided for a resident that was care planned to have the assistance of one person while bathing/showering which placed the resident at risk for falls. This is a closed record resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to address, assess and treat a resident's pain for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #6), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on information obtained during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing task, the facility staff failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours a day on 2/27/22, which could potentially affect all residents care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a medication was securely stored for 1 of 35 residents in the survey sample, Resident #53. The facility staff failed to securely store a respiratory inhaler that was observed at the bedside of Resident #53.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, medical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure assistive devices for meal consumption was provided for 1 of 35 resident's in the survey sample, Resident #3. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident # 3's issued built up weighted rocker knife and foam built up fork for self feeding were provided on each meal tray.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to designate at least one qualified staff member as the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 out of 35 resident (Resident #35) in the survey sample, was given the opportunity to either refuse or accept a COVID-19 vaccine.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee which meets at least quarterly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, group interview, staff interview and facility records, the facility staff failed to maintain hot water temperatures in resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide needed hygienic care for a dependent resident for 1 of 43 residents (Residents #57), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to provide necessary oral hygiene to remove adhered food and plaque from Resident #57's teeth; and the facility staff failed to provide basic hygienic care to Resident #57's feet to prevent severe dryness and flakiness.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 43 residents in the survey sample, Resident #93, was free from a medication timing error. Resident #93 received his pain medication 60 or more minutes later than the prescribed time which interfered with the resident's pain control.
Inspectors wroteBased on information revealed during the Infection Prevention and Control Program review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to have an current and active Infection Prevention and Control Program. The facility staff failed to sign the Infection Prevention and Control Program policy into effect, effective 1/1/2019, and establish an infection control program which investigates collected data to track trends, prevent the onset and the spread of infections or use the data to educate the staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for one (Resident #51) of 43 residents in the survey sample to determine if the resident was capable of self-administering medication. Resident #51 was not assessed or approved to self-administer eye drops.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a Plan of Care Summary was sent upon transfer to the hospital for 3 of 43 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 73, Resident #87 and Resident #57. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #73's Plan of Care Summary was sent to the receiving facility upon transfer to the hospital on 1/16/19. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #87's Plan of Care Summary was sent to the receiving facility upon transfer to the hospital on 2/25/19. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #57's Plan of Care Summary was sent to the receiving facility upon transfer to the hospital on 5/31/18
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a written notice of Bed-Hold Policy Notice was sent upon transfer to the hospital for 2 of 43 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 73, and Resident #87. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #73 received a written notice of Bed-Hold Policy Notice upon transfer to hospital on 1/16/19. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #87 received a written notice of Bed-Hold Policy Notice upon transfer to hospital on 2/25/19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 43 residents (Residents #57), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to accurately code Resident #57's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], in section L (Oral/Dental Status).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to assure that services provided met professional standards, for 1 of 43 residents (Residents #71), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to transcribe Resident #71's antibiotic order on 2/1/19.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and a review of clinical records, the facility staff failed to provide podiatry services for 3 residents out of a survey sample of 43 residents. (Resident # 47, # 28 & #57)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include administering medications to 2 of 43 Resident's in the Survey Sample (Resident #67 and #51). 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #67's medications were consumed on 2/25/19 instead of being left on the bedside table unattended. 2. The facility staff failed to administer Resident #51 ophthalmic drops according to the prescriber's orders. The facility staff allowed Resident #51 to self-administer Refresh eye drops while contaminating the vial.
Inspectors wroteBased on information obtained during a complaint investigation, a closed record review, and a staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 43 residents (Resident #92), in the survey sample. The facility staff administered three doses of Keflex (an antibiotic) to Resident #92, secondary to a medication transcription error.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to assure residents received needed dental services for 1 of 43 residents (Residents #57), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to assist Resident #57 obtain needed dental services for decayed teeth and dental caries (cavities).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review and the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of a hospital discharge for 2 of 43 residents (Resident #57 and 73) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #57's discharge and admission to a local acute care hospital, 5/31/18. 2. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #73's discharge to the hospital on 1/16/19.
Inspectors wroteBased on a complaint investigation, staff interviews and facility document review the facility staff failed to accurately submit mandatory Payroll Based Journal Quarterly data to include direct care staffing information. The facility staff failed to accurately submit mandatory Payroll Based Journal Quarterly data to include direct care staffing hours for the Director of Nursing for July-September 2018.
46 fire safety citations on file: 6 on February 20, 2026, 25 on March 3, 2022, 15 on March 1, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 20, 2026 | Fine | $368,040 |
| February 20, 2026 | Payment Denial | 27 days from May 23, 2026 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.24 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.33 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.70 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.11 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 66.7% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.3% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.45 on weekdays and 2.70 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.24 | 0.33 | 3.45 | 2.70 | 9.2% | 0 of 90 | 104 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.29 | 0.48 | 3.52 | 2.72 | 17.5% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.06 | 0.42 | 3.22 | 2.65 | 20.3% | 0 of 92 | 108 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.16 | 0.46 | 3.39 | 2.58 | 7.0% | 0 of 91 | 106 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.0 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Old Dominion Rehabilitation and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (39.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
39.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.
12.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.
6.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
52.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
1.8% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
9.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
86.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OLD DOMINION REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC. CMS links this home to Eastern Healthcare Group, a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA SNF Operations Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Gittleson, Layla | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Jj United Tr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 05/01/2024 |
| Deutsche Bank New York Branch | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Northwind Healthcare Debt Fund II Master Reit LP | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Gittleson, Yehuda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/28/2023 | |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Shapiro, Akiva | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Sommer, Nechama | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Hc Family Trust | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA SNF Master Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Zanziper Family Trust | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Gittleson, Yehuda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Sommer, Nechama | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Wombold, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Gittleson, Layla | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Hyman, Rachel | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Schonfeld, Akiva | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Old Dominion Propco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA 15 Mezz Borrower II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA 15 Propco Holdco II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA SNF Master Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA SNF Propco Holdings II LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| VA SNF Realty Holdings 1 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2024 | |
| Wombold, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/04/2025 | |
| Zanziper, Natalie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.