Home / Virginia / Newport News
1000 Old Denbeigh Boulevard, Newport News, VA 23602 · Newport News City County · (757) 875-2000
209 certified beds, about 198 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1969
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495071 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 8, 2023, inspectors cited 26 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 58 health citations since August 2018, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,358 in the last three years; the largest was $10,358, and the latest is dated August 25, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
CMS links it to Riverside Health System, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 58 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #8) in the survey sample, which constituted harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews and review of facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure resident care and services were provided in accordance with accepted standards of clinical practice for medication administration for 1of 17 residents. Resident #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to manage acute pain secondary to fractures for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews and review of facility documentation the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administration of drugs to meet the needs of each the resident for 1 of 17 residents. Resident #11.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide necessary documents for two Residents receiving hospice care (Resident #15, and 6) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. 1. The Facility staff failed to provide Hospice nurses' notes and wound care measurements pertaining to Resident #15. Resident #15 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the community. The current diagnoses included cerebral vascular disease. The admission, significant change, annual quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 3 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #15's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to notify the resident's family representative of two pressure ulcers identified on 7/09/25 for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #15), in the survey sample. Resident #15 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] from the community. The current diagnoses included cerebral vascular Disease. The admission, significant change, annual quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/15/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 3 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #15 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interviews, staff interviews, and review of the clinical record, the facility staff failed to provide toileting upon request for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #2) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of written RP (responsible party) notification was provided when four of 60 residents in the survey sample who were transferred to the hospital, Residents #49, Resident #58, Resident #8 and Resident #60.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the care plan for seven of 60 residents in the survey sample, Residents #59, #70, #49, #115, #60, #23, and #134.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of providing ADLs (activities of daily living) care to maintain abilities for two of 60 residents, Resident #49 and Resident #8. 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide dialysis care and services to three of nine facility dialysis residents; Residents #72, #60, and #120.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and implemented in a timely manner for three of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #24, Resident #39 and Resident #41.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of sixty residents in the survey sample, Resident #134, was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food in a palatable manner from one of one facility kitchens.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence bed inspections for four of 60 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 49, Resident #58, Resident #60 and Resident #8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility's documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote and facilitate the resident's right to self-determination by promoting resident's choice in transferring to wheelchair for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #154.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of required resident information when a resident is transferred to the hospital, for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Residents #49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for two out of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #192 and Resident #129.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a complete baseline care plan for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #347.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plans for three of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #24, Resident #120 and Resident #145.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to meet professional standards for one of 60 residents, Resident #49.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to a dependent resident to one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for a urinary catheter for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #344.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement a complete pain management program for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #23.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide trauma informed care for one of 60 residents in the sample Resident #115.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for three out of 60 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 49, Resident #58 and Resident #60.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient CNA (certified nursing assistant) staffing to provide care and services for one of 60 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for one of 60 residents in the sample, Resident #115.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide medically related social services for one of 60 residents in the sample Resident #115.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide pharmacy services in a timely manner for one of 60 residents, Resident #49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, family interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to prevent an avoidable fall for 1 of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #121. During the provision of care by staff, the resident fell off the bed and sustained left hip and left femur fractures. Following the fall, the facility staff did a root cause analysis and implemented a plan of correction with a completion date of 1/15/2020. No other falls during provision of care was identified after the completion date. The deficiency is cited as a level 3 isolated, past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #122's choice to receive showers was honored. Resident #122 was dependent on staff for the provision of showers and had not received a shower from 12/6/19 through 2/19/20.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure eight residents (Residents #48, #135, #39, #46, #77, #138, #52, and #91, were given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive in the survey sample of 59 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review; the facility's staff failed to covey a copy of the resident's comprehensive care plan goals to the receiving facility for 8 of 59 residents (Resident #80, #40, #125, #43, #63, #121, #3 and #77) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to convey the summary and goals of the comprehensive plan of care upon transfer/discharge to the local hospital for Resident #80. Resident #80 was admitted to the nursing facility on 10/28/11 with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, Alzheimer's Disease and diabetes mellitus. Resident #80's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment and coded the resident with short and long term memory problems and severely impaired in the cognitive skills for daily decision making. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to revise 5 (Resident #52, #175, #100, #122 and #165) comprehensive person-centered care plans of 59 residents in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 59 residents (Resident #109) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide evidence that the written bed hold notification/policy was sent with three of 59 sampled residents, Residents #3, #77, and #63, upon transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interviews, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a baseline care plan was person-centered to include hospice services for 1 of 59 Residents in the Survey Sample, Resident #442.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review; it was determined that facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for two of 59 residents in the survey sample, Resident #189 and Resident #77. 1. For Resident #189, facility staff failed to thoroughly assess a healing stage 3 pressure ulcer* to her second right toe upon admission to the facility; and, failed to provide treatment in a timely manner. 2. For Resident #77, facility staff failed to apply physician ordered heel boots for the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on medication pass observations, staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure they were free from a medication error rate of 5 % or greater. There were 28 observed medication opportunities with 2 errors (Resident #41 and #58), resulting in a 7.14% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of six medication carts were free from expired medications; the second medication cart on [NAME] Unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and family interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards and receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for two residents (Resident #87 and #47) in the survey sample of 52 residents. 1. The facility identified Resident #87 was a high fall risk. The facility developed a plan of care to prevent avoidable injuries, which included the use of a Hoyer lift with two staff assistance for transfer. The resident was transferred on 02/16/18 by one staff member doing a stand pivot transfer instead of using a Hoyer lift. As a result, Resident #87 sustained an avoidable Right Femur Fracture resulting in harm. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management was provided for 1 of 52 residents (Resident #136), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to provide effective pain management to Resident #136, by not having the ordered narcotic analgesic (Hydrocodone/APAP tablet 5/325 milligrams) readily available for administration, resulting in periods of unnecessary and excruciating pain, constituting harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure a program of activities were in place for 1 of 51 residents (Resident #110) in the survey. Resident #110 was not provided one-to-one activities based on the comprehensive plan of care for five months.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure Medicare Beneficiary Notices in accordance with applicable Federal regulations, were issued to 2 of 52 residents (Resident #102 and 152) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) letter to Resident #102 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining. 2. The facility staff failed to issue an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) letter to Resident #152 who was discharged from skilled services with Medicare days remaining.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, staff interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of hospital discharges for 2 of 52 residents in the survey sample, Resident #142 and #44. 1. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #142's transfer and admission to the hospital on 1/4/18. 2. The facility staff failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident #44 being transferred and admitted to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to issue bed hold notices for 2 (Residents #133 and #142) of 52 residents in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #133 or resident representative was issued a written notice of the bed hold policy prior to transfer to the local hospital. 2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #142 or resident's representative with a written or a copy of the bed hold policy.
Inspectors wroteThe facility staff failed to obtain PASARR level I assessments prior to admission for two residents (Resident #17 and #85) in the survey sample of 52.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 out of 52 residents (Resident #37) in the survey sample who were unable to independently carry out activities of daily (ADL), received necessary services to maintain grooming. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #37 was provided ADL care to include removal of long facial hair to her lower lip and chin.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of the Hospice policy; the facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided a written agreement describing the provision of services for 1 of 52 residents (Resident #101), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided the facility staff with the coordinated plan of care for Resident #101, to identify which services the Hospice Agency would provide, when the services would be provided, the communication process, and when or why the nursing facility staff should notify the Hospice Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed ensure 1 of 52 residents (Resident #151) in the survey sample's indwelling Foley catheter tubing remained off the floor. The facility staff failed to provide appropriate indwelling Foley catheter care.
Inspectors wroteBased on information obtain during a complaint investigation, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 52 residents was free from unnecessary drugs for (Resident #232), in the survey sample. The facility staff administered excess doses of Prednisone totaling of 50 mg everyday to Resident #232, from 12/17/17 through 12/20/17.
Inspectors wroteBased on information obtain during a complaint investigation, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 52 residents was free from significant medication error for (Resident #232), in the survey sample. The facility staff abruptly discontinued administration of Prednisone to Resident #232, against the prescriber's order and without tapering (a gradual dose reduction) a medication which can result in withdrawal syndrome.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure medications were stored in a secured location for 1 (Resident #142) of 52 residents in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the following medications, Cortizone 10 liquid and Arctic Ice Analgesic gel were stored in a secured location. The medications were observed on Resident #142's overbed table.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of the Hospice policy; the facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided a written agreement describing the provision of services for 1 of 52 residents (Resident #101), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure the Hospice Agency provided the facility staff with the coordinated plan of care for Resident #101, to identify which services the Hospice Agency would provide, when the services would be provided, the communication process, and when or why the nursing facility staff should notify the Hospice Agency.
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on December 8, 2023, 4 on August 3, 2018.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 25, 2025 | Fine | $10,358 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.97 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.07 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 1.12 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.55 | 3.55 | 2.97 | 8.5% | 0 of 90 | 198 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.53 | 3.52 | 2.97 | 13.6% | 0 of 92 | 199 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.36 | 0.49 | 3.52 | 2.94 | 13.8% | 0 of 92 | 196 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 1.12 | 0.16 | 1.17 | 1.01 | 12.3% | 60 of 91 | 197 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.3 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.7 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.8 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Riverside Lifelong H & R Warwick Forest's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.0% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 430 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 404 eligible stays.
5.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 250 eligible stays.
37.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 219 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 264 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 264 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PATRICK HENRY HOSPITAL, INC.. CMS links this home to Riverside Health System, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Healthcare Association, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/03/2010 | |
| Nelson, Linwood | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/01/2019 | |
| Alewynse, Joyce | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Bates, Jared | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Haywood, Barbara | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Houser, Jason | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Smith, Conway | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Smith, Kirby | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Tiller, Brooke | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Verser, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Zeidler, Jeanne | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Austin, Walter | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/02/2012 | |
| Dacey, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Downey, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Heckler, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.